The Steel in Obama's Spine

[Edgetho]

obama doesn't have steel in his spine. He believes he is never wrong and never makes a mistake. That's why he never tests the ground before he takes a step. He assumes the world will do what he says because democrats at home do. He announced sanctions against Russia before asking Europe if they would support sanctions then found out no one, not even Britian would. He announced freezing Russia's assets before making a phone call, then found out no one would support freezing assets not even Germany. He announced a boycott of the G8, then found out he's the only one staying home. To the bewilderment of the world, obama says that Russia will be isolated when it is clear that due to obama's silliness he is creating the isolation of the US.

the lying-cocksucker-in-chief's problem is that he's always playing to the home crowd.

Anything he does at home, the DISGUSTING FILTH in the LSM is there, hat in hand, on their knees, willing to unzip his pants fly and back him up.

In Russia? In the rest of the World?

Nobody gives a FUCK about what the scum at the New Yawk Slimes, the WaPo, ABC, NBC, CBS and CNN think, print or say.

Like Col Peters said, "Putin has obama's number. And it is 'Zero'"

The whole world is laughing at obama. There is NOTHING he can do about Putin taking back the Crimea.

And if Putin decides to take back the rest of Ukraine?

the lying-cocksucker-in-chief will do nothing about that, either.

Just talk. It's all any dimocrap scumbag is good for -- Just talk. And lies.

dimocraps lie. It's what they do.

And real men don't care about the lies coming from an effeminate douche like obama.

This is already over

 

[Esmeralda]

There were hints a few days ago that the Ukrainian leaders/activists will not be nominated for sainthood any time soon. Probably the best thing that can be said is that the pundits, the press and the pols remain clueless about forces on the loose in the world and that's why they cheer when we cut our military to buy votes from the slobs....standing...in the line...to the trough.

It's hard to believe the New York Times, Washington Post, and other MSM outlets were ignorant of how their government spearheaded the demise of an elected president and installed a political regime that includes Neo-Nazis in key positions; obviously they would prefer the rest of us remain ignorant or risk even greater set backs than they've recently experienced in Syria and Iran. Maybe we are returning to the days of MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) with the Berlin Wall on Russia's western border?

Oh, yes. It's all a huge conspiracy.

 

[Mojo2]

Nuland and other neo-cons sound like they're proposing a future for Ukraine that is based on IMF austerity measures that have recently proven disastrous for a majority of Greeks and others while providing major revenue streams for private western investors.

You mean noodle.

Obama's spine?
Apparently, you're not alone in that assessment.
How would Bush II have handled this situation in Ukraine?

You guys are actually mentally impaired, biologically.

Seriously.

I can't tell you how many of you Liberals, on these very pages, have asked what Bush would do in this case.

And the point is that he would have avoided it or prevented it rather than allowing it to reach this point.

Obama could have and should have been smart like Mitt and recognized Russia was our opponent...STILL!

And he should have been smart like Sarah Palin by recognizing the potential for Putin to invade Ukraine just as she predicted.

Jesus Christ, no wonder you vote so stupidly. You can't learn from others because you won't listen to them, you don't pay attention to someone if you don't like them, you can't see these things beyond today and tomorrow's repercussions and because you lack far sightedness you are bound to produce a mess of unintended consequences with every "well intentioned" policy you dream up.

You Liberals are like children who shouldn't be allowed to drive the government unless you have a Conservative supervising you and IN CHARGE.

 

[georgephillip]

WE Americans are being asked to support one group of thugs versus another group of thugs.

Some of us are dumb enough to think we have a dog in this fight.

Maybe 1% of us do have dog$ in this fight?

 

[Stephanie]

WE Americans are being asked to support one group of thugs versus another group of thugs.

Some of us are dumb enough to think we have a dog in this fight.

Maybe 1% of us do have dog$ in this fight?

well that fits all the Democrat party who you support by the way

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Nuland and other neo-cons sound like they're proposing a future for Ukraine that is based on IMF austerity measures that have recently proven disastrous for a majority of Greeks and others while providing major revenue streams for private western investors.

You mean noodle.

Obama's spine?
Apparently, you're not alone in that assessment.
How would Bush II have handled this situation in Ukraine?

I'm not advocating conflict however, we are obligated to ukraine's protection under previous accords. Bush isn't relevant here.

 

[georgephillip]

There were hints a few days ago that the Ukrainian leaders/activists will not be nominated for sainthood any time soon. Probably the best thing that can be said is that the pundits, the press and the pols remain clueless about forces on the loose in the world and that's why they cheer when we cut our military to buy votes from the slobs....standing...in the line...to the trough.

