The painful truth about Ahmaud Arberry

You can't block a human being with a vehicle in a wide-open street with plenty of places to run...

They blocked AA’s path of travel. The judge denied bail mentioning that they blocked AA’s path of travel.

You are so stupid you posted video evidence of two white morons with guns blocking AA’s path of travel

6A132D6C-56AA-4C41-A4A9-2F7BAFDC28B0.jpeg

AA’s path of travel was never to go running through somebody’s yard.

As an added legal jeopardy bonus TM has his shotgun aimed at AA right there too.

This is likely the point where the judge who denied bail said TM shouldered a firearm while blocking AA’s path of Travel.

So your video image is showing precisely why those white morons with guns are sitting in jail waiting for trial - without bail.

Because they were stupid to think they could shoulder a firearm and block AA’s path of travel and end up killing him and the good ole white boy network would take care of it.
 
It doesn't matter at all if he ran in front of arberry and blocked his straight line path of Escape
What do you mean it doesn’t matter? It matters because your whole line of bullshit is wrong. If TM ran ahead of AA and cut off his path then TM is probably 6 feet ahead of the truck and there is no 90° angle that AA turned. There is none of your white supremacist bullshit that TM was using the engine block for cover standing right next to the truck if he’s about 6 feet away when the first shot was fired. Now that you are giving up your ridiculous interpretation of the facts Such as the one where you say TM walked about 3 feet after he raised his shotgun and aimed towards AA from the driver side of the truck to the position 6 feet ahead of the truck where he’s blocking AAs path it means there is no argument that TM was simply standing his ground. It means TM was aggressive and attacking the route we’re AA decided to go as an escape. TM cannot claim self-defense when he is blocking AAs escape and he shoots AA in the lower chest.
Who committed the first crime that provoked the entire thing and who committed the first act of violence?

That question has been answered so often as to be approved by the Department of Redundancy Department. It was the McMichaels. That is why they are in jail. It is why they are facing decades in prison. It is why their own attorneys admit crimes were committed.
 
You can't block a human being with a vehicle in a wide-open street with plenty of places to run...

They blocked AA’s path of travel. The judge denied bail mentioning that they blocked AA’s path of travel.

You are so stupid you posted video evidence of two white morons with guns blocking AA’s path of travel

View attachment 448557
AA’s path of travel was never to go running through somebody’s yard.

As an added legal jeopardy bonus TM has his shotgun aimed at AA right there too.

This is likely the point where the judge who denied bail said TM shouldered a firearm while blocking AA’s path of Travel.

So your video image is showing precisely why those white morons with guns are sitting in jail waiting for trial - without bail.

Because they were stupid to think they could shoulder a firearm and block AA’s path of travel and end up killing him and the good ole white boy network would take care of it.
If Travis wanted to kill a black jogger in broad daylight

I already told you TM didn’t want to shoot him but the outcome indicates he did not want AA to get past the road block they set up. So he shot him.
It doesn't matter at all if he ran in front of arberry and blocked his straight line path of Escape
What do you mean it doesn’t matter? It matters because your whole line of bullshit is wrong. If TM ran ahead of AA and cut off his path then TM is probably 6 feet ahead of the truck and there is no 90° angle that AA turned. There is none of your white supremacist bullshit that TM was using the engine block for cover standing right next to the truck if he’s about 6 feet away when the first shot was fired. Now that you are giving up your ridiculous interpretation of the facts Such as the one where you say TM walked about 3 feet after he raised his shotgun and aimed towards AA from the driver side of the truck to the position 6 feet ahead of the truck where he’s blocking AAs path it means there is no argument that TM was simply standing his ground. It means TM was aggressive and attacking the route we’re AA decided to go as an escape. TM cannot claim self-defense when he is blocking AAs escape and he shoots AA in the lower chest.
Who committed the first crime that provoked the entire thing and who committed the first act of violence?

That question has been answered so often as to be approved by the Department of Redundancy Department. It was the McMichaels. That is why they are in jail. It is why they are facing decades in prison. It is why their own attorneys admit crimes were committed.
At the end of the day, McMichael dies in prison.

