The Supreme Court may be running out of patience for Trump’s worst judges.

[berg80]

More than a year ago, a Trump-appointed judge named Drew Tipton effectively seized control of parts of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the federal agency that enforces immigration laws within the United States. On Friday, the Supreme Court ended Tipton’s reign over ICE’s enforcement priorities.

The Court’s decision in United States v. Texas was 8–1, with all eight justices in the majority concluding that Tipton didn’t even have jurisdiction to hear this case in the first place — though they split 5-3 on why Tipton lacked jurisdiction. Only Justice Samuel Alito, the Court’s most reliable Republican partisan, dissented.

The case concerned 2021 guidelines, issued by Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas, that instructed ICE agents to prioritize enforcement efforts against undocumented or otherwise removable immigrants who “pose a threat to national security, public safety, and border security and thus threaten America’s well-being.”

The Supreme Court may be running out of patience for Trump’s worst judges

The Court’s decision in United States v. Texas stops rogue judges from seizing control of law enforcement.

www.vox.com

Tipton, Cannon, just two examples of the hacks Trump appointed. The turd he left America to deal with will stink for decades.

For all you, "but Vox" nitwits out there..........it's a very well written, informative article. Just try to refute what it says.

 

[Votto]

As far as I'm concerned, as long as the US has an open border they don't have a country.

It's the only country in the world like this.

Why?

 

[excalibur]

From the excellent dissent by Justice Alito.

In the exercise of that power, Congress passed and President Clinton signed a law that commands the detention and removal of aliens who have been convicted of certain particularly dangerous crimes. Homeland Security, however, has instructed his agents to disobey this legislative command and instead follow a different policy that is more to his liking.

And the Court now says that no party injured by this policy is allowed to challenge it in court. That holding not only violates the Constitution's allocation of authority among the three branches of the Federal Government; it also undermines federalism. This Court has held that the Federal Government's authority in the field of immigration severely restricts the ability of States to enact laws or follow practices that address harms resulting from illegal immigration. ​

 

[johngaltshrugged]

Didn't Pedo Joe make a lesbian SCOTUS pick based on affirmative blaction & LGBFJB+ nonsense?
She's even a horrible lesbian who can't even recognize a real woman

 

[Votto]

From the excellent dissent by Justice Alito.

In the exercise of that power, Congress passed and President Clinton signed a law that commands the detention and removal of aliens who have been convicted of certain particularly dangerous crimes. Homeland Security, however, has instructed his agents to disobey this legislative command and instead follow a different policy that is more to his liking. ​

​

And the Court now says that no party injured by this policy is allowed to challenge it in court. That holding not only violates the Constitution's allocation of authority among the three branches of the Federal Government; it also undermines federalism. This Court has held that the Federal Government's authority in the field of immigration severely restricts the ability of States to enact laws or follow practices that address harms resulting from illegal immigration. ​

But his opinion means nothing cuz the black robes outnumber him.

Of course, this is not how the Constitution reads regarding determining what is Constitutional, that came later with Marbury vs. Madison

Jefferson, BTW, vehemently disagreed with the court ruling.

 

[BackAgain]

Some folks get confused by terminology. For example, just to clarify something worthy of attention, Immigration “judges” are actually not judges in the Constitutional sense. An Article III judge isn’t subject to being fired by the Executive Branch. But an administrative judge like an immigration judge isn’t a “judge” at all under Article III.

The Executive Branch can and does keep track of immigration judges’ “rulings.” They do so for a reason. The Executive Branch wants the outcomes it wants. Period. Justice has damn little to do with it.

Sometimes this leads to a great deal of unfairness to the immigrants. Sometimes it leads to unfairness to American citizens.
But in either case, it isn’t designed to be fair and impartial.

 

[1srelluc]

While the decision was correct, here's the kicker....They would not have to prioritize if the fuckin' border had been properly secured.

Somehow that is not even being considered......Biden owns the border crisis.

And don't look now but the issue is in the top three concerns of the American public.

 

[22lcidw]

Again. Never help anyone who has screwed you over. If never helping anyone else due to that then so be it. Until you feel things are even. Authoritarians with power like police and judicial who are petty are potential murderers easily in not so good times.

