My, my, my... quite the little accusatory rant... doesn't matter, though... Hillary Clinton will not win the 2016 general election.
What do you call it when an invitro fertilization clinic purges its freezers of fertilized zygotes? Would that be a mass murder?
Nobody is ignoring what some muslims are doing.
Let's review why this is ridiculous, wrong, and overall fails.
Correct.You mean as opposed to all the nice things conservatives say about their opponents?
It's all part of it, but we're not the ones screaming TOLERANCE!!!!! I WANT TOLERANCE!!!!!!!!
No you don't. You want a rightwingnut world where everyone who isn't like you gets discriminated against.
Calling bogits on their bigotry is not being a bigot
And not wanting theocratic extremists to impair others' rights is not intolerance.
Now let's see another thread where the religious loons call people who support reproductive choice "murderers"
Damn you lying lions are stupid. Biggest hacks on the planet.
Telling those hostile to privacy rights that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'
Telling those hostile to the equal protection rights of gay Americans that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'
Telling those hostile to the due process rights of immigrants that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'
Telling those hostile to public accommodations laws that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'
And telling those hostile to Establishment Clause jurisprudence that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'
Conservatives have the right to be bigots, to hate homosexuals, to fear immigrants, and to be in general ignorant and wrong – and liberals will always defend the right of conservatives to be intolerant and hateful.
But when conservatives seek to codify their bigotry, hate, and intolerance, in violation of the Constitution, liberals will oppose such efforts and defend the rights of those disadvantaged as they have for decades, where to oppose conservatives' efforts to codify their bigotry and hate is not to be 'intolerant' on the part of liberals.
So, in essence, you're saying Gay rights are fine so long as Gays learn their place and relent to being treated as second class citizens who are the worthy of the same level of services offered by public businesses. Why? Because the bigotry of some merchants is more viable and valuable rights than those you would grant other Americans because they do not fit into the narrow moral template you woul have imposed on the larger American society.
Typical left wing idiocy. Christians are not murdering raping and enslaving TODAY...and no Christians alive today did such things. Asshole!
Oh no not the tell that to the family ploy again!Correct.You mean as opposed to all the nice things conservatives say about their opponents?
It's all part of it, but we're not the ones screaming TOLERANCE!!!!! I WANT TOLERANCE!!!!!!!!
No you don't. You want a rightwingnut world where everyone who isn't like you gets discriminated against.
Calling bogits on their bigotry is not being a bigot
And not wanting theocratic extremists to impair others' rights is not intolerance.
Now let's see another thread where the religious loons call people who support reproductive choice "murderers"
Damn you lying lions are stupid. Biggest hacks on the planet.
Telling those hostile to privacy rights that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'
Telling those hostile to the equal protection rights of gay Americans that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'
Telling those hostile to the due process rights of immigrants that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'
Telling those hostile to public accommodations laws that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'
And telling those hostile to Establishment Clause jurisprudence that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'
Conservatives have the right to be bigots, to hate homosexuals, to fear immigrants, and to be in general ignorant and wrong – and liberals will always defend the right of conservatives to be intolerant and hateful.
But when conservatives seek to codify their bigotry, hate, and intolerance, in violation of the Constitution, liberals will oppose such efforts and defend the rights of those disadvantaged as they have for decades, where to oppose conservatives' efforts to codify their bigotry and hate is not to be 'intolerant' on the part of liberals.
go and tell that to the family of Kate Steinle, if you have the stones, which I doubt.
Oh no not the tell that to the family ploy again!Correct.You mean as opposed to all the nice things conservatives say about their opponents?
It's all part of it, but we're not the ones screaming TOLERANCE!!!!! I WANT TOLERANCE!!!!!!!!
No you don't. You want a rightwingnut world where everyone who isn't like you gets discriminated against.
Calling bogits on their bigotry is not being a bigot
And not wanting theocratic extremists to impair others' rights is not intolerance.
Now let's see another thread where the religious loons call people who support reproductive choice "murderers"
Damn you lying lions are stupid. Biggest hacks on the planet.
Telling those hostile to privacy rights that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'
Telling those hostile to the equal protection rights of gay Americans that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'
Telling those hostile to the due process rights of immigrants that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'
Telling those hostile to public accommodations laws that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'
And telling those hostile to Establishment Clause jurisprudence that as a fact of Constitutional law they're wrong is not to be 'intolerant.'
Conservatives have the right to be bigots, to hate homosexuals, to fear immigrants, and to be in general ignorant and wrong – and liberals will always defend the right of conservatives to be intolerant and hateful.
But when conservatives seek to codify their bigotry, hate, and intolerance, in violation of the Constitution, liberals will oppose such efforts and defend the rights of those disadvantaged as they have for decades, where to oppose conservatives' efforts to codify their bigotry and hate is not to be 'intolerant' on the part of liberals.
go and tell that to the family of Kate Steinle, if you have the stones, which I doubt.
