The "No Evidence" Crowd Seems To Have Become Silent

Status
Not open for further replies.
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."






You are a text book, irredeemable, brain washed, cult follower, do you also believe in unicorns? haaa ha ha...

1606699132763.png
 
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."





We're just tired of engaging in this pointless conversation over all of your right wing conspiracy theories...and most of us have moved on.
Trump lost. Biden won. Deal with it.



Nah......the scam has been exposed and you have egg on your face, sucker.


But don't wipe it off......it's an improvement.
[/QUOTE
:clap2: :clap2: :clap2: :clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2:


:clap2: :clap2: :clap2: :clap2: :clap2: :clap2: :clap2: :clap2: :clap2: :clap2: :clap2: :clap2:
 
Last edited:
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."




LOL and Biden kicked the wall
 
Now you sound like Hillary 2016.

On January 20th 2021 when Biden is sworn in I am wondering how those like the OP’er will react to the harsh reality that Biden is President...?


I've never said Trump would win.

I'm a pessimist due to the number of imbeciles like you that we find posting.

What I've said, and the posts of your imbeciles prove, you no longer claim that there is no evidence of cheating.
Just carry on you are making some excellent points... If most people on the left or the Trump haters don’t mind following “ the president of vice” Joe Biden ( yes it is that much in our faces) then they get what they deserve unfortunately the rest of us have to suffer as well if DiamondJoe and his band of merry marauders actually pull off this scam....
 
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."





We're just tired of engaging in this pointless conversation over all of your right wing conspiracy theories...and most of us have moved on.
Trump lost. Biden won. Deal with it.


JackOff SEZ????? "Now you listen to me!!!! We just know that Pedo Joe is legit and stop bringing up all these facts of voter fraud because you all are stealing our stolen victory celebration!!! Do you hear me????"


Good luck with all that....anyone with two brain cells knows that this entire fiasco was a blatant, coordinated event that was so obvious that even Stevie Wonder could see it. I do have a question (if you can honestly answer it).......do you REALLY believe that people are so fucking blind to the antifa and BLM attacks that did ZERO to further the cause of the leftard that Pedo Joe never criticized? That they didn't see the bullshit about the "ROOSKIEs stole the election for Trump" bullshit and then when THAT didn't work? Leftards played the "Quid pro quo" bullshit game as it pertains to the Ukraine when Pedo Joe stupidly bragged that aide for the Ukrainians hinged on the firing of the one looking into the money laundering scam that was Burmesa in a leaked recording at a CFR meeting where he bragged about doing the same fucking thing that Trump was accused of? The same "firm" that hired his ne'er-do-well son that didn't have the slightest clue about oil and gas but is an expert in procuring all the necessary means for smoking crack that paid him 83K per month for "consultant work"??????


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Let's face some very unpleasant facts as it pertains to Pedo Joe , the gaffe machine that has always suffered from the affliction of sticking his foot in his mouth at the most inopportune times. Pedo Joe, the career politician that never contributed anything of worth except to his own "bottom line
 
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."






Some Dems are really good people.

They sincerely feel that President Trump is a dangerous person.

But they are disappointed that he has been ousted through massive electoral fraud, the worst in our history.

Of course, they cannot say anything in public, or they would be considered traitors to the Resistance.

I actually feel sorry for them.

They are good Americans who realize that the people who rigged this election are bad Americans.

Many of the dems have jumped ship after the lawlessness, antisemitism, corruption, racism, and extremism. Those that haven't, I can't feel sorry for them. After the Russia Hoax, Campaign Spying, the imprisonment of General Flynn, the Kavanaugh Hearings, The Fake Impeachment, the primary riggings, the endorsed violence, the immunity to laws, and their blatant disregard for working people, if they are still onboard, they deserve no sympathy.
 
Don't blame me I didn't vote for either of the seriously flawed main candidates. I don't see what people see in either.

It's unimaginable what destruction Trump could do with 4 more years and no worries about running for office again.
Like Bolton said, Trump was fixated on the 2020 election from the very start of his first term.
He hates the job, just loves the attention and power.
Like no stupid wars?
Like not taxing the crap out of people who work?
Like not shipping our cash overseas for nothing in return?
You are out of your mind.
 
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."





Oh, no. We're still asking 'where's the beef'.

As are the courts where these claims are being made....but not backed up with evidence. This Friday, from a judge that Trump appointed himself:


And this last week from a life long republican judge:


You're being played, Poli.
 
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."





Oh, no. We're still asking 'where's the beef'.

As are the courts where these claims are being made....but not backed up with evidence. This Friday, from a judge that Trump appointed himself:


And this last week from a life long republican judge:


You're being played, Poli.

Your entire party has been crooked for four straight years. From the ridiculous impeachment to the Kavanaugh Hearings. Out and out election fraud seems entirely possible, and a lot of the math points to clear malfeasance. It is a clear trend, and more believable that the left would be crooked as to their nature rather than Biden getting more votes than Obama. It is sad that democrats have become government shills.
 
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."





Oh, no. We're still asking 'where's the beef'.

As are the courts where these claims are being made....but not backed up with evidence. This Friday, from a judge that Trump appointed himself:


And this last week from a life long republican judge:


You're being played, Poli.

