Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And none of that changes the fact that Bush became the president AGAINST THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE which the CON$ are now hypocritically saying THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE is SUDDENLY so important with Obama when it was and still is totally meaningless with Bush.Bush was elected using the same system as the 42 Presidents before him.
Indeed.
Q: Which Presidents lost the popular vote but still became President?
A: There have been four cases of this happening thus far. In 1824, John Quincy Adams was awarded the presidency by the House of Representatives, despite not having won the popular vote or the electoral college vote (neither he nor opponent Andrew Jackson had an electoral college majority). In 1876, Rutherford B. Hayes became President despite losing the popular vote to Samuel J. Tilden, because Hayes had a one vote advantage in the electoral college. In 1888, in a much more clear-cut example of a candidate losing the popular vote but winning the electoral college vote, Benjamin Harrison was elected President over Grover Cleveland. Finally, in 2000, George W. Bush became president after losing the popular vote to Al Gore, but winning the electoral vote. For more information on how the electoral college works, see the U.S. Electoral College homepage, administered by the National Archives and Records Administration: U.S. Electoral College (NARA | Federal Register | U.S. Electoral College). U. S. Electoral College FAQs
CON$ love the ChiComs better than the USA. Why don't you CON$ move to China?China puts a Coal fired power plant online every other week. Obama is standing on the throats of the coal industry.
And none of that changes the fact that Bush became the president AGAINST THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE which the CON$ are now hypocritically saying THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE is SUDDENLY so important with Obama when it was and still is totally meaningless with Bush.Bush was elected using the same system as the 42 Presidents before him.
Indeed.
Q: Which Presidents lost the popular vote but still became President?
A: There have been four cases of this happening thus far. In 1824, John Quincy Adams was awarded the presidency by the House of Representatives, despite not having won the popular vote or the electoral college vote (neither he nor opponent Andrew Jackson had an electoral college majority). In 1876, Rutherford B. Hayes became President despite losing the popular vote to Samuel J. Tilden, because Hayes had a one vote advantage in the electoral college. In 1888, in a much more clear-cut example of a candidate losing the popular vote but winning the electoral college vote, Benjamin Harrison was elected President over Grover Cleveland. Finally, in 2000, George W. Bush became president after losing the popular vote to Al Gore, but winning the electoral vote. For more information on how the electoral college works, see the U.S. Electoral College homepage, administered by the National Archives and Records Administration: U.S. Electoral College (NARA | Federal Register | U.S. Electoral College). U. S. Electoral College FAQs
It has nothing to do with the Electoral College and everything to do with the sudden relevance of THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE to CON$.
Get it?
So THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE must Constitutionally override the Electoral College for the current CON$ervoFascist rationalization against Obama to be valid.And none of that changes the fact that Bush became the president AGAINST THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE which the CON$ are now hypocritically saying THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE is SUDDENLY so important with Obama when it was and still is totally meaningless with Bush.Indeed.
It has nothing to do with the Electoral College and everything to do with the sudden relevance of THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE to CON$.
Get it?
There's nothing to 'get', it's the Constitution.
So THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE must Constitutionally override the Electoral College for the current CON$ervoFascist rationalization against Obama to be valid.And none of that changes the fact that Bush became the president AGAINST THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE which the CON$ are now hypocritically saying THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE is SUDDENLY so important with Obama when it was and still is totally meaningless with Bush.
It has nothing to do with the Electoral College and everything to do with the sudden relevance of THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE to CON$.
Get it?
There's nothing to 'get', it's the Constitution.
Get it now???
Keep trying to change the subject away from the hypocrisy of CON$ accusing Obama of governing AGAINST THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE when they had no problem with bush governing AGAINST THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE. No one will ever notice.So THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE must Constitutionally override the Electoral College for the current CON$ervoFascist rationalization against Obama to be valid.There's nothing to 'get', it's the Constitution.
Get it now???
This wave towards Nov seems to have made you slightly unhinged. Take it easy, it will be ok.
Keep trying to change the subject away from the hypocrisy of CON$ accusing Obama of governing AGAINST THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE when they had no problem with bush governing AGAINST THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE. No one will ever notice.So THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE must Constitutionally override the Electoral College for the current CON$ervoFascist rationalization against Obama to be valid.
Get it now???
This wave towards Nov seems to have made you slightly unhinged. Take it easy, it will be ok.
No, I'm showing how every rationalization CON$ use against Dems is suddenly invalid when applied exactly the same way to the GOP.Keep trying to change the subject away from the hypocrisy of CON$ accusing Obama of governing AGAINST THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE when they had no problem with bush governing AGAINST THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE. No one will ever notice.This wave towards Nov seems to have made you slightly unhinged. Take it easy, it will be ok.
You are mixing apples and oranges and know it. Sorry, I give you too much credence to think you are actually this ignorant.
More than 50 million Americans today are collecting welfare from either the state or federal governments that have to borrow money to fund their defecit spending. It's an absolutely stunning and disgraceful statistic that explains why the U. S. is hurtling towards bankruptcy. This agitated rat who works for Rolling Stone tries to ridicule the Americans who want to restore sanity by voting out the wackjob liberal pols who got us into this mess. The sad bitter truth is that unless the Tea Party succeeds in ousting repulsives like Pelosi and Reed, and thwarting the moochers who vote them into office, America will be bled dry within a decade.
