why do you need the constitution ?
This has nothing to do with the constitution.....
you're dodging the question.....WHY do they need to know their names?
it has everything to do with the constitution you moron ...
how damn dumb are you ?
No it doesn't. Releasing names of jurors is not a constitutional issue. Where is it in the constitution?
And again you never told us whey they needed them.
explaining reality to you is like teaching a door to spell ..
here ya go iotboi -
Excellent examples of cases recognizing the qualified First Amendment right of access to juror names and addresses include
United States v. Wecht,
[37] United States v. Doherty,
[38] Commonwealth v. Long,
[39] State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publ’g Co. v. Bond,
[40] and
People v. Mitchell.
[41]
now please stfu.
morons arguing about something they know nothing about - amazing
From your article
The use of anonymous juries undoubtedly raises important questions concerning a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial.
[10] Their use, however, also raises important questions for journalists who cover the courts. Jurors in high profile cases are often a fundamental part of the story. Even though journalists, as a matter of ethics, typically refrain from interviewing jurors during a trial, journalists routinely make post-verdict requests for interviews. These interviews can enlighten the judicial process for readers and viewers, often shedding light on why a particular juror voted as he or she did.
[11] Moreover, although journalists typically avoid naming jurors before and after a verdict is entered, journalists occasionally feel it is necessary to name jurors when serving as “watchdogs” of the democratic process. For instance, as the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently noted, a press investigation into the jury in the corruption trial of former Illinois Governor George Ryan revealed that several jurors “had lied on their questionnaires and had disqualifying convictions or otherwise might have been subject to challenge for cause.”
[12]
Ah they want to serve as "watchdogs" IE.....unleash the mob on these people......and like kitty said earlier because they want to show the next jury what will happen if they don't give the correct result (guilty)
