The new Reagan administration? Blinken says US will respond to reckless Moscow (Evil empire) acts/ Navalny, Solar Winds, election interference.

[StormAl]

"Like Stalin ran US war effort in WWII" is the best conspiracy theory comment of the day. In fact, China is not going to take over any country. They want economic power not land.

 

[shockedcanadian]

So they should. Blinken might surprise me. However, Russia is well beneath the threat that China poses. The world knows this, American citizens know this and intelligence agencies know this.

Therefore, if we are going to have more shouting about Russia, while China does as they please (and holds an olympic games as a reward), America risks losing India, Japan, Australia and numerous others. You can't call out a lesser threat and get brownie points while the other gets a free pass. That would be very unReagan like and self destructive.

The way to deal with China isn't to allow them to save face, it isn't to walk on eggshells. it is to confront them loudly, publicly and directly. THAT is what Reagan would do, and why he was the best president in my lifetime. Calling out Russia today, would be like calling out Cuba during Reagans time. Yeah, they are a thorn in the side in the 80s, but they aren't what Russia was then.

"Russia is well beneath the threat that China poses." Moscow did 3 times already what red hans are only planing to do

View attachment 487649

China walked into Hong Kong, changed laws, arrested pro-West citizens and laughed at the West. Russia went into Crimea after a trumped up referendum.

In both cases, the West lost their reputation for being the defender of free citizens. In the case of Russia, Obama listened to bad intel who told him that arming Ukraine would upset Russia (well no shyte, isn't that the point?). Obama threw Russia out of the G8 as punishment.

In the case of China, it was so brazen and without consequences that it desperately weakened the UK and USA. What consequences have come from this? Any arguing that China should be thrown out of the WTO or UN? They are laughing loudly, once again violating their own agreement with England to allow HK to be independent and autonomous until 2047. What a steal for China. Great economic wealth and control over this wealth.

You tell me, which action made the West look weakest? Which action had the most consequences for the aggressor?

We are losing to China. We are weak and allowing soft, cuck corporate betrayers to control politicians and NOT confront the obvious danger. The worst threat to the West in Americas history since she achieved Independence.

"China walked into Hong Kong" No , UK delivered Hong Kong to China according 100 year - old agreement. No even close to what Moscow does in Ukraine today

Come on, when do I lie? Hong Kong was to be autonomous and separate from the CCP until 2047. They violated this agreement and spit on the British and Americans in particular.

Without consequences, they will continue to boldly do as they please. Like the playground bully.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

So they should. Blinken might surprise me. However, Russia is well beneath the threat that China poses. The world knows this, American citizens know this and intelligence agencies know this.

Therefore, if we are going to have more shouting about Russia, while China does as they please (and holds an olympic games as a reward), America risks losing India, Japan, Australia and numerous others. You can't call out a lesser threat and get brownie points while the other gets a free pass. That would be very unReagan like and self destructive.

The way to deal with China isn't to allow them to save face, it isn't to walk on eggshells. it is to confront them loudly, publicly and directly. THAT is what Reagan would do, and why he was the best president in my lifetime. Calling out Russia today, would be like calling out Cuba during Reagans time. Yeah, they are a thorn in the side in the 80s, but they aren't what Russia was then.

"Russia is well beneath the threat that China poses." Moscow did 3 times already what red hans are only planing to do

View attachment 487649

China walked into Hong Kong, changed laws, arrested pro-West citizens and laughed at the West. Russia went into Crimea after a trumped up referendum.

In both cases, the West lost their reputation for being the defender of free citizens. In the case of Russia, Obama listened to bad intel who told him that arming Ukraine would upset Russia (well no shyte, isn't that the point?). Obama threw Russia out of the G8 as punishment.

In the case of China, it was so brazen and without consequences that it desperately weakened the UK and USA. What consequences have come from this? Any arguing that China should be thrown out of the WTO or UN? They are laughing loudly, once again violating their own agreement with England to allow HK to be independent and autonomous until 2047. What a steal for China. Great economic wealth and control over this wealth.

You tell me, which action made the West look weakest? Which action had the most consequences for the aggressor?

We are losing to China. We are weak and allowing soft, cuck corporate betrayers to control politicians and NOT confront the obvious danger. The worst threat to the West in Americas history since she achieved Independence.

"China walked into Hong Kong" No , UK delivered Hong Kong to China according 100 year - old agreement. No even close to what Moscow does in Ukraine today

Come on, when do I lie? Hong Kong was to be autonomous and separate from the CCP until 2047. They violated this agreement and spit on the British and Americans in particular.

Without consequences, they will continue to boldly do as they please. Like the playground bully.