Justice served...
bond was denied entirely on their behavior AFTER the shooting

all they did was try to delete naughty text messages that they fear will drum up drama of racism... the kind of knee-jerk emotional drama that sends men to prison even though they didn't violate a law in our deeply broken country

Their denial of bond had absolutely nothing to do with the actions on the ground during the shooting because those actions were completely Justified

 
It doesn't matter at all if he ran in front of arberry and blocked his straight line path of Escape
What do you mean it doesn’t matter? It matters because your whole line of bullshit is wrong. If TM ran ahead of AA and cut off his path then TM is probably 6 feet ahead of the truck and there is no 90° angle that AA turned. There is none of your white supremacist bullshit that TM was using the engine block for cover standing right next to the truck if he’s about 6 feet away when the first shot was fired. Now that you are giving up your ridiculous interpretation of the facts Such as the one where you say TM walked about 3 feet after he raised his shotgun and aimed towards AA from the driver side of the truck to the position 6 feet ahead of the truck where he’s blocking AAs path it means there is no argument that TM was simply standing his ground. It means TM was aggressive and attacking the route we’re AA decided to go as an escape. TM cannot claim self-defense when he is blocking AAs escape and he shoots AA in the lower chest.
Who committed the first crime that provoked the entire thing and who committed the first act of violence?

That question has been answered so often as to be approved by the Department of Redundancy Department. It was the McMichaels. That is why they are in jail. It is why they are facing decades in prison. It is why their own attorneys admit crimes were committed.
Ahmauds criminal activity in the neighborhood is what precipitated the entire thing and Ahmaud escalated what was simply a pursuit by attacking a man standing his ground who hadent even aimed a gun at him or touched him in any way

It's a laughable notion that two trucks could "trap" a young athletic black man with a penchant for trespass in this neighborhood

two trucks couldn't trap a city bus on these roads LOL

Screenshot_20210107-113210.png
 
At the end of the day, McMichael dies in prison.

Justice served...
And the next time a decent citizen sees someone fleeing the scene of a crime they'll run and hide like a coward just like your natural instinct dictates

I bet Richard Ramirez wishes the Mexican American heros that ran his serial killer ass down in Southern California were a bunch of limp-wristed sissies like you...

The next time our American citizens see a wanted criminal they'll run away and call the police as the criminal escapes into the sunset
download (81).jpeg


The next time a decent man sees someone dragging an 11 year old girl down the street he's not going to interfere with him cuz he doesn't want to go to prison... after all he can't be 100% certain he's witnessing a felony so he needs to just let her get drug into the van and call the cops, maybe if he's lucky he can get a license plate and she survives the rape

 
You can't block a human being with a vehicle in a wide-open street with plenty of places to run...

They blocked AA’s path of travel. The judge denied bail mentioning that they blocked AA’s path of travel.

You are so stupid you posted video evidence of two white morons with guns blocking AA’s path of travel

View attachment 448557
AA’s path of travel was never to go running through somebody’s yard.

As an added legal jeopardy bonus TM has his shotgun aimed at AA right there too.

This is likely the point where the judge who denied bail said TM shouldered a firearm while blocking AA’s path of Travel.

So your video image is showing precisely why those white morons with guns are sitting in jail waiting for trial - without bail.

Because they were stupid to think they could shoulder a firearm and block AA’s path of travel and end up killing him and the good ole white boy network would take care of it.
If Travis wanted to kill a black jogger in broad daylight

I already told you TM didn’t want to shoot him but the outcome indicates he did not want AA to get past the road block they set up. So he shot him.
It doesn't matter at all if he ran in front of arberry and blocked his straight line path of Escape
What do you mean it doesn’t matter? It matters because your whole line of bullshit is wrong. If TM ran ahead of AA and cut off his path then TM is probably 6 feet ahead of the truck and there is no 90° angle that AA turned. There is none of your white supremacist bullshit that TM was using the engine block for cover standing right next to the truck if he’s about 6 feet away when the first shot was fired. Now that you are giving up your ridiculous interpretation of the facts Such as the one where you say TM walked about 3 feet after he raised his shotgun and aimed towards AA from the driver side of the truck to the position 6 feet ahead of the truck where he’s blocking AAs path it means there is no argument that TM was simply standing his ground. It means TM was aggressive and attacking the route we’re AA decided to go as an escape. TM cannot claim self-defense when he is blocking AAs escape and he shoots AA in the lower chest.
Who committed the first crime that provoked the entire thing and who committed the first act of violence?

