The OLDER Official Discussion Thread for the creation of Israel, the UN and the British Mandate

[Hollie]

Israel’s birth was legally ordained via the UN Partition Resolution of November 29, 1947.

Israeli bullshit, of course.

YOUR own, endless BS.

Am Israel Chai !!!!

17:00 to 18:45

It's funny that you spend your entire existence in the bowels of YouTube.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Israel’s birth was legally ordained via the UN Partition Resolution of November 29, 1947.

Israeli bullshit, of course.

YOUR own, endless BS.

Am Israel Chai !!!!

17:00 to 18:45

The video discusses Judea and Samaria (taken by Jordan in 1948) and not about Israel

Genius !!!

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israel’s birth was legally ordained via the UN Partition Resolution of November 29, 1947.

Israeli bullshit, of course.

YOUR own, endless BS.

Am Israel Chai !!!!

17:00 to 18:45

The video discusses Judea and Samaria (taken by Jordan in 1948) and not about Israel

Genius !!!

He was saying how resolution 181 meant nothing.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

TheOldSchool

I think at this point we can all agree that the people who decided creating Israel after WW2 was a good idea really fucked up and wouldn't do it again if they knew the shitstorm it would start.

(COMMENT)

This is one of those theoretical questions (calling for the hypothetical: "what if") where the answer is: "We'll never know now."

When I came back from Europe the first time, I had seen most of it through a 1970s version of a minds-eye; clearly not through the eyes of my father. The men and women who contributed to the WWII War effort were special, and had seen things and done things they would better left forgotten. The names and places like Monte Cassino, the Ardennes, Luzon, Normandy, Arnhem, Bastogne, provoked different memories for me then it did for them. The Battle of Bataan and Corregidor, Midway and Leyte Gulf --- all mean something more to them --- then it will ever will for me. They tackled and triumphed over two most powerful and ruthless military machines ever assembled.​

It is very difficult for me to guess what, as Tom Brokaw called them, the "Greatest Generation" would have thought about the today's plight of the Jewish People and the arrogance of the Arab-Palestinian, in an attempt to defy the establishment of a Jewish National Home, and engaged in a deliberate effort to alter by force the decision of the UN and the Allied Powers. I'm not sure how the would react to the complaints of the Arab Palestinian People given that many of the key leaders that fought to overrun Israel support the NAZIs. The policy of the day, was deNAZIfication.

When COL William Quinn, ACofS G-2 was compiling the CIC reports one finding in Dachau, he wrote these words:

View attachment 56920​

Given that the two leads of the Arab-Palestinian Resistance Militia Units (Holy War Army and Arab Liberation Army) were both NAZIs: (i) Hasan Salama, a special commando unit of the Waffen SS in Operation ATLAS, which was jointly operated by German Intelligence and Grand Mufti al-Husseini; (ii) Fawzi al-Qawuqi, was a Colonel in the Wehrmacht. Even the Grand Mufti Hajj Amin al-Husayni, an Arab nationalist, opponent to the establishment of a Jewish National Home, and future First President of the All Palestine Government, had direct ties to NAZI Germany, and the Führer.

Yes, it would be hard to say if they would choose the Jewish side --- or --- Arab-Palestinian side that was a former enemy element (Germany was still Occupied by Allied Forces).

Most Respectfully,
R

Once again RoccoR descends into spouting drivel, whilest simultaneously trying to create sympathy by invoking the Holocaust and "NAZI" Arabs. Are you taking lessons from Phoney? It's embarassing.

Had you bothered to do even a modicum of research, you would have discovered that ATLAS was an Abwehr operation, nothing at all to do with the SS, the unit was composed of ex-Brandenburg Regiment German soldiers who were born in Palestine amongst the Templar community of slighly whacko Protestant Christian "millenials", the two Muslims involved Hasan Salama and Abdul Latif were never Nazis.

Fawzi al-Qawuqi was given a colonel's rank for propaganda purposes, but never swore any German military oath, nor did he declare any allegience to Hitler. Grand Mufti Hajj Amin al-Husayni's "ties" to Hitler consisted of one 90 minute meeting during which a photo was taken.

yep he has gone into desperation mode and is doing this knowing you speak the truth LOL

 

[Sixties Fan]

Israel’s birth was legally ordained via the UN Partition Resolution of November 29, 1947.

Israeli bullshit, of course.

YOUR own, endless BS.

Am Israel Chai !!!!

17:00 to 18:45

The video discusses Judea and Samaria (taken by Jordan in 1948) and not about Israel

Genius !!!

