The New York Times finally gives up: "NO EVIDENCE IMPLICATING TRUMP IN EPSTEIN'S ABUSE AND TRAFFICKING OF MINORS"

[dudmuck]

The article, written by Times reporters Nicholas Confessore and Julie Tate, was based on interviews with “more than 30 former employees of Jeffrey Epstein, victims of his abuse and others who crossed paths with Mr. Epstein and President Trump.”​

​

... the Times ultimately conceded that its review found no evidence tying Trump to Epstein’s abuse or trafficking of minors.​

​

“An examination of their history by The New York Times has found no evidence implicating Mr. Trump in Mr. Epstein’s abuse and trafficking of minors,” the article stated.​

 

[Dorian Mode]

Nobody said anything about hating him.

We've said he was the better choice. That hasn't changed.

But I knew from the start that he yapped a lot and said a lot of things that were almost beyond hyperbolic.


You don't read much, do you. Or you don't keep context.

Not to long ago I said I could not be in the same room with GWBush. I'd break his nose. I blame him for lighting the fuse on our national debt. So, that should answer your question. But if it's not clear, the answer is not only no, it's hell no.


Certainly not Obama.

And I would never pick a Clinton over Trump.

If you are or have been married, you know that you don't like your wife ALL THE TIME. Some times you simply disagree.


Seriously? Who knew?

And no wife who does either. But you don't dump her (if you are smart) at the first sign of trouble.


Yep. And if they continue to run up the debt, it pisses me off. But I'll take a victory when I can get it. With Harris, there were going to be NO VICTORIES. And what's worse, there might never have been coming back.

And for me, the big things was the SCOTUS.

I got:

Gorsuch
Kavenaugh
Barrett

And I call Trump a hero for that.

But when he does stupid stuff, I call him something else. Doesn't mean I regret my vote for him.

You guys much find it boring living in your black and white world.

And you are telling me this why?

Didn't I say:

1 I voted for him 3 times.
2. I'd vote for him again
3. He gave us three great Scotus Judges
4. He's not going to screw over the Constitution the way Harris/Walz (and the rest of the assholes on the left were.

So, please tell me again why I have to wade through your little rant in response to my post?

It's not a rant, it's my perspective. Trump does not get his fair due because the democraps continuously demonize him everywhere, and it encourages others to join in needlessly. There is nothing you or I can do to influence Trump at this point and all we can do is live with the consequences of our vote. Sure Trump is going to **** up sometimes, but the rest of the time he is hitting home runs one after another. When was the last time we had a POTUS like that?

 

[Care4all]

Something anyone with an IQ over 60 knew years ago when first the Clinton campaign, then the Biden campaign, and then the Harris campaign refused to release the Eptein files.

If there was anything in there implicating Trump, we would have seen it in 2016, and then ten million more times since then.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/18/us/jeffrey-epstein-donald-trump.html?unlocked_article_code=1.9k8.Nnw5.17luqjB59BrY

"The Times interviewed more than 30 former Epstein employees, victims of his abuse and others who crossed paths with the two men over the years. The Times also obtained new documents that illuminate their relationship and scoured court documents and other public records...An examination of their history by The New York Times has found no evidence implicating Mr. Trump in Mr. Epstein’s abuse and trafficking of minors."

That's not all that the times reported on and found out in their very lengthy article....

 

[struth]

That's not all that the times reported on and found out in their very lengthy article....

It’s literally a quote directly from the article

Sigh you dembots

 

[Care4all]

It’s literally a quote directly from the article

Sigh you dembots

Surely, it is.....one direct quote from the times article... but you left out their 100 other quotes from the article, which the op apparently never read to put it in context of everything else said.

 

[ColonelAngus]

It is comical to see the lefty circle jerk over this.

Should the Biden administration be held criminally responsible for having evidence Trump fucked kids and not prosecuting Trump?

Why did the Biden administration cover it up for Trump?

 

[struth]

Surely, it is.....one direct quote from the times article... but you left out their 100 other quotes from the article, which the op apparently never read to put it in context of everything else said.

It’s the conclusion

It’s the part that matters

 

[ColonelAngus]

For real, the Trump DOJ should prosecute the Biden DOJ for having evidence in their possession that TRUMP FUCKED KIDS, BUT COVERING IT UP TO PROTECT TRUMP.

Disgusting Dems protected Pedophile Trump.

