Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 64,995
- 27,585
- 2,173
Self awareness isn’t the strong suit for MAGA.Sure thing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Self awareness isn’t the strong suit for MAGA.Sure thing.
.Self awareness isn’t the strong suit for MAGA.
I don’t have to pretend he couldn’t prove it. Because he didn’t. It’s a fact he didn’tFine. Just don't pretend like he couldn't prove it.
The factual basis of the allegations is unchanged.
I don’t really care what you’re guessing about.
I just want to know what it has to do with the fact that Steyn is a liar.
Didn’t has a different meaning than couldn’t.I don’t have to pretend he couldn’t prove it. Because he didn’t. It’s a fact he didn’t
If he could, he would ofDidn’t has a different meaning than couldn’t.
He wasn't allowed to try by a judge with a history of being overturned for bad decisions.If he could, he would of
Haha of course not, because he was illegal.He wasn't allowed to try by a judge with a history of being overturned for bad decisions.
Again, doesn't mean he couldn't prove it and the factual basis of the allegations was never found to be false.Haha of course not, because he was illegal.
We don’t allow lawless prosecutions
Knock yourself out. No one cares about the democrat's Lawfare. The election proved that.The election result doesn't change the facts. Sorry you can't handle that.
Clearly MAGA cares since they started a thread whining about your false narrative.Knock yourself out. No one cares about the democrat's Lawfare. The election proved that.
Of course it means he couldn’t. Prove it. He didn’tAgain, doesn't mean he couldn't prove it and the factual basis of the allegations was never found to be false.
The factual evidence was a slam dunk. If it had gone to trial, Smith could have easily proven it.Of course it means he couldn’t. Prove it. He didn’t
If it was a slam duck then the xiden admin would of got a convictionThe factual evidence was a slam dunk. If it had gone to trial, Smith could have easily proven it.
Cannon knew this which is why I think she had to find a reason to prevent that from happening.
Given enough time they certainly would have, but voters like yourself made sure that couldn’t happen.If it was a slam duck then the xiden admin would of got a conviction
They didn’t. In fact they engaged in illegal activity
Geez yeah I’m sure if given enough time they could have put trump in prison…they had years and engaged in illegal practices but still couldn’tGiven enough time they certainly would have, but voters like yourself made sure that couldn’t happen.
Sometimes the wheels of justice turn very slowly. It helps when you have what looks like a corrupt judge slowing things down.Geez yeah I’m sure if given enough time they could have put trump in prison…they had years and engaged in illegal practices but still couldn’t
The issue was that justice isn’t locking up someone simply because they are running against your party in an electionSometimes the wheels of justice turn very slowly. It helps when you have what looks like a corrupt judge slowing things down.
Justice is applying the law to everyone, including ex-presidents who were obstructing justice, tampering with witnesses and attempting to destroy evidence while illegally retaining classified documents.The issue was that justice isn’t locking up someone simply because they are running against your party in an election
In fact that’s illegal, justice was served when that was exposed
Agreed. Hence why xiden had to get a corrupt illegally appointed lawyer to go after his political rival. Nobody else would do itJustice is applying the law to everyone, including ex-presidents who were obstructing justice, tampering with witnesses and attempting to destroy evidence while illegally retaining classified documents.
Cannon’s dismissal was primed to be appealed to a court that was getting very accustomed to overturning her illegal orders that exclusively benefited Trump.