Deflecting from the fact you've been caught lying? How typical.
The President with the worst average unemployment rate since World War II is?
- Thread starter U2Edge
- Start date
In what "alternative universe" did that take place in, Winger? I know it didn't happen in THIS one! When the Obama Stimulus was approved unemployment stood at 7.8%. By the end of six months it had shot all the way up to 10%. It didn't come back to 7.8% until September of 2012 almost three YEARS after the stimulus was passed. Do you really not know this stuff? Damn, son...you gotta stop watching MSNBC!!!
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 298,560
- 224,091
- 3,615
Lets look at the impact that Obamas Stimulus had on employment shall we?
Stimulus passed on Feb 17 2009
Within six weeks of the passing of the Stimulus the number of jobs being lost each month went from losing 800,000 to losing 650,000 to losing 380,000 a month. We finally went to positive employment in March 2010.
Even a casual observation shows how dramatic the change in jobs being lost was.
Last edited:
Lets look at the impact that Obamas Stimulus had on employment shall we?
Stimulus passed on Feb 17 2009
Within six weeks of the passing of the Stimulus the number of jobs being lost each month went from losing 800,000 to losing 650,000 to losing 380,000 a month. We finally went to positive employment in March 2010.
Even a casual observation shows how dramatic the change in jobs being lost was.
LOL...wait a second! You just claimed that after the Obama Stimulus kicked in that unemployment started going down almost immediately. I just showed that it DIDN'T! That in fact after the stimulus unemployment continued to go up until it hit 10% and that it didn't come back down to the rate it was when the Obama Stimulus was passed until YEARS later!
Economies historically rebound from recessions. We've had dozens of them and they've all rebounded in much the same fashion. The Obama Stimulus was a nearly trillion dollar liberal "pork fest" that rewarded Democratic supporters and created so few jobs that the Obama Administration had to come up with a new labor statistic "jobs created or saved" to hide just how bad it was.
Perhaps instead of a "casual observation", you might want to take a GOOD LOOK?
Lets look at the impact that Obamas Stimulus had on employment shall we?
Stimulus passed on Feb 17 2009
Within six weeks of the passing of the Stimulus the number of jobs being lost each month went from losing 800,000 to losing 650,000 to losing 380,000 a month. We finally went to positive employment in March 2010.
Even a casual observation shows how dramatic the change in jobs being lost was.
More proof you can't read a graph.
Try posting something about the Unemployment Rate, moron.
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 298,560
- 224,091
- 3,615
Lets look at the impact that Obamas Stimulus had on employment shall we?
Stimulus passed on Feb 17 2009
Within six weeks of the passing of the Stimulus the number of jobs being lost each month went from losing 800,000 to losing 650,000 to losing 380,000 a month. We finally went to positive employment in March 2010.
Even a casual observation shows how dramatic the change in jobs being lost was.
LOL...wait a second! You just claimed that after the Obama Stimulus kicked in that unemployment started going down almost immediately. I just showed that it DIDN'T! That in fact after the stimulus unemployment continued to go up until it hit 10% and that it didn't come back down to the rate it was when the Obama Stimulus was passed until YEARS later!
Economies historically rebound from recessions. We've had dozens of them and they've all rebounded in much the same fashion. The Obama Stimulus was a nearly trillion dollar liberal "pork fest" that rewarded Democratic supporters and created so few jobs that the Obama Administration had to come up with a new labor statistic "jobs created or saved" to hide just how bad it was.
Perhaps instead of a "casual observation", you might want to take a GOOD LOOK?
LoL
Yea...the old Republican standby
The economy would have reversed itself anyway
The biggest failure of Bush was not that we went into recession but that he denied the fact that we were in a recession and stood by doing nothing waiting for his recession to self correct. It took Government action to halt the Bush economic collapse and it was Obama who saved us from a depression
Lets look at the impact that Obamas Stimulus had on employment shall we?
Stimulus passed on Feb 17 2009
Within six weeks of the passing of the Stimulus the number of jobs being lost each month went from losing 800,000 to losing 650,000 to losing 380,000 a month. We finally went to positive employment in March 2010.
Even a casual observation shows how dramatic the change in jobs being lost was.
LOL...wait a second! You just claimed that after the Obama Stimulus kicked in that unemployment started going down almost immediately. I just showed that it DIDN'T! That in fact after the stimulus unemployment continued to go up until it hit 10% and that it didn't come back down to the rate it was when the Obama Stimulus was passed until YEARS later!