He was saying how resolution 181 meant nothing.

Resolution 181 and the Arab refusal to any partition of the Mandate, wanting it all to be Muslim land, with the Jews as a minority, again and always, or have the Jews just dead.

The Arabs rejected the partition plan of 1937.
They again rejected the partition plan of 1947.

Islam and rejection are synonymous.

 

[Sixties Fan]

http://www.mythsandfacts.org/conflict/10/resolution-181.pdf

The resolution recognized the need for immediate Jewish statehood [and a parallel Arab state], but the blueprint for peace became a moot issue when the Arabs refused to accept it. Subsequently, realities on the ground in the wake of Arab aggression [and Israel’s survival] became the basis for UN efforts to bring peace.


Aware of Arab’s past aggression, Resolution 181, in paragraph C, calls on the Security Council to:

“Determine as a threat to the peace, breach of the peace or act of aggression, in accordance with Article 39 of the Charter, any attempt to alter by force the settlement envisaged by this resolution.” [Italics by author]


The ones who sought to alter the settlement envisioned in Resolution 181 by force, were the Arabs who threatened bloodshed if the United Nations was to adopt the Resolution:

“The [British] Government of Palestine fear that strife in Palestine will be greatly intensified when the Mandate is terminated, and that the international status of the United Nations Commission will mean little or nothing to the Arabs in Palestine, to whom the killing of Jews now transcends all other considerations. Thus, the Commission will be faced with the problem of how to avert certain bloodshed on a very much wider scale than prevails at present. ... The Arabs have made it quite clear and have told the Palestine government that they do not propose to co-operate or to assist the Commission, and that, far from it, they propose to attack
and impede its work in every possible way. We have no reason to suppose that they do not mean what they say.” [Italics by author]

Arab’s intentions and deeds did not fare better after Resolution 181 was adopted:

(full article online)

http://www.mythsandfacts.org/conflict/10/resolution-181.pdf

 

[P F Tinmore]

http://www.mythsandfacts.org/conflict/10/resolution-181.pdf

The resolution recognized the need for immediate Jewish statehood [and a parallel Arab state], but the blueprint for peace became a moot issue when the Arabs refused to accept it. Subsequently, realities on the ground in the wake of Arab aggression [and Israel’s survival] became the basis for UN efforts to bring peace.


Aware of Arab’s past aggression, Resolution 181, in paragraph C, calls on the Security Council to:

“Determine as a threat to the peace, breach of the peace or act of aggression, in accordance with Article 39 of the Charter, any attempt to alter by force the settlement envisaged by this resolution.” [Italics by author]


The ones who sought to alter the settlement envisioned in Resolution 181 by force, were the Arabs who threatened bloodshed if the United Nations was to adopt the Resolution:

“The [British] Government of Palestine fear that strife in Palestine will be greatly intensified when the Mandate is terminated, and that the international status of the United Nations Commission will mean little or nothing to the Arabs in Palestine, to whom the killing of Jews now transcends all other considerations. Thus, the Commission will be faced with the problem of how to avert certain bloodshed on a very much wider scale than prevails at present. ... The Arabs have made it quite clear and have told the Palestine government that they do not propose to co-operate or to assist the Commission, and that, far from it, they propose to attack
and impede its work in every possible way. We have no reason to suppose that they do not mean what they say.” [Italics by author]

Arab’s intentions and deeds did not fare better after Resolution 181 was adopted:

(full article online)

http://www.mythsandfacts.org/conflict/10/resolution-181.pdf

What resulted was Resolution 181 [known also as the 1947 Partition Plan], a
nonbinding recommendation to partition Palestine, whose implementation
hinged on acceptance by both parties –
Arabs and Jews.

 

[Sixties Fan]

http://www.mythsandfacts.org/conflict/10/resolution-181.pdf

The resolution recognized the need for immediate Jewish statehood [and a parallel Arab state], but the blueprint for peace became a moot issue when the Arabs refused to accept it. Subsequently, realities on the ground in the wake of Arab aggression [and Israel’s survival] became the basis for UN efforts to bring peace.