That question has been answered so often as to be approved by the Department of Redundancy Department. It was the McMichaels. That is why they are in jail. It is why they are facing decades in prison. It is why their own attorneys admit crimes were committed.
At the end of the day, McMichael dies in prison.

Justice served...
bond was denied entirely on their behavior AFTER the shooting

all they did was try to delete naughty text messages that they fear will drum up drama of racism... the kind of knee-jerk emotional drama that sends men to prison even though they didn't violate a law in our deeply broken country

Their denial of bond had absolutely nothing to do with the actions on the ground during the shooting because those actions were completely Justified



So you are angry that the Judge took issue with the son deleting social media posts. There is a term for that. Destruction of evidence. Interference with an investigation. Aren’t those crimes too? I mean. Even in old English law it was a crime to destroy evidence wasn’t it?
 
KingG’s list of 27 racist lies in post #1
KingGUERRILLA, post: 26042618,

“It's unlikely any other case in recent history has inspired more misinformation as media Outlets clearly have an incentive to racialize and dramatized every incident that comes their way” #1 Blame the media.,

“the simple fact is arberry was a well-known local Petty Criminal” #2 AA on the day that he was shot to death AA was to one neighbor a black male running out of a construction area from which the owners maintain he may have stopped to get a drink of water.,

“the simple fact is arberry was a well-known local Petty Criminal” #3 on the day that AA was shot to death to the McMichaels AA was a black man jogging past their house whom GM claimed resembled a black male seen in a surveillance video at the neighboring construction site. No actual crimes of theft or vandalism were committed on camera.

“the simple fact is arberry was a well-known local Petty Criminal” #4 on the day that AA was shot to death to Roddy AA was an unarmed black male on foot that was being chased by his neighbors in a pickup truck..

“who was caught casing out a house” #5 pure racist conjecture. AA per the owners may have stopped for a drink of water. none of the three men who killed AA that day knew what AA was doing at the construction site the day of his death.

“that had suffered a string of recent burglaries” #6 there were no recent burglaries reported on that property.

“and fled like a thief when he was confronted by the neighbor” #7 pure conjecture - The three men charged with murder did not witness the alleged fled like a thief from the construction site.

“The McMichaels weren't a couple of hillbillies sitting on their front porch downing canned beer when an innocent black jogger happened by” #8 AA was an innocent black jogger when he ran by. He must be presumed so by all law abiding citizens including two white morons with guns.

“they are BOTH former professional law enforcement agents” #9 only one was but this is a lie because they did not act “professional” when they chased down a black male who ran past their house.

“who recognized the local Petty Criminal” #10 GM told real police they thought he looked like that guy” seen on a video. That is an admission it was not a positive ID.

“hauling ass up the street from the video Larry English had captured after installing a security system and no trespassing sign due to the burglaries and may have been alerted by the first neighbor who had called 911 when he saw arberry illegally enter the crime scene and subsequently bolt when he realized he'd been caught” #11 Its at worse a trespassing crime. The neighbor witnessed no criminal activity other than trespassing.

“Per Georgia law they armed themselves and engaged in a Pursuit” #12 There is no law that authorizes two white males to engage in an armed pursuit of an unarmed black male running past their house.

“while on the phone with 911 and continued to relay the criminals position to the responding officers” #13 AA was not a criminal.

At one point Arberry decided he was going to attack #14 The video evidence does not show AA physically attacking until after he was shot once in the chest. It is racist conjecture to presume AA “decided” to attack prior to being shot.

“At one point Arberry decided he was going to attack the McMichaels” #15 AA is not ever seen attacking both McMichaels. In fact AA had already run past GM about a second and a half before he was shot.

“and ran towards Travis grabbing his shotgun and punching him in the face numerous times” **The video confirms this but it also shows that AA was bleeding from a shotgun wound to the chest as the struggle for the shotgun commenced.,

“committing a felony assault” #16 No Jurisdiction would charge an unarmed person who has been shot by armed assailants with felony assault of any other crime.

“In fact it was so obvious a simple self-defense shooting that they couldn't even determine whether or not Travis had pulled the trigger intentionally or not as when an attacking person is pulling on a long gun it is perfectly plausible that they themselves set the fire arm off” #17 #18 #19 There are at least three lies in that line of racist bullshit.

