The opinions of legal "experts" on Trumps federal case are 100% irrelevant

Agreed...

They would have to be a blind loyalist, strong beliefs but with no online profile. Otherwise Jack Smith can strike for cause and he has an unlimited amount of those.. I think he gets also 6 peremptory challenges for this case.

It should be probably enough to keep the worst away. All they need is an old post on facebook and they can strike for cause.. Did you vote for Trump by enough...
What happened to secret ballot? :uhh:
 
And you base this on your years of legal expertise?
More like Jack Smith's record of corruption and failings and prosecutorial misdeeds.

Not sure why he was never fired, that he wasn't means whoever is over him is corrupt as well.
 
He was behind the corruption at the IRS and DOJ



"During his years as chief, Smith’s unit garnered a successful conviction against former Gov. Bob McDonnell (R-VA), which was later unanimously overturned by the Supreme Court, and pursued a case against Democratic vice presidential candidate and former Sen. John Edwards (D-NC), which resulted in a hung jury and a mistrial. Smith's team also secured a conviction against Rep. Rick Renzi (R-AZ) before he was pardoned by Trump in 2021 and laid the groundwork for what would become the unsuccessful prosecution of Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ)."


^Trump pardoned one of those he convicted. Conflict of interest?
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom