Paul Revere
Member
As with all aspects of the events of September 11, 2001, there are many unanswered questions and mysteries that linger to this day. I want to address two here. First the dispatch of FEMAs Search and Rescue team to New York City on September 10, 2001 and United Airlines Flight 93.
On CBS, Tom Kennedy, a FEMA rescue worker, was being interviewed by Dan Rather on air Wednesday September 12th 2001. This is what Tom Kennedy had to say, Were one of the first teams that was deployed to support the city of New York for this disaster. We arrived late Monday night (September 10th), and went into action Tuesday morning (September 11th), and not until today did we get a full opportunity to work the entire site.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CW7Qvs-BZGk&mode=related&search[/ame] (first 20 seconds)
Why would FEMA arrive for search and rescue if the WTC attacks were a surprise ????
We witnessed the fire balls when the planes crashed into the Twin Towers.
Does this photo of the Fight 93 crash show a similar fireball?
Or does it show something more similar to a weapon/bomb or such explosion?
The smoke pattern in the photo reported to be of Fight 93 indicates an explosion without any immediate burning of fuel. It did not appear to be larger than a car bomb explosion:
If the fuel from a nearly fully loaded Boeing 767 did not ignite and create a huge fireball, then much of that fuel would have soaked into the soil, yet soil tests at the crash site found zero trace of fuel contamination:
http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/flight93.html
This is an aerial view of the crash site:
An a link to another large aerial view:
http://www.rcfp.org/moussaoui/jpg/P200057-1.jpg
Where are the scorch marks and plane wreckage from a crash that would have looked like this?
On 9/11/2001, we were told to believe that a nose-diving 100 plus ton airplane measuring 155 feet long, 125 feet wide and 45 feet tall magically disappeared into a hole in the ground that measured, about 30 to 40 feet long, 15 to 20 feet wide and 18 feet deep. No explanation has ever been officially offered as to why wreckage of a plane that nose dived into the ground was spread over an area of about 15 square miles.
Witnesses reported that they could not tell that a plane had crashed. The only evidence at the scene was one burning seat and charcoal (charcoal?), some clothing hanging in trees, a smoking hole with grass still alive and unharmed, nothing larger than a phonebook, no recognizable plane parts and no signs of bodies.
Fox News report [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZekosYOmXc[/ame]
Flight 93s black boxes were buried 15ft and 25ft into the ground, which is very strange. They both would have been installed in the tail section next to each other when the plane was built. Why would one travel 10 feet further into the ground? Flight 93s Flight Data recorder (FDR) was sent to NTSB for analysis . Their report mentions the manufacturer as Allied-Signal.
The NTSB released transcript from Flight 93s Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) but did not mention the manufactures name. United Airlines Flight 93 went into service in 1996. The CVR and the FDR should be the from the same manufacturer, Allied-Signal. In 1999 Allied-Signal acquired Honeywell and adopted its more recognizable name. The CVR reported to come from the Flight 93 crash site was manufactured by Honeywell. Do you see the problem here?
Also notable from these Black Box photos is the soil. Does the soil appear to have loose quick sand like properties? Why are these black boxes so clean? Why does the soil contain more loose rock and change color at 25 feet where the CVR was found as opposed to the denser red clay at 15 feet where the FDR was found. Notice the wires on the FDR, that is the only wires found over the whole "crash site". And whats with the brick?
Below is a photo of an engine being recovered from the hole. Notice that it burrowed into the soft ground with the plane, while the other engine that was found several hundred yards away was reported to have hit the same soft ground and bounced. Yet the wing that the bounced engine was attached magically just disappeared.
Here is a new engine for Boeing 767 under construction:
You do see the similarity, don't you?
I don't.
The official story of United Airlines Flight 93 claims that the plane nose-dived into former strip mining land in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. It encountering soft loosely packed soil, and was sucked effortlessly into the ground. To explain the widely scattered debris, the lack of fuel traces, the missing plane and human parts the official story concludes that the portion of the plane that contained the passengers, crew, luggage, cargo, fuel, and the vast majority of the airplane itself, exploded on the ground and was reduced to scraps that soared over mountaintops to reach destinations up to eight miles away.
I, being of sound mind, reject the official story of Flight 93 and all the attacks of September 11th 2001. If the whole point of terrorism is to make a point, just good why did no group take credit for the terrorism committed that day?