Aware of Arab’s past aggression, Resolution 181, in paragraph C, calls on the Security Council to:

“Determine as a threat to the peace, breach of the peace or act of aggression, in accordance with Article 39 of the Charter, any attempt to alter by force the settlement envisaged by this resolution.” [Italics by author]


The ones who sought to alter the settlement envisioned in Resolution 181 by force, were the Arabs who threatened bloodshed if the United Nations was to adopt the Resolution:

“The [British] Government of Palestine fear that strife in Palestine will be greatly intensified when the Mandate is terminated, and that the international status of the United Nations Commission will mean little or nothing to the Arabs in Palestine, to whom the killing of Jews now transcends all other considerations. Thus, the Commission will be faced with the problem of how to avert certain bloodshed on a very much wider scale than prevails at present. ... The Arabs have made it quite clear and have told the Palestine government that they do not propose to co-operate or to assist the Commission, and that, far from it, they propose to attack
and impede its work in every possible way. We have no reason to suppose that they do not mean what they say.” [Italics by author]

Arab’s intentions and deeds did not fare better after Resolution 181 was adopted:

(full article online)

http://www.mythsandfacts.org/conflict/10/resolution-181.pdf

What resulted was Resolution 181 [known also as the 1947 Partition Plan], a
nonbinding recommendation to partition Palestine, whose implementation
hinged on acceptance by both parties –
Arabs and Jews.

Right.

The Jews accepted it and went on to declare Independence on the part they were a majority on, and the Arabs REJECTED IT.

Again, as in 1937.
Again, as in later plans.

Again, and again and again.

The Arabs favorite word to the Jews is

NO

 

[Sixties Fan]

In the late 1990s, more than 50 years after Resolution 181 was rejected by the Arab world, Arab leaders suddenly recommended to the General Assembly that UN Resolution 181 be resurrected as the basis for a peace agreement. There is no foundation for such a notion.

Resolution 181 was the last of a series of recommendations that had been drawn up over the years by the Mandatory and by international commissions, plans designed to reach an historic compromise between Arabs and Jews in western Palestine. The first was in 1922 when Great Britain unilaterally partitioned Palestine, which did not satisfy the Arabs who wanted the entire country to be Arab. Resolution 181 followed such proposals as the Peel Commission (1937); the Woodhead Commission (1938); two 1946 proposals that championed a binational state; one proposed by the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry in April 1946 based on a single state with equal powers for Jews and Arabs; and the Morrison- Grady Plan raised in July 1946 which recommended a federal state with two provinces – one Jewish, one Arab. Every scheme since 1922 was rejected by the Arab side, including decidedly pro-Arab ones merely because these plans recognized Jews as a nation and gave Jewish citizens of Mandate Palestine political representation. Arabs rejected the “unbalanced” Partition Plan. The UN International Court of Justice (ICJ) uses the term “unbalanced” in describing the reason for Arab rejectionism of Resolution 181, which does not exactly fit reality. Seventy-seven percent of the landmass of the original Mandate for the Jews was excised in 1922 to create a fourth Arab state – Trans-Jordan (today Jordan).

In a statement by Dr. Abba Hillel Silver, the representative of the Jewish Agency for Palestine to the United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP), he had that to say about fairness, balance, and justice: “According to David Lloyd George, then British Prime Minister, the Balfour Declaration implied that the whole of Palestine, including Transjordan, should ultimately become a Jewish state. Transjordan had, nevertheless, been severed from Palestine in 1922 and
had subsequently been set up as an Arab kingdom. Now a second Arab state was to be carved out of the remainder of Palestine, with the result that the Jewish National Home would represent less than one eighth of the territory originally set aside for it. Such a sacrifice should not be asked of the Jewish people.” Referring to the Arab States established as independent countries since the First World War, he said:

“17,000,000 Arabs now occupied an area of 1,290,000 square miles, including all the principal Arab and Moslem centers, while Palestine, after the loss of Transjordan, was only 10,000 square miles; yet the majority plan proposed to reduce it by one half. UNSCOP proposed to eliminate Western Galilee from the Jewish State; that was an injustice and a grievous handicap to the development of the Jewish State.” [Italics by author].

Following passage of Resolution 181 by the General Assembly, Arab countries took the dais to reiterate their absolute rejection of the recommendation and intention to render implementation of Resolution 181 a moot question by the use of force. These examples from the transcript of the General Assembly plenary meeting on November 29, 1947 speak for themselves:

“Mr. JAMALI (Iraq): ... We believe that the decision which we have now taken ... undermines peace, justice and democracy. In the name of my Government, I wish to state that it feels that this decision is antidemocratic, illegal, impractical and contrary to the Charter ... Therefore, in the name of my Government, I wish to put on record that Iraq does not recognize the validity of this decision, will reserve freedom of action towards its implementation, and holds those who were influential in passing it against the free conscience of mankind responsible for the consequences.”

