NotfooledbyW
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 24,831
- 4,901
- 245
Indeependent, post: 22126289
If I’m psycho why is it that Trumpo’s best year (2018) in annualized GDP is 2.9 and it is so much better than Obama’s best year in 2015 at 2.9.
The Toddster cannot explain why Obama is weak weak weak on economic growth but Trumpo is strong strong strong based upon a tie.
Trumpo’s best year has burned through his tax cut impact on the economy. There is no 6,0 GDP in sight. He ties Obama’s best year with all that stimulation and government spending at 2.9.
If we compare best two years Obama breaks the tie ahead,
What is psycho about these facts.
To continue on about how great Trumpo is and how bad Obama was is weak minded.
Why are you on board with the Toddster without considering the facts and engaging in the discussion based on those facts.
2.9 = 2.9 Can you dispute the math?
It sounds funny, but sometimes making sense when responding to a psycho can give me a really painful bellyache.
If I’m psycho why is it that Trumpo’s best year (2018) in annualized GDP is 2.9 and it is so much better than Obama’s best year in 2015 at 2.9.
The Toddster cannot explain why Obama is weak weak weak on economic growth but Trumpo is strong strong strong based upon a tie.
Trumpo’s best year has burned through his tax cut impact on the economy. There is no 6,0 GDP in sight. He ties Obama’s best year with all that stimulation and government spending at 2.9.
If we compare best two years Obama breaks the tie ahead,
What is psycho about these facts.
To continue on about how great Trumpo is and how bad Obama was is weak minded.
Why are you on board with the Toddster without considering the facts and engaging in the discussion based on those facts.
2.9 = 2.9 Can you dispute the math?