The UK being very stupid actually believed China would honor their promises and were very upset when China violated their agreements and took complete control of Hong Kong the same way they will do with Taiwan before our midterm elections.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

So they should. Blinken might surprise me. However, Russia is well beneath the threat that China poses. The world knows this, American citizens know this and intelligence agencies know this.

Therefore, if we are going to have more shouting about Russia, while China does as they please (and holds an olympic games as a reward), America risks losing India, Japan, Australia and numerous others. You can't call out a lesser threat and get brownie points while the other gets a free pass. That would be very unReagan like and self destructive.

The way to deal with China isn't to allow them to save face, it isn't to walk on eggshells. it is to confront them loudly, publicly and directly. THAT is what Reagan would do, and why he was the best president in my lifetime. Calling out Russia today, would be like calling out Cuba during Reagans time. Yeah, they are a thorn in the side in the 80s, but they aren't what Russia was then.

"Russia is well beneath the threat that China poses." Moscow did 3 times already what red hans are only planing to do

View attachment 487649

China walked into Hong Kong, changed laws, arrested pro-West citizens and laughed at the West. Russia went into Crimea after a trumped up referendum.

In both cases, the West lost their reputation for being the defender of free citizens. In the case of Russia, Obama listened to bad intel who told him that arming Ukraine would upset Russia (well no shyte, isn't that the point?). Obama threw Russia out of the G8 as punishment.

In the case of China, it was so brazen and without consequences that it desperately weakened the UK and USA. What consequences have come from this? Any arguing that China should be thrown out of the WTO or UN? They are laughing loudly, once again violating their own agreement with England to allow HK to be independent and autonomous until 2047. What a steal for China. Great economic wealth and control over this wealth.

You tell me, which action made the West look weakest? Which action had the most consequences for the aggressor?

We are losing to China. We are weak and allowing soft, cuck corporate betrayers to control politicians and NOT confront the obvious danger. The worst threat to the West in Americas history since she achieved Independence.

"China walked into Hong Kong" No , UK delivered Hong Kong to China according 100 year - old agreement. No even close to what Moscow does in Ukraine today

Come on, when do I lie? Hong Kong was to be autonomous and separate from the CCP until 2047. They violated this agreement and spit on the British and Americans in particular.

Without consequences, they will continue to boldly do as they please. Like the playground bully.

So True!

 

[TheGreenHornet]

"Like Stalin ran US war effort in WWII" is the best conspiracy theory comment of the day. In fact, China is not going to take over any country. They want economic power not land.

Bull fuken shit......China is obsessed with Taiwan....anyone who does not understand that knows nothing of China.

Has China Ever Invaded Another Country? - LaowaiCareer

Has China ever Invaded Another Country? China has a history of expanding its territory. It's an ongoing source of tension worth knowing if you're a visitor.

www.laowaicareer.com

Chinaâs Grand Plan To Take Over The World

When the US and ultimately the rest of the Western world began to engage China, resulting in China finally being allowed into the World Trade Organization in the early 2000s, no one really expected the outcomes we see today.

www.forbes.com

 

[Litwin]

So they should. Blinken might surprise me. However, Russia is well beneath the threat that China poses. The world knows this, American citizens know this and intelligence agencies know this.

Therefore, if we are going to have more shouting about Russia, while China does as they please (and holds an olympic games as a reward), America risks losing India, Japan, Australia and numerous others. You can't call out a lesser threat and get brownie points while the other gets a free pass. That would be very unReagan like and self destructive.

The way to deal with China isn't to allow them to save face, it isn't to walk on eggshells. it is to confront them loudly, publicly and directly. THAT is what Reagan would do, and why he was the best president in my lifetime. Calling out Russia today, would be like calling out Cuba during Reagans time. Yeah, they are a thorn in the side in the 80s, but they aren't what Russia was then.

"Russia is well beneath the threat that China poses." Moscow did 3 times already what red hans are only planing to do

View attachment 487649

China walked into Hong Kong, changed laws, arrested pro-West citizens and laughed at the West. Russia went into Crimea after a trumped up referendum.

In both cases, the West lost their reputation for being the defender of free citizens. In the case of Russia, Obama listened to bad intel who told him that arming Ukraine would upset Russia (well no shyte, isn't that the point?). Obama threw Russia out of the G8 as punishment.

In the case of China, it was so brazen and without consequences that it desperately weakened the UK and USA. What consequences have come from this? Any arguing that China should be thrown out of the WTO or UN? They are laughing loudly, once again violating their own agreement with England to allow HK to be independent and autonomous until 2047. What a steal for China. Great economic wealth and control over this wealth.

You tell me, which action made the West look weakest? Which action had the most consequences for the aggressor?