Economies historically rebound from recessions. We've had dozens of them and they've all rebounded in much the same fashion. The Obama Stimulus was a nearly trillion dollar liberal "pork fest" that rewarded Democratic supporters and created so few jobs that the Obama Administration had to come up with a new labor statistic "jobs created or saved" to hide just how bad it was.
Perhaps instead of a "casual observation", you might want to take a GOOD LOOK?
LoL
Yea...the old Republican standby
The economy would have reversed itself anyway
The biggest failure of Bush was not that we went into recession but that he denied the fact that we were in a recession and stood by doing nothing waiting for his recession to self correct. It took Government action to halt the Bush economic collapse and it was Obama who saved us from a depression
Sorry, what fiction are you basing this on? When did Bush deny it was a recession? Do you recall what TARP was?
You have zero credibility, Nutsucker.
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 298,560
- 224,091
- 3,615
Douche Gargler (its fun when we get to call eachother names isn't it?)
Bushs attempt at TARP did not happen until a month before the 2008 election. Kind of late considering the recession had been going on for a year. As can be seen by the employment charts and the continued collapse of the stock market the Bush TARP was inneffective
Thankfully, President Obama came in and righted the ship
bedowin62
Gold Member
- Feb 6, 2014
- 17,997
- 2,025
- 280
righted the shop?
lmao what an idiot
obama voted FOR Bush's TARP; which was a success. anyway TARP was WRITTEN BY AND PASSED throught a Congress that was majority Dem in both chambers. if you want to call it a failure leftard that's on you; lol!
anyway unemployment skyrocketed to over 10.1% on obama's watch and didnt start falling until Republicans took the House back
true story
libs are losers who lie to themselves
edthecynic
Censored for Cynicism
- Oct 20, 2008
- 43,044
- 6,886
- 1,830
Well let us see. The Bush Depression began Dec 2007.
Bush says economy sound; mum on stimulus plan | Reuters
Jan 4, 2008
U.S. President George W. Bush said on Friday that the U.S. economy was on solid footing despite a weak employment report, and gave no hint of what his administration may have in store to bolster growth.
"This economy of ours is on a solid foundation, but we can't take economic growth for granted," Bush told reporters after meeting with his so-called Working Group on Financial Markets. "If the foundation is strong, yet indicators are mixed, the worst thing that Congress can do is raise taxes."
His comments came hours after a government report showed U.S. job growth in December was the weakest in more than four years, while the unemployment rate climbed to 5 percent, the highest mark in two years.
snip/
"The big drain on the economy for the past year and a half has been housing ... eventually that is going to bottom out and when that bottom outs, even if it doesn't expand, it will remove that negative drag on the economy," he said.
The White House noted the employment report showed continued job growth, and said the unemployment rate was still low by historic standards.
Excuse me....why did you people do hand-springs when it dipped below 8%.
Obama had everything to do with that.
He lost the statistics from California and he fudged the numbers to miraculously come up with 800,000 new jobs right in time for the election. Course that would mean that the economy would have had to grow by 4.8% at the same time, and that hasn't happened during Obama's entire time in the White House. We've had a constantly shrinking UE number but job contraction, not job growth. How does that happen?
Easy, they don't count those who haven't found a job in 2 years or more.
Wow!!! How convenient is that!!!!
You guys spend so much time lying to yourselves you've lost all sense of reality.
edthecynic
Censored for Cynicism
- Oct 20, 2008
- 43,044
- 6,886
- 1,830
Again, you know the economy is improving when the Right tries to take credit for it!!!
True story!
edthecynic
Censored for Cynicism
- Oct 20, 2008
- 43,044
- 6,886
- 1,830
Liar!
" The Bush Depression began Dec 2007."
Yup. The Democrats Controlling Congress made sure of that.
The recession they caused ended early in 2009. Great timing, don't you think?
