The Republican attempt to Make Slavery a Constitutional Right

[IM2]

Many "Republicans" in this forum are truly dishonest people.

The Corwin Amendment

The Corwin Amendment, also called the “Slavery Amendment,” was a constitutional amendment passed by Congress in 1861 but never ratified by the states that would have banned the federal government from abolishing the institution of slavery in the states where it existed at the time. Considering it a last-ditch effort to prevent the looming Civil War, supporters of the Corwin Amendment hoped it would prevent the southern states that had not already done so from seceding from the Union. Ironically, Abraham Lincoln did not oppose the measure.

The operative section of the Corwin Amendment states:

“No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.”

In referring to enslavement as “domestic institutions” and “persons held to labor or service,” rather than by the specific word “slavery,” the amendment reflects wording in the draft of the Constitution considered by delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787, which referred to enslaved people as “Person held to Service."

How the Corwin Amendment of 1861 Would Have Protected Enslavement

In 1861, Congress proposed a constitutional amendment to protect enslavement. What was the Corwin Amendment and did Lincoln actually endorse it?

www.thoughtco.com

Senator William H. Seward and Representative Thomas Corwin introduced the Corwin Amendment, both were republicans.

First you lead with Republicans are dishonest people, and right away I know you're projecting right.

But then you go onto validate my first instinct by blaming Republicans for slavery when you know very well it was YOUR party of preference that made slavery part of their daily lives. And that's ironic, because today PROGS make racism part of their daily lives.

The party of slavery only changed tactics. Tell blacks again how they're victims and should be pitied. Show them how families aren't important because welfare is an adequate replacement aimed to keep blacks in their place. Give blacks another reason to destroy their own communities. That's your Demonicrats in a nutshell.

Republicans introduced this amendment and it would have made slavery a constitutional right. Just face the truth. Your last paragraph is a joke since the majority of every form of welfare has gone to whites.

No, you damn liar. They put forth a re-worded amendment.

BS.

My question to you is.. what do we do with black people? You are letting democrats destroy your community, than you vote for them. What do we do with suck a low iq base?

They’re human beings and legal citizens of the United States. You don’t “ do anything” with them. It’s their choice. They deserve the same rights and opportunities as everyone else.

But they’re not voting for opportunity they’re voting for slavery why not just give it to them here’s money work here’s a house work here is healthcare work. And he’s a whip if you don’t wanna work.. Give them what they want

We were republicans for more than 100 years. We got jim crow. Not opportunity. Now shut your white ass up.

 

[IM2]

Many "Republicans" in this forum are truly dishonest people.

The Corwin Amendment

The Corwin Amendment, also called the “Slavery Amendment,” was a constitutional amendment passed by Congress in 1861 but never ratified by the states that would have banned the federal government from abolishing the institution of slavery in the states where it existed at the time. Considering it a last-ditch effort to prevent the looming Civil War, supporters of the Corwin Amendment hoped it would prevent the southern states that had not already done so from seceding from the Union. Ironically, Abraham Lincoln did not oppose the measure.

The operative section of the Corwin Amendment states:

“No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.”

In referring to enslavement as “domestic institutions” and “persons held to labor or service,” rather than by the specific word “slavery,” the amendment reflects wording in the draft of the Constitution considered by delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787, which referred to enslaved people as “Person held to Service."

How the Corwin Amendment of 1861 Would Have Protected Enslavement

In 1861, Congress proposed a constitutional amendment to protect enslavement. What was the Corwin Amendment and did Lincoln actually endorse it?

www.thoughtco.com

Senator William H. Seward and Representative Thomas Corwin introduced the Corwin Amendment, both were republicans.

First you lead with Republicans are dishonest people, and right away I know you're projecting right.

But then you go onto validate my first instinct by blaming Republicans for slavery when you know very well it was YOUR party of preference that made slavery part of their daily lives. And that's ironic, because today PROGS make racism part of their daily lives.