It's hard to believe the New York Times, Washington Post, and other MSM outlets were ignorant of how their government spearheaded the demise of an elected president and installed a political regime that includes Neo-Nazis in key positions; obviously they would prefer the rest of us remain ignorant or risk even greater set backs than they've recently experienced in Syria and Iran. Maybe we are returning to the days of MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) with the Berlin Wall on Russia's western border?

Oh, yes. It's all a huge conspiracy.

"Composition of the Coalition Government

"We are not dealing with a transitional government (in Ukraine) in which Neo-Nazi elements integrate the fringe of the coalition, formally led by the Fatherland party.

"The Cabinet is not only integrated by the Svoboda and Right Sector (not to mention former members of defunct fascist UNA-UNSO), the two main Neo-Nazi entities have been entrusted with key positions which grant them de facto control over the Armed Forces, Police, Justice and National Security.

"While Yatsenuyk’s Fatherland Party controls the majority of portfolios and Svoboda Neo-Nazi leader Oleh Tyahnybok was not granted a major cabinet post (apparently at the request of assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland), members of Svoboda and the Right Sector occupy key positions in the areas of Defense, Law Enforcement, Education and Economic Affairs."

Of course it's not a conspiracy, it's a Flowering of Democracy in the Fatherland!

The U.S. has Installed a Neo-Nazi Government in Ukraine | Global Research

 

[georgephillip]

History is Important



The Urkraine has a very horrific past folks and they deserve FREEDOM

What makes you think the IMF and Neo-Nazis have any use of FREEDOM?

 

[Edgetho]

Special Assistant to the UN Sec General has reportedly been seized by armed men in Crimea.

That's it. That's all I have and that's all there is.

Go to FNC, they have it but no article with it

 

[georgephillip]

You mean noodle.

Obama's spine?
Apparently, you're not alone in that assessment.
How would Bush II have handled this situation in Ukraine?

You guys are actually mentally impaired, biologically.

Seriously.

I can't tell you how many of you Liberals, on these very pages, have asked what Bush would do in this case.

And the point is that he would have avoided it or prevented it rather than allowing it to reach this point.

Obama could have and should have been smart like Mitt and recognized Russia was our opponent...STILL!

And he should have been smart like Sarah Palin by recognizing the potential for Putin to invade Ukraine just as she predicted.

Jesus Christ, no wonder you vote so stupidly. You can't learn from others because you won't listen to them, you don't pay attention to someone if you don't like them, you can't see these things beyond today and tomorrow's repercussions and because you lack far sightedness you are bound to produce a mess of unintended consequences with every "well intentioned" policy you dream up.

You Liberals are like children who shouldn't be allowed to drive the government unless you have a Conservative supervising you and IN CHARGE.

Conservatives, likeMoney Mitt, and Quitter, and Dubya, would have shown the same sympathy for Svoboda as Obama has because they all serve the same 1% of Americans:

"The All-Ukrainian Union 'Svoboda' (Ukrainian: Всеукраїнське об’єднання «Свобода», Vseukrayinske obyednannia 'Svoboda'), translated as Freedom, is a Ukrainian nationalist political party,[2] and currently one of the five major parties of the country.[9]

"Five members of the party hold positions in Ukraine's government.

The party was founded in 1991 as the Social-National Party of Ukraine (Ukrainian: Соціал-національна партія Україн&#1080, a reference to National Socialism.[10][11]

"Today Svoboda acts as a populist proponent of nationalism and anti-communism.

"It is positioned on the right of the Ukrainian political spectrum,[12][2][13][14][15] and has also been described as far-right,[16][4][17][18] fascistic or anti-semitic.[19][20..."

Right wing fascists in Ukraine are shooting members of Yanukovich's Party of Regions and issuing arrest warrants for those they can't intimidate.

Jewish synagogs and Eastern Orthodox Christian churches are being attacked.

Neo-Nazis in western Ukraine have ordered the local prosecutor's office to resign en mass.

Only corporate tools like Mitt, Sarah, Bush, and Obama would support that flowering of democracy.

Svoboda (political party) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[georgephillip]

WE Americans are being asked to support one group of thugs versus another group of thugs.

Some of us are dumb enough to think we have a dog in this fight.

Maybe 1% of us do have dog$ in this fight?

well that fits all the Democrat party who you support by the way

I haven't supported Democrats OR Republicans for decades.
The only reason you're whining about gun-slinging fascists taking control in Ukraine is because Rich Mitt lost the last presidential election

"If a democratically elected president and ruling party are so easily driven from power by armed neo-nazis, what chance do Washington’s paid stooges among the so-called “moderates” have of forming a government?

"These are the corrupt people who wanted President Yanukovich out of office so that they could take the money instead.

