Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No, you support someone who is black that will bow down and kiss your ass to be accepted by you. See I am not that black man.
Is that like CTR.STFU ******
You have proven by your posts that you are a POS racist.Your response is ridiculous.
You fucken racist are constantly trying to call Conservatives racist when you have zero proof.
When did I call him a racist?How can you possibly cry racism when you call Clarence Thomas a racist?
He's a Black man fer fuckes sake!!!!
Come on Fuck boy, come up with something original.How about you STFU spook!?
You have proven by your posts that you are a POS racist.
When did I call him a racist?
Come on Fuck boy, come up with something original.
Not as disgraceful as the demscum we're at kavanaughs confirmation hearings with their circus of lies.“Tennessee Republican Sen. Marsha Blackburn's final opening remarks Monday revealed the scope of what Jackson's up against. Blackburn's inaccurate and blatantly racist attempts to patronize Jackson while twisting her sterling record into a scare narrative of GOP bogeymen -- critical race theory, the 1619 Project and controversies over transgender athletes and women's sports -- were staggering yet unsurprising.”
The racist, sexist mudslinging at Ketanji Brown Jackson is disgraceful | CNN
Despite disgraceful efforts by Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee to discredit, humiliate and smear Ketanji Brown Jackson with racist and sexist questions and comments, it is well worth remembering why her story matters to so many people, argues historian Peniel E. Joseph.edition.cnn.com
Unsurprising, indeed.
NopeHaha, what a shameless lie.
Demonrats are scum.You’re right. It’s unsurprising that the republicans actually looked into her record as a judge and are grilling her about that. Democrats, on the other hand, try to find something on Brett Kavanaugh from his high school year book. Democrats accuse Brett Kavanaugh of running a gang rapist ring. Democrats ask Amy Coney Barrett if she ever raped anyone.
That bitch has no business becoming a member of the SCOTUS.
Hyper-partisan screwballs do not get to nullify the verdict of the majority of U.S. Senators that reflects the public's approval.That bitch has no business becoming a member of the SCOTUS.
www.nationalreview.com
then stop lying.Haha, what a shameless lie.
Hyper-partisan screwballs do not get to nullify the verdict of the majority of U.S. Senators that reflects the public's approval.
The raving dung flingers calculated that “pedophile sympathizer!” would be a suitably-hyperbolic self-promotion meme for the Supreme Court audition of Judge Brown Jackson, but they only succeeded in befouling themselves from the perspective of reasonable conservatives well-acquainted with the matter.
I urge anyone interested in the reality to read in its entirety the article by this conservative National Review writer, tough-on crime Andrew McCarthy, from which the following excerpts derive. The hyper-partisan pissants, contemptuous of the truth, will be passionately averse to self-enlightenment. of course.
I want to discuss the claim by Senator Josh Hawley (R., Mo.) that Judge Jackson is appallingly soft on child-pornography offenders. The allegation appears meritless to the point of demagoguery.
Senator Hawley is a bright guy, but if he ever handled a child-pornography case in the brief time he spent as a practicing lawyer before he sought public office, that is not apparent. Nor does it appear, from the admittedly sparse research that I’ve done, that child pornography was a priority of the Missouri Attorney General’s Office during Hawley’s two-year stint as AGContrary to Hawley’s suggestion, however, she appears to have followed the guidelines, at the low end of the sentencing range, as most judges do.) But other than the fact that Congress wanted to look as though it was being tough on porn, there’s no good reason for the mandatory minimum in question — and it’s unjust in many instances…There are strong philosophical arguments for opposing Judge Jackson’s nomination to the Supreme Court. And she may in fact be too solicitous of criminals. But the implication that she has a soft spot for “sex offenders” who “prey on children” because she argued against a severe mandatory-minimum prison sentence for the receipt and distribution of pornographic images is aSMEAR.
Senator Hawley’s Disingenuous Attack against Judge Jackson’s Record on Child Pornography | National Review
He distorts her record on ‘sex offenders.’
“Tennessee Republican Sen. Marsha Blackburn's final opening remarks Monday revealed the scope of what Jackson's up against. Blackburn's inaccurate and blatantly racist attempts to patronize Jackson while twisting her sterling record into a scare narrative of GOP bogeymen -- critical race theory, the 1619 Project and controversies over transgender athletes and women's sports -- were staggering yet unsurprising.”
The racist, sexist mudslinging at Ketanji Brown Jackson is disgraceful | CNN
Despite disgraceful efforts by Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee to discredit, humiliate and smear Ketanji Brown Jackson with racist and sexist questions and comments, it is well worth remembering why her story matters to so many people, argues historian Peniel E. Joseph.
Unsurprising, indeed.
No proof whatsoever of the accusation.Funny, I don't recall Coney Barrett and Garland having the problems Kavanaugh did.
Maybe they shouldn't have nominated a rapey moron.
Yes, both in regard to anatomy and to personal gender identity.So do you know what a woman is?
Yes, both in regard to anatomy and to personal gender identity.
Do you?
Unlike democrats Republicans didn't make shit up about her“Tennessee Republican Sen. Marsha Blackburn's final opening remarks Monday revealed the scope of what Jackson's up against. Blackburn's inaccurate and blatantly racist attempts to patronize Jackson while twisting her sterling record into a scare narrative of GOP bogeymen -- critical race theory, the 1619 Project and controversies over transgender athletes and women's sports -- were staggering yet unsurprising.”
The racist, sexist mudslinging at Ketanji Brown Jackson is disgraceful | CNN
Despite disgraceful efforts by Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee to discredit, humiliate and smear Ketanji Brown Jackson with racist and sexist questions and comments, it is well worth remembering why her story matters to so many people, argues historian Peniel E. Joseph.
Unsurprising, indeed.
The Americans Medical Association and the American Psychiatric Association, among other learned bodies, recognize the reality of Gender Dysphoria, but the criteria you demand probably differ.Yes...
Women dont have dicks and cutting yours off doesn't make you a female no matter how much you want it to.