The party of slavery only changed tactics. Tell blacks again how they're victims and should be pitied. Show them how families aren't important because welfare is an adequate replacement aimed to keep blacks in their place. Give blacks another reason to destroy their own communities. That's your Demonicrats in a nutshell.

Republicans introduced this amendment and it would have made slavery a constitutional right. Just face the truth. Your last paragraph is a joke since the majority of every form of welfare has gone to whites.

No, you damn liar. They put forth a re-worded amendment.

BS.

My question to you is.. what do we do with black people? You are letting democrats destroy your community, than you vote for them. What do we do with suck a low iq base?

The low IQ types repeat the bullshit you did in this post.

Thats not a argument

It's a description of what you are.

 

[Redcurtain]

Many "Republicans" in this forum are truly dishonest people.

The Corwin Amendment

The Corwin Amendment, also called the “Slavery Amendment,” was a constitutional amendment passed by Congress in 1861 but never ratified by the states that would have banned the federal government from abolishing the institution of slavery in the states where it existed at the time. Considering it a last-ditch effort to prevent the looming Civil War, supporters of the Corwin Amendment hoped it would prevent the southern states that had not already done so from seceding from the Union. Ironically, Abraham Lincoln did not oppose the measure.

The operative section of the Corwin Amendment states:

“No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.”

In referring to enslavement as “domestic institutions” and “persons held to labor or service,” rather than by the specific word “slavery,” the amendment reflects wording in the draft of the Constitution considered by delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787, which referred to enslaved people as “Person held to Service."

How the Corwin Amendment of 1861 Would Have Protected Enslavement

In 1861, Congress proposed a constitutional amendment to protect enslavement. What was the Corwin Amendment and did Lincoln actually endorse it?

www.thoughtco.com

Senator William H. Seward and Representative Thomas Corwin introduced the Corwin Amendment, both were republicans.

First you lead with Republicans are dishonest people, and right away I know you're projecting right.

But then you go onto validate my first instinct by blaming Republicans for slavery when you know very well it was YOUR party of preference that made slavery part of their daily lives. And that's ironic, because today PROGS make racism part of their daily lives.

The party of slavery only changed tactics. Tell blacks again how they're victims and should be pitied. Show them how families aren't important because welfare is an adequate replacement aimed to keep blacks in their place. Give blacks another reason to destroy their own communities. That's your Demonicrats in a nutshell.

Republicans introduced this amendment and it would have made slavery a constitutional right. Just face the truth. Your last paragraph is a joke since the majority of every form of welfare has gone to whites.

No, you damn liar. They put forth a re-worded amendment.

BS.

My question to you is.. what do we do with black people? You are letting democrats destroy your community, than you vote for them. What do we do with suck a low iq base?

They’re human beings and legal citizens of the United States. You don’t “ do anything” with them. It’s their choice. They deserve the same rights and opportunities as everyone else.

But they’re not voting for opportunity they’re voting for slavery why not just give it to them here’s money work here’s a house work here is healthcare work. And he’s a whip if you don’t wanna work.. Give them what they want

We were republicans for more than 100 years. We got jim crow. Not opportunity. Now shut your white ass up.

Jim Crow was Democrat’s implementing the laws.. not republicans.. why do you deny facts? Why do you defend these horrible people? What are you getting out of this? Pandering!? Does pandering really make you feel good?

 

[Redcurtain]

Many "Republicans" in this forum are truly dishonest people.

The Corwin Amendment

The Corwin Amendment, also called the “Slavery Amendment,” was a constitutional amendment passed by Congress in 1861 but never ratified by the states that would have banned the federal government from abolishing the institution of slavery in the states where it existed at the time. Considering it a last-ditch effort to prevent the looming Civil War, supporters of the Corwin Amendment hoped it would prevent the southern states that had not already done so from seceding from the Union. Ironically, Abraham Lincoln did not oppose the measure.

The operative section of the Corwin Amendment states:

“No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.”