“The notion that a couple of vigilante Hillbillies set upon an innocent black jogger and gunned him down in the street is a complete joke”. #20 Blame the liberals. AA’s death is not a joke nor are the criminal charges brought against the men responsible for his death.

“The fact is Arberry committed a crime by entering a residence with a no trespassing sign” #21 The suspects in the murder caught on camera that day did not know about the alleged trespassing “crime” when they chose to pursue..

“and then bolted when confronted thus providing reasonable suspicion that he was in fact the person they recognized from the videos and a prior encounter Travis had with him.” #22 GM and TM knew was AA was jogging past their house. They did not witness a crime or have first hand knowledge of a crime. There was absolutely no need to engage in the armed pursuit that killed AA.

“In fact Gregory McMichael knew arberry because he had worked on one of his previous crimes” #23 So what. This is a lie because it has no relevance to the shooting death of AA.

“It's absolutely hilarious that mainstream media Outlets” #24 BLAME THE MEDIA.,

“can get away with a false narrative” #25 There is no false narrative in the mainstream news media.

“and an edited video” #26 There is no edited video being presented as real or intentionally distorts the truth.

“designed to convince people that these two men are bloodthirsty murderers who decided to hunt down an innocent black jogger,” #27 the MSM presents the facts - if the facts convince people of that so be it. The facts in this case speak for themselves . I believe based on the facts that two of those men were morons with guns who were stupid to launch an armed pursuit against a black unarmed male they see jogging past their house and will deserve the punishment they get for being stupid.
 
Last edited:
Look man nobody in their right mind is going to Simply Veer to the right in an attempt to avoid two men with guns who were supposedly threatening them...

You are the idiot spewing AA had mental issues and yet you bring this argument to this forum. Seriously?

No one with a loaded shotgun makes this move against an unarmed jogger if his intent is to let the jogger pass by his truck unscathed.

View attachment 446894
And TM started that attack from the position where he “aimed” the shotgun at AA right here:

View attachment 446895

LOL@
"No one with a loaded shotgun makes this move against an unarmed jogger if his intent is to let the jogger pass by his truck unscathed"

-He wasn't a jogger he was a criminal fleeing from the scene of the crime

- if Travis intended to hurt him he had lots of chances prior to being punched

- there's absolutely no way they could determine whether or not he was armed they do know he was intent on Escape however
"He wasn't a jogger he was a criminal fleeing from the scene of the crime"

He committed a misdemeanor. Georgia law doesn't allow for the McMichaels to detain anyone for anything less than a felony.
he committed a crime that precipitated Reasonable Suspicion of a felony

And then incited pursuit by fleeing and refusing to identify himself

He then escalated a confrontation by utilizing violence

sure is tough to defend a criminal isn't it?
There was no "reasonable suspicion of a felony" as none of those 3 hillbillies knew Arbery was just on that site. You lose again.
Trouble for you social justice fantasy Warriors is the fact that the McMichaels were sitting still having given up their Pursuit when they were closed on confronted and subsequently attacked

They put themnselves into a position which they thought would be beneficial in blocking Arbery.

If they'd "given up" they'd have gone the fuck home.

They didn't do that...
So even though they were standing still they were still metaphorically chasing him?
They weren't standing still. Travis got out of the truck and went into the oncoming lane. Then he went back into the same lane of the truck. That's the opposite of standing still.
Oh brother they were trying to stop a CRIMINAL from fleeing the scene of the crime---------then the criminal attacked them.
What was the crime?
A man with several decades of professional local law enforcement experience recognized a fleeing criminal wanted in a string of home invasions and burglaries
Nope, you're lying. He saw nothing. Travis was inside, so who knows what you think he saw. And Greg only saw a man running past his house.

If truth and reality were on your side, you wouldn't have to lie like that.
 
if Travis ran in front of berry boy he would have been pushed DOWN the street not across it dumbass

He had a shotgun. We know he got out in front of the truck by about six feet. When he was in front of the truck in the middle of the lane he was also in front of AA. He had a shotgun you stupid racist. If AA didn’t stop he could shoot him to make him stop even from an angle.