“Amir. ARSLAN [Syria]: ... Gentlemen, the Charter is dead. But it did not die a natural death; it was murdered, and you all know who is guilty. My country will never recognize such a decision [Partition]. It will never agree to be responsible for it. Let the consequences be on the heads of others, not on ours.”

“H. R. H. Prince Seif El ISLAM ABDULLAH (Yemen): The Yemen delegation has stated previously that the partition plan is contrary to justice and to the Charter of the United Nations. Therefore, the Government of Yemen does not consider itself bound by such a decision ... and will reserve its freedom of action towards the implementation of this decision.”

The Partition Plan was met not only by verbal rejection on the Arab side but also by concrete, bellicose steps to block its implementation and destroy the Jewish polity by force of arms, a goal the Arabs publicly declared even before Resolution 181 was brought to a vote.

Arabs not only rejected the compromise and took action to prevent establishment of a Jewish state but also blocked establishment of an Arab state under the partition plan not just before the Israel War of Independence, but also after the war when they themselves controlled the West Bank (1948-1967).

(full article online)

http://www.mythsandfacts.org/conflict/10/resolution-181.pdf

 

[P F Tinmore]

http://www.mythsandfacts.org/conflict/10/resolution-181.pdf

The resolution recognized the need for immediate Jewish statehood [and a parallel Arab state], but the blueprint for peace became a moot issue when the Arabs refused to accept it. Subsequently, realities on the ground in the wake of Arab aggression [and Israel’s survival] became the basis for UN efforts to bring peace.


Aware of Arab’s past aggression, Resolution 181, in paragraph C, calls on the Security Council to:

“Determine as a threat to the peace, breach of the peace or act of aggression, in accordance with Article 39 of the Charter, any attempt to alter by force the settlement envisaged by this resolution.” [Italics by author]


The ones who sought to alter the settlement envisioned in Resolution 181 by force, were the Arabs who threatened bloodshed if the United Nations was to adopt the Resolution:

“The [British] Government of Palestine fear that strife in Palestine will be greatly intensified when the Mandate is terminated, and that the international status of the United Nations Commission will mean little or nothing to the Arabs in Palestine, to whom the killing of Jews now transcends all other considerations. Thus, the Commission will be faced with the problem of how to avert certain bloodshed on a very much wider scale than prevails at present. ... The Arabs have made it quite clear and have told the Palestine government that they do not propose to co-operate or to assist the Commission, and that, far from it, they propose to attack
and impede its work in every possible way. We have no reason to suppose that they do not mean what they say.” [Italics by author]

Arab’s intentions and deeds did not fare better after Resolution 181 was adopted:

(full article online)

http://www.mythsandfacts.org/conflict/10/resolution-181.pdf

What resulted was Resolution 181 [known also as the 1947 Partition Plan], a
nonbinding recommendation to partition Palestine, whose implementation
hinged on acceptance by both parties –
Arabs and Jews.

Right.

The Jews accepted it and went on to declare Independence on the part they were a majority on, and the Arabs REJECTED IT.

Again, as in 1937.
Again, as in later plans.

Again, and again and again.

The Arabs favorite word to the Jews is

NO

You are forgetting what it was that they proposed to partition.

 

[Sixties Fan]

http://www.mythsandfacts.org/conflict/10/resolution-181.pdf

The resolution recognized the need for immediate Jewish statehood [and a parallel Arab state], but the blueprint for peace became a moot issue when the Arabs refused to accept it. Subsequently, realities on the ground in the wake of Arab aggression [and Israel’s survival] became the basis for UN efforts to bring peace.


Aware of Arab’s past aggression, Resolution 181, in paragraph C, calls on the Security Council to:

“Determine as a threat to the peace, breach of the peace or act of aggression, in accordance with Article 39 of the Charter, any attempt to alter by force the settlement envisaged by this resolution.” [Italics by author]

They proposed to partition, again....THE JEWISH HOMELAND, giving the biggest pie to the Arabs.
The ones who sought to alter the settlement envisioned in Resolution 181 by force, were the Arabs who threatened bloodshed if the United Nations was to adopt the Resolution:

“The [British] Government of Palestine fear that strife in Palestine will be greatly intensified when the Mandate is terminated, and that the international status of the United Nations Commission will mean little or nothing to the Arabs in Palestine, to whom the killing of Jews now transcends all other considerations. Thus, the Commission will be faced with the problem of how to avert certain bloodshed on a very much wider scale than prevails at present. ... The Arabs have made it quite clear and have told the Palestine government that they do not propose to co-operate or to assist the Commission, and that, far from it, they propose to attack
and impede its work in every possible way. We have no reason to suppose that they do not mean what they say.” [Italics by author]

Arab’s intentions and deeds did not fare better after Resolution 181 was adopted:

(full article online)

http://www.mythsandfacts.org/conflict/10/resolution-181.pdf

What resulted was Resolution 181 [known also as the 1947 Partition Plan], a
nonbinding recommendation to partition Palestine, whose implementation
hinged on acceptance by both parties –
Arabs and Jews.