I also question why was a mysterious white aircraft reported at all the 9/11/01 scenes?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
More on Fight 93 and 9/11/01
Flight 93 Witness reports:
Despite extensive recovery efforts, nothing resembling a human corpse was ever found, officially at least, anywhere within the eight-mile-long debris field. According to the official storyline, all that was recovered, apart from, here and there, a finger, a toe or a tooth were small pieces of tissue and bone. -John Carlin "Unanswered Questions: The Mystery of Flight 93," The Independent, August 13, 2002
The largest piece of human tissue reportedly found was a section of spine eight inches long. No torsos, no arms, no legs, no hands, no feet not even a head, or at least a portion of one of the forty-four skulls. - Richard Wallace "What Did Happen to Flight 93?"
Daily Mirror, September 12, 2002
"It was as if the plane had stopped and let the passengers off before it crashed," Miller said." - Pittsburg Post Gazette (10/15/01)
"Wally Miller was among the very first to arrive after 10:06 on the magnificently sunny morning of September 11. Once he was able to absorb the scene, Miller says, "I stopped being coroner after about 20 minutes, because there were no bodies there. It became like a giant funeral service."
Thousands of people -- the locals estimate up to 1,000 a week -- have arrived at an old coal-mining access trail called Skyline Road, where finally they can see what remains of Flight 93: nothing. "There's not really much to it, is there?" Wally Miller often says to families and other visitors who are bewildered by what they don't see.
Immediately after the crash, the seeming absence of human remains led the mind of coroner Wally Miller to a surreal fantasy: that Flight 93 had somehow stopped in mid-flight and discharged all of its passengers before crashing. "There was just nothing visible," he says. "It was the strangest feeling." It would be nearly an hour before Miller came upon his first trace of a body part." - Washington Post (05/12/02)
"No bodies were recovered here, at least not as we normally think of bodies. In the cataclysmic violence of the crash, the people on Flight 93 literally disintegrated. Searchers found fragments of bones, small pieces of flesh, a hand. But no bodies." - Miami Herald (09/07/02)
"Wallace Miller, the lanky, Civil War-studying county coroner, did see it. He sat at the family funeral home, his father, Wilbur, with him. They watched the second plane sweep in low from nowhere. They winced when it hit.
He takes off his glasses, cleans them with his T-shirt. "This is the most eerie thing," he says. "I have not, to this day, seen a single drop of blood. Not a drop." - Pittsburgh Live (09/11/02)
More pictures in this video that tell an important 9/11 story:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3873474711036143711&hl=en
On CBS, Tom Kennedy, a FEMA rescue worker, was being interviewed by Dan Rather on air Wednesday September 12th 2001. This is what Tom Kennedy had to say, Were one of the first teams that was deployed to support the city of New York for this disaster. We arrived late Monday night (September 10th), and went into action Tuesday morning (September 11th), and not until today did we get a full opportunity to work the entire site.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CW7Qvs-BZGk&mode=related&search[/ame] (first 20 seconds)
Why would FEMA arrive for search and rescue if the WTC attacks were a surprise ????
We witnessed the fire balls when the planes crashed into the Twin Towers.
Does this photo of the Fight 93 crash show a similar fireball?
Or does it show something more similar to a weapon/bomb or such explosion?
The smoke pattern in the photo reported to be of Fight 93 indicates an explosion without any immediate burning of fuel. It did not appear to be larger than a car bomb explosion:
If the fuel from a nearly fully loaded Boeing 767 did not ignite and create a huge fireball, then much of that fuel would have soaked into the soil, yet soil tests at the crash site found zero trace of fuel contamination:
http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/flight93.html
This is an aerial view of the crash site:
An a link to another large aerial view:
http://www.rcfp.org/moussaoui/jpg/P200057-1.jpg
Where are the scorch marks and plane wreckage from a crash that would have looked like this?
On 9/11/2001, we were told to believe that a nose-diving 100 plus ton airplane measuring 155 feet long, 125 feet wide and 45 feet tall magically disappeared into a hole in the ground that measured, about 30 to 40 feet long, 15 to 20 feet wide and 18 feet deep. No explanation has ever been officially offered as to why wreckage of a plane that nose dived into the ground was spread over an area of about 15 square miles.
Witnesses reported that they could not tell that a plane had crashed. The only evidence at the scene was one burning seat and charcoal (charcoal?), some clothing hanging in trees, a smoking hole with grass still alive and unharmed, nothing larger than a phonebook, no recognizable plane parts and no signs of bodies.
