Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,448
- 2,290
14th amendment. Equal protection of the laws.
Idiot.
Who is being treated unequal?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
14th amendment. Equal protection of the laws.
Idiot.
There is no conflict of interest. Also, they did not eliminate it for any other public union in the state. If there was a conflict of interest why not do it for all of public unions of the state?
The bigger problem is the fact that so many people are fine with political retaliation against anyone they do not agree with.
Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida signed a bill into law Tuesday that will require teachers who want to be in unions to mail in written checks every month.
Now the Repubs are dictating by law how people pay their bills.
Can someone explain how this is a Conservative thing to do?
The same thing. Is this another one of those "we're just as shitty as them" arguments??Well what do you call what they are doing to Donald Trump?
You said this....Yep. If it's a right, it has to be written somewhere.
Now you are taking that back?
Does it matter how much? Why do you support any loss of freedom? How much freedom do you lose by the NSA reading you every email?
Ninth Amendment
You with your constant apples and oranges comparisons. One has zero to do with the other.
These people work for the state of Florida government. They are not required to make union deductions for their employees; it's an option. DeSantis is simply saying the government will no longer do that for you any longer. If you want to be in the union, pay them yourselves.
If anything it's more freedom and and less government.
I am sure in your world having less options is more freedom, but you are a fucking partisan loon so I do not really care about your world.
It's the stock answer to anyway who asks "where is such-and-such right in the Constitution?" The question comes from ignorance about how the Constitution works.That has zero to do with it. Show me in the amendment union workers have the right to demand their employer make their dues as a deduction.
Oh, I see. Well, if you're denying that these acts are targeted retribution, then you're just lying. Which isn't a bad strategy, politically, if you can't defend your position.
It's the stock answer to anyway who asks "where is such-and-such right in the Constitution?" The question comes from ignorance about how the Constitution works.
In other words you can't show me. That's all you had to say.
The state is under no obligation to withhold union dues then remit them to a union.14th amendment. Equal protection of the laws.
Idiot.
Thomas Jefferson, and others, actually opposed the Bill of Rights because they thought that future idiots, like you, might confuse it with an exclusive list of our rights, and then insist we have no others.In other words you can't show me. That's all you had to say.
So, now you are back to if it is not in writing, it is not a right.
You need to make up your mind
I already explained it to you. If you can't catch on, that's not my problem.
There is no power in an allotment being taken out of check. My wife has the Govt deduct money from check and put into a savings account, should that be outlawed as well?
The payment to the union, like any other allotment can be stopped with a few clicks of the mouse.
What my way offers is freedom of choice, the thing your way takes away.