In referring to enslavement as “domestic institutions” and “persons held to labor or service,” rather than by the specific word “slavery,” the amendment reflects wording in the draft of the Constitution considered by delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787, which referred to enslaved people as “Person held to Service."

How the Corwin Amendment of 1861 Would Have Protected Enslavement

In 1861, Congress proposed a constitutional amendment to protect enslavement. What was the Corwin Amendment and did Lincoln actually endorse it?

www.thoughtco.com

Senator William H. Seward and Representative Thomas Corwin introduced the Corwin Amendment, both were republicans.

First you lead with Republicans are dishonest people, and right away I know you're projecting right.

But then you go onto validate my first instinct by blaming Republicans for slavery when you know very well it was YOUR party of preference that made slavery part of their daily lives. And that's ironic, because today PROGS make racism part of their daily lives.

The party of slavery only changed tactics. Tell blacks again how they're victims and should be pitied. Show them how families aren't important because welfare is an adequate replacement aimed to keep blacks in their place. Give blacks another reason to destroy their own communities. That's your Demonicrats in a nutshell.

Republicans introduced this amendment and it would have made slavery a constitutional right. Just face the truth. Your last paragraph is a joke since the majority of every form of welfare has gone to whites.

No, you damn liar. They put forth a re-worded amendment.

BS.

My question to you is.. what do we do with black people? You are letting democrats destroy your community, than you vote for them. What do we do with suck a low iq base?

The low IQ types repeat the bullshit you did in this post.

Thats not a argument

It's a description of what you are.

You are protecting the oppressors . All facts all current events all history shows Democrats are the oppressors

 

[WTH_Progs?]

The party of slavery only changed tactics. I'll bet they were better people by many measures, during slavery. You can bet they surely had more bronze and were more honest than snowflakes today.

 

[hadit]

You said there are conservative democrats

Never said any such thing, never. You’ve yet to post it. While
you're the one using that label I’m just pulling your chain and you’re biting.

I gave you your own quote and you chose to pretend it didn't happen. Not my problem.

 

[mikegriffith1]

Many "Republicans" in this forum are truly dishonest people.

The Corwin Amendment

The Corwin Amendment, also called the “Slavery Amendment,” was a constitutional amendment passed by Congress in 1861 but never ratified by the states that would have banned the federal government from abolishing the institution of slavery in the states where it existed at the time. Considering it a last-ditch effort to prevent the looming Civil War, supporters of the Corwin Amendment hoped it would prevent the southern states that had not already done so from seceding from the Union. Ironically, Abraham Lincoln did not oppose the measure.

The operative section of the Corwin Amendment states:

“No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.” Edited

In referring to enslavement as “domestic institutions” and “persons held to labor or service,” rather than by the specific word “slavery,” the amendment reflects wording in the draft of the Constitution considered by delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787, which referred to enslaved people as “Person held to Service."

How the Corwin Amendment of 1861 Would Have Protected Enslavement

In 1861, Congress proposed a constitutional amendment to protect enslavement. What was the Corwin Amendment and did Lincoln actually endorse it?

www.thoughtco.com

Senator William H. Seward and Representative Thomas Corwin introduced the Corwin Amendment, both were republicans. Edited, red is reserved for moderator's action on the open board.

This OP might just be the dumbest OP ever posted on this board. Obviously, the author is a high school or college student who just began to study American history and who knows nothing about the context of the Corwin Amendment.

First of all, most of the Senators and Representatives who voted FOR the Corwin Amendment were DEMOCRATS, while most of those who voted AGAINST the amendment were REPUBLICANS. A DEMOCRAT was president at the time, James Buchanan, and he SUPPORTED the amendment. In fact, Buchanan signed the amendment, even though his signature was not required.

Furthermore, the Corwin Amendment would NOT have prevented a slave state from abolishing slavery because the amendment only applied to the federal government.

The bill was crafted by republicans, that's my point. Lincoln supported the Amendment also. But this is not the only time republicans supported racism. The fact remains and history proves it, that republicans were complicit in past racism and today it is the party of racists.

