Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.
In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.
Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????
Maybe this?
"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.
As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.
Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:
1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?
2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.
3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”
4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.
5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."
Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers
How do you reconcile all this?redstate.com
Some Dems are really good people.
They sincerely feel that President Trump is a dangerous person.
But they are disappointed that he has been ousted through massive electoral fraud, the worst in our history.
Of course, they cannot say anything in public, or they would be considered traitors to the Resistance.
I actually feel sorry for them.
They are good Americans who realize that the people who rigged this election are bad Americans.
"They sincerely feel that President Trump is a dangerous person."
Can you show me where they have made that argument?
No, you can't.
Anybody who says he gets love letters from a dictator like Kim Jong Un is dangerous.
Anybody who won't confront Putin about paying off Taliban to kill our troops is dangerous.
Anybody who can't handle losing an election and is burning the house down on his way out is dangerous.
Wake the fuck up.
No vulgarity, dunce.
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.
In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.
Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????
Maybe this?
"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.
As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.
Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:
1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?
2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.
3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”
4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.
5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."
Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers
How do you reconcile all this?redstate.com
Some Dems are really good people.
They sincerely feel that President Trump is a dangerous person.
But they are disappointed that he has been ousted through massive electoral fraud, the worst in our history.
Of course, they cannot say anything in public, or they would be considered traitors to the Resistance.
I actually feel sorry for them.
They are good Americans who realize that the people who rigged this election are bad Americans.
The "no evidence" crowd is alive and well, thank you very much.
The silence you hear is coming from inside your own empty fucking head.
Trump lawyers suffer embarrassing rebukes from judges over ...
www.washingtonpost.com › politics › 2020/11/11 › tru...
Nov 11, 2020 — asked Diamond, who was appointed to the federal bench by President ... Trump to produce evidence of widespread election fraud after Trump ...
Judge rejects 'shocking ask' of new election over voter fraud ...
thenevadaindependent.com › article › judge-rejects-sho...
Nov 20, 2020 — Combined, he said that was evidence enough that fraudulent activity had taken place and a new election was warranted. “This is a revolutionary ...
Trump Lawyer to Pa. Judge: I've Got No Evidence of Voter Fraud
www.phillymag.com › voter-fraud-pennsylvania-lawsuits
Nov 11, 2020 — A portion of a transcript in a Pennsylvania election lawsuit in which a Pennsylvania judge asks a Trump lawyer if there's actually any evidence ...
Trump's legal team cried vote fraud, but courts found none
apnews.com › article › election-2020-donald-trump-pe...
7 days ago — And they asked Sunday night for an expedited hearing Wednesday as ... No judges ever found any evidence of election fraud in Pennsylvania ...
Trump rails at judges as another court rejects his lawyers ...
www.theguardian.com › us-news › nov › trump-electio...
4 hours ago — US elections 2020 ... of dozens of failed lawsuits by Trump's lawyers, with judges castigating his lawyers for failing to present evidence of fraud.
Trump Cries Voter Fraud. In Court, His Lawyers Don't. - WSJ
www.wsj.com › Politics › Election 2020
Nov 13, 2020 — Under questioning from judges, at least two of the lawyers have backed ... In other instances, attorneys have said under oath they have no evidence of fraud. ... Election-law experts say many of Mr. Trump's legal claims amount to ... a state judge Tuesday repeatedly asked lawyer Jonathan Goldstein if he ...
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.
In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.
Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????
Maybe this?
"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.
As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.
Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:
1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?
2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.
3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”
4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.
5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."
Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers
How do you reconcile all this?redstate.com
Some Dems are really good people.
They sincerely feel that President Trump is a dangerous person.
But they are disappointed that he has been ousted through massive electoral fraud, the worst in our history.
Of course, they cannot say anything in public, or they would be considered traitors to the Resistance.
I actually feel sorry for them.
They are good Americans who realize that the people who rigged this election are bad Americans.
An ignorant American is not a good American!
Don't blame me I didn't vote for either of the seriously flawed main candidates. I don't see what people see in either.
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.
In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.
Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????
Maybe this?
"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.
As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.
Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:
1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?
2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.
3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”
4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.
5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."
Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers
How do you reconcile all this?redstate.com
No one is silent. We are just bored of pointing out what morons trump cultists are.
They are becoming more like zombies. Dragging around following Trump's every word almost by scent because they've lost all ability to see and hear.
The "no evidence" crowd is alive and well, thank you very much.
The silence you hear is coming from inside your own empty fucking head.
Trump lawyers suffer embarrassing rebukes from judges over ...
www.washingtonpost.com › politics › 2020/11/11 › tru...
Nov 11, 2020 — asked Diamond, who was appointed to the federal bench by President ... Trump to produce evidence of widespread election fraud after Trump ...
Judge rejects 'shocking ask' of new election over voter fraud ...
thenevadaindependent.com › article › judge-rejects-sho...
Nov 20, 2020 — Combined, he said that was evidence enough that fraudulent activity had taken place and a new election was warranted. “This is a revolutionary ...
