The opinions of legal "experts" on Trumps federal case are 100% irrelevant

[Mac1958]

So is Bill Barr, Trump's own handpicked AG, part of that unhinged left that is "targeting Trump"?

These snowflakes are the biggest victims in the history of historical histories.

Everybody is corrupt but them. They are Good. Everyone else is Evil.

TRUMP'S OWN PEOPLE provided the evidence and tips for Smith, so the rubes try to deflect to Hillary or Biden or anyone else.

Tough shit for them.

 

[Michael1985]

The second I see a news headline purporting to tell me what some "expert" or "experts" tell me about a given topic of interest, I take it as my cue to keep scrolling.

 

[The Duke]

The second I see a news headline purporting to tell me what some "expert" or "experts" tell me about a given topic of interest, I take it as my cue to keep scrolling.

Argument from Authority fallacy. The premise of this thread is correct.

 

[CowboyTed]

If Trump gets a leftist leaning jury he will be found guilty. End of story.

Lovely, so you don't want to see actual evidence...

Who will determine 'Leftist'... Have a funny feeling that you will judge that after the verdict...

It is plain to see that Trump's defence team has some serious questions to answer...
This is not the same as any other politicians like Hillary or Biden, which has been explained multiple times... Acting like you too stupid to understand is not a defence strategy..

Either way Whataboutism is not a defence either...

 

[Mac1958]

Lovely, so you don't want to see actual evidence...

Their orange god is above the law, so any evidence is irrelevant.

All that evidence, provided by his own people, even his own lawyers? Fake news.

Cult.

 

[Batcat]

If Trump gets a leftist leaning jury he will be found guilty. End of story.

Just one Trump supporter on that jury and Trump walks away scot-free.

 

[IM2]

Bullshit ******* lies. You have faith in the system you've been blasting since cops get off and the treyvon case and the kid who shot off the dudes arm at the riot. You jackasses couldn't cry loud enough about how corrupt our system is. This is NOTHING MORE than you covering for what will be an inevitable guilty verdict from a hack jury.

Trump isn't guilty of anything the last half dozen presidents (including republicans) haven't done before him, including Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State and Biden as a senator. Is trumps bathroom any less secure than Bidens ******* garage or Clinton's closet???
That in an of itself PROVES how ******* wack this shit is.

This is 100% a political hit job and these fucktards have opened a can of worms we'll NEVER recover from.

Bullshit.

 

[CowboyTed]

I know as much about the charges as everyone else here. What I know even better is how partisans can't see outside their bubble.
Democrat jury guilty
Republican jury innocent

And you KNOW I'm right so stop your asinine trolling

Not everyone are sheep... Actually a lot of people can sit in a jury and hear evidence and make up their own mind...

The largest group in America are independents.

There has been Trump Votes in the past who have voted to convict him later when they get all the information..

I understand you come from a pretty harsh Media Bubble on the right where if you disagree with a political opponent you accuse them of being pedophiles with no evidence...

I know you probably hate Rachel Maddow, but can you show where she has accused a GOP official of being a pedophile with no evidence..

Marjorie Taylor Greene doubles down: Democrats are 'pedophiles'

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene reasserted her allegations the Democratic Party is 'full of pedophiles' and said Joe Biden's transgender agenda for minors contributes to the 'sexualizing children.'

www.dailymail.co.uk

Why Republicans Have Become Obsessed With Accusing Their Opponents of Pedophilia

It’s the only thing worse than their record.

slate.com

 

[IM2]

No district in the country shows Trump's approval under 8.3%, liberals are just begging to be disappointed yet again.

That's a lie, unless you're only counting republicans.

 

[CowboyTed]

Just one Trump supporter on that jury and Trump walks away scot-free.

Agreed...

They would have to be a blind loyalist, strong beliefs but with no online profile. Otherwise Jack Smith can strike for cause and he has an unlimited amount of those.. I think he gets also 6 peremptory challenges for this case.

It should be probably enough to keep the worst away. All they need is an old post on facebook and they can strike for cause.. Did you vote for Trump by enough...

 

[IM2]

You CLEARLY don't know the law. MANY defendants are left on "bail" until appeals are exhausted.

You need to read the indictment.

The facts. Not partisan jibberish.

 

[Care4all]

Risky either way. I prefer DeSantis by a wide margin but I don't like this political shit they're pulling.

Clearly we have document issues from senators to secretaries to presidents.

Create new legislation to prevent this shit if it's a real problem.

He was not charged with having documents at his home, just like Joe and Mike.

You really do need to spend 5 minutes to read the indictment.... to know what he was charged with.

 

[Batcat]

Agreed...

They would have to be a blind loyalist, strong beliefs but with no online profile. Otherwise Jack Smith can strike for cause and he has an unlimited amount of those.. I think he gets also 6 peremptory challenges for this case.

It should be probably enough to keep the worst away. All they need is an old post on facebook and they can strike for cause.. Did you vote for Trump by enough...

I use Facebook only because some people message me using Facebook or post pictures of family members. However I do post here and it should be obvious that I support Trump or DeSantis. Since I am over 70, I don’t have to serve on a Florida jury.

Still Florida has a good number of elderly people who do not use computers except for email and ordering stuff from Walmart. Florida also has a lot of Trump supporters. It would be easy for one to end up on Trump’s jury. Southern Florida is mostly a Democrat stronghold so who knows?

 

[surada]

Regardless, if he loses he will appeal for years and it will be pursued all the way to the Supreme Court.

I doubt the Supreme Court would hear the case. The law is crystal clear and the evidence is damning.

 

[surada]

The second I see a news headline purporting to tell me what some "expert" or "experts" tell me about a given topic of interest, I take it as my cue to keep scrolling.

Trump doesn't listen to lawyers either.

 

[konradv]

If Trump gets a leftist leaning jury he will be found guilty. End of story.

I don’t see how any jury could fail to convict, considering he admitted guilt on audio recordings. Real ones, not just phantoms, like we’re getting from the Biden “investigation”.

 

[SweetSue92]

Hey, Einstein.

NOT prosecuting him, with the evidence they have, PROVIDED BY HIS OWN PEOPLE, would be unequal justice. NOT prosecuting him would be putting him above the law. Evidently that's what you want.

But enjoy your talking points. Cling to them. And keep thinking that anyone who dares to not think like you is stupid.

But you are stupid, Mac. You didn't used to be though

 

[JoeB131]

If Trump gets a leftist leaning jury he will be found guilty. End of story.

Well, that and he actually did what he's accused of and has pretty much admitted it publicly.

Not much of a defense to say, "I totally did it!"

 

[Moonglow]

You're a ******* idiot.

The VERY FOUNDATION of our judicial system is EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW.

Without that we don't have justice we have a ******* banana republic where every administration chases & jails the prior.

You people are so ******* stupid you don't even see the plug you just pulled from the drain

If Trump were a poor black man you wouldn't give a shit.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

If Trump were a poor black man you wouldn't give a shit.

I have no problems with Steve Martin