The "No Evidence" Crowd Seems To Have Become Silent

[JackOfNoTrades]

Here comes the knife through where your heart would be if you had one.


Just because a series of corrupt courts.....including the 'supreme' one.....wouldn't hear the evidence doesn't mean there wasn't clear and dispositive evidence.

I can provide it.

The fact is that the only document that Americans have agreed to be governed by is the Constitution. It is written in English….no ‘interpretation’ is required. Wherein we find this:
Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.
Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”

​

McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)

supreme.justia.com



But....this occurred: courts altered voting rules.
“In Pennsylvania, the question was whether the state’s Supreme Court could override voting rules set by the state legislature. In North Carolina, the question was whether state election officials had the power to alter such voting rules.”
NYTimes

Sooo.....no, the election was not correctly decided, and we don't actually know who won the election.

It was correctly voted on, decided, and certified.
Why do you keep parroting lies?

Legislatures determined voting rules.

Pa. Supreme Court weighs future of state’s popular mail voting law

A group of Republican lawmakers — some of whom voted for the law — now say no-excuse mail voting requires a change to the Pennsylvania Constitution.

www.spotlightpa.org

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

If you can find it, an HBO film called "Hacking Democracy" talks about how easy it is to hack voting machines.

 

[toobfreak]

Sooo.....no, the election was not correctly decided, and we don't actually know who won the election.

Jack would understand that if he had the brains which he doesn't, or the desire, which he doesn't. Jack is just another mind-numbing mouthpiece for the socialist agenda who can't see the hand in front of his face because he is paid not to see.

 

[toobfreak]

Why do you keep parroting lies?

Are you accusing people of lying? I just can't wait to see you present your evidence to support that!

 

[PoliticalChic]

If you can find it, an HBO film called "Hacking Democracy" talks about how easy it is to hack voting machines.

No real need to......one of the 'benefits' of contracting with Dominion is you can alter totals.

Dominion voting machines do not report the absolute number or sorting of the ballots as cast.......instead, they allow the ‘adjusting’ of the number and selection of the votes.







In the contracts that Dominion signs with municipalities, we find the following:



AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA AND DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC. This Agreement is entered into between the County of Santa Clara (“County”) and Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. (“Contractor” or “Dominion”) (collectively, the “Parties”).



Section 2.26 "Allows staff to adjust tally based on review of scanned ballot images."



https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov/Documents/CW2232168 Dominion Final.pdf

 

[PoliticalChic]

It was correctly voted on, decided, and certified.
Why do you keep parroting lies?

Legislatures determined voting rules.

Pa. Supreme Court weighs future of state’s popular mail voting law

A group of Republican lawmakers — some of whom voted for the law — now say no-excuse mail voting requires a change to the Pennsylvania Constitution.

www.spotlightpa.org

So you and the Democrats no longer follow the United States Constituition.

Exactly what I have always said: you are traitors, and the enemies of America.


Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.
Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”



McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)

supreme.justia.com





Does the Constitution say that or not?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Jack would understand that if he had the brains which he doesn't, or the desire, which he doesn't. Jack is just another mind-numbing mouthpiece for the socialist agenda who can't see the hand in front of his face because he is paid not to see.

....if he had the backbone to actully confront....or even question....his masters.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

So you and the Democrats no longer follow the United States Constituition.

Exactly what I have always said: you are traitors, and the enemies of America.


Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.
Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”



McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)

supreme.justia.com





Does the Constitution say that or not?

Legislatures set rules for voting..in accordance with states right to conduct their elections in the manner they see fit. All passing Constitutional muster. Republicans voted for these rule changes. Why are you complaining about them now?..because your savior lost? Too bad. Deal with it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Legislatures set rules for voting..in accordance with states right to conduct their elections in the manner they see fit. All passing Constitutional muster. Republicans voted for these rule changes. Why are you complaining about them now?..because your savior lost? Too bad. Deal with it.

No they don't.

The law comes from the Constitution. For America and Americans.