It was crafted by a few Republicans who were trying to appease the Deep South's unfounded concerns over slavery's continued existence, and the amendment would not have prevented any slave state from abolishing slavery; it merely would have prevented the federal government from doing so, and there was no credible chance that the federal government would have attempted any such thing for decades.

And I repeat the fact that most of the Senators and Reps who voted against the amendment were Republicans, and that most of those voted for it were Democrats.

Yes, Lincoln supported the amendment as a compromise measure to keep the Upper South from leaving the Union, but he refused to budge on the issue of allowing slavery to expand into the western territories, whereas most Democrats were pushing for this.

The amendment never would have even been proposed if the South had been clamoring for the extension of slavery into the territories and for the repeal of Northern personal liberty laws that forbade the surrender of runaway slaves to slave catchers.

CORRECTON: The amendment never would have even been proposed if the South had NOT been clamoring for the extension of slavery into the territories and for the repeal of Northern personal liberty laws that forbade the surrender of runaway slaves to slave catchers.

 

[Dagosa]

You said there are conservative democrats

Never said any such thing, never. You’ve yet to post it. While
you're the one using that label I’m just pulling your chain and you’re biting.

I gave you your own quote and you chose to pretend it didn't happen. Not my problem.

And my quote never had me saying any such thing.

 

[hadit]

You said there are conservative democrats

Never said any such thing, never. You’ve yet to post it. While
you're the one using that label I’m just pulling your chain and you’re biting.

I gave you your own quote and you chose to pretend it didn't happen. Not my problem.

And my quote never had me saying any such thing.

I said there used to be fairly conservative democrats, yes or no?
You said there still are, yes or no?

Be honest for a change.

 

[Dagosa]

You said there are conservative democrats

Never said any such thing, never. You’ve yet to post it. While
you're the one using that label I’m just pulling your chain and you’re biting.

I gave you your own quote and you chose to pretend it didn't happen. Not my problem.

And my quote never had me saying any such thing.

I said there used to be fairly conservative democrats, yes or no?
You said there still are, yes or no?

Be honest for a change.

You’re funny. You have a mental block that won’t allow you to see, that republicans are the radical far right. They aren’t mainstream. They aren’t even conservative. When was the last time you balanced a fking budget or even tried to reduce a deficit, when was the last time trump actually practiced law and order. When was the last time your party respected the constitution ? Not lately.

You’re trying to make a difference between your Labels when there is none. You don’t get it. Name one major difference between a Biden and AOC.....name one. Then I’ll remind you what what I said that you can’t hear. What you want to call conservative ( Biden) and those who you want to call progressive/liberal just doesn’t exist. I did explained all that. Be honest. You really want to vote for Biden because you think he’s conservative.

Its Obama that defended our country and borders more than trump. You want to call it conservative to do that ? Then vote for democrats.

That’s laughable. I’ll repeat; Today’s Republicans are radical. AOC suports ideas that are mainstream and are called conservative by the average American and the rest of the world.

it’s YOU who are a far right radical.....

 

[Flash]

Democrats want us all to be slaves to the state.

 

[Dagosa]

Democrats want us all to be slaves to the state.

Republicans want us to be slaves to corporate greed.

 

[Flash]

Democrats want us all to be slaves to the state.

Republicans want us to be slaves to corporate greed.

You are confused Moon Bat.

Corporations provide jobs, goods and services, tax revenue and community services. In fact the computer that you are using to type your ignorance and the internet that you are using to spread your ignorance are provided by corporations. So is the food you're eating and almost everything else that you have.

Socialist government like we see from the filthy Democrats only provides bare existence welfare, economic destruction, slavery and oppression.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Many "Republicans" in this forum are truly dishonest people.

The Corwin Amendment

The Corwin Amendment, also called the “Slavery Amendment,” was a constitutional amendment passed by Congress in 1861 but never ratified by the states that would have banned the federal government from abolishing the institution of slavery in the states where it existed at the time. Considering it a last-ditch effort to prevent the looming Civil War, supporters of the Corwin Amendment hoped it would prevent the southern states that had not already done so from seceding from the Union. Ironically, Abraham Lincoln did not oppose the measure.