Your entire party has been crooked for four straight years. From the ridiculous impeachment to the Kavanaugh Hearings. Out and out election fraud seems entirely possible, and a lot of the math points to clear malfeasance. It is a clear trend, and more believable that the left would be crooked as to their nature rather than Biden getting more votes than Obama. It is sad that democrats have become government shills.

And......where is the evidence of fraud that Trump keeps failing to present to the courts?

Oh, a ballroom at the Hyatt, and Trump's all over it. But an actual court of law.....and his lawyers again and again insist that the aren't arguing that fraud occurred. Let alone presenting evidence to back such a claim.

You're being played.
 
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."





Oh, no. We're still asking 'where's the beef'.

As are the courts where these claims are being made....but not backed up with evidence. This Friday, from a judge that Trump appointed himself:


And this last week from a life long republican judge:


You're being played, Poli.

Your entire party has been crooked for four straight years. From the ridiculous impeachment to the Kavanaugh Hearings. Out and out election fraud seems entirely possible, and a lot of the math points to clear malfeasance. It is a clear trend, and more believable that the left would be crooked as to their nature rather than Biden getting more votes than Obama. It is sad that democrats have become government shills.

And......where is the evidence of fraud that Trump keeps failing to present to the courts?

Oh, a ballroom at the Hyatt, and Trump's all over it. But an actual court of law.....and his lawyers again and again insist that the aren't arguing that fraud occurred. Let alone presenting evidence to back such a claim.

You're being played.



As you know, no member of the Biden Crime Syndicate is going to sing like a canary.

So we are sharpening the tools to extricate it.

Give us time. They had 4 years to prepare.

wait for it, wait for it
 
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."




No one is silent. We are just bored of pointing out what morons trump cultists are.




But you are no longer saying there's 'no evidence' of cheating, are you?


BTW....the term 'cult' is reserved for the party that called its candidate god, Jesus, and the messiah.
That would be your party.

PC, I would like to think you are smarter than to be like other conservatives and just blindly believe this fraud non sense. Isn’t there something from the republican ideology you reject?
 
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."




No one is silent. We are just bored of pointing out what morons trump cultists are.




But you are no longer saying there's 'no evidence' of cheating, are you?


BTW....the term 'cult' is reserved for the party that called its candidate god, Jesus, and the messiah.
That would be your party.

PC, I would like to think you are smarter than to be like other conservatives and just blindly believe this fraud non sense. Isn’t there something from the republican ideology you reject?


Please stop comparing them to Conservatives. They aren't conservatives and never were. They are Party of the Rumpers which are closer to late 1920s and early 1930s Mussolini Fascists. Bennito sold a bill of goods back then as well. And Bennito got rid of Democratic Elections to make him King. The US came very close to the same sequence of events but we did what Americans always do and went back to our Democratic Elections. The Voters decide, not the Legislators, on who will be the President unless it's in a Fascist or Communists Regime.
 
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."





That's an easy one. The whole election was a fraud and it all started with the mail in ballots the Dems were pushing for.
 
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."






Some Dems are really good people.

They sincerely feel that President Trump is a dangerous person.

But they are disappointed that he has been ousted through massive electoral fraud, the worst in our history.

Of course, they cannot say anything in public, or they would be considered traitors to the Resistance.

I actually feel sorry for them.

They are good Americans who realize that the people who rigged this election are bad Americans.

Many of the dems have jumped ship after the lawlessness, antisemitism, corruption, racism, and extremism. Those that haven't, I can't feel sorry for them. After the Russia Hoax, Campaign Spying, the imprisonment of General Flynn, the Kavanaugh Hearings, The Fake Impeachment, the primary riggings, the endorsed violence, the immunity to laws, and their blatant disregard for working people, if they are still onboard, they deserve no sympathy.


Neither do I feel sorry for those who have NOT jumped ship.

Sadly, they deserve everything adverse that happens to them under the Honorable Joseph R. Biden, Jr., and the Honorable Nancy P. Pelosi.
 
...The Supreme Court should require that no ballots received beyond the 5 o’clock deadline of election day be counted.
No. The Court should NOT require. The Court is merely there to ensure compliance of State voting laws with the overarching provisions of the US Constitution.

The Pennsylvania State Supreme Court and the US District Court of Appeals have both ruled that the Republicans provided no evidence of wrongdoing.

That said, the Supreme Court will leave it to the States to regulate their own election processes, so long as they conform with a Constitutional outline.

As is the case here already.

Oh, and, by the way... Amy Coney Barrett is already under suspicion that she was fast-tracked for just this purpose, and she vehemently denies that.

She is honor-bound by an Oath to the US Constitution - not your Orange Baboon-God - she is an honorable woman, and will fulfill her sacred Oath.

You have been sold a bill of nonexistent goods by a consummate liar, flim-flam and con-man, and power-hungry predator robber-baron.

One day, you will realize what you have been supporting, and you will be ashamed.

Today is not that day.

Consequently, the bull$hit that you're still spewing must be countered.



The Constitution prevails, not the partisan hack Pennsylvanian sec'y of state.


If the Supremes impose the actual law of the nation......the Constitution......every vote received post 8 pm election day will be thrown out.

Whether that makes a difference in the outcome, who knows.

Of course, you being a Democrat supporter, laws don't matter.

You simply serve the Prince of Darkness.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top