Right.

The Jews accepted it and went on to declare Independence on the part they were a majority on, and the Arabs REJECTED IT.

Again, as in 1937.
Again, as in later plans.

Again, and again and again.

The Arabs favorite word to the Jews is

NO

You are forgetting what it was that they proposed to partition.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Resolution 181 was the last of a series of recommendations that had been drawn up over the years by the Mandatory and by international commissions, plans designed to reach an historic compromise between Arabs and Jews in western Palestine.

A "compromise" where only the Palestinians make concessions?

 

[Sixties Fan]

Resolution 181 was the last of a series of recommendations that had been drawn up over the years by the Mandatory and by international commissions, plans designed to reach an historic compromise between Arabs and Jews in western Palestine.

A "compromise" where only the Palestinians make concessions?

The Jewish People were the ONLY ONES who were forced to make any concessions, over THEIR ancient homeland.

78% of it was given to the Arab Hashemite clan. (From Arabia)

And then, the other Arabs, and the Hashemite themselves, would not accept a Jewish sovereign state on ( oh, my!!! ) the Jewish ancient homeland.

And your "Palestinians" only recognized themselves as Arabs and Muslims until 1964.

Calling it "Palestine" does not make it the homeland of the "Palestinians", a country and people which never existed before WWI and the Mandates.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Resolution 181 was the last of a series of recommendations that had been drawn up over the years by the Mandatory and by international commissions, plans designed to reach an historic compromise between Arabs and Jews in western Palestine.

A "compromise" where only the Palestinians make concessions?

The Jewish People were the ONLY ONES who were forced to make any concessions, over THEIR ancient homeland.

78% of it was given to the Arab Hashemite clan. (From Arabia)

And then, the other Arabs, and the Hashemite themselves, would not accept a Jewish sovereign state on ( oh, my!!! ) the Jewish ancient homeland.

And your "Palestinians" only recognized themselves as Arabs and Muslims until 1964.

Calling it "Palestine" does not make it the homeland of the "Palestinians", a country and people which never existed before WWI and the Mandates.

Pfffft, Israeli BS talking points.

Link?

 

[Sixties Fan]

Resolution 181 was the last of a series of recommendations that had been drawn up over the years by the Mandatory and by international commissions, plans designed to reach an historic compromise between Arabs and Jews in western Palestine.

A "compromise" where only the Palestinians make concessions?

The Jewish People were the ONLY ONES who were forced to make any concessions, over THEIR ancient homeland.

78% of it was given to the Arab Hashemite clan. (From Arabia)

And then, the other Arabs, and the Hashemite themselves, would not accept a Jewish sovereign state on ( oh, my!!! ) the Jewish ancient homeland.

And your "Palestinians" only recognized themselves as Arabs and Muslims until 1964.

Calling it "Palestine" does not make it the homeland of the "Palestinians", a country and people which never existed before WWI and the Mandates.

Pfffft, Israeli BS talking points.

Link?

Tinmore's endless belief that Jews do not exist and do not have any rights over their ancient homeland.

Christian/Muslim thinking.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Resolution 181 was the last of a series of recommendations that had been drawn up over the years by the Mandatory and by international commissions, plans designed to reach an historic compromise between Arabs and Jews in western Palestine.

A "compromise" where only the Palestinians make concessions?

The Jewish People were the ONLY ONES who were forced to make any concessions, over THEIR ancient homeland.

78% of it was given to the Arab Hashemite clan. (From Arabia)

And then, the other Arabs, and the Hashemite themselves, would not accept a Jewish sovereign state on ( oh, my!!! ) the Jewish ancient homeland.

And your "Palestinians" only recognized themselves as Arabs and Muslims until 1964.

Calling it "Palestine" does not make it the homeland of the "Palestinians", a country and people which never existed before WWI and the Mandates.

Pfffft, Israeli BS talking points.

Link?