The operative section of the Corwin Amendment states:

“No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.” Edited

In referring to enslavement as “domestic institutions” and “persons held to labor or service,” rather than by the specific word “slavery,” the amendment reflects wording in the draft of the Constitution considered by delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787, which referred to enslaved people as “Person held to Service."

How the Corwin Amendment of 1861 Would Have Protected Enslavement

In 1861, Congress proposed a constitutional amendment to protect enslavement. What was the Corwin Amendment and did Lincoln actually endorse it?

www.thoughtco.com

Senator William H. Seward and Representative Thomas Corwin introduced the Corwin Amendment, both were republicans. Edited, red is reserved for moderator's action on the open board.

a lying sack of shit calling others dishonest lol

 

[mikegriffith1]

You said there are conservative democrats

Never said any such thing, never. You’ve yet to post it. While
you're the one using that label I’m just pulling your chain and you’re biting.

I gave you your own quote and you chose to pretend it didn't happen. Not my problem.

And my quote never had me saying any such thing.

I said there used to be fairly conservative democrats, yes or no?
You said there still are, yes or no?

Be honest for a change.

You’re funny. You have a mental block that won’t allow you to see, that republicans are the radical far right. They aren’t mainstream. They aren’t even conservative. When was the last time you balanced a fking budget or even tried to reduce a deficit, when was the last time trump actually practiced law and order. When was the last time your party respected the constitution ? Not lately.

You’re trying to make a difference between your Labels when there is none. You don’t get it. Name one major difference between a Biden and AOC.....name one. Then I’ll remind you what what I said that you can’t hear. What you want to call conservative ( Biden) and those who you want to call progressive/liberal just doesn’t exist. I did explained all that. Be honest. You really want to vote for Biden because you think he’s conservative.

Its Obama that defended our country and borders more than trump. You want to call it conservative to do that ? Then vote for democrats.

That’s laughable. I’ll repeat; Today’s Republicans are radical. AOC suports ideas that are mainstream and are called conservative by the average American and the rest of the world.

it’s YOU who are a far right radical.....

HUH? Just HUH? AOC is "mainstream"?! Is that why Biden and Harris have loudly denied that they support her Green New Deal?

Trump has been all about law and order, while a bunch of Democratic mayors and governors have stood back and let rioters destroy and loot in their cities. Heck, Kamala Harris has been raising money to get the rioters and other violent thugs released from jail.

 

[hadit]

You said there are conservative democrats

Never said any such thing, never. You’ve yet to post it. While
you're the one using that label I’m just pulling your chain and you’re biting.

I gave you your own quote and you chose to pretend it didn't happen. Not my problem.

And my quote never had me saying any such thing.

I said there used to be fairly conservative democrats, yes or no?
You said there still are, yes or no?

Be honest for a change.

You’re funny. You have a mental block that won’t allow you to see, that republicans are the radical far right. They aren’t mainstream. They aren’t even conservative. When was the last time you balanced a fking budget or even tried to reduce a deficit, when was the last time trump actually practiced law and order. When was the last time your party respected the constitution ? Not lately.

You’re trying to make a difference between your Labels when there is none. You don’t get it. Name one major difference between a Biden and AOC.....name one. Then I’ll remind you what what I said that you can’t hear. What you want to call conservative ( Biden) and those who you want to call progressive/liberal just doesn’t exist. I did explained all that. Be honest. You really want to vote for Biden because you think he’s conservative.

Its Obama that defended our country and borders more than trump. You want to call it conservative to do that ? Then vote for democrats.

That’s laughable. I’ll repeat; Today’s Republicans are radical. AOC suports ideas that are mainstream and are called conservative by the average American and the rest of the world.

it’s YOU who are a far right radical.....

