Ok, let's assume that the towers were brought down by explosives. Let's not argue that point in yet another thread, let's move on.
So then how do they get the terrorists to fly the planes into the buildings? One plane was diverted away from it's target, how would they know that one or more of the others wouldn't be?
If the terrorists weren't real terrorists, but volunteers, how did they get Osama Bin Laden to cooperate? How did they get him to pretend he did it? How did they stop him from telling the world of the US Government's plot to drag the country into a war for oil?
The US Government's involvement in the attacks on 9-11 is too much to ask me to believe. The Truthers like to point out the holes in the NIST's report and also ignore the gaping and glaring holes in their own conspiracies.
So folks, let's address the problems with YOUR theory.
First off, I don't like to say or insinuate that the whole US government is to blame.
It is my opinion that only a handful of people in authority would be necessary to accomplish a 9-11.
A good place to start would be to see who was in these positions of influence, in the Bush administration, and little background regarding PNAC, and who actually benefited from an attack on the US, one of which was into remote guidance systems of aircraft.
To even begin to try to understand much of this , one would have to dig into the relationship with OBL, and Alqaeda.
The NIST report or the 9-11 commission have nothing that could be gained about this.
NIST was charged with making sure that their investigation did not deviate from the official narrative that devout Islamic Jihadists flew the planes and cause all the damage, because they hated us for our freedumbs. The NIST report did its job in keeping with the theme, and when Itry to speak about it, I try to point out the instances where they did so, in another thread..
So do you want to seriously talk about the military, political and other objectives that are the real reason for 9-11 attacks, or are you really convinced that we were attacked because Bush said "they hate us for our freedoms"?
Feel free to start addressing what problems there may be in an alternative cause and explanation.
None of the above. I'm not going to argue about whether the NIST's report is valid or not. I'm taking the NEXT step and trying to point out that there are serious problems with the theory that the towers were brought down by explosives.
The opposition to your CT relies on the NIST reports ignoring controversial instances that point to the investigation being politicized and conducted in a way that keept in line with the official story, that justified the reasons for invasions of other countries to get revenge for the 9-11 attacks..
There are serious problems that have been pointed out regarding the official story line, and the NIST reports that try to legitimize it.
The problem with those that oppose any alternative and counter views, is that not many look at what and why there is opposition to the OCT.
I at least try to understand why you folks have the opinions that you do, and what compels you to believe it.
I just don't understand why many of you give the glaring discrepancies of the official narrative such an easy pass. To fully understand why some people do not, you must try to be more open minded and take an honest view regarding them, and also include the history of less then benevolent actions by your own government in the past, and try to understand that 9-11 was just one of many incidents where the American people were mislead, and if we just stay focused on the events of 9-11, those that oppose the official narrative do have some good points and questions that argue against it, and the NIST report is just one of many, and good place to start.
9-11 was just a launching point, a "Pearl Harbor" event to galvanize support and sentiment for plans that were drawn up many years before and included both political parties and their advisers. It just so happened that the majority of them were of the Zionist persuasion, with Israeli interests first and foremost on their minds.
One shouldn't limit or dismiss that we were lied to again, simply because there is no hard proof of explosive demolition devices and no confessions from those that might have participated.
If anything was seriously examined by NIST, that might point to any other alternative explanation and was removed, destroyed, ignored etc...it does not mean nothing incriminating didn't exist, it simply means that they did not want to even include any other possible explanation, because it would not fit with the needed story line to continue with planned objectives such as the invasion of Afghanistan, Iraq, and other nations on the list.
9-11 had nothing to do with catching OBL, or destroying "terrorism" for the advancement of democracy and our "freedumbs", in many peoples opinion including mine.
NIST could not have conducted an honest investigation for fear of revealing the possibility that those buildings were imploded and that the possibility that the 9-11 attacks were facilitated by other entities other then Alqaeda and OBL, who supposedly only used only planes, fires and gravity, while circumventing national defense on the same day it would be overwhelmed by terrorist drills and phoney radar blips on screens.
The explanation had to stay in step with what was needed to establish "proof" to blame the jihadists and to get overwhelming national and world support so the planners could fulfill their objectives.
There is nothing anyone can do to change what happened, but awareness about the 9-11 attacks, and all that is connected to them, is a way to be on the look out for any other future schemes, and hopefully curtail or avoid another such event, by Americans being better informed especially about who they throw their support at in all future elections and appointments.
The rhetoric about Iran is one such case where we are hearing the same things as we heard about Iraq.
By directing attention to, and discourage supporting and electing people into official government positions, who would in turn possibly support and appoint their own like minded criminals, once they are elected, like those who have the same goals for more war based on BS intel and info, as those who held positions that advocated and pushed ahead the disastrous actions and or inaction's such as those that allowed 9-11 to happen (and were even rewarded for it), and disastrous actions that took place after, "justified" by the 9-11 attacks, Americans might be able to hold off and possibly even stop another 9-11, or another financial disaster, and other scandals.
9-11 happened partly because Americans were asleep and too trusting of who had control of their government, and assumed nothing like it could ever happen to America because there are no evil men in America? They're all good guys?? BS.
How ******* naive is that? Have we learned to be more diligent and aware as citizens?
How many more obvious grievances do there have to be for us to become so?
Awareness and courage on Americans part is important. Stepping back away from the "system" and conducting your own personnel observation of it and the order (disorder) of things and what is happening, is the next logical step.
Don't support and cast your vote for the same cast of liars and criminals who coddle up to moneyed interests and un American foreign influences.
He does that everytime he is cornered.this troll actually still thinks oswald killed kennedy
and wont even look at the evidence at that that proves a conspiracy so count on him running off from this post of yours as well.
