- Dec 16, 2017
- 23,526
- 12,781
- 1,290
Ahh, you meant the other liberal.Note the word “liberal”
In that case, no, I think the cotus is very specific, but “we the people” have made it “liberal”
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ahh, you meant the other liberal.Note the word “liberal”
If the Constitution were written by Conservatives, it would read…..”We the wealthy”Ahh, you meant the other liberal.
In that case, no, I think the cotus is very specific, but “we the people” have made it “liberal”
They are ignoring and moving forwardIf they are a “higher power over one judge " , then why are they appealing the decision? And why do they go to court at all?
View attachment 1242411
“We the weepy…” for your ilkIf the Constitution were written by Conservatives, it would read…..”We the wealthy”
No they aren't. Thats the entire point of the system. It's designed to protect against a Daddy Cult like yours.Pentagon still doing as it pleases because they are a higher power over one “judge”
The system is not so that one judge can run the PentagonNo they aren't. Thats the entire point of the system. It's designed to protect against a Daddy Cult like yours.
Educated people call this a non sequitur.The system is not so that one judge can run the Pentagon
Schools out today and the challenged kid is on earlyEducated people call this a non sequitur.
That’s a misuse of the identification of non sequiturEducated people call this a non sequitur.
Yes you are. You don't know what a non sequitur is or why it shows your grasp of basic logic is nonexistent. And why you would get laughed out of any room of educated people.Schools out today and the challenged kid is on early
HahahaThat’s a misuse of the identification of non sequitur