Tinmore's endless belief that Jews do not exist and do not have any rights over their ancient homeland.

Christian/Muslim thinking.

Nice duck. I don't see a link.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Resolution 181 was the last of a series of recommendations that had been drawn up over the years by the Mandatory and by international commissions, plans designed to reach an historic compromise between Arabs and Jews in western Palestine.

A "compromise" where only the Palestinians make concessions?

The Jewish People were the ONLY ONES who were forced to make any concessions, over THEIR ancient homeland.

78% of it was given to the Arab Hashemite clan. (From Arabia)

And then, the other Arabs, and the Hashemite themselves, would not accept a Jewish sovereign state on ( oh, my!!! ) the Jewish ancient homeland.

And your "Palestinians" only recognized themselves as Arabs and Muslims until 1964.

Calling it "Palestine" does not make it the homeland of the "Palestinians", a country and people which never existed before WWI and the Mandates.

Pfffft, Israeli BS talking points.

Link?

Tinmore's endless belief that Jews do not exist and do not have any rights over their ancient homeland.

Christian/Muslim thinking.

Nice duck. I don't see a link.

I do not owe you any.

It is always the same game with you.

Facts do not matter, you always end up your posts with "deflection" and "nice duck", "links".

It is your deceitful way to attempt to delegitimize the Jewish People/nation's right to their own ancient homeland.

It has not worked, it will not work.

You are an ignorant Christian/Muslim who will never accept the rights of the Jewish people to be sovereign over any part of their ancient homeland.

Too bad, because it does not matter one inch to Israel and the Jewish people.

 

[P F Tinmore]

A "compromise" where only the Palestinians make concessions?

The Jewish People were the ONLY ONES who were forced to make any concessions, over THEIR ancient homeland.

78% of it was given to the Arab Hashemite clan. (From Arabia)

And then, the other Arabs, and the Hashemite themselves, would not accept a Jewish sovereign state on ( oh, my!!! ) the Jewish ancient homeland.

And your "Palestinians" only recognized themselves as Arabs and Muslims until 1964.

Calling it "Palestine" does not make it the homeland of the "Palestinians", a country and people which never existed before WWI and the Mandates.

Pfffft, Israeli BS talking points.

Link?

Tinmore's endless belief that Jews do not exist and do not have any rights over their ancient homeland.

Christian/Muslim thinking.

Nice duck. I don't see a link.

I do not owe you any.

It is always the same game with you.

Facts do not matter, you always end up your posts with "deflection" and "nice duck", "links".

It is your deceitful way to attempt to delegitimize the Jewish People/nation's right to their own ancient homeland.

It has not worked, it will not work.

You are an ignorant Christian/Muslim who will never accept the rights of the Jewish people to be sovereign over any part of their ancient homeland.

Too bad, because it does not matter one inch to Israel and the Jewish people.

More duck.

 

[Sixties Fan]

The Jewish People were the ONLY ONES who were forced to make any concessions, over THEIR ancient homeland.

78% of it was given to the Arab Hashemite clan. (From Arabia)

And then, the other Arabs, and the Hashemite themselves, would not accept a Jewish sovereign state on ( oh, my!!! ) the Jewish ancient homeland.

And your "Palestinians" only recognized themselves as Arabs and Muslims until 1964.

Calling it "Palestine" does not make it the homeland of the "Palestinians", a country and people which never existed before WWI and the Mandates.

Pfffft, Israeli BS talking points.

Link?

Tinmore's endless belief that Jews do not exist and do not have any rights over their ancient homeland.

Christian/Muslim thinking.

Nice duck. I don't see a link.

I do not owe you any.

It is always the same game with you.

Facts do not matter, you always end up your posts with "deflection" and "nice duck", "links".

It is your deceitful way to attempt to delegitimize the Jewish People/nation's right to their own ancient homeland.

It has not worked, it will not work.

You are an ignorant Christian/Muslim who will never accept the rights of the Jewish people to be sovereign over any part of their ancient homeland.

Too bad, because it does not matter one inch to Israel and the Jewish people.

More duck.

You are the duck.
One can hear you quacking in all the threads.

Keep it up, quack, quack.

 

[Shusha]

Resolution 181 was the last of a series of recommendations that had been drawn up over the years by the Mandatory and by international commissions, plans designed to reach an historic compromise between Arabs and Jews in western Palestine.

A "compromise" where only the Palestinians make concessions?

That's like saying a compromise where only the Czechoslovaks made concessions when they divided Czechoslovakia into the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Stupid argument.