National self-determination. A nation for each of them.
OK, so we have Palestine, a successor state broken from Turkish rule by the treaty of Lausanne and international borders were defined by post war treaties. According to the Treaty of Lausanne, international and domestic law, the Palestinians obtained the nationality of Palestinian and became citizens of that defined territory. As citizens of Palestine they have the right to self determination without external interference, etc, as affirmed by subsequent UN resolutions.
OK, your turn.
WRONG as it was not mentioned in the treaty of Lausanne, in fact it was not mentioned other than as an area in which the Jewish national home was to be built. The arab muslim refused to be part of this and as such lost the right to live in Jewish Palestine. The Jews now have a defined nationality under International law, within defined borders and have the right to self determination without external influence.
WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO WIPE OUT THE JEWS, DESTROY THEIR NATION AND REMOVE THEIR INALIENABLE RIGHTS TO SELF DETERMINATION AS DEFINED BY THE U.N. CHARTER WHICH IS INTERNATIONAL LAW.
Of course you can't prove any of that.
But I can and have by posting the treaty of Lausanne in full that does not mention Palestine once. And the same treaty states that the ottomans and their allies ( arab muslims under the Grand Mufti ) lost the war and as such lost the right to own the land. All there in the full treaties that you ignore when they work in the Jews favour
And the same treaty states that the ottomans and their allies ( arab muslims under the Grand Mufti ) lost the war and as such lost the right to own the land.
Where does it say that?
Treaty of Sevres, 1920
2. With Syria:
From a point to be chosen on the eastern bank of the outlet of the Hassan Dede, about 3 kilometres north-west of Karatash Bu- run, north-eastwards to a point to be chosen on the Djaihun Irmak about 1 kilometre north of Babeli, a line to be fixed on the ground passing north of Karatash; thence to Kesik Kale, the course of the Djaihun Irmak upstream;
thence north-eastwards to a point to be chosen on the Djaihun Irmak about 15 kilometres east-southeast of Karsbazar, a line to be fixed on the ground passing north of Kara Tepe;
thence to the bend in the Djaihun Irmak situated west of Duldul Dagh, the course of the Djaihun Irmak upstream;
thence in a general south-easterly direction to a point to be chosen on Emir Musi Dagh about 15 kilometres south-south-west of Giaour Geul a line to be fixed on the ground at a distance of about 18 kilometres from the railway, and leaving Duldul Dagh to Syria;
thence eastwards to a point to be chosen about 5 kilometres north of Urfa a generally straight line from west to east to be hxed on the ground passing north of the roads connecting the towns of Bagh- che, Aintab, Biridjik, and Urfa and leaving the last three named towns to Syria;
thence eastwards to the south-western extremity of the bend in the Tigris about 6 kilometres north of Azekh (27 kilometres west of Djezire-ibn-Omar), a generally straight line from west to east to be fixed on the ground leaving the town of Mardin to Syria;
thence to a point to be chosen on the Tigris between the point of confluence of the Khabur Su with the Tigris and the bend in the Tigris situated about 10 kilometres north of this point,
the course of the Tigris downstream, leaving the island on which is situated the town of Djezire-ibn-Omar to Syria.
3. With Mesopotamia:
Thence in a general easterly direction to a point to be chosen on the northern boundary of the vilayet of Mosul,
a line to be fixed on the ground;
thence eastwards to the point where it meets the frontier between Turkey and Persia,
the northern boundary of the vilayet of Mosul, modified, however, so as to pass south of Amadia.
4. On the East and the North East:
From the point above defined to the Black Sea, the existing frontier between
