The power to propel us to the stars

stop trying to delude others that your fantasies are real.
Poor poor Franie you are the only one deluded. Proposals are just that. If the probes were real they wouldn't be just proposals would they.

.
In other words the Harvard story that you referenced had no more reality in it than any episode of Star Trek.

What neither you are the fool who wrote the fiction understands is that a probe that has no method to communicate with the sender has NO PURPOSE.

Next test, but get your Mommy involved this time

Chinese-Newborn-Baby-777x518.jpg
 
The power to propel us to the stars

Can we reach the stars and beyond?

The answer is YES!!

Getting humans into outer space is not the problem. Humans have already walked on the moon. The problem with space travel is the vast distance between our solar system and the nearest one to us. The problem is in the speed needed to reach these far-off places in a reasonable time frame. The solution to the has been right in front of us.

Take for example someone at the front of a train traveling 100 MPH. If the person fires a bullet out ahead of the trail that travels at 300 MPH if you clocked the speed of this bullet it would clock at 400 MPH, not 300.

The same principle could be applied to space travel. The craft would have multiple propulsion engines. When the first one is fired it propels to craft to a speed of 1,000 MPH. When the second propulsion engine is fired (with the same propulsion force as the first), the craft is now traveling at a speed of 1,000+1,000 equaling a speed of 2,000 MPH.

If you continue firing these engines your speed increases with each engine burn. The ultimate speed you reach depends on how many propulsion bursts your engines can provide. One burst at a time you could reach the speed of light and beyond.

Or so it seemed~~~~~~~~

Now, some time later I discarded the above idea, a spacecraft could not contain enough fuel to propel us to distant stars.

Then an actual solution came to mind.

We use the force of gravity to pull us to wherever we want to go. Magnify the force of gravity using the gravity pull of galaxies channeling that pull in a narrow band multiply the pulling force of gravity exponentially to a limitless speed.getting us to where we want to go
:)-


Chemical energy won't do it.

Ion engines are too slow.

It will take all the energy produced on earth for three years just to get a space craft the size of the shuttle to 20% of light speed.

We ain't going nowhere.

Maybe to Mars in a two year trip but not much farther than that.
 
The power to propel us to the stars

Can we reach the stars and beyond?

The answer is YES!!

Getting humans into outer space is not the problem. Humans have already walked on the moon. The problem with space travel is the vast distance between our solar system and the nearest one to us. The problem is in the speed needed to reach these far-off places in a reasonable time frame. The solution to the has been right in front of us.

Take for example someone at the front of a train traveling 100 MPH. If the person fires a bullet out ahead of the trail that travels at 300 MPH if you clocked the speed of this bullet it would clock at 400 MPH, not 300.

The same principle could be applied to space travel. The craft would have multiple propulsion engines. When the first one is fired it propels to craft to a speed of 1,000 MPH. When the second propulsion engine is fired (with the same propulsion force as the first), the craft is now traveling at a speed of 1,000+1,000 equaling a speed of 2,000 MPH.

If you continue firing these engines your speed increases with each engine burn. The ultimate speed you reach depends on how many propulsion bursts your engines can provide. One burst at a time you could reach the speed of light and beyond.

Or so it seemed~~~~~~~~

Now, some time later I discarded the above idea, a spacecraft could not contain enough fuel to propel us to distant stars.

Then an actual solution came to mind.

We use the force of gravity to pull us to wherever we want to go. Magnify the force of gravity using the gravity pull of galaxies channeling that pull in a narrow band multiply the pulling force of gravity exponentially to a limitless speed.getting us to where we want to go
:)-


Chemical energy won't do it.

Ion engines are too slow.

It will take all the energy produced on earth for three years just to get a space craft the size of the shuttle to 20% of light speed.

We ain't going nowhere.

Maybe to Mars in a two year trip but not much farther than that.

98 Newtons is the thrust to hover 1 kg.
11m/s is said to be the minimum velocity at the surface to keep on going with no other assistance.


98 newtons force to get one kilogram off the surface.

That's 22 pounds to get 1 kg up

23 lbs and you are off into space.

Keep doing that until you get to no less than 11m/s and you can stop trusting.
 
Last edited:
The power to propel us to the stars

Can we reach the stars and beyond?

The answer is YES!!

Getting humans into outer space is not the problem. Humans have already walked on the moon. The problem with space travel is the vast distance between our solar system and the nearest one to us. The problem is in the speed needed to reach these far-off places in a reasonable time frame. The solution to the has been right in front of us.