It has already been explained to you about the angles dumbass. Try reading it this time.

post: 26423706
No. The video evidence shows AA turned a 45 degree angle coming around the front of the truck not expecting TM to be there. As he did that he saw TM directly either in his path or moving in the direction that would block his path and within half a second TM fired a shot hitting AA In the chest. TM then began running backwards with AA in pursuit.

They pretty much stay on a 45 degree angle coming out about 10 feet in front of the truck coming back into view and then they turn a second 45 to complete a full 90 turn perpendicular to the centerline.
But he had a perfect shot right here:
View attachment 448563

If Travis wanted to kill a black jogger in broad daylight in front of witnesses in the middle of the street while his dad was on the phone with 911 he had a perfect opportunity in that frame!!!

he had an easy kill right there, why would he wait for Arberry to run up and be able to take cover behind his truck?

why wait till the man you had been chasing is already on top of you to pull the trigger?
He couldn't shoot Arbery there because he risked hitting Bryan who was behind Arbery. You'll note in that frame, taken from Bryan's phone, Arbery is lined up about a foot off of center from Travis' position.
 
It doesn't matter at all if he ran in front of arberry and blocked his straight line path of Escape
What do you mean it doesn’t matter? It matters because your whole line of bullshit is wrong. If TM ran ahead of AA and cut off his path then TM is probably 6 feet ahead of the truck and there is no 90° angle that AA turned. There is none of your white supremacist bullshit that TM was using the engine block for cover standing right next to the truck if he’s about 6 feet away when the first shot was fired. Now that you are giving up your ridiculous interpretation of the facts Such as the one where you say TM walked about 3 feet after he raised his shotgun and aimed towards AA from the driver side of the truck to the position 6 feet ahead of the truck where he’s blocking AAs path it means there is no argument that TM was simply standing his ground. It means TM was aggressive and attacking the route we’re AA decided to go as an escape. TM cannot claim self-defense when he is blocking AAs escape and he shoots AA in the lower chest.
Who committed the first crime that provoked the entire thing and who committed the first act of violence?

That question has been answered so often as to be approved by the Department of Redundancy Department. It was the McMichaels. That is why they are in jail. It is why they are facing decades in prison. It is why their own attorneys admit crimes were committed.
Ahmauds criminal activity in the neighborhood is what precipitated the entire thing and Ahmaud escalated what was simply a pursuit by attacking a man standing his ground who hadent even aimed a gun at him or touched him in any way

It's a laughable notion that two trucks could "trap" a young athletic black man with a penchant for trespass in this neighborhood

two trucks couldn't trap a city bus on these roads LOL

View attachment 448717
If they couldn't block him, then how is it Arbery couldn't escape their neighborhood after trying to do so for more than 4 minutes?
 
You can't block a human being with a vehicle in a wide-open street with plenty of places to run...

They blocked AA’s path of travel. The judge denied bail mentioning that they blocked AA’s path of travel.

You are so stupid you posted video evidence of two white morons with guns blocking AA’s path of travel

View attachment 448557
AA’s path of travel was never to go running through somebody’s yard.

As an added legal jeopardy bonus TM has his shotgun aimed at AA right there too.

This is likely the point where the judge who denied bail said TM shouldered a firearm while blocking AA’s path of Travel.

So your video image is showing precisely why those white morons with guns are sitting in jail waiting for trial - without bail.

Because they were stupid to think they could shoulder a firearm and block AA’s path of travel and end up killing him and the good ole white boy network would take care of it.
If Travis wanted to kill a black jogger in broad daylight

I already told you TM didn’t want to shoot him but the outcome indicates he did not want AA to get past the road block they set up. So he shot him.
It doesn't matter at all if he ran in front of arberry and blocked his straight line path of Escape
What do you mean it doesn’t matter? It matters because your whole line of bullshit is wrong. If TM ran ahead of AA and cut off his path then TM is probably 6 feet ahead of the truck and there is no 90° angle that AA turned. There is none of your white supremacist bullshit that TM was using the engine block for cover standing right next to the truck if he’s about 6 feet away when the first shot was fired. Now that you are giving up your ridiculous interpretation of the facts Such as the one where you say TM walked about 3 feet after he raised his shotgun and aimed towards AA from the driver side of the truck to the position 6 feet ahead of the truck where he’s blocking AAs path it means there is no argument that TM was simply standing his ground. It means TM was aggressive and attacking the route we’re AA decided to go as an escape. TM cannot claim self-defense when he is blocking AAs escape and he shoots AA in the lower chest.
Who committed the first crime that provoked the entire thing and who committed the first act of violence?

