The south won't rise again; U.S. Judge Strikes Down Texas’s Strict Photo Voter-ID Law! WHEEE!

[Baz Ares]

btw.. Sweet!

"Does Texas law allow you to shoot a protester if you see him or her defacing a Confederate statue? A Texas man claiming to be a police academy instructor says the answer is yes."

Crazy Killer Cops!

Texas Penal Code 9.43 clearly states the private property being protected with deadly force needs to be "tangible and moveable." A statue doesn't meet that qualification either.

Perhaps you should look up the definition of tangible. Are you saying the statue isn't something that can be touched?

While you're at it, look up the definition of movable. A synonym is transportable. By definition it means something that can be moved.

Since the statue can be touched, it's tangible. Since you whiners cried about those statues to the point a bunch of pussies on local governing bodies pandered to you and reMOVED those statues, they fit the definition of movable. What that means is according to Texas Penal Code 9.43 is that deadly force CAN be used to protect that property.

Tangible, refer to personal property here.
The shit traitor statue do not meet the standard.

By definition, tangible means it can be touched. Are you saying the statue can't be touched?

Are you saying the statue can't be moved? You do know it doesn't have to move on it's own to fit the definition of movable. It simply has to be able to be moved.

Nope. tangible personal property per law.

Texas Penal Code 9.43
A person is justified in using force or deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property of a third person if, under the circumstances as he reasonably believes them to be, the actor would be justified under Section 9.41 or 9.42 in using force or deadly force to protect his own land or property and:

(1) the actor reasonably believes the unlawful interference constitutes attempted or consummated theft of or criminal mischief to the tangible, movable property; or

(2) the actor reasonably believes that:

(A) the third person has requested his protection of the land or property;

(B) he has a legal duty to protect the third person's land or property; or

(C) the third person whose land or property he uses force or deadly force to protect is the actor's spouse, parent, or child, resides with the actor, or is under the actor's care.

Clearly..under Section 9.41 or 9.42 . Shooting them is NOT justified.
PENAL CODE CHAPTER 9. JUSTIFICATION EXCLUDING CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY

Again, this IS Public Property. Sorry, no wall trophy for you.

Interesting how you jump from referencing private property to public property when you're proven wrong.

TexASS wrote the laws. I did not change shit.

 

[Conservative65]

Perhaps you should look up the definition of tangible. Are you saying the statue isn't something that can be touched?

While you're at it, look up the definition of movable. A synonym is transportable. By definition it means something that can be moved.

Since the statue can be touched, it's tangible. Since you whiners cried about those statues to the point a bunch of pussies on local governing bodies pandered to you and reMOVED those statues, they fit the definition of movable. What that means is according to Texas Penal Code 9.43 is that deadly force CAN be used to protect that property.

Tangible, refer to personal property here.
The shit traitor statue do not meet the standard.

By definition, tangible means it can be touched. Are you saying the statue can't be touched?

Are you saying the statue can't be moved? You do know it doesn't have to move on it's own to fit the definition of movable. It simply has to be able to be moved.

Nope. tangible personal property per law.

Texas Penal Code 9.43
A person is justified in using force or deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property of a third person if, under the circumstances as he reasonably believes them to be, the actor would be justified under Section 9.41 or 9.42 in using force or deadly force to protect his own land or property and:

(1) the actor reasonably believes the unlawful interference constitutes attempted or consummated theft of or criminal mischief to the tangible, movable property; or

(2) the actor reasonably believes that:

(A) the third person has requested his protection of the land or property;

(B) he has a legal duty to protect the third person's land or property; or

(C) the third person whose land or property he uses force or deadly force to protect is the actor's spouse, parent, or child, resides with the actor, or is under the actor's care.

Clearly..under Section 9.41 or 9.42 . Shooting them is NOT justified.
PENAL CODE CHAPTER 9. JUSTIFICATION EXCLUDING CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY

Again, this IS Public Property. Sorry, no wall trophy for you.