"The corruption charge against Yanukovich was cover for the disloyal, undemocratic 'moderate' schemers to seize power and be paid millions of dollars by Washington for taking Ukraine into the EU and NATO.

"The Washington-paid schemers are now reaping their just reward as they sit in craven silence while neo-nazi Muzychko wielding an Ak-47 challenges government officials to their face: 'I dare you take my gun!'"

"Only Obama, Susan Rice, Victoria Nuland, Washington’s European puppets, and the Western prostitute media can describe the brutal reality of post-coup Ukraine as 'the forward march of democracy.'"

The above quote was written by a former Assistant Secretary for the Treasury in the Reagan Administration, BTW.

Ukrainian Neo-Nazis Declare that Power Comes Out of the Barrels of their Guns - PaulCraigRoberts.org

 

[Iceweasel]

Ukrainian Neo-Nazis Declare that Power Comes Out of the Barrels of their Guns - PaulCraigRoberts.org

So that's your proof? The opinion of a nutbag?

 

[georgephillip]

Special Assistant to the UN Sec General has reportedly been seized by armed men in Crimea.

That's it. That's all I have and that's all there is.

Go to FNC, they have it but no article with it

"Nuland: … “when I talked to Jeff Feltman this morning, he had a new name for the UN guy …Robert Serry – he’s now gotten both Serry and Ban ki Moon to agree that Serry could come in Monday or Tuesday… so that would be great I think to help glue this thing and have the UN help glue it and you know fuck the EU.”

Chronology of the Ukrainian Coup » CounterPunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names

"NEW YORK (TRNS) – The U.N.’s envoy to Ukraine was attacked while on an official visit to the Crimean city of Simferopol Wednesday, Deputy Secretary-General Jan Eliasson told the media.

Refuting a report by Russia’s Interfax news service that Robert Serry, the former Dutch ambassador to Ukraine, had been kidnapped and was being held hostage, Eliasson said that Serry was safe following the incident."

UN Envoy Threatened In Crimea, Agrees To End VisitTalk Radio News Service

Honestly, what do you think Bush/Obama would be doing right now if Putin was trying this shit in Mexico?

 

[mamooth]

The fascinating thing is how Obama can, according to conservatives, simultaneously be both a ruthless thug dictator and a total wimp.

 

[georgephillip]

Ukrainian Neo-Nazis Declare that Power Comes Out of the Barrels of their Guns - PaulCraigRoberts.org

So that's your proof? The opinion of a nutbag?

"Paul Craig Roberts (born April 3, 1939) is an American economist and a columnist for Creators Syndicate. He served as an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration and was noted as a co-founder of Reaganomics.[1]

"He is a former editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and Scripps Howard News Service.

"He has testified before congressional committees on 30 occasions on issues of economic policy.

"During the 21st century, Roberts has frequently published in Counterpunch, writing extensively about the effects of the Bush (and later Obama) administrations related to the War on Terror, which he says have destroyed the US Constitution's protections of Americans' civil liberties, such as habeas corpus and due process.

"He has taken positions different from former Republican allies, opposing the War on Drugs and the War on Terror, and criticizing Israel's policies and actions against the Palestinians.[2] Roberts is also a columnist for alternative news outlets Press TV [3] and Veterans Today [4]"

Paul Craig Roberts - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Iceweasel]

The fascinating thing is how Obama can, according to conservatives, simultaneously be both a ruthless thug dictator and a total wimp.

Who said that? Yes he acts like a dictator but he's never responsible for anything. It's always someone else's fault. Even Bush if no one else is handy.

 

[Katzndogz]

You mean noodle.

Obama's spine?
Apparently, you're not alone in that assessment.
How would Bush II have handled this situation in Ukraine?

You guys are actually mentally impaired, biologically.

Seriously.

I can't tell you how many of you Liberals, on these very pages, have asked what Bush would do in this case.

And the point is that he would have avoided it or prevented it rather than allowing it to reach this point.

Obama could have and should have been smart like Mitt and recognized Russia was our opponent...STILL!

And he should have been smart like Sarah Palin by recognizing the potential for Putin to invade Ukraine just as she predicted.

Jesus Christ, no wonder you vote so stupidly. You can't learn from others because you won't listen to them, you don't pay attention to someone if you don't like them, you can't see these things beyond today and tomorrow's repercussions and because you lack far sightedness you are bound to produce a mess of unintended consequences with every "well intentioned" policy you dream up.

You Liberals are like children who shouldn't be allowed to drive the government unless you have a Conservative supervising you and IN CHARGE.

You're right. Bush would never have cancelled the missile shield in Poland. There would have been no idiotic reset button. Bush would never have said "Tell Vlad that I will have more flexibility after the election". This would never have happened.