 

[SweetTea]

Oh well, I think a lot have jumped on the "let's be cool and hate Trump" bandwagon. Trump is an ass sometimes, but would you rather have someone like GW Bush instead? Would you like someone slick like Clinton or Obama, but are really establishment politicians? I once got a handmade boutique guitar tailor made for me, and drove the builder crazy until he looked at me and said "There is no such thing as perfection in an imperfect world." There are no perfect politicians who do exactly what I want them to do. When they finally do something I want, like close the damn border, I jump up and down with joy. Now, if that person makes a mean tweet the next day, I can forgive him. Trading a closed border for a mean tweet seems like a sweet deal to me. So, if I have to chose between an asshat who gets things done, and a slick politician who ***** up everything they touch, I'll take the asshat.

Exactly the way I feel. Most Democrats are emotional creatures first and foremost. Their feelings take priority over logic or outcomes. I don’t think it is a secret that women, in general, tend to be more emotionally driven than men, which helps explain why more women align with the Democratic Party. It is also why the Democratic Party does everything in their power to emasculate men. That being said, the ideal President, man or woman, shouldn’t be void of emotion and empathy, however, they should not be the overriding character traits. I would choose the heart surgeon who had horrible bedside manor and was a complete jerk if they were the most skilled surgeon available. Democrats would make the same choice in that scenario, but they are incapable of applying that same logic when choosing the President.

 

[sealybobo]

I found what I was expecting

The dems are all over the files, they protected Epstein, colluded with him, and conspired with him even after he was convicted awx offender

So did trump. He palled around Epstein the most. Don’t ignore it embrace your perversity by supporting trump. You’re experiencing cognitive dissonance

 

[sealybobo]

I found what I was expecting

The dems are all over the files, they protected Epstein, colluded with him, and conspired with him even after he was convicted awx offender

Remember trump was a democrat back then. He palled around with Clinton too. Lol. Puff daddy. Epstein. Yes bill and trump are the same. Only trump blew bubba

Trump could have never won the democratic nomination. Too racist. He lost every democratic demographic he just won 5% more than bush or McCain.

Dude, Scott bessent is a gay man who adopted kids. Charlie Kirk said that should be illegal.

 

[struth]

Remember trump was a democrat back then. He palled around with Clinton too. Lol. Puff daddy. Epstein. Yes bill and trump are the same. Only trump blew bubba

Trump could have never won the democratic nomination. Too racist. He lost every democratic demographic he just won 5% more than bush or McCain.

Dude, Scott bessent is a gay man who adopted kids. Charlie Kirk said that should be illegal.

Yep he donated to Dems, but that was cause you were easily corrupted

Trump could never win the Dem nominee for that reason

But he wasn’t a Dem, in fact in the mid 80s to the late 90s he was Republican, then part of the reform party movement…the reconnected with the Dems because chuck Schumer and Clinton were sentors for. NY and easily corrupted

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump

 

[struth]

So did trump. He palled around Epstein the most. Don’t ignore it embrace your perversity by supporting trump. You’re experiencing cognitive dissonance

Link to the “most?” From the 60k pages released be seemed to be talking to Dems a lot

A lot of times talking about Trump

In fact even after he was convicted his lost communications are with Obama White House counsel

 

[Concerned American]

It is comical to see the lefty circle jerk over this.

Should the Biden administration be held criminally responsible for having evidence Trump fucked kids and not prosecuting Trump?

Why did the Biden administration cover it up for Trump?

Yeah, Care4None twists herself into positions I didn't think were humanly possible to vilify DJT.

 

[Frankenstein]

If there is no Evidence of any wrongdoing of Trump, release the full unredacted files.

Yeah Democrats know why the files are redacted, and know they have to be, but it's a chance to try and score political points, and so as usual they just have at it

 

[Dorian Mode]

Yeah, Care4None twists herself into positions I didn't think were humanly possible to vilify DJT.

All democrats are as fake as press on nails and all their social warrior justice BS is just cosplay on the Internet. The irony here is the behavior of the typical democrat is so much worse that the behavior of Trump.

 

[struth]

Yeah Democrats know why the files are redacted, and know they have to be, but it's a chance to try and score political points, and so as usual they just have at it

Of course and to deflect from the content of the 60k pages that show the Epstein case is nothing more than a Democrat case. They colluded with him, even after he was convicted, and their presidents protected him

 

[Dorian Mode]

Yeah Democrats know why the files are redacted, and know they have to be, but it's a chance to try and score political points, and so as usual they just have at it

I think they are desperate for points because the score is something like 150 to 6 and it's only the first quarter. I think Trump is going to score well over a thousand points by the end of the game and I don't think the democraps will break 25.

 

[Nostra]

Trump was named in the files 1600 times.

And not a single Trump quote, right?

 

[Nostra]

So did trump. He palled around Epstein the most. Don’t ignore it embrace your perversity by supporting trump. You’re experiencing cognitive dissonance

Lies. But then, even you say you lie all the time.