Interesting how you jump from referencing private property to public property when you're proven wrong.

TexASS wrote the laws. I did not change shit.

You switched. Not my fault you can't keep up. You must be one from the average 85 IQ group.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Throw out judicial review.

 

[Baz Ares]

Tangible, refer to personal property here.
The shit traitor statue do not meet the standard.

By definition, tangible means it can be touched. Are you saying the statue can't be touched?

Are you saying the statue can't be moved? You do know it doesn't have to move on it's own to fit the definition of movable. It simply has to be able to be moved.

Nope. tangible personal property per law.

Texas Penal Code 9.43
A person is justified in using force or deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property of a third person if, under the circumstances as he reasonably believes them to be, the actor would be justified under Section 9.41 or 9.42 in using force or deadly force to protect his own land or property and:

(1) the actor reasonably believes the unlawful interference constitutes attempted or consummated theft of or criminal mischief to the tangible, movable property; or

(2) the actor reasonably believes that:

(A) the third person has requested his protection of the land or property;

(B) he has a legal duty to protect the third person's land or property; or

(C) the third person whose land or property he uses force or deadly force to protect is the actor's spouse, parent, or child, resides with the actor, or is under the actor's care.

Clearly..under Section 9.41 or 9.42 . Shooting them is NOT justified.
PENAL CODE CHAPTER 9. JUSTIFICATION EXCLUDING CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY

Again, this IS Public Property. Sorry, no wall trophy for you.

Interesting how you jump from referencing private property to public property when you're proven wrong.

TexASS wrote the laws. I did not change shit.

You switched. Not my fault you can't keep up. You must be one from the average 85 IQ group.

Texas Penal Code 9.43 clearly states the private property being protected with deadly force needs to be "tangible and moveable." A statue doesn't meet that qualification either.
AS it's NOT personal property. Being "tangible and moveable." does not matter, under this law.
The law does not apply to this issue. But if you want to test it, please do.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

A federal judge struck down Texas’s restrictive photo voter-identification law and Republican lawmakers’ most recent attempt at fixing it, finding neither version corrects provisions that intentionally make it harder for poor and minority citizens to vote.

“Not one of the discriminatory features” of Texas’s original photo ID law “is fully ameliorated by the terms” of the measure Texas lawmakers passed earlier this year, U.S. District Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos of Corpus Christi said in the ruling Wednesday.

Furthermore, the 2017 version of the voter ID law “trades one obstacle to voting with another -- replacing the lack of qualified photo ID with an overreaching affidavit threatening severe penalties for perjury,” Ramos said.
U.S. Judge Strikes Down Texas’s Strict Photo Voter-ID Law



Wheee...More Voters! That's the American way.

The difference between you and I is, I care if an individual is a citizen when voting.

 

[Baz Ares]

A federal judge struck down Texas’s restrictive photo voter-identification law and Republican lawmakers’ most recent attempt at fixing it, finding neither version corrects provisions that intentionally make it harder for poor and minority citizens to vote.

“Not one of the discriminatory features” of Texas’s original photo ID law “is fully ameliorated by the terms” of the measure Texas lawmakers passed earlier this year, U.S. District Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos of Corpus Christi said in the ruling Wednesday.

Furthermore, the 2017 version of the voter ID law “trades one obstacle to voting with another -- replacing the lack of qualified photo ID with an overreaching affidavit threatening severe penalties for perjury,” Ramos said.
U.S. Judge Strikes Down Texas’s Strict Photo Voter-ID Law



Wheee...More Voters! That's the American way.

The difference between you and I is, I care if an individual is a citizen when voting.

I do care as well. What does a photo ID do? Where is the YUGE amounts of voters using the same name? NOW!
They're rules for voting. And well covered already, by both sides.

Btw. With 3M illegal votes for HRC. why has none been found? That changes anythang? NOW!

 

[L.K.Eder]

btw.. Sweet!

