The Next Several Election Cycles Are Painfully Predictable

By this time the national debt will probably be around $50 trillion with still no end in sight. Health care costs will be out of control because they keep Band-Aiding a gaping wound instead of finding a cure. AI will have supplanted millions of jobs and the same struggles we hear about now will still be the campaign focus, but short of any resolution. The tribalists will continue to play the game and be at each other's throats while they continue to be lambs to the slaughter. The American people will have learned nothing.
Nothing stands in the way of this no matter who holds the reigns.
 
Why would anyone believe the Democrats are heading for a win streak? Their message remains to support illegal aliens over US citizens, the whole tranny nonsense, soft on crime, and with no economic plan. Maybe they take the House, maybe, but Senate is out of reach and the White House doesn't look good. The Democrats have no leaders who can win a general election.
 
And in your original post that I responded to you omitted (lie by omission is a thing you know). Californias actions was a direct response to Texas's action which was implemented by the GOP.s

WW
You claimed I said something about Texas Democrats.

For a supposed life-long Republican, you sure are defending the Democrat party which certainly did not begin all their gerrymandering with Texas.
 
Why would anyone believe the Democrats are heading for a win streak? Their message remains to support illegal aliens over US citizens, the whole tranny nonsense, soft on crime, and with no economic plan. Maybe they take the House, maybe, but Senate is out of reach and the White House doesn't look good. The Democrats have no leaders who can win a general election.
Unfortunately, the one thing they DO have going for them is our dishonest media and an educational system committed to indoctrination.
 
You claimed I said something about Texas Democrats.

For a supposed life-long Republican, you sure are defending the Democrat party which certainly did not begin all their gerrymandering with Texas.

You said it was DEM action that cause California to repeal their bi-partisian commision law base on voter ballot.

Except the actual start of GOP action in Texas.

I pointed out the lie of omission on the part you left out.

WW
 
I'm not a Democrat. I voted GOP in ever election from 1978 to 2016, voted twice for Kasich in 2016. I'm an Anti-Trumper Republican. But more along the lines of a Goldwater Republican, unlike the current cult version.

I've basically been shuned by the MAGA because I warned them of the dumpster fire that Trump would be, and I was right.

Stop drinking the Orange Koolaid.

WW
You just contradicted yourself because Kasich is actually a Democrat after attending their convention in 2020. You just didn't know he was a democrat wearing a Republican label.

Your problem is a severe case of TDS. You have one of the worst cases on this forum.
 
I'm not lying and have not lied., you chose to ignore the reason California is looking at changing districts.

That's because it's a response to Texas and Texas did it because Trump told them too.

Think through a process before typing a bumper sticker.

WW
Got a link to that? No, of course you don't.
 
I don't agree with gerrymandering for political power. I understand the response though to Trump/Abbott/Texas actions.

I'd prefer a federal law under the Constituition Article I, Section 4 power of Congress to:

#1 Establish that all states must use non-elected, bi-partisian election commissions required to draw district lines based on population density, natural barriers (moutains, rivers, etc.) and established civil boundaries (villiage, town, city, county, etc.) lines.

#2 Once set post Census, States cannot redraw lines.

DEM and GOP gerrymandering is a bane on the Republic.

WW
Too bad there is no such thing.
 
You just contradicted yourself because Kasich is actually a Democrat after attending their convention in 2020. You just didn't know he was a democrat wearing a Republican label.

Your problem is a severe case of TDS. You have one of the worst cases on this forum.

I said I voted for Kasich in 2016, not 2020. In 2016 he was a Republican Candidate (note: candidate, not nominee).

No contradiction.

WW
 
It's easy to predict how these next several years are going to go. Despite the Republicans' mid-decade gerrymandering scheme, they're going to lose the House and possibly the Senate. The Democrats will waste the next two years holding hearings and grandstanding in front of the cameras being sure to get some viral quotes out there for the public and media to digest. They'll certainly make impeachments attempts on Trump and possibly Hegseth. Nothing will get accomplished in the meantime.

In 2028, Trump fatigue will have soaked in so much that a Democrat will win the White House, even if it's an incompetent grifter like Newsom. The Democrats will hold the House and probably win the Senate if they didn't already in '26. As usual, they'll misread the room and think they've been given some big mandate by the people to push whatever extreme economic and social nonsense they can imagine on the country. They'll piss off the American people and 2030 will usher in a Republican resurgence who will win back the House and likely the Senate.

By this time the national debt will probably be around $50 trillion with still no end in sight. Health care costs will be out of control because they keep Band-Aiding a gaping wound instead of finding a cure. AI will have supplanted millions of jobs and the same struggles we hear about now will still be the campaign focus, but short of any resolution. The tribalists will continue to play the game and be at each other's throats while they continue to be lambs to the slaughter. The American people will have learned nothing.
They proved it in Jersey and Virginia. And they passed the proposition in California. To me I believe that regionalism is going to be more important. And the Red areas need to get everything they can from the Prog areas to increase their wealth and infrastructure. There is actually a pathway for Manhattan to become poorer.
 
I pointed out he was a Dem in a Republican's clothing, so you did unknowingly vote for a Democrat. Your TDS made you do it!

:rolleyes::rolleyes:

Under that logic you voted for a DEM with Trump, you know he was a registered DEM before grifting the GOP.

WW
 
That's why I said Congress needs to use their Article I, Section 4 power to create it.

(Not going to happen, but it should.)

WW
You can't create something than simply cannot exist. There will always be some partisan involvement. It's human nature and you cannot remove that by legislation.

It's also too bad that you cannot read that Article I, Section 4 does NOT give Congress power to create commissions for reapportionment.
 
:rolleyes::rolleyes:

Under that logic you voted for a DEM with Trump, you know he was a registered DEM before grifting the GOP.

WW
No, he changed the right way. He was a Republican when I voted for him all three times, and is a Republican today.

By those standards, Reagan was a Democrat.

You really should just quit when someone points out your hypocrisy because all you do is confirm they were right.
 
You can't create something than simply cannot exist. There will always be some partisan involvement. It's human nature and you cannot remove that by legislation.

It's also too bad that you cannot read that Article I, Section 4 does NOT give Congress power to create commissions for reapportionment.

I didn't say Congress would create them.

I said: "Establish that all states must use non-elected, bi-partisian election commissions required to draw district lines based on population density, natural barriers (moutains, rivers, etc.) and established civil boundaries (villiage, town, city, county, etc.) lines." The actual commission would be created by each state to comply with federal law.

(And I agree, it ain't happen'n.)

WW
 
15th post
And when the same polls are in your side’s favor, you’re the first to tout them
I have never touted any poll. I think they are too inaccurate.
 
I didn't say Congress would create them.

I said: "Establish that all states must use non-elected, bi-partisian election commissions required to draw district lines based on population density, natural barriers (moutains, rivers, etc.) and established civil boundaries (villiage, town, city, county, etc.) lines." The actual commission would be created by each state to comply with federal law.

(And I agree, it ain't happen'n.)

WW

Yes. You did. You said:
"That's why I said Congress needs to use their Article I, Section 4 power to create it."

Do you even read the tripe you post?

Congress does not have that power under the Constitution. It is not listed and therefore is delegated to the states.

Have a nice day, TDS-infected hypocrite that you are!
 
Unfortunately, the one thing they DO have going for them is our dishonest media and an educational system committed to indoctrination.
The media loses more credibility by the day. They keep crying wolf with no results. If Trump's cases in appeal go his way they look even more foolish and impotent. The only thing that might save them would be ending birthright citizenship by the Supreme Court. They might be able to scrounge some votes from that.
 
Back
Top Bottom