 

[elektra]

More than a year ago, a Trump-appointed judge named Drew Tipton effectively seized control of parts of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the federal agency that enforces immigration laws within the United States. On Friday, the Supreme Court ended Tipton’s reign over ICE’s enforcement priorities.

The Court’s decision in United States v. Texas was 8–1, with all eight justices in the majority concluding that Tipton didn’t even have jurisdiction to hear this case in the first place — though they split 5-3 on why Tipton lacked jurisdiction. Only Justice Samuel Alito, the Court’s most reliable Republican partisan, dissented.

The case concerned 2021 guidelines, issued by Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas, that instructed ICE agents to prioritize enforcement efforts against undocumented or otherwise removable immigrants who “pose a threat to national security, public safety, and border security and thus threaten America’s well-being.”

The Supreme Court may be running out of patience for Trump’s worst judges

The Court’s decision in United States v. Texas stops rogue judges from seizing control of law enforcement.

www.vox.com

Tipton, Cannon, just two examples of the hacks Trump appointed. The turd he left America to deal with will stink for decades.

For all you, "but Vox" nitwits out there..........it's a very well written, informative article. Just try to refute what it says.

I am unaware of Trump conducting or participating in any confirmation hearings.

And any bad Republican is always better than a democrat

 

[Flash]

More than a year ago, a Trump-appointed judge named Drew Tipton effectively seized control of parts of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the federal agency that enforces immigration laws within the United States. On Friday, the Supreme Court ended Tipton’s reign over ICE’s enforcement priorities.

The Court’s decision in United States v. Texas was 8–1, with all eight justices in the majority concluding that Tipton didn’t even have jurisdiction to hear this case in the first place — though they split 5-3 on why Tipton lacked jurisdiction. Only Justice Samuel Alito, the Court’s most reliable Republican partisan, dissented.

The case concerned 2021 guidelines, issued by Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas, that instructed ICE agents to prioritize enforcement efforts against undocumented or otherwise removable immigrants who “pose a threat to national security, public safety, and border security and thus threaten America’s well-being.”

The Supreme Court may be running out of patience for Trump’s worst judges

The Court’s decision in United States v. Texas stops rogue judges from seizing control of law enforcement.

www.vox.com

Tipton, Cannon, just two examples of the hacks Trump appointed. The turd he left America to deal with will stink for decades.

For all you, "but Vox" nitwits out there..........it's a very well written, informative article. Just try to refute what it says.

You dumb fuck.

The idiots on the Supreme Court are those two confused dingbats The Worthless Negro appointed and that stupid low IQ affirmative action Negro bitch Potatohead appointed.

 

[theHawk]

More than a year ago, a Trump-appointed judge named Drew Tipton effectively seized control of parts of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the federal agency that enforces immigration laws within the United States. On Friday, the Supreme Court ended Tipton’s reign over ICE’s enforcement priorities.

The Court’s decision in United States v. Texas was 8–1, with all eight justices in the majority concluding that Tipton didn’t even have jurisdiction to hear this case in the first place — though they split 5-3 on why Tipton lacked jurisdiction. Only Justice Samuel Alito, the Court’s most reliable Republican partisan, dissented.

The case concerned 2021 guidelines, issued by Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas, that instructed ICE agents to prioritize enforcement efforts against undocumented or otherwise removable immigrants who “pose a threat to national security, public safety, and border security and thus threaten America’s well-being.”

The Supreme Court may be running out of patience for Trump’s worst judges

The Court’s decision in United States v. Texas stops rogue judges from seizing control of law enforcement.

www.vox.com

Tipton, Cannon, just two examples of the hacks Trump appointed. The turd he left America to deal with will stink for decades.

For all you, "but Vox" nitwits out there..........it's a very well written, informative article. Just try to refute what it says.

Just remember the ruling goes both ways. When MAGA is back in the White House your lunatic left states won’t be able to do anything about the deportations.

