The shit is being thrown into the fan.

Superlative

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2007
Messages
1,382
Reaction score
109
Points
48
Ex-C.I.A. Chief, in Book, Assails Cheney on Iraq


WASHINGTON, April 26 — George J. Tenet, the former director of central intelligence, has lashed out against Vice President Dick Cheney and other Bush administration officials in a new book, saying they pushed the country to war in Iraq without ever conducting a “serious debate” about whether Saddam Hussein posed an imminent threat to the United States.

The 549-page book, “At the Center of the Storm,” is to be published by HarperCollins on Monday. By turns accusatory, defensive, and modestly self-critical, it is the first detailed account by a member of the president’s inner circle of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the decision to invade Iraq and the failure to find the unconventional weapons that were a major justification for the war.

“There was never a serious debate that I know of within the administration about the imminence of the Iraqi threat,” Mr. Tenet writes in a devastating judgment that is likely to be debated for many years. Nor, he adds, “was there ever a significant discussion” about the possibility of containing Iraq without an invasion.

Mr. Tenet admits that he made his famous “slam dunk” remark about the evidence that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. But he argues that the quote was taken out of context and that it had little impact on President Bush’s decision to go to war. He also makes clear his bitter view that the administration made him a scapegoat for the Iraq war.

A copy of the book was purchased at retail price in advance of publication by a reporter for The New York Times. Mr. Tenet described with sarcasm watching an episode of “Meet the Press” last September in which Mr. Cheney twice referred to Mr. Tenet’s “slam dunk” remark as the basis for the decision to go to war.

“I remember watching and thinking, ‘As if you needed me to say ‘slam dunk’ to convince you to go to war with Iraq,’ ” Mr. Tenet writes.

As violence in Iraq spiraled beginning in late 2003, Mr. Tenet writes, “rather than acknowledge responsibility, the administration’s message was: Don’t blame us. George Tenet and the C.I.A. got us into this mess.”

Mr. Tenet takes blame for the flawed 2002 National Intelligence Estimate about Iraq’s weapons programs, calling the episode “one of the lowest moments of my seven-year tenure.” He expresses regret that the document was not more nuanced, but says there was no doubt in his mind at the time that Saddam Hussein possessed unconventional weapons. “In retrospect, we got it wrong partly because the truth was so implausible,” he writes.

Despite such sweeping indictments, Mr. Bush, who in 2004 awarded Mr. Tenet a Presidential Medal of Freedom, is portrayed personally in a largely positive light, with particular praise for the his leadership after the 2001 attacks. “He was absolutely in charge, determined, and directed,” Mr. Tenet writes of the president, whom he describes as a blunt-spoken kindred spirit.

But Mr. Tenet largely endorses the view of administration critics that Mr. Cheney and a handful of Pentagon officials, including Paul D. Wolfowitz and Douglas J. Feith, were focused on Iraq as a threat in late 2001 and 2002 even as Mr. Tenet and the C.I.A. concentrated mostly on Al Qaeda.............


...............He gives a detailed account of the episode, which occurred during an Oval Office meeting in December 2002 when the administration was preparing to make public its case for war against Iraq.

During the meeting, the deputy C.I.A. director, John McLaughlin, unveiled a draft of a proposed public presentation that left the group unimpressed. Mr. Tenet recalls that Mr. Bush suggested that they could “add punch” by bringing in lawyers trained to argue cases before a jury.

“I told the president that strengthening the public presentation was a ‘slam dunk,’ a phrase that was later taken completely out of context,” Mr. Tenet writes. “If I had simply said, ‘I’m sure we can do better,’ I wouldn’t be writing this chapter — or maybe even this book.”................

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/27/washington/27intel.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/27/news/tenet.php
 

RetiredGySgt

Diamond Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
47,980
Reaction score
10,026
Points
2,040
Location
North Carolina
Yup, I can sure see how the comment that WMD's were a "slam Dunk" could be taken out of context. No axe to grind here. And I suggest you review who it was that appointed him to begin with.

Another example of taking a minor issue and trying to make it into some earth shattering event. Last I checked the President is free to use or not use his advisors as much or as little as he wants. he is free to include or exclude them in any discussion he wants.

What would be more telling is if the press discussed the fact that 44 members of Congress didn't even bother to review the intel before voting on war or no war. Either they are admitting they were absolutely derilect in their duties OR it is an attempt to claim they were hoodwinked by their own stupidity. Would appear they wouldn't know if they were lied to or not since they didn't even read what was available to them.
 

actsnoblemartin

I love Andrea & April
Joined
Mar 7, 2007
Messages
4,039
Reaction score
412
Points
98
Location
La Mesa, CA
Yup, I can sure see how the comment that WMD's were a "slam Dunk" could be taken out of context. No axe to grind here. And I suggest you review who it was that appointed him to begin with.

Another example of taking a minor issue and trying to make it into some earth shattering event. Last I checked the President is free to use or not use his advisors as much or as little as he wants. he is free to include or exclude them in any discussion he wants.