So we've had nearly 5 years to recover. Problem is, Democrat policies aren't designed to improve the economy. They're designed to cause hardship in the economy, then blame it on Bush or anyone who tries to end the hardship.
bedowin62
Gold Member
- Feb 6, 2014
- 17,997
- 2,025
- 280
i'm just stating facts idiot.
but speaking of trying to take credit. you were the same losers that were just ranting that the "job creators werent creating jobs" and "hiding their money in the cayman islands" and other assorted left-wing rants and talking points
now you want to give obama and dems credit for job creation?
you're nothing but a hypocritical clown
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 298,560
- 224,091
- 3,615
The first time Bush admitted we were in a Recession was Dec 2008, a month after Republicans were trounced in the 2008 elections
President Bush Finally Admits We're In A Recession | Crooks and Liars
President George W. Bush publicly acknowledged for the first time Friday that the U.S. economy is in a recession and worried aloud that Detroit's Big Three automakers may not all survive their mounting troubles.
Four days after the government made the long-suspected existence of a recession official, Bush used the word himself.
"Our economy is in a recession," Bush said flatly, speaking to reporters on the South Lawn only hours after the release of a government report showing the biggest month of job losses in 34 years. "This is in large part because of severe problems in our housing, credit and financial markets, which have resulted in significant job losses."
Last edited:
The recession was not going on for a year. Remember McCain suspending his campaign to return to DC? Yeah, that was in the summer of 2008. So getting a big package like TARP passed within a coupel of months is a real achievment. That's what leaders do, work with people who disagree with them.
The economy had stabilized by the time Obozo got into office. We did not see the large firm failures after that.
Obozo's policies made both recession last longer and the recovery weaker.
Don't even try to attempt to rewrite the history here. We all know the real story.
bedowin62
Gold Member
- Feb 6, 2014
- 17,997
- 2,025
- 280
libs said:
"job creators arent creating jobs"
and
"corporations are sitting on trillions" and "hiding their money in the Cayman Islands"
and
"corporations are sending the jobs that are here overseas"
now all of a sudden under obam real job creation is supposed to be happenging and the credit goes to obama and the dem Party?
libs are laughable losers who lie to themselves and exptect others to believe the lies
"job creators arent creating jobs"
and
"corporations are sitting on trillions" and "hiding their money in the Cayman Islands"
and
"corporations are sending the jobs that are here overseas"
now all of a sudden under obam real job creation is supposed to be happenging and the credit goes to obama and the dem Party?
libs are laughable losers who lie to themselves and exptect others to believe the lies
Lets look at the impact that Obamas Stimulus had on employment shall we?
Stimulus passed on Feb 17 2009
Within six weeks of the passing of the Stimulus the number of jobs being lost each month went from losing 800,000 to losing 650,000 to losing 380,000 a month. We finally went to positive employment in March 2010.
Even a casual observation shows how dramatic the change in jobs being lost was.
LOL...wait a second! You just claimed that after the Obama Stimulus kicked in that unemployment started going down almost immediately. I just showed that it DIDN'T! That in fact after the stimulus unemployment continued to go up until it hit 10% and that it didn't come back down to the rate it was when the Obama Stimulus was passed until YEARS later!
Economies historically rebound from recessions. We've had dozens of them and they've all rebounded in much the same fashion. The Obama Stimulus was a nearly trillion dollar liberal "pork fest" that rewarded Democratic supporters and created so few jobs that the Obama Administration had to come up with a new labor statistic "jobs created or saved" to hide just how bad it was.
Perhaps instead of a "casual observation", you might want to take a GOOD LOOK?
The Stimulus was a scam. It was designed to establish a spending base. It's called baseline budgeting.
That's why Obama had a $1.4 trillion dollar deficit his first year. The year before, under Bush, the deficit was $400 billion. The year before that, before the Dems took back Congress it was $159 billion.
So Obama would have over a trillion dollars in deficit spending because of baseline budgeting, but he gets a gift from Boehner. A $600 tax increase, which would have put us into a surplus if we didn't establish this new base.
As it is, we're still at $600 billion in deficit spending and our taxes are ever higher, and Obama is still looking for more money to steal from us and more ways to spend it. But compared to Obama's first two years of trillion dollar deficits, $600 billion appears like an improvement. So, of course, the liberals crow about it constantly.
Last edited:
Similar threads
New Topics
-
reality of Moscow empire "So this is how we fight for Moscow 🇷🇺 empire — not a single Muscovite here!"- Started by Litwin
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
Trump's big bill teeters as House conservatives say it's not brutal enough- Started by C_Clayton_Jones
- Replies: 6
-
Lawyer groups are ‘deeply concerned’ about proposed changes to civil lawsuits in Ontario- Started by shockedcanadian
- Replies: 0