So you won't even be honest enough to admit you said it and you've been lying about it all along. That's really sad, and your deflection gets you nothing. Just name those conservative democrats that you said existed. That's all you have to do.

 

[hadit]

Many "Republicans" in this forum are truly dishonest people.

The Corwin Amendment

The Corwin Amendment, also called the “Slavery Amendment,” was a constitutional amendment passed by Congress in 1861 but never ratified by the states that would have banned the federal government from abolishing the institution of slavery in the states where it existed at the time. Considering it a last-ditch effort to prevent the looming Civil War, supporters of the Corwin Amendment hoped it would prevent the southern states that had not already done so from seceding from the Union. Ironically, Abraham Lincoln did not oppose the measure.

The operative section of the Corwin Amendment states:

“No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.”

In referring to enslavement as “domestic institutions” and “persons held to labor or service,” rather than by the specific word “slavery,” the amendment reflects wording in the draft of the Constitution considered by delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787, which referred to enslaved people as “Person held to Service."

How the Corwin Amendment of 1861 Would Have Protected Enslavement

In 1861, Congress proposed a constitutional amendment to protect enslavement. What was the Corwin Amendment and did Lincoln actually endorse it?

www.thoughtco.com

Senator William H. Seward and Representative Thomas Corwin introduced the Corwin Amendment, both were republicans.

First you lead with Republicans are dishonest people, and right away I know you're projecting right.

But then you go onto validate my first instinct by blaming Republicans for slavery when you know very well it was YOUR party of preference that made slavery part of their daily lives. And that's ironic, because today PROGS make racism part of their daily lives.

The party of slavery only changed tactics. Tell blacks again how they're victims and should be pitied. Show them how families aren't important because welfare is an adequate replacement aimed to keep blacks in their place. Give blacks another reason to destroy their own communities. That's your Demonicrats in a nutshell.

Republicans introduced this amendment and it would have made slavery a constitutional right. Just face the truth. Your last paragraph is a joke since the majority of every form of welfare has gone to whites.

No, you damn liar. They put forth a re-worded amendment.

BS.

My question to you is.. what do we do with black people? You are letting democrats destroy your community, than you vote for them. What do we do with suck a low iq base?

They’re human beings and legal citizens of the United States. You don’t “ do anything” with them. It’s their choice. They deserve the same rights and opportunities as everyone else.

But they’re not voting for opportunity they’re voting for slavery why not just give it to them here’s money work here’s a house work here is healthcare work. And he’s a whip if you don’t wanna work.. Give them what they want

We were republicans for more than 100 years. We got jim crow. Not opportunity. Now shut your white ass up.

This is interesting. You start a thread practically demanding that racists show up and comment, then when they do and you don't like what they say, you demand that they shut up. Why is that? You do know, don't you, that you could short circuit the whole process and just not post stuff deliberately designed to get them riled up, right?

Obvious troll is obvious.

 

[Dagosa]

You said there are conservative democrats

Never said any such thing, never. You’ve yet to post it. While
you're the one using that label I’m just pulling your chain and you’re biting.

I gave you your own quote and you chose to pretend it didn't happen. Not my problem.

And my quote never had me saying any such thing.

I said there used to be fairly conservative democrats, yes or no?
You said there still are, yes or no?

Be honest for a change.

You’re funny. You have a mental block that won’t allow you to see, that republicans are the radical far right. They aren’t mainstream. They aren’t even conservative. When was the last time you balanced a fking budget or even tried to reduce a deficit, when was the last time trump actually practiced law and order. When was the last time your party respected the constitution ? Not lately.

You’re trying to make a difference between your Labels when there is none. You don’t get it. Name one major difference between a Biden and AOC.....name one. Then I’ll remind you what what I said that you can’t hear. What you want to call conservative ( Biden) and those who you want to call progressive/liberal just doesn’t exist. I did explained all that. Be honest. You really want to vote for Biden because you think he’s conservative.

Its Obama that defended our country and borders more than trump. You want to call it conservative to do that ? Then vote for democrats.