What would be more telling is if the press discussed the fact that 44 members of Congress didn't even bother to review the intel before voting on war or no war. Either they are admitting they were absolutely derilect in their duties OR it is an attempt to claim they were hoodwinked by their own stupidity. Would appear they wouldn't know if they were lied to or not since they didn't even read what was available to them.
I would agree with you.
 

red states rule

Senior Member
Joined
May 30, 2006
Messages
16,011
Reaction score
573
Points
48
I thought we already had a debate on the Iraq war in 2004 and the libs lost

Now, the Dems are the party of appeasement and surrender, that fact is clear
 

Psychoblues

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2003
Messages
2,701
Reaction score
142
Points
48
Location
North Missisippi
And you are still a liar.


I thought we already had a debate on the Iraq war in 2004 and the libs lost

Now, the Dems are the party of appeasement and surrender, that fact is clear
This Democrat and no Democrat with whom I associate myself is advocating appeasement or surrender. Just who do you consider that we might appease or surrender to? You? I don't think that will happen.
 

red states rule

Senior Member
Joined
May 30, 2006
Messages
16,011
Reaction score
573
Points
48
And you are still a liar.




This Democrat and no Democrat with whom I associate myself is advocating appeasement or surrender. Just who do you consider that we might appease or surrender to? You? I don't think that will happen.
Libs are wanting to surrender in Iraq

When you tell the enemy the moment you are leaving the fight - is it surrender
 

Psychoblues

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2003
Messages
2,701
Reaction score
142
Points
48
Location
North Missisippi
What and where do you base your assertion?


Libs are wanting to surrender in Iraq

When you tell the enemy the moment you are leaving the fight - is it surrender
I'll say that you are a liar. Oh, I forgot!!!!!! I've called you that before and you have never proven me wrong about it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

red states rule

Senior Member
Joined
May 30, 2006
Messages
16,011
Reaction score
573
Points
48
What and where do you base your assertion?




I'll say that you are a liar. Oh, I forgot!!!!!! I've called you that before and you have never proven me wrong about it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Tio bad libs are blinded by their hate to see the truth

What else would you call it when you tell the enemy when you are going to leave the fight - and turn the country over to the terrorists?

It is surrender
 

Psychoblues

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2003
Messages
2,701
Reaction score
142
Points
48
Location
North Missisippi
Who said that besides you?




Tio bad libs are blinded by their hate to see the truth

What else would you call it when you tell the enemy when you are going to leave the fight - and turn the country over to the terrorists?

It is surrender
Idiot/coward take your choice. I won't play your false nomenclature game. I am an American.
 

Truthmatters

Diamond Member
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
80,182
Reaction score
2,265
Points
1,283
"Mr. Tenet largely endorses the view of administration critics that Mr. Cheney and a handful of Pentagon officials, including Paul D. Wolfowitz and Douglas J. Feith, were focused on Iraq as a threat in late 2001 and 2002 even as Mr. Tenet and the C.I.A. concentrated mostly on Al Qaeda............. "

There is no amount of evidence which will convince some of these facts.

There have been quite a few of people coming out of this admin who have said the same.

Bush was not bright enough to be president and Cheney was not honest enough to be vice president.

In the end Bush is not honest either because he had to go along with the lies to cover his ass.

They have screwed this country big time.

There will be some who will years from now try to convince people that anything good that happens for the next thirthy years was because of Bush and there will be others who spend their time saying they didnt vote for Bush and were against the war.

They will never admitt it on this sight.
 

Psychoblues

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2003
Messages
2,701
Reaction score
142
Points
48
Location
North Missisippi
OK, I moved one as you suggested. When you get old and you can move one it's a great beginning for a new day!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Ok -you can't counter the truth

Just fess up and move one
Oh yes, I can counter anything you got, cowgirl. You haven't countered a single argument in this thread without your pitiful innuendo and obfuscations. That's all you got? Your daddy needs to spank your ass.
 

Truthmatters

Diamond Member
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
80,182
Reaction score
2,265
Points
1,283
He is a total waste of time and space phy.

He needs to go dust his ronny reagan doll collection(the cowboys his favorite)
and clean up the basement because grandma will come down to do laundry today and she hates it when the strawberry Yahoo bottles are allk over the place and he hasnt cleaned up.

She may make him move back to his parents garage.
 

Psychoblues

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2003
Messages
2,701
Reaction score
142
Points
48
Location
North Missisippi
Watch out, Tm!!!!!!!


He is a total waste of time and space phy.

He needs to go dust his ronny reagan doll collection(the cowboys his favorite)
and clean up the basement because grandma will come down to do laundry today and she hates it when the strawberry Yahoo bottles are allk over the place and he hasnt cleaned up.

She may make him move back to his parents garage.
I know all that and I didn't need your reminders. rsr has an agenda and you or I will not change it. Absolute and Verified Truth escapes his litlle dumb ass so why do you think anything you or I have to say would impress his self inflicted little ignorant mind? He is not alone.

If you have a reasonable solution please get back with me and I will gladly help you implement the implications.
 

Annie

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Messages
50,848
Reaction score
4,826
Points
1,790
seems this thread now belongs in taunting? From CIA to RSR in less than 2 pages. :rolleyes:
 

Psychoblues

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2003
Messages
2,701
Reaction score
142
Points
48
Location
North Missisippi
Still a credible argument. How would the "taunting area" improve the conversation? Or are there just too many inconsistensies, refusals and deletions of comment from the right wing side of this to suit you?
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top