Keep trying to change the subject away from the hypocrisy of CON$ accusing Obama of governing AGAINST THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE when they had no problem with bush governing AGAINST THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE. No one will ever notice.So THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE must Constitutionally override the Electoral College for the current CON$ervoFascist rationalization against Obama to be valid.
Get it now???
This wave towards Nov seems to have made you slightly unhinged. Take it easy, it will be ok.
What "support" Bush had he got by lying his CON$ervoFascist ass off. Once the American people figured out what a lying POS he is the support for the Iraq war dropped to 38%.Keep trying to change the subject away from the hypocrisy of CON$ accusing Obama of governing AGAINST THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE when they had no problem with bush governing AGAINST THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE. No one will ever notice.This wave towards Nov seems to have made you slightly unhinged. Take it easy, it will be ok.
That is because Bush didn't govern against the will of the people. He had the support of the people when we went into both wars.
Obama has pushed for a Stimulus Bill, and a Health care bill that were Both wildly unpopular with the people, and he Sued Arizona when 70% of Americans were against it.
Your caparison is just plain wrong.
More than 50 million Americans today are collecting welfare from either the state or federal governments that have to borrow money to fund their defecit spending. It's an absolutely stunning and disgraceful statistic that explains why the U. S. is hurtling towards bankruptcy. This agitated rat who works for Rolling Stone tries to ridicule the Americans who want to restore sanity by voting out the wackjob liberal pols who got us into this mess. The sad bitter truth is that unless the Tea Party succeeds in ousting repulsives like Pelosi and Reed, and thwarting the moochers who vote them into office, America will be bled dry within a decade.
What's more "stunning and disgraceful" are Wall Street bankers who blow a $12 trillion hole in our economy due to reckless gambling in the derivatives market. You tea bagger fuckholes love government deregulation and the "free market" and you saw the ugly result in the fall of 2008.
I'm sorry...you don't have the foggiest clue what I'm talking about because you are an unsophisticated tea bagger idiot simpleton. My bad.
More than 50 million Americans today are collecting welfare from either the state or federal governments that have to borrow money to fund their defecit spending. It's an absolutely stunning and disgraceful statistic that explains why the U. S. is hurtling towards bankruptcy. This agitated rat who works for Rolling Stone tries to ridicule the Americans who want to restore sanity by voting out the wackjob liberal pols who got us into this mess. The sad bitter truth is that unless the Tea Party succeeds in ousting repulsives like Pelosi and Reed, and thwarting the moochers who vote them into office, America will be bled dry within a decade.
WASHINGTON Welfare rolls rose in 2009 for the first time in 15 years, but the 5% increase was dwarfed by spikes in the number of people receiving food stamps and unemployment insurance.
The cash-assistance program that once helped more than 14 million people served an average of 4 million in the 2009 fiscal year, up from 3.8 million in fiscal 2008. By comparison, there were more than 37 million people receiving food stamps in September, an increase of 18% from the year before. The number receiving unemployment benefits more than doubled, to about 9.1 million.
More than 50 million Americans today are collecting welfare from either the state or federal governments that have to borrow money to fund their defecit spending. It's an absolutely stunning and disgraceful statistic that explains why the U. S. is hurtling towards bankruptcy. This agitated rat who works for Rolling Stone tries to ridicule the Americans who want to restore sanity by voting out the wackjob liberal pols who got us into this mess. The sad bitter truth is that unless the Tea Party succeeds in ousting repulsives like Pelosi and Reed, and thwarting the moochers who vote them into office, America will be bled dry within a decade.
Just in case any of you are truly interested in the real facts about welfare?
WASHINGTON Welfare rolls rose in 2009 for the first time in 15 years, but the 5% increase was dwarfed by spikes in the number of people receiving food stamps and unemployment insurance.
The cash-assistance program that once helped more than 14 million people served an average of 4 million in the 2009 fiscal year, up from 3.8 million in fiscal 2008. By comparison, there were more than 37 million people receiving food stamps in September, an increase of 18% from the year before. The number receiving unemployment benefits more than doubled, to about 9.1 million.
source
To recap:
There's about 4 million people on welfare. (that's about 1.3% total population)
There's currently about 37 million people are on foodstamps. (that's about 12% of the population).
The class system in the US is a fabrication of parasitic progressives.
You think we have a free market?More than 50 million Americans today are collecting welfare from either the state or federal governments that have to borrow money to fund their defecit spending. It's an absolutely stunning and disgraceful statistic that explains why the U. S. is hurtling towards bankruptcy. This agitated rat who works for Rolling Stone tries to ridicule the Americans who want to restore sanity by voting out the wackjob liberal pols who got us into this mess. The sad bitter truth is that unless the Tea Party succeeds in ousting repulsives like Pelosi and Reed, and thwarting the moochers who vote them into office, America will be bled dry within a decade.
What's more "stunning and disgraceful" are Wall Street bankers who blow a $12 trillion hole in our economy due to reckless gambling in the derivatives market. You tea bagger fuckholes love government deregulation and the "free market" and you saw the ugly result in the fall of 2008.
I'm sorry...you don't have the foggiest clue what I'm talking about because you are an unsophisticated tea bagger idiot simpleton. My bad.