That question has been answered so often as to be approved by the Department of Redundancy Department. It was the McMichaels. That is why they are in jail. It is why they are facing decades in prison. It is why their own attorneys admit crimes were committed.
At the end of the day, McMichael dies in prison.

Justice served...
bond was denied entirely on their behavior AFTER the shooting

all they did was try to delete naughty text messages that they fear will drum up drama of racism... the kind of knee-jerk emotional drama that sends men to prison even though they didn't violate a law in our deeply broken country

Their denial of bond had absolutely nothing to do with the actions on the ground during the shooting because those actions were completely Justified



So you are angry that the Judge took issue with the son deleting social media posts. There is a term for that. Destruction of evidence. Interference with an investigation. Aren’t those crimes too? I mean. Even in old English law it was a crime to destroy evidence wasn’t it?


I referred to the McMichaels as morons multiple times throughout this thread and suggested every facet of their pre arrest behavior was foolish and ill-advised yet completely legal

By actively trying to erase
All the naughty language on social media they committed violations of the terms of custody even though it has no evidentiary value whatsoever in reference to the shooting.... it's pure drama designed to incite drama queens like you
LOL

In an intelligent tactic perfected in the OJ trial introducing dramatic accusations of racism often times can make even the most guilty black person a victim in the eyes of the jury and create just enough doubt in a jury to let a murderer walk much less send a couple innocent men to jail

download (45).jpeg
 
That’s true. but I also believe TM did not want to shoot him until he was almost about to escape from their neighborhood
so you're saying that he was shot for escaping the neighborhood?

As if for some reason they couldn't commission a citizen's arrest outside of the neighborhood?
 
It doesn't matter at all if he ran in front of arberry and blocked his straight line path of Escape
What do you mean it doesn’t matter? It matters because your whole line of bullshit is wrong. If TM ran ahead of AA and cut off his path then TM is probably 6 feet ahead of the truck and there is no 90° angle that AA turned. There is none of your white supremacist bullshit that TM was using the engine block for cover standing right next to the truck if he’s about 6 feet away when the first shot was fired. Now that you are giving up your ridiculous interpretation of the facts Such as the one where you say TM walked about 3 feet after he raised his shotgun and aimed towards AA from the driver side of the truck to the position 6 feet ahead of the truck where he’s blocking AAs path it means there is no argument that TM was simply standing his ground. It means TM was aggressive and attacking the route we’re AA decided to go as an escape. TM cannot claim self-defense when he is blocking AAs escape and he shoots AA in the lower chest.
Who committed the first crime that provoked the entire thing and who committed the first act of violence?

That question has been answered so often as to be approved by the Department of Redundancy Department. It was the McMichaels. That is why they are in jail. It is why they are facing decades in prison. It is why their own attorneys admit crimes were committed.
Ahmauds criminal activity in the neighborhood is what precipitated the entire thing and Ahmaud escalated what was simply a pursuit by attacking a man standing his ground who hadent even aimed a gun at him or touched him in any way

It's a laughable notion that two trucks could "trap" a young athletic black man with a penchant for trespass in this neighborhood

two trucks couldn't trap a city bus on these roads LOL

View attachment 448717
If they couldn't block him, then how is it Arbery couldn't escape their neighborhood after trying to do so for more than 4 minutes?

I'm not sure he was trying to escape when he was trying to get in Roddy's car and running directly at the McMichaels with an intention to violently attack them

If he believed he had been identified killing the witnesses would have been his only way to escape jail
 
You can't block a human being with a vehicle in a wide-open street with plenty of places to run...

They blocked AA’s path of travel. The judge denied bail mentioning that they blocked AA’s path of travel.

You are so stupid you posted video evidence of two white morons with guns blocking AA’s path of travel

View attachment 448557
AA’s path of travel was never to go running through somebody’s yard.

As an added legal jeopardy bonus TM has his shotgun aimed at AA right there too.

This is likely the point where the judge who denied bail said TM shouldered a firearm while blocking AA’s path of Travel.

So your video image is showing precisely why those white morons with guns are sitting in jail waiting for trial - without bail.

