Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 121,755
- 128,317
- 3,645
That is not the equivalent of what he said.So you're saying a reporter can have forced access, go out and lie their asses off, and nothing can be done about it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is not the equivalent of what he said.So you're saying a reporter can have forced access, go out and lie their asses off, and nothing can be done about it?
I think you need to be less utterly vague in your posts so people know what you are talking about.I think maybe you need a dictionary for Christmas.
You say that because it is you who operates that way.I think you need to be less utterly vague in your posts so people know what you are talking about.
You say that because it is you who operates that way.
It's an old game.
So, detail the assumption.
Why so vague?
They gave a press pass to Laura Loomer so don’t pretend it’s about honesty in the press.So you're saying a reported can have forced access, go out and lie their asses off, and nothing can be done about it? I don't believe that.
.
It is a long known fact that leftist press agencies spread lies. You - yourself - appear to be worthless leftist traitor trash, also.Watching the GOP get legally pantsed again is my favorite genre of comedy. A federal judge just nuked your authoritarian Pentagon press ban because…surprise!…the First Amendment actually exists.![]()
Federal judge rules against restrictive Pentagon press policy
The policy sought to bar news outlets from reporting information not officially sanctioned for release by agency heads.www.usatoday.com
You hypocrites scream about "freedom" non-stop, then try to lock out journalists because your egos are too soft to handle tough questions. Absolute clown behavior.
Hegseth allowed only right wing ass kissing outlets like the Gateway Pundit to pitch the softballs. The real press corps is laughing:
Hegseth tried to legally bully the press, then got relentlessly body-slammed by a judge, the New York Times and others are laughing.
View attachment 1233277
Why so vague? What assumption?Negative, I’ve always been straightforward with you. You seem to believe I have some ulterior motive. I can’t help that.
They all know.As you know from the decision, it was about having a press corps that would be compliant and supportive. Not truthful.
That is not the equivalent of what he said.
Why so vague? What assumption?
Ok Mr. Judge.Yeah, you can spin it that way, it's about access to government facilities and whether an agency can set their own rules for that access. The court seems to think they have the authority to set the rules for access to government agencies.
.
Ope, and they jusy got slapped down again:Ok Mr. Judge.
Are you admitting that the Constitution is a liberal document?The policy was to protect national security..
Liberal judge says “nope! Report it all!”
I guess the pentagon can just stop having press briefings
He doesnt know.Are you admitting that the Constitution is a liberal document?
TRANSLATION: "OK, I gave you what you asked for...now take care business"Hold This L: Judge curb-stomps the GOP's pathetic pentagon press ban
I admit it...perhaps the single greatest document ever written, and defending it from white liberalism has morphed into a conservative effort.Are you admitting that the Constitution is a liberal document?
The cotus doesn’t have a “party”Are you admitting that the Constitution is a liberal document?
Note the word “liberal”The cotus doesn’t have a “party”
If they are a “higher power over one judge " , then why are they appealing the decision? And why do they go to court at all?Pentagon still doing as it pleases because they are a higher power over one “judge”