"Does Texas law allow you to shoot a protester if you see him or her defacing a Confederate statue? A Texas man claiming to be a police academy instructor says the answer is yes."

Crazy Killer Cops!

Texas Penal Code 9.43 clearly states the private property being protected with deadly force needs to be "tangible and moveable." A statue doesn't meet that qualification either.

Perhaps you should look up the definition of tangible. Are you saying the statue isn't something that can be touched?

While you're at it, look up the definition of movable. A synonym is transportable. By definition it means something that can be moved.

Since the statue can be touched, it's tangible. Since you whiners cried about those statues to the point a bunch of pussies on local governing bodies pandered to you and reMOVED those statues, they fit the definition of movable. What that means is according to Texas Penal Code 9.43 is that deadly force CAN be used to protect that property.

Holy toledo, a legal beagle. Awesome!

 

[IsaacNewton]

Any government official asking for ID in America sounds like "papers please".

American's DNA rejects that shit outright.

No different than a store clerk.. We are asked to identify ourselves all the time.

Herr Goebbels you showed up.

 

[L.K.Eder]

I like the trumptards whining for moar gobernment interference.

 

[Baz Ares]

Lower courts get over turned in higher courts all the time..........another Supreme Court ruling..................

Enjoy your moment of happiness OP.........it will not last.

okay, I will.

The Supreme Court’s didn’t consider the merits of the case in its denial of the petition for writ of certiorari
The Supreme Court Rejects North Carolina's Voter ID Law


btw. They is consistent.

 

[Baz Ares]

oops!
Supreme Court won't rescue Texas voter ID law

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

The question begs...why do dems fear voter ID?

In spite of the lies.......because voter ID helps prevent voter fraud. Democrats only thrive on illegal votes. Obama was probably the ONE exception.....because they thought he was their messiah. But Hillary's loss and the continued loss of seats by the Dims proves they were tricked and finally realized it. Democrats have been exchanging our nations sovereignty for votes for many decades now.

So we now have thousands if not millions of Anti-Americans more than willing to slice up America in the name of their own personal gain.

 

[Uncensored2008]

A federal judge struck down Texas’s restrictive photo voter-identification law and Republican lawmakers’ most recent attempt at fixing it, finding neither version corrects provisions that intentionally make it harder for poor and minority citizens to vote.

“Not one of the discriminatory features” of Texas’s original photo ID law “is fully ameliorated by the terms” of the measure Texas lawmakers passed earlier this year, U.S. District Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos of Corpus Christi said in the ruling Wednesday.

Furthermore, the 2017 version of the voter ID law “trades one obstacle to voting with another -- replacing the lack of qualified photo ID with an overreaching affidavit threatening severe penalties for perjury,” Ramos said.
U.S. Judge Strikes Down Texas’s Strict Photo Voter-ID Law

What else would you expect from a minority judge appointed by a minority President? That decision was more predictable than the winner of a majority minority Congressional district.

GOP strategy for decades is trying to stop black and brown people from voting.
Clearly, they know the growth in GOP voters is negative. As Obama won by 9.1M
more votes in 2008 and by 6M in 2012. Think about it.
Recall, One Republican in Pennsylvania even publicly admitted that

Because black and brown voters are too stupid to get a drivers license?

Besides being a racist, you're dumb as a dog turd.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The question begs...why do dems fear voter ID?

Hillary had 3 million more popular votes.

/Thread//

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

oops!
Supreme Court won't rescue Texas voter ID law

All that is required for evil men to prevail is for good men to do nothing.

I sure will miss America. In 50 years it'll be a hell hole that people want to leave...not immigrate to.

Problem is.....without America there won'e be anywhere to go. Glad I won't be around for that shit show.

 

[Baz Ares]

A federal judge struck down Texas’s restrictive photo voter-identification law and Republican lawmakers’ most recent attempt at fixing it, finding neither version corrects provisions that intentionally make it harder for poor and minority citizens to vote.