Take for example someone at the front of a train traveling 100 MPH. If the person fires a bullet out ahead of the trail that travels at 300 MPH if you clocked the speed of this bullet it would clock at 400 MPH, not 300.

The same principle could be applied to space travel. The craft would have multiple propulsion engines. When the first one is fired it propels to craft to a speed of 1,000 MPH. When the second propulsion engine is fired (with the same propulsion force as the first), the craft is now traveling at a speed of 1,000+1,000 equaling a speed of 2,000 MPH.

If you continue firing these engines your speed increases with each engine burn. The ultimate speed you reach depends on how many propulsion bursts your engines can provide. One burst at a time you could reach the speed of light and beyond.

Or so it seemed~~~~~~~~

Now, some time later I discarded the above idea, a spacecraft could not contain enough fuel to propel us to distant stars.

Then an actual solution came to mind.

We use the force of gravity to pull us to wherever we want to go. Magnify the force of gravity using the gravity pull of galaxies channeling that pull in a narrow band multiply the pulling force of gravity exponentially to a limitless speed.getting us to where we want to go
:)-


Chemical energy won't do it.

Ion engines are too slow.

It will take all the energy produced on earth for three years just to get a space craft the size of the shuttle to 20% of light speed.

We ain't going nowhere.

Maybe to Mars in a two year trip but not much farther than that.
Ion engines are more than fast enough as there is no hurry, any way that you look at the situation the ship has to be larger than hundreds of cargo ships as those who leave are becoming a new interstellar species
 
The power to propel us to the stars

Can we reach the stars and beyond?

The answer is YES!!

Getting humans into outer space is not the problem. Humans have already walked on the moon. The problem with space travel is the vast distance between our solar system and the nearest one to us. The problem is in the speed needed to reach these far-off places in a reasonable time frame. The solution to the has been right in front of us.

Take for example someone at the front of a train traveling 100 MPH. If the person fires a bullet out ahead of the trail that travels at 300 MPH if you clocked the speed of this bullet it would clock at 400 MPH, not 300.

The same principle could be applied to space travel. The craft would have multiple propulsion engines. When the first one is fired it propels to craft to a speed of 1,000 MPH. When the second propulsion engine is fired (with the same propulsion force as the first), the craft is now traveling at a speed of 1,000+1,000 equaling a speed of 2,000 MPH.

If you continue firing these engines your speed increases with each engine burn. The ultimate speed you reach depends on how many propulsion bursts your engines can provide. One burst at a time you could reach the speed of light and beyond.

Or so it seemed~~~~~~~~

Now, some time later I discarded the above idea, a spacecraft could not contain enough fuel to propel us to distant stars.

Then an actual solution came to mind.

We use the force of gravity to pull us to wherever we want to go. Magnify the force of gravity using the gravity pull of galaxies channeling that pull in a narrow band multiply the pulling force of gravity exponentially to a limitless speed.getting us to where we want to go
:)-


Chemical energy won't do it.

Ion engines are too slow.

It will take all the energy produced on earth for three years just to get a space craft the size of the shuttle to 20% of light speed.

We ain't going nowhere.

Maybe to Mars in a two year trip but not much farther than that.

98 Newtons is the thrust to hover 1 kg.
11m/s is said to be the minimum velocity at the surface to keep on going with no other assistance.


98 newtons force to get one kilogram off the surface.

That's 22 pounds to get 1 kg up

23 lbs and you are off into space.

Keep doing that until you get to no less than 11m/s and you can stop trusting.

Don't like those numbers. The dont' feel right.
What a terrible page


"The 11 km/hr is the minimum speed necessary at the surface of the earth, to enable travelling any arbitrary distance from the earth without any means of propulsion."

"At 11km/s you can successfully break orbit and escape"

or

The escape velocity from Earth's surface is about 11,186 m/s

Geeze, that's terrible answers from a quick google search

11,186 m/s = 11.186 km/s so there's what that is That 11 km/hr can't be right either because that gets 660 km/s.

This is the right one.

The escape velocity from Earth's surface is about 11,186 m/s

So does 98 N and 22lbs seem right?
 
Last edited:
The power to propel us to the stars

Can we reach the stars and beyond?

The answer is YES!!

Getting humans into outer space is not the problem. Humans have already walked on the moon. The problem with space travel is the vast distance between our solar system and the nearest one to us. The problem is in the speed needed to reach these far-off places in a reasonable time frame. The solution to the has been right in front of us.

Take for example someone at the front of a train traveling 100 MPH. If the person fires a bullet out ahead of the trail that travels at 300 MPH if you clocked the speed of this bullet it would clock at 400 MPH, not 300.