Because they were stupid to think they could shoulder a firearm and block AA’s path of travel and end up killing him and the good ole white boy network would take care of it.
If Travis wanted to kill a black jogger in broad daylight

I already told you TM didn’t want to shoot him but the outcome indicates he did not want AA to get past the road block they set up. So he shot him.
It doesn't matter at all if he ran in front of arberry and blocked his straight line path of Escape
What do you mean it doesn’t matter? It matters because your whole line of bullshit is wrong. If TM ran ahead of AA and cut off his path then TM is probably 6 feet ahead of the truck and there is no 90° angle that AA turned. There is none of your white supremacist bullshit that TM was using the engine block for cover standing right next to the truck if he’s about 6 feet away when the first shot was fired. Now that you are giving up your ridiculous interpretation of the facts Such as the one where you say TM walked about 3 feet after he raised his shotgun and aimed towards AA from the driver side of the truck to the position 6 feet ahead of the truck where he’s blocking AAs path it means there is no argument that TM was simply standing his ground. It means TM was aggressive and attacking the route we’re AA decided to go as an escape. TM cannot claim self-defense when he is blocking AAs escape and he shoots AA in the lower chest.
Who committed the first crime that provoked the entire thing and who committed the first act of violence?

That question has been answered so often as to be approved by the Department of Redundancy Department. It was the McMichaels. That is why they are in jail. It is why they are facing decades in prison. It is why their own attorneys admit crimes were committed.
At the end of the day, McMichael dies in prison.

Justice served...
bond was denied entirely on their behavior AFTER the shooting

all they did was try to delete naughty text messages that they fear will drum up drama of racism... the kind of knee-jerk emotional drama that sends men to prison even though they didn't violate a law in our deeply broken country

Their denial of bond had absolutely nothing to do with the actions on the ground during the shooting because those actions were completely Justified



So you are angry that the Judge took issue with the son deleting social media posts. There is a term for that. Destruction of evidence. Interference with an investigation. Aren’t those crimes too? I mean. Even in old English law it was a crime to destroy evidence wasn’t it?


I referred to the McMichaels as morons multiple times throughout this thread and suggested every facet of their pre arrest behavior was foolish and ill-advised yet completely legal

By actively trying to erase
All the naughty language on social media they committed violations of the terms of custody even though it has no evidentiary value whatsoever in reference to the shooting.... it's pure drama designed to incite drama queens like you
LOL

In an intelligent tactic perfected in the OJ trial introducing dramatic accusations of racism often times can make even the most guilty black person a victim in the eyes of the jury and create just enough doubt in a jury to let a murderer walk much less send a couple innocent men to jail

View attachment 448842


If the posts can demonstrate an existing bias against a minority doesn’t that qualify as a hate crime? Or at least can be shown as a predisposition to use force against a minority.

Either way. It is information. And according to Republicans the police are entitled to any and all information. How else will they stop guilty people from going free?

the McMichaels are Morons. And criminals. They committed crimes.
 
if Travis ran in front of berry boy he would have been pushed DOWN the street not across it dumbass

He had a shotgun. We know he got out in front of the truck by about six feet. When he was in front of the truck in the middle of the lane he was also in front of AA. He had a shotgun you stupid racist. If AA didn’t stop he could shoot him to make him stop even from an angle.

It has already been explained to you about the angles dumbass. Try reading it this time.

post: 26423706
No. The video evidence shows AA turned a 45 degree angle coming around the front of the truck not expecting TM to be there. As he did that he saw TM directly either in his path or moving in the direction that would block his path and within half a second TM fired a shot hitting AA In the chest. TM then began running backwards with AA in pursuit.

They pretty much stay on a 45 degree angle coming out about 10 feet in front of the truck coming back into view and then they turn a second 45 to complete a full 90 turn perpendicular to the centerline.
But he had a perfect shot right here:
View attachment 448563

If Travis wanted to kill a black jogger in broad daylight in front of witnesses in the middle of the street while his dad was on the phone with 911 he had a perfect opportunity in that frame!!!

he had an easy kill right there, why would he wait for Arberry to run up and be able to take cover behind his truck?

why wait till the man you had been chasing is already on top of you to pull the trigger?
He couldn't shoot Arbery there because he risked hitting Bryan who was behind Arbery. You'll note in that frame, taken from Bryan's phone, Arbery is lined up about a foot off of center from Travis' position.
what about when amaud was running around the back side of the truck he could have easily shot him then

perfect angle because Travis was standing on the driver side of the truck while Roddy was safely directly behind maude about 30 meters

ATFNJX47G5E3BD3E5XQXJOXSWQ.jpeg
 
You can't block a human being with a vehicle in a wide-open street with plenty of places to run...

