www.foxnews.com
www.theguardian.com
Give me a source that isn't a dedicated anti-Trump publication please. I gave you a left leaning ABC source for mine.Deutsche Bank joins companies cutting ties with Donald Trump
Bank had propped up Trump Organization for years despite being sued by president but acted after Capitol attack
Deutsche Bank joins companies cutting ties with Donald Trump
In 2008, Trump sued the bank’s real estate division after he defaulted on a $40m repayment, used to fund the construction of the Trump International Hotel and Tower in Chicago. He accused Deutsche of co-causing the financial crisis and demanded $3bn in compensation.
Instead of dumping him as a client, Deutsche’s private wealth division stepped in and loaned him more money to pay off the existing debt.
Unless of course, the defense also asks for that summary judgement.
In other words, a total sham. The defendants didn't get to call any witnesses or present any evidence nor contest any of the evidence. This is the prog conception of justice.
What to Know About Trump’s Civil Fraud Trial (Published 2023)
The former president will testify Monday in a Manhattan courtroom as he tries to preserve the business empire that made his name.www.nytimes.com
The judge, Arthur F. Engoron, ruled even before the trial that Mr. Trump and the other defendants were liable for fraud, and that their annual financial statements were filled with examples of such misconduct.
That determination was based on the documentary evidence presented to the court, with sets of valuations that differed several fold. Based on the documentary evidence, the judge found the defendants guilty of fraud on motion for summary judgement.
This trial is about what the penalties will be. there was another trial, where Trumps' attorneys did not contest the evidence and asked for a summary judgement.
No there wasn't. They got a summary judgement, but Trump didn't ask for it.
The defense did not ask for it. A box was mistakenly not checked.
I think that's a myth that got debunked.
The infamous box was for a jury trial. The summary judgement in the first part was requested by both parties.
That's a big fucking lie.
He's bad because he cheated via lying, with his fraudulent, certified, financial condition schemes.....and he did so repeatedly, over decades.... While all other businesses had to follow the rules and regs and honesty on their certified financial condition forms when applying for their loans....So, somehow Trump is 'Orange Man Bad' because he had trouble getting loans but NOW he's 'Orange Man Bad' because he easily got a loan.
Your aa fucking dumbass. Every prog who claims Trump is corrupt voted for the criminal Biden.Trump is corrupt. I thought you would have gotten this by now. If he wasn't, he wouldn't be in the situations he's in. And this is just the low hanging fruit trial. But in some ways, it's bigger than the other three trials. This one goes to to the heart of Trump's four decades of bragging about "The Art of the Deal" and him being this successful, savvy businessman. When in fact, he lost all his daddy's money and then proceeded to scam and fraud his way through the next decades. The fine coming from this trial may bankrupt him and take away his family's right to do business in the state of NY. More than that, it will forever dispel the notion that Trump is anything but a grifting con artist.
Not a lie....
No one follows those rules, dumbass. No one lost a dime as a result of Trump's loans. That's the essential fact that you prog douchebag can't get around.
Big fucking lie
The fact that Trump IS THE ONLY PERSON to ever be charged with this tells you all you need to know. The willfully ignorant TDS suffering morons cant be taken seriously.
AFTER becoming POTUS and threatening the establishment. AFTER being in business for decades! Strange huh.
The civil law he is being charged with has nothing to do with some other entity losing money....