The same principle could be applied to space travel. The craft would have multiple propulsion engines. When the first one is fired it propels to craft to a speed of 1,000 MPH. When the second propulsion engine is fired (with the same propulsion force as the first), the craft is now traveling at a speed of 1,000+1,000 equaling a speed of 2,000 MPH.

If you continue firing these engines your speed increases with each engine burn. The ultimate speed you reach depends on how many propulsion bursts your engines can provide. One burst at a time you could reach the speed of light and beyond.

Or so it seemed~~~~~~~~

Now, some time later I discarded the above idea, a spacecraft could not contain enough fuel to propel us to distant stars.

Then an actual solution came to mind.

We use the force of gravity to pull us to wherever we want to go. Magnify the force of gravity using the gravity pull of galaxies channeling that pull in a narrow band multiply the pulling force of gravity exponentially to a limitless speed.getting us to where we want to go
:)-


Chemical energy won't do it.

Ion engines are too slow.

It will take all the energy produced on earth for three years just to get a space craft the size of the shuttle to 20% of light speed.

We ain't going nowhere.

Maybe to Mars in a two year trip but not much farther than that.
Ion engines are more than fast enough as there is no hurry, any way that you look at the situation the ship has to be larger than hundreds of cargo ships as those who leave are becoming a new interstellar species


If you want to take 200 years to get to the nearest star then maybe an Ion engine could get you there providing we could engineer one that could be operational that long.
 
Humanity is going to leave this planet unless we destroy ourselves first.

We will construct a huge spaceship that contains platforms to grow plants that will sustain our needs. Water will be recycled. Many generations will be born here and die here while the ship moves on.

It may take five generations to reach the nearest solar system, but time is not an issue, how we get there is. I proposed using the pull of gravity. The means to do this has not been invented yet, but it will.

Entire galaxies are held together by a unifying gravity force. We will learn how to use this force.

310px-NGC_4414_(NASA-med).jpg

:)-
 
In other words the Harvard story that you referenced had no more reality in it than any episode of Star Trek.
Too much hyperbole there Franie.

What neither you are the fool who wrote the fiction understands is that a probe that has no method to communicate with the sender has NO PURPOSE.
The purpose is a feasibility test.

.
 
Humanity is going to leave this planet unless we destroy ourselves first.

We will construct a huge spaceship that contains platforms to grow plants that will sustain our needs. Water will be recycled. Many generations will be born here and die here while the ship moves on.

It may take five generations to reach the nearest solar system, but time is not an issue, how we get there is. I proposed using the pull of gravity. The means to do this has not been invented yet, but it will.

Entire galaxies are held together by a unifying gravity force. We will learn how to use this force.
If the spaceship is to go 10% lightspeed, and fuel can be ejected at an average of 1% lightspeed, the initial weight of fuel would have to be 10 times the weight of the spaceship empty of fuel. That comes from the conservation of momentum. If the spaceship is to go close to the speed of light, then the relativistic formula must be used, and the ratio of fuel increases considerably.

The rough idea of the atom was discovered by Rutherford only about 100 years ago. Our understanding of matter since then has been astounding. We have no idea what it will be 1000 years from now. We should not abandon hope of interstellar travel even if today's ideas aren't feasible.

.
 
In other words the Harvard story that you referenced had no more reality in it than any episode of Star Trek.
Too much hyperbole there Franie.

What neither you are the fool who wrote the fiction understands is that a probe that has no method to communicate with the sender has NO PURPOSE.
The purpose is a feasibility test.

.
Can you describe the feasibility test of a solar sail laser powered interstellar probe sending back data from light years away from Earth all packed into a centimeter or less package? Kid the fact is that you have no clue that the article that you read is science fiction just like most of the garbage coming out of Harvard. The purpose of the article is to fool idiotic parents of moronic kids so that the idiotic parents send their moronic kids to Harvard relieving the idiot parents of their cash reserves as the plutonically brain dead communist professors laugh all the way back to Beijing.

How does the transmitter work, being that this transmitter is 1,000,000 times smaller than the present transmitters doing similar activity at .00001 percent the range that the science fiction article presented

35b0b7a3e1cfba9be6051306b0859a08.jpg
 
Last edited:
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa And in your delusional mind a laser on Earth can power a centimeter sized probe light years into space
Yes. You should do some reading. You're making yourself look like a fool.

Learn to use google

I own Google kid. Really it hit a new high today. So I know how to use Google

How many shares of GOOGL do you own?
 
Can you describe the feasibility test of a solar sail laser powered interstellar probe sending back data from light years away from Earth all packed into a centimeter or less package? Kid the fact is that you have no clue that the article that you read is science fiction just like most of the garbage coming out of Harvard. The purpose of the article is to fool idiotic parents of moronic kids so that the idiotic parents send their moronic kids to Harvard relieving the idiot parents of their cash reserves as the plutonically brain dead communist professors laugh all the way back to Beijing.

How does the transmitter work, being that this transmitter is 1,000,000 times smaller than the present transmitters doing similar activity at .00001 percent the range that the science fiction article presented
Why are you so obsessed with this?

.
 
Humanity is going to leave this planet unless we destroy ourselves first.

Or, the most likely third option ... we don't destroy ourselves (not completely anyway) and we just stay right here arguing over how many genders there are.
 
Can you describe the feasibility test of a solar sail laser powered interstellar probe sending back data from light years away from Earth all packed into a centimeter or less package? Kid the fact is that you have no clue that the article that you read is science fiction just like most of the garbage coming out of Harvard. The purpose of the article is to fool idiotic parents of moronic kids so that the idiotic parents send their moronic kids to Harvard relieving the idiot parents of their cash reserves as the plutonically brain dead communist professors laugh all the way back to Beijing.

How does the transmitter work, being that this transmitter is 1,000,000 times smaller than the present transmitters doing similar activity at .00001 percent the range that the science fiction article presented
Why are you so obsessed with this?

.
Just pointing out that fools like you believe the TOATL NONSENSE coming out of the cesspool known as Harvard. The fact is that the professor who wrote that article is a misplaced phone scammer that has you totally scammed into believing that laser powered solar sail gram sized probes that have no use because they have no transmitter are real.

So think first next time
 
Can you describe the feasibility test of a solar sail laser powered interstellar probe sending back data from light years away from Earth all packed into a centimeter or less package? Kid the fact is that you have no clue that the article that you read is science fiction just like most of the garbage coming out of Harvard. The purpose of the article is to fool idiotic parents of moronic kids so that the idiotic parents send their moronic kids to Harvard relieving the idiot parents of their cash reserves as the plutonically brain dead communist professors laugh all the way back to Beijing.

How does the transmitter work, being that this transmitter is 1,000,000 times smaller than the present transmitters doing similar activity at .00001 percent the range that the science fiction article presented
Why are you so obsessed with this?

.
Just pointing out that fools like you believe the TOATL NONSENSE coming out of the cesspool known as Harvard. The fact is that the professor who wrote that article is a misplaced phone scammer that has you totally scammed into believing that laser powered solar sail gram sized probes that have no use because they have no transmitter are real.

So think first next time
A non-answer. Try again.
 
may take us 100 years to get to that point and we'll have made much progress in the fields of nano-tech and AI. Imagine a self-replicating AI the size of a molecule. It could be accelerated almost to light-speed and make the trip to the nearest stars in just years (stopping is another issue). Once there it would have the ability to populate it in a variety of ways. We would spread our humanity, just not our humans.
"At a recent talk at Harvard University, Philip Lubin of the University of California, Santa Barbara, presented a plan to launch small probes deep into space. Using an array of laser thrusters, a probe weighing one gram (just 0.035 ounces) would travel 4.4 light years the nearest star, Alpha Centauri, in just two decades. That’s only twice as long as it took the New Horizons spacecraft to fly by Pluto."​
A non reality, please try again.

All the clown has to do is shrink the laser by 5,000,000 percent, and stop licking Gerry Garcia stamps

Prof-Philip-Lubin.jpg
 
may take us 100 years to get to that point and we'll have made much progress in the fields of nano-tech and AI. Imagine a self-replicating AI the size of a molecule. It could be accelerated almost to light-speed and make the trip to the nearest stars in just years (stopping is another issue). Once there it would have the ability to populate it in a variety of ways. We would spread our humanity, just not our humans.
"At a recent talk at Harvard University, Philip Lubin of the University of California, Santa Barbara, presented a plan to launch small probes deep into space. Using an array of laser thrusters, a probe weighing one gram (just 0.035 ounces) would travel 4.4 light years the nearest star, Alpha Centauri, in just two decades. That’s only twice as long as it took the New Horizons spacecraft to fly by Pluto."​
A non reality, please try again.

All the clown has to do is shrink the laser by 5,000,000 percent, and stop licking Gerry Garcia stamps

Prof-Philip-Lubin.jpg
I'm embarrassed to have to point this out but the laser would remain in our solar system, it would never travel anywhere so the size of it wouldn't matter.
 

Forum List

Back
Top