 

[excalibur]

Some folks get confused by terminology. For example, just to clarify something worthy of attention, Immigration “judges” are actually not judges in the Constitutional sense. An Article III judge isn’t subject to being fired by the Executive Branch. But an administrative judge like an immigration judge isn’t a “judge” at all under Article III.

The Executive Branch can and does keep track of immigration judges’ “rulings.” They do so for a reason. The Executive Branch wants the outcomes it wants. Period. Justice has damn little to do with it.

Sometimes this leads to a great deal of unfairness to the immigrants. Sometimes it leads to unfairness to American citizens.
But in either case, it isn’t designed to be fair and impartial.

DOJ fires Black immigration judge in the ongoing purge of Trump hires

Edwin Pieters is searching for answers to why the Biden administration fired him as an immigration judge.

www.washingtontimes.com

 

[berg80]

From the excellent dissent by Justice Alito.

In the exercise of that power, Congress passed and President Clinton signed a law that commands the detention and removal of aliens who have been convicted of certain particularly dangerous crimes. Homeland Security, however, has instructed his agents to disobey this legislative command and instead follow a different policy that is more to his liking. ​

​

And the Court now says that no party injured by this policy is allowed to challenge it in court. That holding not only violates the Constitution's allocation of authority among the three branches of the Federal Government; it also undermines federalism. This Court has held that the Federal Government's authority in the field of immigration severely restricts the ability of States to enact laws or follow practices that address harms resulting from illegal immigration. ​

Good thing the rest of the Court rightly sees Alito's view as that of a crackpot.

On Thursday evening, the Supreme Court handed down a brief, 5-4 decision that effectively places Drew Tipton, a Trump-appointed federal trial judge in Texas, in charge of many of Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) decisions about which immigrants to target.

The decision was largely along party lines, except that Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the Court’s three Democratic appointees.

The decision in United States v. Texas is temporary, but the upshot of this decision is that Tipton will effectively wield much of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas’s authority over how ICE officers prioritize their time for as much as an entire year — and that’s assuming that the Biden administration ultimately prevails when the Court reconsiders this case next winter.

The Supreme Court just let a Trump judge seize control of ICE, at least for now

Apparently President Biden isn’t in charge of the executive branch anymore.

www.vox.com

 

[surada]

I am unaware of Trump conducting or participating in any confirmation hearings.

And any bad Republican is always better than a democrat

Oh Trump is a fraud and a con man.

 

[elektra]

Oh Trump is a fraud and a con man.

Of course the businessman is a fraud, it is the 50 year lawyer politician that is the good guy

 

[ThisIsMe]

More than a year ago, a Trump-appointed judge named Drew Tipton effectively seized control of parts of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the federal agency that enforces immigration laws within the United States. On Friday, the Supreme Court ended Tipton’s reign over ICE’s enforcement priorities.

The Court’s decision in United States v. Texas was 8–1, with all eight justices in the majority concluding that Tipton didn’t even have jurisdiction to hear this case in the first place — though they split 5-3 on why Tipton lacked jurisdiction. Only Justice Samuel Alito, the Court’s most reliable Republican partisan, dissented.

The case concerned 2021 guidelines, issued by Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas, that instructed ICE agents to prioritize enforcement efforts against undocumented or otherwise removable immigrants who “pose a threat to national security, public safety, and border security and thus threaten America’s well-being.”

The Supreme Court may be running out of patience for Trump’s worst judges

The Court’s decision in United States v. Texas stops rogue judges from seizing control of law enforcement.

www.vox.com

Tipton, Cannon, just two examples of the hacks Trump appointed. The turd he left America to deal with will stink for decades.

For all you, "but Vox" nitwits out there..........it's a very well written, informative article. Just try to refute what it says.

Man, that trump appointed Supreme Court…huh, turns out maybe not so “in the tank for trump” as you all first thought ?

 

[ThisIsMe]

By the way…if we’re in the business of helping people south of the border…explain why it is that Biden turned away Cubans?

 

[whitehall]

How does an unknown named Ian Milhiser of some alt-net blog called Vox become a subject for political discussion while we see the Country go drown the drain and the president insulting MOH medals? It beats talking about reality.