That’s laughable. I’ll repeat; Today’s Republicans are radical. AOC suports ideas that are mainstream and are called conservative by the average American and the rest of the world.

it’s YOU who are a far right radical.....

HUH? Just HUH? AOC is "mainstream"?! Is that why Biden and Harris have loudly denied that they support her Green New Deal?

Trump has been all about law and order, while a bunch of Democratic mayors and governors have stood back and let rioters destroy and loot in their cities. Heck, Kamala Harris has been raising money to get the rioters and other violent thugs released from jail.

AOC to serve on Biden’s climate panel as well as join Berne on his policy panel. Does that sound they disagree.

Green New Deal Champion AOC Will Serve on Biden Climate Panel - EcoWatch

When Joe Biden effectively clinched the Democratic nomination in April, a concern for the climate movement was that his plan for tackling the issue was not ambitious enough. Now, Green New Deal champion Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) has agreed to serve on a panel helping him...

www.ecowatch.com

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/10/01/fact-check-post-joe-biden-green-new-deal-missing-

the green new deal ? Biden says one thing, his site says another.
The truth is, it’s both. Healthcare is addressed in the green new deal. Biden wants to address it through the ACA. He does want a new vehicle. The end game is the same...Medicare for anyone who wants it.
the other one, is a jobs bill that Biden wants to address through a deferent vehicle.
look it up. All differences without a difference.

context/5887079002/#:~:text=The%20plan%20differs%20from%20the%20Green%20New%20Deal,in%20fight%20with%20Trump%20over%20Rust%20Belt%20moderates

laughable. Both Bernie and AOC will be policy movers.

 

[hadit]

You said there are conservative democrats

Never said any such thing, never. You’ve yet to post it. While
you're the one using that label I’m just pulling your chain and you’re biting.

I gave you your own quote and you chose to pretend it didn't happen. Not my problem.

And my quote never had me saying any such thing.

I said there used to be fairly conservative democrats, yes or no?
You said there still are, yes or no?

Be honest for a change.

You’re funny. You have a mental block that won’t allow you to see, that republicans are the radical far right. They aren’t mainstream. They aren’t even conservative. When was the last time you balanced a fking budget or even tried to reduce a deficit, when was the last time trump actually practiced law and order. When was the last time your party respected the constitution ? Not lately.

You’re trying to make a difference between your Labels when there is none. You don’t get it. Name one major difference between a Biden and AOC.....name one. Then I’ll remind you what what I said that you can’t hear. What you want to call conservative ( Biden) and those who you want to call progressive/liberal just doesn’t exist. I did explained all that. Be honest. You really want to vote for Biden because you think he’s conservative.

Its Obama that defended our country and borders more than trump. You want to call it conservative to do that ? Then vote for democrats.

That’s laughable. I’ll repeat; Today’s Republicans are radical. AOC suports ideas that are mainstream and are called conservative by the average American and the rest of the world.

it’s YOU who are a far right radical.....

HUH? Just HUH? AOC is "mainstream"?! Is that why Biden and Harris have loudly denied that they support her Green New Deal?

Trump has been all about law and order, while a bunch of Democratic mayors and governors have stood back and let rioters destroy and loot in their cities. Heck, Kamala Harris has been raising money to get the rioters and other violent thugs released from jail.

AOC to serve on Biden’s climate panel as well as join Berne on his policy panel. Does that sound they disagree.

Green New Deal Champion AOC Will Serve on Biden Climate Panel - EcoWatch

When Joe Biden effectively clinched the Democratic nomination in April, a concern for the climate movement was that his plan for tackling the issue was not ambitious enough. Now, Green New Deal champion Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) has agreed to serve on a panel helping him...

www.ecowatch.com

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/10/01/fact-check-post-joe-biden-green-new-deal-missing-

the green new deal ? Biden says one thing, his site says another.
The truth is, it’s both. Healthcare is addressed in the green new deal. Biden wants to address it through the ACA. He does want a new vehicle. The end game is the same...Medicare for anyone who wants it.
the other one, is a jobs bill that Biden wants to address through a deferent vehicle.
look it up. All differences without a difference.

context/5887079002/#:~:text=The%20plan%20differs%20from%20the%20Green%20New%20Deal,in%20fight%20with%20Trump%20over%20Rust%20Belt%20moderates

laughable. Both Bernie and AOC will be policy movers.

