The New York Times finally gives up: "NO EVIDENCE IMPLICATING TRUMP IN EPSTEIN'S ABUSE AND TRAFFICKING OF MINORS"

[struth]

And not a single Trump quite, right?

What sealybobo isnt saying is he was mentioned by Epstein to Dems he was colluding with, from Obama’s White House counsel to sitting members of congress…in efforts to get Trump before he was indicted

 

[Frankenstein]

Remember trump was a democrat back then. He palled around with Clinton too. Lol. Puff daddy. Epstein. Yes bill and trump are the same. Only trump blew bubba

Trump could have never won the democratic nomination. Too racist. He lost every democratic demographic he just won 5% more than bush or McCain.

Dude, Scott bessent is a gay man who adopted kids. Charlie Kirk said that should be illegal.

Can you look at your lying face in the mirror it has to be hard to hate someone so much that all you can do is lie about them what's the matter one of your blue haired non binary kids get their feelings hurt

 

[excalibur]

Surely, it is.....one direct quote from the times article... but you left out their 100 other quotes from the article, which the op apparently never read to put it in context of everything else said.

The article, written by Times reporters Nicholas Confessore and Julie Tate, was based on interviews with "more than 30 former employees of Jeffrey Epstein, victims of his abuse and others who crossed paths with Mr. Epstein and President Trump.”

... the Times ultimately conceded that its review found no evidence tying Trump to Epstein’s abuse or trafficking of minors.

“An examination of their history by The New York Times has found no evidence implicating Mr. Trump in Mr. Epstein’s abuse and trafficking of minors.” the article stated.​

NYT Buries the Lede: Admits No Proof Trump Was Involved in Epstein Crimes

The New York Times acknowledged in a recent report that there has never been any evidence connecting President Donald Trump to the criminal activities of

www.lifezette.com

 

[marvin martian]

The article, written by Times reporters Nicholas Confessore and Julie Tate, was based on interviews with “more than 30 former employees of Jeffrey Epstein, victims of his abuse and others who crossed paths with Mr. Epstein and President Trump.”​

​

... the Times ultimately conceded that its review found no evidence tying Trump to Epstein’s abuse or trafficking of minors.​

​

“An examination of their history by The New York Times has found no evidence implicating Mr. Trump in Mr. Epstein’s abuse and trafficking of minors,” the article stated.​

Yup, the rest of it was typically fact-free Trump-hate from the DNC's propaganda arm. But even they had to admit there's NOTHING tying President Trump to any of Epstein's crimes.

Now Bill Clinton, on the other hand, is in a LOT of trouble.

I guess now we know why Joe Biden hid these files for 4 years.

 

[sealybobo]

Can you look at your lying face in the mirror it has to be hard to hate someone so much that all you can do is lie about them what's the matter one of your blue haired non binary kids get their feelings hurt

Oh my god you ******* hypocrite. LOL.

Cognitive dissonance is the mental stress or discomfort experienced when holding conflicting beliefs, values, or attitudes, or when your actions contradict your beliefs, motivating you to change one to achieve internal consistency, like a smoker downplaying health risks to justify smoking. People reduce this dissonance by changing behaviors, altering beliefs, rationalizing the inconsistency, or minimizing its importance, often leading to self-justification or attitude shifts to restore psychological harmony.

 

[cnm]

Yup, the rest of it was typically fact-free Trump-hate from the DNC's propaganda arm. But even they had to admit there's NOTHING tying President Trump to any of Epstein's crimes.

Now Bill Clinton, on the other hand, is in a LOT of trouble.

I guess now we know why Joe Biden hid these files for 4 years.

That's why Chump is fighting so ferociously to prevent their release.

I hear ya.

 

[Care4all]

The article, written by Times reporters Nicholas Confessore and Julie Tate, was based on interviews with "more than 30 former employees of Jeffrey Epstein, victims of his abuse and others who crossed paths with Mr. Epstein and President Trump.”​

​

... the Times ultimately conceded that its review found no evidence tying Trump to Epstein’s abuse or trafficking of minors.​

​

“An examination of their history by The New York Times has found no evidence implicating Mr. Trump in Mr. Epstein’s abuse and trafficking of minors.” the article stated.​

NYT Buries the Lede: Admits No Proof Trump Was Involved in Epstein Crimes

The New York Times acknowledged in a recent report that there has never been any evidence connecting President Donald Trump to the criminal activities of

www.lifezette.com

No evidence of trump being involved in the sex trafficking of Epstein.

But the 30 interviewed had plenty to say about Trump's close relationship with Epstein, which Trump has continually lied about....and some sexual harassment of victim.

 

[excalibur]

No evidence of trump being involved in the sex trafficking of Epstein.

But the 30 interviewed had plenty to say about Trump's close relationship with Epstein, which Trump has continually lied about....and some sexual harassment of victim.

An examination of their history by The New York Times has found no evidence implicating Mr. Trump in Mr. Epstein’s abuse and trafficking of minors.” the article stated.​

 

[Nostra]

And not a single Trump quote, right?

: crickets: from sealybobo

 

[Nostra]

No evidence of trump being involved in the sex trafficking of Epstein.

But the 30 interviewed had plenty to say about Trump's close relationship with Epstein, which Trump has continually lied about....and some sexual harassment of victim.

Link to this sexual harassment

 

[cnm]

I guess the evidence that Lard a Magat spa supplied young masseuses to Epstein was hidden from everyone before.

Oh well.

 

[Nostra]

Another Dimwinger Cult Nothingburger.

 

[cnm]

Another Dimwinger Cult Nothingburger.

He's allowed to send child masseuses from the Moron a Lardo spa so Epstein can grab them by the *****.

We hear ya.

 

[Nostra]

He's allowed to send child masseuses from the Moron a Lardo spa so Epstein can grab them by the *****.

We hear ya.

Desperation always sets in when these things blow up in your faces, loser.

 

[cnm]

Desperation always sets in when these things blow up in your faces, loser.

Yeah. Forbes is really desperate. You really are a tool for Chump.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/maryroeloffs/2025/12/31/spa-workers-accusation-got-jeffrey-epstein-banned-from-mar-a-lago-spa-report-says/

​

Epstein's close relationship with Trump afforded him the privilege of house calls from spa employees for massages and other services from the late 1990s and early 2000s, the Wall Street Journal reported late Tuesday night.​

Epstein was known to be sexually suggestive and expose himself during appointments, the Journal reported citing unnamed Mar-a-Lago employees, and Trump was confronted about his behavior after an 18-year-old beautician told her bosses Epstein had pressured her for sex.​

​