Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Who is illegally taking anyone's firearms? What most Democrats want is stricter background checks, to weed out the Adam Lanza types. That is not "taking your guns", duh. I'll easily pass any such background check, and will with or without the enhanced checks be the proud owner of a new .30/.06 soon. Got my eyes on a nice one...
And I'm a progressive Democrat, so you'd best keep your insurrection away from me.
It's you who needs to understand why it was put there. I'm giving you a scenario that could happen in the future.
Constitutions are not set in stone and neither is the second.
Maybe you need to familarize yourself with the rules before you post. Just saying.This is my first time on the message board, I may be making mistakes but at least I'm not a boorish person like you.
terrible link, it takes you to their main page. You need to learn how to link your documentation correctly if you want any credibility.National Library of Medicine - National Institutes of Health then there's a v symbol sideways followed by PMC
Holy fuck are you stupid!!!
No one has ever been shot while stopping a tyrannical government?
There's this thing that happened back in 1776 maybe you've heard about it.
You'd have to own a gun to pick him off from a half mile away wouldnt you?
And what makes you think he couldnt do the same to you?
So then the OP is wrong?There has never been a uprising by the people againt a tyrannical government.
Never a shot fired is what I said. Read it again. You called Obama a terrorist, Muslim and not American but did absolutely nothing to get rid if him. Home of the brave my arse.
What makes you think I have to own a gun to shoot someone?
Try this. If the correct authorities arrived at your house with documentation legislated by law, how would you react.
They knock and state their case, would you start shooting then?
You grab your guns and point them. Would you start now?
You fire the first shot and he cripples you, then maybe?
None of the above. You wouldn't have the guts to commence firing. They could kill you at their will. So where's all this bravado and 2nd then? Your gun doesn't give you permission to act outside the law and they would take you down like a dog.
So settle down. Your weapons are only show pieces and will never be used to defy the law.
You see the way you are the one trying to use threats and force against me, while claiming I'm the danger?Due to your name, I ask, Are you involved with Asatru Folk Assembly? They are a terrorist group, very much a concern in Virginia where they're big in the prisons.
I've forwarded this ID to HS to be checked out. If you don't already have a file, you do now.
I covered the scenario in another post.Okay then.
You tell me why we have the 2nd.
And it's highly unlikely the 2nd will be struck down,it would be political suicide to try.
I actually didn't put those words. I typed out the Link, it transformed itself when you print it out there's a comment.terrible link, it takes you to their main page. You need to learn how to link your documentation correctly if you want any credibility.
I do not lie nor do I care to associate with people who do so goodbyeCome get mine, liar.
There has never been a uprising by the people againt a tyrannical government.
Never a shot fired is what I said. Read it again. You called Obama a terrorist, Muslim and not American but did absolutely nothing to get rid if him. Home of the brave my arse.
What makes you think I have to own a gun to shoot someone?
Try this. If the correct authorities arrived at your house with documentation legislated by law, how would you react.
They knock and state their case, would you start shooting then?
You grab your guns and point them. Would you start now?
You fire the first shot and he cripples you, then maybe?
None of the above. You wouldn't have the guts to commence firing. They could kill you at their will. So where's all this bravado and 2nd then? Your gun doesn't give you permission to act outside the law and they would take you down like a dog.
So settle down. Your weapons are only show pieces and will never be used to defy the law.
There has never been a uprising by the people againt a tyrannical government.
But the right is.It's you who needs to understand why it was put there. I'm giving you a scenario that could happen in the future.
Constitutions are not set in stone and neither is the second.
I couldn't find the story and you seem unable to back up your claim at all. Oh well, I hope you do better next time.I actually didn't put those words. I typed out the Link, it transformed itself when you print it out there's a comment.
So then the OP is wrong?
Which is why Queen Elizabeth is our supreme leader.
Right?
False.There has never been a uprising by the people againt a tyrannical government.
Never a shot fired is what I said. Read it again. You called Obama a terrorist, Muslim and not American but did absolutely nothing to get rid if him. Home of the brave my arse.
What makes you think I have to own a gun to shoot someone?
Try this. If the correct authorities arrived at your house with documentation legislated by law, how would you react.
They knock and state their case, would you start shooting then?
You grab your guns and point them. Would you start now?
You fire the first shot and he cripples you, then maybe?
None of the above. You wouldn't have the guts to commence firing. They could kill you at their will. So where's all this bravado and 2nd then? Your gun doesn't give you permission to act outside the law and they would take you down like a dog.
So settle down. Your weapons are only show pieces and will never be used to defy the law.
There has never been a uprising by the people againt a tyrannical government.
Never a shot fired is what I said. Read it again. You called Obama a terrorist, Muslim and not American but did absolutely nothing to get rid if him. Home of the brave my arse.
What makes you think I have to own a gun to shoot someone?
Try this. If the correct authorities arrived at your house with documentation legislated by law, how would you react.
They knock and state their case, would you start shooting then?
You grab your guns and point them. Would you start now?
You fire the first shot and he cripples you, then maybe?
None of the above. You wouldn't have the guts to commence firing. They could kill you at their will. So where's all this bravado and 2nd then? Your gun doesn't give you permission to act outside the law and they would take you down like a dog.
So settle down. Your weapons are only show pieces and will never be used to defy the law.
I covered the scenario in another post.
The 2nd is clear in what is says. The scenario has never arrived. That's why we have a military.
It is now over 60% of people wants guns restricted or banned. That majority doesn't equate to political suicide.
It is unlikely but you protect guns like your life depends on it and they rarely get used for hunting. That's a fact. You have them because you can and you live in fear of a communist takeover. Bullshit.
That's why we have a military.
I must have missed that one. Can you give me a date when the British were attacked by every citizen who owned a gun. Where did it happen?