We are losing to China. We are weak and allowing soft, cuck corporate betrayers to control politicians and NOT confront the obvious danger. The worst threat to the West in Americas history since she achieved Independence.

"China walked into Hong Kong" No , UK delivered Hong Kong to China according 100 year - old agreement. No even close to what Moscow does in Ukraine today

Come on, when do I lie? Hong Kong was to be autonomous and separate from the CCP until 2047. They violated this agreement and spit on the British and Americans in particular.

Without consequences, they will continue to boldly do as they please. Like the playground bully.

"Hong Kong was to be autonomous and separate from the CCP until 2047." the hans will do the same with out Manchuria, and coward putin knows it

The Treaty of Nerchinsk signed in 1689 after a series of conflicts, defined the China–Russia border as the Stanovoy Mountains and the Argun River, making Outer Manchuria a part of Qing dynasty China. After losing the Opium Wars, the Qing dynasty was forced to sign a series of treaties that gave away land and ports to the imperialist Western powers as well as to Russia and Japan; these were known as the Unequal Treaties. Starting with the Treaty of Aigun in 1858 and the Treaty of Peking in 1860, the Sino–Russian border was realigned in Russia's favor along the Amur and Ussuri rivers. As a result, China lost Outer Manchuria (an area of more than 1 million km2), and access to the Sea of Japan

 

[Litwin]

"Like Stalin ran US war effort in WWII" is the best conspiracy theory comment of the day. In fact, China is not going to take over any country. They want economic power not land.

"In fact, China is not going to take over any country." the hans will get back outer Manchuria its 100%

Outer Manchuria - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Litwin]

Like Stalin ran US war effort in WWII, the CCP will guide the USA to declare war on Russia

", the CCP will guide the USA to declare war on Russia" USA to declare war on Nigeria with snow ? you just be joking

Xi wants to continue to use Biden to weaken the USA. If we leave Afghanistan he will have Biden get involved with Russia, maybe defending the Ukraine against "Russian aggression"?

"defending the Ukraine against "Russian aggression"?" Muscovite empire is dying , it up to sale

which part of Moscow empire USA´d annex ? Chukotka will be enough?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

"Like Stalin ran US war effort in WWII" is the best conspiracy theory comment of the day. In fact, China is not going to take over any country. They want economic power not land.

The US and Brits could have taken Berlin months before your beloved Commie masters. FDR was just following orders

 

[Dragonlady]

So they should. Blinken might surprise me. However, Russia is well beneath the threat that China poses. The world knows this, American citizens know this and intelligence agencies know this.

Therefore, if we are going to have more shouting about Russia, while China does as they please (and holds an olympic games as a reward), America risks losing India, Japan, Australia and numerous others. You can't call out a lesser threat and get brownie points while the other gets a free pass. That would be very unReagan like and self destructive.

The way to deal with China isn't to allow them to save face, it isn't to walk on eggshells. it is to confront them loudly, publicly and directly. THAT is what Reagan would do, and why he was the best president in my lifetime. Calling out Russia today, would be like calling out Cuba during Reagans time. Yeah, they are a thorn in the side in the 80s, but they aren't what Russia was then.

China didn't install a puppet President to do Putin's bidding. Of course all of your right wing loons think Putin is a great guy. He is worse than Xi. Putin is actively and effectively working to destroy western democracy. Xi is not.

And he has a hacker army to help him.

 

[shockedcanadian]

So they should. Blinken might surprise me. However, Russia is well beneath the threat that China poses. The world knows this, American citizens know this and intelligence agencies know this.

Therefore, if we are going to have more shouting about Russia, while China does as they please (and holds an olympic games as a reward), America risks losing India, Japan, Australia and numerous others. You can't call out a lesser threat and get brownie points while the other gets a free pass. That would be very unReagan like and self destructive.

The way to deal with China isn't to allow them to save face, it isn't to walk on eggshells. it is to confront them loudly, publicly and directly. THAT is what Reagan would do, and why he was the best president in my lifetime. Calling out Russia today, would be like calling out Cuba during Reagans time. Yeah, they are a thorn in the side in the 80s, but they aren't what Russia was then.

China didn't install a puppet President to do Putin's bidding. Of course all of your right wing loons think Putin is a great guy. He is worse than Xi. Putin is actively and effectively working to destroy western democracy. Xi is not.

And he has a hacker army to help him.

If you are comparing Putins threat to the West to that of Xi, you are lost. It's not even close. Watch International news once in awhile, not just naive, drunken, corporate media apologists.

Ask the Aussies, Japanese, Indian, Taiwanese ad Philippines governments and citizens what they believe. Not to mention the propping up of Iran, N Korea and the trillions in resources they are aiming to steal from the South China Sea.