Fox News report [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZekosYOmXc[/ame]
Flight 93s black boxes were buried 15ft and 25ft into the ground, which is very strange. They both would have been installed in the tail section next to each other when the plane was built. Why would one travel 10 feet further into the ground? Flight 93s Flight Data recorder (FDR) was sent to NTSB for analysis . Their report mentions the manufacturer as Allied-Signal.
The NTSB released transcript from Flight 93s Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) but did not mention the manufactures name. United Airlines Flight 93 went into service in 1996. The CVR and the FDR should be the from the same manufacturer, Allied-Signal. In 1999 Allied-Signal acquired Honeywell and adopted its more recognizable name. The CVR reported to come from the Flight 93 crash site was manufactured by Honeywell. Do you see the problem here?
Also notable from these Black Box photos is the soil. Does the soil appear to have loose quick sand like properties? Why are these black boxes so clean? Why does the soil contain more loose rock and change color at 25 feet where the CVR was found as opposed to the denser red clay at 15 feet where the FDR was found. Notice the wires on the FDR, that is the only wires found over the whole "crash site". And whats with the brick?
Below is a photo of an engine being recovered from the hole. Notice that it burrowed into the soft ground with the plane, while the other engine that was found several hundred yards away was reported to have hit the same soft ground and bounced. Yet the wing that the bounced engine was attached magically just disappeared.
Here is a new engine for Boeing 767 under construction:
You do see the similarity, don't you?
I don't.
The official story of United Airlines Flight 93 claims that the plane nose-dived into former strip mining land in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. It encountering soft loosely packed soil, and was sucked effortlessly into the ground. To explain the widely scattered debris, the lack of fuel traces, the missing plane and human parts the official story concludes that the portion of the plane that contained the passengers, crew, luggage, cargo, fuel, and the vast majority of the airplane itself, exploded on the ground and was reduced to scraps that soared over mountaintops to reach destinations up to eight miles away.
I, being of sound mind, reject the official story of Flight 93 and all the attacks of September 11th 2001. If the whole point of terrorism is to make a point, just good why did no group take credit for the terrorism committed that day?
I also question why was a mysterious white aircraft reported at all the 9/11/01 scenes?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
More on Fight 93 and 9/11/01
Flight 93 Witness reports:
Despite extensive recovery efforts, nothing resembling a human corpse was ever found, officially at least, anywhere within the eight-mile-long debris field. According to the official storyline, all that was recovered, apart from, here and there, a finger, a toe or a tooth were small pieces of tissue and bone. -John Carlin "Unanswered Questions: The Mystery of Flight 93," The Independent, August 13, 2002
The largest piece of human tissue reportedly found was a section of spine eight inches long. No torsos, no arms, no legs, no hands, no feet not even a head, or at least a portion of one of the forty-four skulls. - Richard Wallace "What Did Happen to Flight 93?"
Daily Mirror, September 12, 2002
"It was as if the plane had stopped and let the passengers off before it crashed," Miller said." - Pittsburg Post Gazette (10/15/01)
"Wally Miller was among the very first to arrive after 10:06 on the magnificently sunny morning of September 11. Once he was able to absorb the scene, Miller says, "I stopped being coroner after about 20 minutes, because there were no bodies there. It became like a giant funeral service."
Thousands of people -- the locals estimate up to 1,000 a week -- have arrived at an old coal-mining access trail called Skyline Road, where finally they can see what remains of Flight 93: nothing. "There's not really much to it, is there?" Wally Miller often says to families and other visitors who are bewildered by what they don't see.
Immediately after the crash, the seeming absence of human remains led the mind of coroner Wally Miller to a surreal fantasy: that Flight 93 had somehow stopped in mid-flight and discharged all of its passengers before crashing. "There was just nothing visible," he says. "It was the strangest feeling." It would be nearly an hour before Miller came upon his first trace of a body part." - Washington Post (05/12/02)
"No bodies were recovered here, at least not as we normally think of bodies. In the cataclysmic violence of the crash, the people on Flight 93 literally disintegrated. Searchers found fragments of bones, small pieces of flesh, a hand. But no bodies." - Miami Herald (09/07/02)
"Wallace Miller, the lanky, Civil War-studying county coroner, did see it. He sat at the family funeral home, his father, Wilbur, with him. They watched the second plane sweep in low from nowhere. They winced when it hit.
He takes off his glasses, cleans them with his T-shirt. "This is the most eerie thing," he says. "I have not, to this day, seen a single drop of blood. Not a drop." - Pittsburgh Live (09/11/02)
More pictures in this video that tell an important 9/11 story:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3873474711036143711&hl=en