Name some conservative democrats. You said they exist, then lied about saying it.

 

[Dagosa]

You said there are conservative democrats

Never said any such thing, never. You’ve yet to post it. While
you're the one using that label I’m just pulling your chain and you’re biting.

I gave you your own quote and you chose to pretend it didn't happen. Not my problem.

And my quote never had me saying any such thing.

I said there used to be fairly conservative democrats, yes or no?
You said there still are, yes or no?

Be honest for a change.

You’re funny. You have a mental block that won’t allow you to see, that republicans are the radical far right. They aren’t mainstream. They aren’t even conservative. When was the last time you balanced a fking budget or even tried to reduce a deficit, when was the last time trump actually practiced law and order. When was the last time your party respected the constitution ? Not lately.

You’re trying to make a difference between your Labels when there is none. You don’t get it. Name one major difference between a Biden and AOC.....name one. Then I’ll remind you what what I said that you can’t hear. What you want to call conservative ( Biden) and those who you want to call progressive/liberal just doesn’t exist. I did explained all that. Be honest. You really want to vote for Biden because you think he’s conservative.

Its Obama that defended our country and borders more than trump. You want to call it conservative to do that ? Then vote for democrats.

That’s laughable. I’ll repeat; Today’s Republicans are radical. AOC suports ideas that are mainstream and are called conservative by the average American and the rest of the world.

it’s YOU who are a far right radical.....

HUH? Just HUH? AOC is "mainstream"?! Is that why Biden and Harris have loudly denied that they support her Green New Deal?

Trump has been all about law and order, while a bunch of Democratic mayors and governors have stood back and let rioters destroy and loot in their cities. Heck, Kamala Harris has been raising money to get the rioters and other violent thugs released from jail.

AOC to serve on Biden’s climate panel as well as join Berne on his policy panel. Does that sound they disagree.

Green New Deal Champion AOC Will Serve on Biden Climate Panel - EcoWatch

When Joe Biden effectively clinched the Democratic nomination in April, a concern for the climate movement was that his plan for tackling the issue was not ambitious enough. Now, Green New Deal champion Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) has agreed to serve on a panel helping him...

www.ecowatch.com

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/10/01/fact-check-post-joe-biden-green-new-deal-missing-

the green new deal ? Biden says one thing, his site says another.
The truth is, it’s both. Healthcare is addressed in the green new deal. Biden wants to address it through the ACA. He does want a new vehicle. The end game is the same...Medicare for anyone who wants it.
the other one, is a jobs bill that Biden wants to address through a deferent vehicle.
look it up. All differences without a difference.

context/5887079002/#:~:text=The%20plan%20differs%20from%20the%20Green%20New%20Deal,in%20fight%20with%20Trump%20over%20Rust%20Belt%20moderates

laughable. Both Bernie and AOC will be policy movers.

Name some conservative democrats. You said they exist, then lied about saying it.

Some one is listening with their arse.
Every democrat is more conservative economically then Trump republicans. Medicare for all is a huge cheaper over the years then private insurance. In modern times Every Dem administration has driven down the deficits over the years in office vs republicans. Tea party people were a joke. Their candidates voted to raise the yearly deficits.

climate change investments now are cheaper then funding repair after storms.

We prefer a military that uses our allies so they become our buffer between us and out enemies. It’s cheaper.

We abide the constitution... we have fewer crooks in office of the president by 117 to 1. Is that not being a crook a conservative value ?
obama deported nearly twice the illegal criminals then you guys.
His border security was more effective. Trump steals from the gov. Is that a conservative value ? Hope not.
anything else ?