“Not one of the discriminatory features” of Texas’s original photo ID law “is fully ameliorated by the terms” of the measure Texas lawmakers passed earlier this year, U.S. District Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos of Corpus Christi said in the ruling Wednesday.

Furthermore, the 2017 version of the voter ID law “trades one obstacle to voting with another -- replacing the lack of qualified photo ID with an overreaching affidavit threatening severe penalties for perjury,” Ramos said.
U.S. Judge Strikes Down Texas’s Strict Photo Voter-ID Law

What else would you expect from a minority judge appointed by a minority President? That decision was more predictable than the winner of a majority minority Congressional district.

GOP strategy for decades is trying to stop black and brown people from voting.
Clearly, they know the growth in GOP voters is negative. As Obama won by 9.1M
more votes in 2008 and by 6M in 2012. Think about it.
Recall, One Republican in Pennsylvania even publicly admitted that

Because black and brown voters are too stupid to get a drivers license?

Besides being a racist, you're dumb as a dog turd.

Many, many people don't drive.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

A federal judge struck down Texas’s restrictive photo voter-identification law and Republican lawmakers’ most recent attempt at fixing it, finding neither version corrects provisions that intentionally make it harder for poor and minority citizens to vote.

“Not one of the discriminatory features” of Texas’s original photo ID law “is fully ameliorated by the terms” of the measure Texas lawmakers passed earlier this year, U.S. District Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos of Corpus Christi said in the ruling Wednesday.

Furthermore, the 2017 version of the voter ID law “trades one obstacle to voting with another -- replacing the lack of qualified photo ID with an overreaching affidavit threatening severe penalties for perjury,” Ramos said.
U.S. Judge Strikes Down Texas’s Strict Photo Voter-ID Law



Wheee...More Voters! That's the American way.

You want illegals voting. We know. Take it to the Supreme Court Texas.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

btw.. Sweet!

"Does Texas law allow you to shoot a protester if you see him or her defacing a Confederate statue? A Texas man claiming to be a police academy instructor says the answer is yes."

Crazy Killer Cops!

Texas Penal Code 9.43 clearly states the private property being protected with deadly force needs to be "tangible and moveable." A statue doesn't meet that qualification either.

That horse has orange diarrhea. The Republicans want to run the diarrhea for president in 2020.

Diarrhea is the color of Obama.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Too many imbecile asswipe bleeding heart liberal federal judges.
How can this be a nation of laws when those entrusted to interpret and enforce laws are more than willing to give the nation away to the lawless?

Everybody wants to screw the golden goose....but nobody wants to protect it or care for it

The face of an anti-American, Obama appointed traitor......

U.S. District Traitor Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos

 

[Uncensored2008]

A federal judge struck down Texas’s restrictive photo voter-identification law and Republican lawmakers’ most recent attempt at fixing it, finding neither version corrects provisions that intentionally make it harder for poor and minority citizens to vote.

“Not one of the discriminatory features” of Texas’s original photo ID law “is fully ameliorated by the terms” of the measure Texas lawmakers passed earlier this year, U.S. District Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos of Corpus Christi said in the ruling Wednesday.

Furthermore, the 2017 version of the voter ID law “trades one obstacle to voting with another -- replacing the lack of qualified photo ID with an overreaching affidavit threatening severe penalties for perjury,” Ramos said.
U.S. Judge Strikes Down Texas’s Strict Photo Voter-ID Law

What else would you expect from a minority judge appointed by a minority President? That decision was more predictable than the winner of a majority minority Congressional district.

GOP strategy for decades is trying to stop black and brown people from voting.
Clearly, they know the growth in GOP voters is negative. As Obama won by 9.1M
more votes in 2008 and by 6M in 2012. Think about it.
Recall, One Republican in Pennsylvania even publicly admitted that

Because black and brown voters are too stupid to get a drivers license?

Besides being a racist, you're dumb as a dog turd.

Many, many people don't drive.

Sure, Racist boi...

What Berkeley Liberals Think of Voter ID Laws vs. What Actual Harlem Black People Think