The Popular Vote Is In!

[toobfreak]

Although the House and the Senate still are not totally finalized, now that Arizona is called, I found a CNN article that gave the final numbers. Of course, Trump won 312 to 226, but what I was interested in was the Popular Vote. According to what CNN said,

TRUMP = 74,535,879 (very similar to his 2020 numbers)
HARRIS = 70,858,899

Harris fell short of Biden by about 11,000,000. So Trump won the popular vote by 3,676,980. That is 126% over the popular vote lead that Hillary took over Trump in 2016 (Hillary won the popular vote then by a mere 2,868,686), which at that time, democrats thought all of the world about.

So by Democrat standards, Trump SMASHED it!

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-election-house-11-10-24/index.html

 

[daveman]

Nuh-UH!!!

-- The Democratic Party

 

[struth]

Mandate

 

[Donald H]

The questions remain:

Will Trump attempt interference in the war against Russia?

And will the US military tolerate his interference?

 

[struth]

The questions remain:

Will Trump attempt interference in the war against Russia?

And will the US military tolerate his interference?

Huh??? Will the US military tolerate him? He’s the commander and chief

 

[jotathought]

Although the House and the Senate still are not totally finalized, now that Arizona is called, I found a CNN article that gave the final numbers. Of course, Trump won 312 to 226, but what I was interested in was the Popular Vote. According to what CNN said,

TRUMP = 74,535,879 (very similar to his 2020 numbers)
HARRIS = 70,858,899

Harris fell short of Biden by about 11,000,000. So Trump won the popular vote by 3,676,980. That is 126% over the popular vote lead that Hillary took over Trump in 2016 (Hillary won the popular vote then by a mere 2,868,686), which at that time, democrats thought all of the world about.

So by Democrat standards, Trump SMASHED it!

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-election-house-11-10-24/index.html

Counting is still ongoing -- for example, California is roughly 75% complete, and Arizona is 88% complete.

 

[Donald H]

Huh??? Will the US military tolerate him? He’s the commander and chief

No doubt and he won the election convincingly.

But has the US military come to accept his win and would they tolerate interference in the war even if Kamala tried it?

Just consider this a warning that everything isn't what it appears to be. The military could even attempt to convince Trump to change his attitude toward Russia.

Politics and the MIC aren't always compatible.

Biden and Kamala made sure that they didn't show any opposition to the military and so never lost the support of the Generals.

 

[MisterBeale]

The questions remain:

Will Trump attempt interference in the war against Russia?

And will the US military tolerate his interference?

This post show your complete lack of understanding of the US Constitution and American government.

The administrative branch is IN CHARGE of foreign policy, thus it is impossible for it to, "interfere with," something that the voters have mandated that they do. . .

IOW? THEIR JOB!

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S1-C1-8/ALDE_00013797/

Section 2.

"The President shall be commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several states, when called into the actual service of the United States; he may require the opinion, in writing, of the principal officer in each of the executive departments, upon any subject relating to the duties of their respective offices, and he shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.

He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States, whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law: but the Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departments.

The President shall have power to fill up all vacancies that may happen during the recess of the Senate, by granting commissions which shall expire at the end of their next session."

Article II

www.law.cornell.edu

If Congress wants Trump to wage war with Russia? They need to declare it, otherwise? Trump can do what ever the hell he wants in the foreign policy realm vis-à-vis Russia.

 

[struth]

No doubt and he won the election convincingly.

But has the US military come to accept his win and would they tolerate interference in the war even if Kamala tried it?

Just consider this a warning that everything isn't what it appears to be. The military could even attempt to convince Trump to change his attitude toward Russia.

Politics and the MIC aren't always compatible.

Biden and Kamala made sure that they didn't show any opposition to the military and so never lost the support of the Generals.

Are you suggesting the military would do some sort of coup? I don’t think they would

 

[MisterBeale]

Huh??? Will the US military tolerate him? He’s the commander and chief

He's just a dumb ass globalist pawn of the crown who doesn't really understand how America works.

 

[Donald H]

Counting is still ongoing -- for example, California is roughly 75% complete, and Arizona is 88% complete.

Trump, the senate, the House, and the Scotus, are not where the real power in America lies!

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

I’m sure there are plenty of mail-in ballots that democrats haven’t finished filling out yet.

 

[Donald H]

Are you suggesting the military would do some sort of coup? I don’t think they would

It wouldn't necessitate a coup as long as the war against Russia isn't tampered with by Trump.

I'm only convinced that interference by the Trump regime won't be tolerated. There are ways for Trump to get back onside with the war.

The question is, will he cooperate? Or will he demand that the people's money no longer go to the Ukraine?

We at least know that Trump has blamed America (Biden) for starting the war. Why would he not end it to save many billions of the people's money?

 

[struth]

It wouldn't necessitate a coup as long as the war against Russia isn't tampered with by Trump.

I'm only convinced that interference by the Trump regime won't be tolerated. There are ways for Trump to get back onside with the war.

The question is, will he cooperate? Or will he demand that the people's money no longer go to the Ukraine?

We at least know that Trump has blamed America (Biden) for starting the war. Why would he not end it to save many billions of the people's money?

Our country isn’t at war with Russia. If he wants to stop funding he can with congress help.

The military has nothing to do with it

 

[DonGlock26]

Respect muh Democracy.

 

[MisterBeale]

Are you suggesting the military would do some sort of coup? I don’t think they would

Agreed.

Miley told some lies and was insubordinate. Word on the street is he might be tried for treason.

Woodward/Costa book: Worried Trump could 'go rogue,' Milley took secret action to protect nuclear weapons

Two days after the January 6 attack on the US Capitol, President Donald Trump's top military adviser, Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark Milley, single-handedly took secret action to limit Trump from potentially ordering a dangerous military strike or launching nuclear weapons, according to...

www.cnn.com

The Deep State KNOWS they f-ed up. Now they are spreading garbage narratives to cover for their treason.

Milley taking 'safety precautions' after Trump suggests he's a traitor who deserves death penalty

In response to the former president's Truth Social post last week, Mark Milley said he is taking measures for his and his family's safety.

www.usatoday.com

Donald Trump's attacks on top military officer are 'outrageous,' Pete Buttigieg says

Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg knocked Donald Trump's remarks on the retiring chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staffs and other service members.

www.usatoday.com

Internet divided as Donald Trump labels Mark Milley 'loser' after hearing on Afghanistan withdrawal

Donald Trump said, 'This is an act so egregious that, in times gone by, the punishment would have been death'

news.meaww.com

Folks don't run unless they are guilty and know it.

 

[MisterBeale]

Respect muh Democracy.

Awesome.

 

[DonGlock26]

 

[Donald H]

Our country isn’t at war with Russia. If he wants to stop funding he can with congress help.

The military has nothing to do with it

Other presidents in the past have never stepped out of line with the military and so that's good reason why Trump will change his mind on abandoning the war against Russia.

Trump is currently acting un-American.

 

[struth]

Other presidents in the past have never stepped out of line with the military and so that's good reason why Trump will change his mind on abandoning the war against Russia.

Trump is currently acting un-American.

Stepped out of line with the military?? What does that even mean?

Being for peace and not war isn’t in-American.