 

[Iceweasel]

Ukrainian Neo-Nazis Declare that Power Comes Out of the Barrels of their Guns - PaulCraigRoberts.org

So that's your proof? The opinion of a nutbag?

"Paul Craig Roberts (born April 3, 1939) is an American economist and a columnist for Creators Syndicate. He served as an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration and was noted as a co-founder of Reaganomics.[1]

"He is a former editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and Scripps Howard News Service.

"He has testified before congressional committees on 30 occasions on issues of economic policy.

"During the 21st century, Roberts has frequently published in Counterpunch, writing extensively about the effects of the Bush (and later Obama) administrations related to the War on Terror, which he says have destroyed the US Constitution's protections of Americans' civil liberties, such as habeas corpus and due process.

"He has taken positions different from former Republican allies, opposing the War on Drugs and the War on Terror, and criticizing Israel's policies and actions against the Palestinians.[2] Roberts is also a columnist for alternative news outlets Press TV [3] and Veterans Today [4]"

Paul Craig Roberts - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I was asking for proof. Not proof that someone said something.

 

[Mojo2]

Obama's spine?
Apparently, you're not alone in that assessment.
How would Bush II have handled this situation in Ukraine?

You guys are actually mentally impaired, biologically.

Seriously.

I can't tell you how many of you Liberals, on these very pages, have asked what Bush would do in this case.

And the point is that he would have avoided it or prevented it rather than allowing it to reach this point.

Obama could have and should have been smart like Mitt and recognized Russia was our opponent...STILL!

And he should have been smart like Sarah Palin by recognizing the potential for Putin to invade Ukraine just as she predicted.

Jesus Christ, no wonder you vote so stupidly. You can't learn from others because you won't listen to them, you don't pay attention to someone if you don't like them, you can't see these things beyond today and tomorrow's repercussions and because you lack far sightedness you are bound to produce a mess of unintended consequences with every "well intentioned" policy you dream up.

You Liberals are like children who shouldn't be allowed to drive the government unless you have a Conservative supervising you and IN CHARGE.

You're right. Bush would never have cancelled the missile shield in Poland. There would have been no idiotic reset button. Bush would never have said "Tell Vlad that I will have more flexibility after the election". This would never have happened.

Absolutely right!

 

[georgephillip]

So that's your proof? The opinion of a nutbag?

"Paul Craig Roberts (born April 3, 1939) is an American economist and a columnist for Creators Syndicate. He served as an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration and was noted as a co-founder of Reaganomics.[1]

"He is a former editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and Scripps Howard News Service.

"He has testified before congressional committees on 30 occasions on issues of economic policy.

"During the 21st century, Roberts has frequently published in Counterpunch, writing extensively about the effects of the Bush (and later Obama) administrations related to the War on Terror, which he says have destroyed the US Constitution's protections of Americans' civil liberties, such as habeas corpus and due process.

"He has taken positions different from former Republican allies, opposing the War on Drugs and the War on Terror, and criticizing Israel's policies and actions against the Palestinians.[2] Roberts is also a columnist for alternative news outlets Press TV [3] and Veterans Today [4]"

Paul Craig Roberts - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I was asking for proof. Not proof that someone said something.

Why did you refer to someone who's forgotten more about US media and society than you'll ever know as a "nutbag"?

"US media[edit]

"Anyone who depends on print, TV, or right-wing talk radio media is totally misinformed.

"The Bush administration has achieved a 'de facto' Ministry of Propaganda."[21]

"The uniformity of the US media has become much more complete since the days of the cold war. During the 1990s, the US government permitted an unconscionable concentration of print and broadcast media that terminated the independence of the media.

"Today the US media is owned by 5 giant companies in which pro-Zionist Jews have disproportionate influence.

"More importantly, the values of the conglomerates reside in the broadcast licenses, which are granted by the government, and the corporations are run by corporate executives—not by journalists—whose eyes are on advertising revenues and the avoidance of controversy that might produce boycotts or upset advertisers and subscribers."[22]

"Society[edit]
...I had a 16-year stint as Business Week's first outside columnist, despite hostility within the magazine and from the editor's New York social set, because the editor regarded me as the most trenchant critic of the George H.W. Bush administration in the business.

"The White House felt the same way and lobbied to have me removed from the William E. Simon Chair in Political Economy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies...

"In their hatred of 'the rich,' the left-wing overlooks that in the 20th century the rich were the class most persecuted by government. The class genocide of the 20th century is the greatest genocide in history.[21]

"His reference is to what he considered 'class genocide' in the widespread massacres and deaths in the Soviet Union and Maoist China of people for being members of the wrong class."

Paul Craig Roberts - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia