Actually. It is the same report released more than three years ago.
False. Social media users are sharing a page from the 20-page autopsy report that was publicly released by the Hennepin County Medical Examiner’s office in full on June 3, 2020.
apnews.com
The problem is that it isn’t new. And it ignores page one. It doesn’t even cherry pick, it pretends the Cherry’s are actually Apples.
I gave you the raw data. The cross examination of the Defense Expert Witness. The cross examination that destroyed your own argument, and of course
Blisterfinger
The Defense Expert made those arguments on the stand. He said he would rule the death undetermined. Then the cross examination. He admitted that there are often circumstances that positional asphyxiation will not leave traditional strangulation marks or evidence. He admitted that it is impossible to prove that positional asphyxiation did not occur in those cases.
Then the death nails. The Prosecutor asked if the Doctor as a medical expert would recommend that Officer Chauvin kneel on an individual for an extended time. No the Doctor testified. He would not as a Medical Expert recommend such a thing. As a medical expert would you want to see a check of the suspect after he lost consciousness? Yes. As a medical expert I would recommend that a check on the person be performed. As a medical expert would you recommend that Officer Chauvin continue kneeling on the suspect George Floyd after he lost consciousness? No. I would not recommend that as a medical expert.
The Defense Expert just proved the Prosecutions case. For some reason this was never covered in the RW news sites. For some reason they utterly ignored that. Why? You tell me why they ignored the testimony of the Defense Expert?