Well....not for you Democrats.....you are not an American party.





Let me explain why:

The Constitution was a distillation of the views of Madison, Jefferson and Franklin. Democrat/Progressive doctrine is from the views of Rousseau, Hegel and Marx.
And those are the godfathers of your party.


Now, let's quote 'progressives,' also known as totalitarians.



a. The Germans have a history of embracing authoritarian rule. As the German philosopher Hegel said, “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest” (Ralf Dahrendorf, Society and Democracy in Germany).



b. The attitude of the FDR government can be seen in these words of A.B. “Happy” Chandler, a former Kentucky governor: “[A]ll of us owe the government; we owe it for everything we have—and that is the basis of obligation—and the government can take everything we have if the government needs it. . . . The government can assert its right to have all the taxes it needs for any purpose, either now or at any time in the future.”

From a speech delivered on the Senate floor

May 14, 1943 Happy Chandler's dangerous statism - The Bluegrass Institute for Public Policy Solutions



c. Jim Cramer, one of the Left's apparatchiks, say what Democrats believe, encourage.....but blames it on the other side.



“government has a right to force you to obey and has always exercised it especially under GOP”



Anyone think to question what the GOP has forced any to obey about?



Masks?



Injections?



Taxation?


See what I mean about the Left/Progressives lying about everything?



The Democrats are the European Party, the party of Obey.

We’re the other side, the personal liberty, individualism, the right to make personal decisions.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Legislatures set rules for voting..in accordance with states right to conduct their elections in the manner they see fit. All passing Constitutional muster. Republicans voted for these rule changes. Why are you complaining about them now?..because your savior lost? Too bad. Deal with it.

Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.

Supremacy Clause | Wex | US Law​

You're pretty much a moron, aren't you.

Have you always been or only under Democrat auspices?

 

[toobfreak]

Legislatures set rules for voting..

Then why were so many rule changes for 2020 not approved through the legislatures?

in accordance with states right to conduct their elections in the manner they see fit.

See fit? Then why were all the changes made in secret court sessions behind closed doors with no public involvement? Why were they begun in December 2019 then the public told it was all because of Covid?

All passing Constitutional muster.

WHICH constitution? Proof?

Republicans voted for these rule changes.

If a few did, so what?

Why are you complaining about them now?..

Same reason as for the past 16 months. Crimes do not go away with the passage of time just because YOU keep trying to wish them away!

because your savior lost? Too bad. Deal with it.

You mean like in 2016 the way you dealt with it Jack?

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Then why were so many rule changes for 2020 not approved through the legislatures?


See fit? Then why were all the changes made in secret court sessions behind closed doors with no public involvement? Why were they begun in December 2019 then the public told it was all because of Covid?


WHICH constitution? Proof?


If a few did, so what?


Same reason as for the past 16 months. Crimes do not go away with the passage of time just because YOU keep trying to wish them away!


You mean like in 2016 the way you dealt with it Jack?


View attachment 622354

The rule changes WERE approved by legislatures...try and keep up here. There were no secret court sessions. Only legislatures can approve changes to state voting rules...which they did...willingly.

I dealt with Trump winning in 2016 just fine Freaky. HE on the other hand, did a bang up job of continually sabotaging his own Presidency...all with NO help from me.

BTW, stop posting selfies. 1.5 years is a LONG time to hold a scream.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The rule changes WERE approved by legislatures...try and keep up here. There were no secret court sessions. Only legislatures can approve changes to state voting rules...which they did...willingly.

I dealt with Trump winning in 2016 just fine Freaky. HE on the other hand, did a bang up job of continually sabotaging his own Presidency...all with NO help from me.

BTW, stop posting selfies. 1.5 years is a LONG time to hold a scream.

You lying scum.

The Constituton forbids any but the elected legislature from altering dates and times.



There is no basis for that extension in state law. The state supreme court made that up, and it is not allowed by the Constitution of the United States.

A state court authorized it, and it does not have the authority under the US Constitution.

 

[toobfreak]

The rule changes WERE approved by legislatures...

WRONG. Better check again Jack.

There were no secret court sessions.

WRONG. How many did you know about at the time they happened? None?

I dealt with Trump winning in 2016 just fine Freaky.

You still on Tramadol?

 

[PoliticalChic]

The rule changes WERE approved by legislatures...try and keep up here. There were no secret court sessions. Only legislatures can approve changes to state voting rules...which they did...willingly.

I dealt with Trump winning in 2016 just fine Freaky. HE on the other hand, did a bang up job of continually sabotaging his own Presidency...all with NO help from me.

BTW, stop posting selfies. 1.5 years is a LONG time to hold a scream.

"The rule changes WERE approved by legislatures...try and keep up here."

You lying low-life scum: they were NOT.


At least I forced you to change you original lie.



When you can't support your lies......there is this:

Not only has it been decided in the US Supreme Court that only the state legislature, and not any court, may alter or set the dates, but this played an important role in the 2000 Gore v Bush case.



“U.S. Supreme Court

McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)



McPherson v. Blacker



Argued Oct. 11, 1892 Decided Oct. 17, 1892



“The validity of a state law providing for the appointment of electors of President and Vice President having been drawn in question before the highest tribunal of a state as repugnant to the laws and Constitution of the United States, and that court having decided in favor of its validity, this Court has jurisdiction to review the judgment under Rev.Stat. § 709. Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.



Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”

McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)

McPherson v. Blacker

supreme.justia.com

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

You lying scum.

The Constituton forbids any but the elected legislature from altering dates and times.



There is no basis for that extension in state law. The state supreme court made that up, and it is not allowed by the Constitution of the United States.

A state court authorized it, and it does not have the authority under the US Constitution.

Not familiar with a Constituton.
And you missed the whole point about the legislatures changing the voting laws..which they did. Ergo, you have NOTHING to complain about.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Not familiar with a Constituton.
And you missed the whole point about the legislatures changing the voting laws..which they did. Ergo, you have NOTHING to complain about.

Let's wipe up the floor with you again:


I revealed you as low-life lying scum when you tried to claim that the 2020 election was correctly carried out.

I pointed out that the Constitution forbids the alteration of dates and times for voting by any courts….only elected legislators can do this.

You lied….claiming:

“It was correctly voted on, decided, and certified.
Why do you keep parroting lies?

Legislatures determined voting rules.”

​

Pa. Supreme Court weighs future of state’s popular mail voting law | Spotlight PA

A group of Republican lawmakers — some of whom voted for the law — now say no-excuse mail voting requires a change to the Pennsylvania Constitution.

www.spotlightpa.org

The "No Evidence" Crowd Seems To Have Become Silent post 621

I wrote:

Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.
Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”



No where does it state that the legislature altered voting requirements!





2.Your next lie:

“Legislatures set rules for voting..in accordance with states right to conduct their elections in the manner they see fit. All passing Constitutional muster.” Post628

I eviscerated your lie here:

Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.


Supremacy Clause | Wex | US Law







3.You tried this lie again:

“The rule changes WERE approved by legislatures...try and keep up here. There were no secret court sessions. Only legislatures can approve changes to state voting rules...which they did...willingly.” Post 632

Document that!!!!

If you can’t prove that….and, you can’t….change your avi to “LowLifeLyingScumForLife,” immediately.

 

[Faun]

LOLOLOLOL

You flamin' retard... that photo is from March, 2020. That's not Biden's economy, it was Trump's economy! You must have one enormous mouth to get your entire foot inserted like that.

From March, 2020...

Photo by Richard Burlton on Unsplash

Download this photo by Richard Burlton on Unsplash

unsplash.com

 

[PoliticalChic]

Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."

Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers

How do you reconcile all this?

redstate.com

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Karma is already beginning to attack Joe.
He sprained his ankle yesterday playing with his dog 'Major'!
I just love karma, don't you?

The dog was running for its life because Joe had plans for it