They blocked AA’s path of travel. The judge denied bail mentioning that they blocked AA’s path of travel.

You are so stupid you posted video evidence of two white morons with guns blocking AA’s path of travel

View attachment 448557
AA’s path of travel was never to go running through somebody’s yard.

As an added legal jeopardy bonus TM has his shotgun aimed at AA right there too.

This is likely the point where the judge who denied bail said TM shouldered a firearm while blocking AA’s path of Travel.

So your video image is showing precisely why those white morons with guns are sitting in jail waiting for trial - without bail.

Because they were stupid to think they could shoulder a firearm and block AA’s path of travel and end up killing him and the good ole white boy network would take care of it.
If Travis wanted to kill a black jogger in broad daylight

I already told you TM didn’t want to shoot him but the outcome indicates he did not want AA to get past the road block they set up. So he shot him.
It doesn't matter at all if he ran in front of arberry and blocked his straight line path of Escape
What do you mean it doesn’t matter? It matters because your whole line of bullshit is wrong. If TM ran ahead of AA and cut off his path then TM is probably 6 feet ahead of the truck and there is no 90° angle that AA turned. There is none of your white supremacist bullshit that TM was using the engine block for cover standing right next to the truck if he’s about 6 feet away when the first shot was fired. Now that you are giving up your ridiculous interpretation of the facts Such as the one where you say TM walked about 3 feet after he raised his shotgun and aimed towards AA from the driver side of the truck to the position 6 feet ahead of the truck where he’s blocking AAs path it means there is no argument that TM was simply standing his ground. It means TM was aggressive and attacking the route we’re AA decided to go as an escape. TM cannot claim self-defense when he is blocking AAs escape and he shoots AA in the lower chest.
Who committed the first crime that provoked the entire thing and who committed the first act of violence?

That question has been answered so often as to be approved by the Department of Redundancy Department. It was the McMichaels. That is why they are in jail. It is why they are facing decades in prison. It is why their own attorneys admit crimes were committed.
At the end of the day, McMichael dies in prison.

Justice served...
bond was denied entirely on their behavior AFTER the shooting

all they did was try to delete naughty text messages that they fear will drum up drama of racism... the kind of knee-jerk emotional drama that sends men to prison even though they didn't violate a law in our deeply broken country

Their denial of bond had absolutely nothing to do with the actions on the ground during the shooting because those actions were completely Justified



So you are angry that the Judge took issue with the son deleting social media posts. There is a term for that. Destruction of evidence. Interference with an investigation. Aren’t those crimes too? I mean. Even in old English law it was a crime to destroy evidence wasn’t it?


I referred to the McMichaels as morons multiple times throughout this thread and suggested every facet of their pre arrest behavior was foolish and ill-advised yet completely legal

By actively trying to erase
All the naughty language on social media they committed violations of the terms of custody even though it has no evidentiary value whatsoever in reference to the shooting.... it's pure drama designed to incite drama queens like you
LOL

In an intelligent tactic perfected in the OJ trial introducing dramatic accusations of racism often times can make even the most guilty black person a victim in the eyes of the jury and create just enough doubt in a jury to let a murderer walk much less send a couple innocent men to jail

View attachment 448842


If the posts can demonstrate an existing bias against a minority doesn’t that qualify as a hate crime? Or at least can be shown as a predisposition to use force against a minority.

Either way. It is information. And according to Republicans the police are entitled to any and all information. How else will they stop guilty people from going free?

the McMichaels are Morons. And criminals. They committed crimes.

The act of Criminal Trespass repeatedly caught on Larry English's security system had already identified the young black man as the most likely suspect in the string of burglaries in the neighborhood

it has nothing to do with "racism"

it's Simple enforcement Logistics that they took off chasing the man they recognized from the video and their personal first-hand experience with him

he just happened to be black

if he were white or hispanic he would have been chased exactly the same
 

Forum List

Back
Top