Trump Lawyer to Pa. Judge: I've Got No Evidence of Voter Fraud
www.phillymag.com › voter-fraud-pennsylvania-lawsuits
Nov 11, 2020 — A portion of a transcript in a Pennsylvania election lawsuit in which a Pennsylvania judge asks a Trump lawyer if there's actually any evidence ...
Trump's legal team cried vote fraud, but courts found none
apnews.com › article › election-2020-donald-trump-pe...
7 days ago — And they asked Sunday night for an expedited hearing Wednesday as ... No judges ever found any evidence of election fraud in Pennsylvania ...
Trump rails at judges as another court rejects his lawyers ...
www.theguardian.com › us-news › nov › trump-electio...
4 hours ago — US elections 2020 ... of dozens of failed lawsuits by Trump's lawyers, with judges castigating his lawyers for failing to present evidence of fraud.
Trump Cries Voter Fraud. In Court, His Lawyers Don't. - WSJ
www.wsj.com › Politics › Election 2020
Nov 13, 2020 — Under questioning from judges, at least two of the lawyers have backed ... In other instances, attorneys have said under oath they have no evidence of fraud. ... Election-law experts say many of Mr. Trump's legal claims amount to ... a state judge Tuesday repeatedly asked lawyer Jonathan Goldstein if he ...
You stupid fuck
The FAKE NEWS MEDIA aka The SEE BS Network will NEVER acknowledge anything that is favorable to Trump. NEVER.
.
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.
In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.
Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????
Maybe this?
"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.
As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.
Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:
1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?
2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.
3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”
4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.
5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."
Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers
How do you reconcile all this?redstate.com
No one is silent. We are just bored of pointing out what morons trump cultists are.
They are becoming more like zombies. Dragging around following Trump's every word almost by scent because they've lost all ability to see and hear.
its actually you dim wits that need to be led around. you retards gave your life away to the publishers of msm and the other fake news outlets.
Don't blame me I didn't vote for either of the seriously flawed main candidates. I don't see what people see in either.
It's unimaginable what destruction Trump could do with 4 more years and no worries about running for office again.
Like Bolton said, Trump was fixated on the 2020 election from the very start of his first term.
He hates the job, just loves the attention and power.
unimaginable economy, your take home pay will be reduced, your guns will be taken....yup thats xiden, the asshole geriatric, dementia. pedophile you voted forDon't blame me I didn't vote for either of the seriously flawed main candidates. I don't see what people see in either.
It's unimaginable what destruction Trump could do with 4 more years and no worries about running for office again.
Like Bolton said, Trump was fixated on the 2020 election from the very start of his first term.
He hates the job, just loves the attention and power.
I see nothing wrong with investigating the election. I also see nothing wrong with not having either candidate in the white house. The entertainment value is immense though. Both sides going back and forth like repugnant spoiled kids.
I voted for cousin Howie Hawkins I have no idea what you are blabbing about.We saw this coming. You even told us what you were going to do. Hillary and the Communist Globalists did not even think of the Trump victory happening. They made sure the fix was in. In front of us all. But they had to tell everyone what they were going to do like it was some rule that had to be told to the people.Now you sound like Hillary 2016.
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.
In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.
Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????
Maybe this?
"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.
As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.
Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:
1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?
2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.
3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”
4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.
5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."
Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers
How do you reconcile all this?redstate.com
No one is silent. We are just bored of pointing out what morons trump cultists are.
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.
In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.
Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????
Maybe this?
"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.
As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.
Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:
1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?
2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.
3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”
4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.
5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."
Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers
How do you reconcile all this?redstate.com
Some Dems are really good people.
They sincerely feel that President Trump is a dangerous person.
But they are disappointed that he has been ousted through massive electoral fraud, the worst in our history.
Of course, they cannot say anything in public, or they would be considered traitors to the Resistance.
I actually feel sorry for them.
They are good Americans who realize that the people who rigged this election are bad Americans.
"They sincerely feel that President Trump is a dangerous person."
Can you show me where they have made that argument?
No, you can't.
Anybody who says he gets love letters from a dictator like Kim Jong Un is dangerous.
Anybody who won't confront Putin about paying off Taliban to kill our troops is dangerous.
Anybody who can't handle losing an election and is burning the house down on his way out is dangerous.
Wake the fuck up.
I see nothing wrong with investigating the election. I also see nothing wrong with not having either candidate in the white house. The entertainment value is immense though. Both sides going back and forth like repugnant spoiled kids.
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.
In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.
Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????
Maybe this?
"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.
As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.
Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:
1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?
2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.
3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”
4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.
5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."
Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers
How do you reconcile all this?redstate.com
No one is silent. We are just bored of pointing out what morons trump cultists are.
They are becoming more like zombies. Dragging around following Trump's every word almost by scent because they've lost all ability to see and hear.
its actually you dim wits that need to be led around. you retards gave your life away to the publishers of msm and the other fake news outlets.
Trump's little Stalinist trick worked out well on you zombies.
Pay close attention to "facts" I have posted, more than once- a judge in Pa said the legislature and governor in Pa didn't abide by the Pa constitution- same thing in Ca- that nullifies your myths you believe to be facts-Don't deflect from the fucking facts I just posted.