PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
This is an instructional thread, designed to provide what is missing in Democrat controlled schools and media. Everything is linked to allow research.
1.In this thread we examine three ‘origins,’ or at least connections points between
2. Science and Religion as Gould put it, ‘two non-overlapping magisteria.’ But they do overlap.
We are learning that science and religion are not competitors, as they are both approaching a similar explanation of the origin of the universe and the origin of Homo sapiens. While we hear that they two are different, but not necessarily competitors, the truth is that they have most recently converged on two salient points. Dennis Prager writes:
“In my lifetime alone, science went from positing a universe that always existed to positing a universe that had a beginning (the Big Bang). So, in jut one generation [the Bible], in describing a beginning to the universe, went from conflicting with science to agreeing with science….[The Bible] should not violate essential truths (for example, it accurately depicts human beings as the last creation).”
3. Curious, the author of Genesis lived in a landlocked region; and Moses wandered in the desert, not along the coast. Yet…sea and land appear in this prominent position in Genesis. Must be a coincidence….
The opening page of Genesis asserts that plant life appeared after the seas were formed, and names specifically, grass, herbs and fruit trees. According to the author of Genesis, this is the stage where life actually begins: this is the first mention life of any kind. Plant life. Yet, the simple forms of life that are considered plant life were not discovered until a couple of millennia after Genesis was completed. So…how come Genesis mentions grass, herbs, and fruit trees at precisely this moment on the creation narrative? Parker, “The Genesis Enigma,” chapter four.
a. “…Genesis shows remarkable accuracy when compared to the scientific story of life’s evolutionary journey. Here, the Genesis writer envisioned great creatures evolving from those tiny Cambrian forms, eventually making their way out of the sea….Genesis seems to have picked out all the events of the highest order of importance, and put them in the right order….I don’t know the odds against such a parallel- against making a successful guess at the scientific orthodoxy of three thousand year into the future from a knowledge base of nothing- but they must be extraordinarily long.”
Parker, Op. Cit., p.163-164.
The order of the events that took place on our planet are now the very same order that science accepts today.
Written three millennia ago.
What are the odds?
Next…..the origin of both Communism and Nazism.
1.In this thread we examine three ‘origins,’ or at least connections points between
- Science and religion
- Communism and Nazism
- The major Leftist political movements and Islam
2. Science and Religion as Gould put it, ‘two non-overlapping magisteria.’ But they do overlap.
We are learning that science and religion are not competitors, as they are both approaching a similar explanation of the origin of the universe and the origin of Homo sapiens. While we hear that they two are different, but not necessarily competitors, the truth is that they have most recently converged on two salient points. Dennis Prager writes:
“In my lifetime alone, science went from positing a universe that always existed to positing a universe that had a beginning (the Big Bang). So, in jut one generation [the Bible], in describing a beginning to the universe, went from conflicting with science to agreeing with science….[The Bible] should not violate essential truths (for example, it accurately depicts human beings as the last creation).”
3. Curious, the author of Genesis lived in a landlocked region; and Moses wandered in the desert, not along the coast. Yet…sea and land appear in this prominent position in Genesis. Must be a coincidence….
The opening page of Genesis asserts that plant life appeared after the seas were formed, and names specifically, grass, herbs and fruit trees. According to the author of Genesis, this is the stage where life actually begins: this is the first mention life of any kind. Plant life. Yet, the simple forms of life that are considered plant life were not discovered until a couple of millennia after Genesis was completed. So…how come Genesis mentions grass, herbs, and fruit trees at precisely this moment on the creation narrative? Parker, “The Genesis Enigma,” chapter four.
a. “…Genesis shows remarkable accuracy when compared to the scientific story of life’s evolutionary journey. Here, the Genesis writer envisioned great creatures evolving from those tiny Cambrian forms, eventually making their way out of the sea….Genesis seems to have picked out all the events of the highest order of importance, and put them in the right order….I don’t know the odds against such a parallel- against making a successful guess at the scientific orthodoxy of three thousand year into the future from a knowledge base of nothing- but they must be extraordinarily long.”
Parker, Op. Cit., p.163-164.
The order of the events that took place on our planet are now the very same order that science accepts today.
Written three millennia ago.
What are the odds?
Next…..the origin of both Communism and Nazism.
Last edited: