MarcATL
Diamond Member
- Aug 12, 2009
- 44,001
- 23,136
- 2,605
Because she doesn't have to.If it's a given, why won't she say it?
Do you think her saying it will mean anything to Hamas?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because she doesn't have to.If it's a given, why won't she say it?
She is a US Congressman damn it!!That's a given.
You think Hamas will listen if she says that?
America first, remember?She is a US Congressman damn it!!
As such, it is her job to represent US citizens, let alone an obligation to defend innocent civilians no matter who they are around the world.
Because she doesn't have to.
Do you think her saying it will mean anything to Hamas?
Do you think that Hamas would listen if she asks them to release the hostages?She won't because she supports Hamas.
They do this all the time now. They take points and observations made about them and (try to) turn them around on their "enemy".Why are Republicans inviting dictators to their conferences OP?
Well I said "liked." But it was merely meant as an example of using one questionable assertion of a fact to prove another questionable assertion of fact. Simply a logical fallacy.She doesn't love Hamas.
Some peoples need dictatorial rule. Look what happened in the middle east when their dictators were overthrown. Even American democracy needs some 'dictatorial' rule in the form of presidential executive orders in order to get certain things done.
Here is an interesting conundrum, people harp about how beneficial democracy is, but when someone like Putin is up for election we all know what the outcome will be. However, would he win a fair election since such dictators seem popular? If they able to engineer the votes effectively what is the point of democracy?
It seems to me that the more lopsided the media is towards one dictator or political party, the more they are like the Putin regime.
Looking at the US, it is evident the media and academia have leaned to the far Left for some time now.
In these sentiments, Sir, I agree to this Constitution with all its faults, if they are such; because I think a general Government necessary for us, and there is no form of Government but what may be a blessing to the people if well administered, and believe farther that this is likely to be well administered for a course of years, and can only end in Despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic Government, being incapable of any other.Some peoples need dictatorial rule. Look what happened in the middle east when their dictators were overthrown. Even American democracy needs some 'dictatorial' rule in the form of presidential executive orders in order to get certain things done.
I don't think that Talib is inhuman. What are you referring to?Well I said "liked." But it was merely meant as an example of using one questionable assertion of a fact to prove another questionable assertion of fact. Simply a logical fallacy.
In reality, neither AIPAC nor Talib really want to confront the inhumanity of their own positions. But hey, we invaded Iraq over 9-11 .... so glass houses.
Do you think that Hamas would listen if she asks them to release the hostages?
Dictators are put in power in many ways. Joe is one.Why are Republicans inviting dictators to their conferences OP?
Nope, I don't care either way though.No.
Do you think she'll burst into flames if she criticized Hamas?
Again, why are REPUBLICANS inviting dictators to THEIR conferences?Dictators are put in power in many ways. Joe is one.
Hamas is PalestineShe doesn't love Hamas.
You speak to those in power.Again, why are REPUBLICANS inviting dictators to THEIR conferences?
Nope, I don't care either way though.
Why do you care so much as to FORCE her to comply to your arbitrary demand while KNOWING it will mean squat to Hamas?