The name of the whistleblower is......... drumroll

[gipper]

Adam Schiff...........

Prove me wrong

You are wrong, it is Trump himself... this whole thing is a sting operation designed by Trump himself to trap the Dems. When all is done, Obama, Biden, Hillary and a many more will spend the rest of their days at GITMO.

If only!

 

[HappyJoy]

Q-Anon Frannie said something she can't back up? Gosh, didn't see that coming.

You cant back up that there even is a whistleblower

I guess you don't get how this works. You made a claim, you back it up. I have no idea who the whistle blower is.

Adam Schiff sure does.

And your evidence?

Adam Schiff himself.

When questions of Vindman were being asked about who he spoke to, no names were mentioned. Yet, when pressed, Schiff suddenly stopped the questioning because it threatened to out the whistleblower.

How would he know if the whistleblower was going to be outed if he didn't know who the whistleblower is?

Simple. He knows exactly who this person is.

.

No the Republicans were trying to find out who Vindman talked to when he relayed information which could lead to the identity of the whistle blower. The question was irrelevant other than to attempt to identify the whistle blower.

 

[The Original Tree]

You cant back up that there even is a whistleblower

I guess you don't get how this works. You made a claim, you back it up. I have no idea who the whistle blower is.

Adam Schiff sure does.

And your evidence?

Adam Schiff himself.

When questions of Vindman were being asked about who he spoke to, no names were mentioned. Yet, when pressed, Schiff suddenly stopped the questioning because it threatened to out the whistleblower.

How would he know if the whistleblower was going to be outed if he didn't know who the whistleblower is?

Simple. He knows exactly who this person is.

.

No the Republicans were trying to find out who Vindman talked to when he relayed information which could lead to the identity of the whistle blower. The question was irrelevant other than to attempt to identify the whistle blower.

Can you please show me in The Constitution and US Code where an accusing Witness is allowed to remain Anonymous especially in something as big as an Impeachment Inquiry?

Thanks....I'll be waiting.

 

[HappyJoy]

I guess you don't get how this works. You made a claim, you back it up. I have no idea who the whistle blower is.

Adam Schiff sure does.

And your evidence?

Adam Schiff himself.

When questions of Vindman were being asked about who he spoke to, no names were mentioned. Yet, when pressed, Schiff suddenly stopped the questioning because it threatened to out the whistleblower.

How would he know if the whistleblower was going to be outed if he didn't know who the whistleblower is?

Simple. He knows exactly who this person is.

.

No the Republicans were trying to find out who Vindman talked to when he relayed information which could lead to the identity of the whistle blower. The question was irrelevant other than to attempt to identify the whistle blower.

Can you please show me in The Constitution and US Code where an accusing Witness is allowed to remain Anonymous especially in something as big as an Impeachment Inquiry?

Thanks....I'll be waiting.

When you show me that jaywalking is in the Constitution.

 

[The Original Tree]

Adam Schiff sure does.

And your evidence?

Adam Schiff himself.

When questions of Vindman were being asked about who he spoke to, no names were mentioned. Yet, when pressed, Schiff suddenly stopped the questioning because it threatened to out the whistleblower.

How would he know if the whistleblower was going to be outed if he didn't know who the whistleblower is?

Simple. He knows exactly who this person is.

.

No the Republicans were trying to find out who Vindman talked to when he relayed information which could lead to the identity of the whistle blower. The question was irrelevant other than to attempt to identify the whistle blower.

Can you please show me in The Constitution and US Code where an accusing Witness is allowed to remain Anonymous especially in something as big as an Impeachment Inquiry?

Thanks....I'll be waiting.

When you show me that jaywalking is in the Constitution.

Jay walking statutes can be found all over the country, so I will ask you again.

Can you please show me in The Constitution and US Code where an accusing Witness is allowed to remain Anonymous especially in something as big as an Impeachment Inquiry?

Thanks....I'll be waiting.

 

[g5000]

Adam Schiff...........

Prove me wrong

Argument from ignorance

 

[The Original Tree]

Adam Schiff...........

Prove me wrong

Argument from ignorance - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Eric Ciaramella

Prove me wrong

 

[g5000]

Adam Schiff...........

Prove me wrong

You are wrong, it is Trump himself... this whole thing is a sting operation designed by Trump himself to trap the Dems. When all is done, Obama, Biden, Hillary and a many more will spend the rest of their days at GITMO.

Trump is definitely the biggest leaker in the White House.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Adam Schiff...........

Prove me wrong

You are wrong, it is Trump himself... this whole thing is a sting operation designed by Trump himself to trap the Dems. When all is done, Obama, Biden, Hillary and a many more will spend the rest of their days at GITMO.

The word "sting" is not in the dictionary.

 

[g5000]

Adam Schiff...........

Prove me wrong

Argument from ignorance - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Eric Ciaramella

Prove me wrong

Argument from ignorance

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Adam Schiff...........

Prove me wrong

You are wrong, it is Trump himself... this whole thing is a sting operation designed by Trump himself to trap the Dems. When all is done, Obama, Biden, Hillary and a many more will spend the rest of their days at GITMO.

The word "sting" is not in the dictionary.

dance little bear...dance

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Adam Schiff...........

Prove me wrong

You are wrong, it is Trump himself... this whole thing is a sting operation designed by Trump himself to trap the Dems. When all is done, Obama, Biden, Hillary and a many more will spend the rest of their days at GITMO.

Trump is definitely the biggest leaker in the White House.

A Trump worshiper on this forum told me this, so it has to be true!!

 

[The Original Tree]

Adam Schiff...........

Prove me wrong

You are wrong, it is Trump himself... this whole thing is a sting operation designed by Trump himself to trap the Dems. When all is done, Obama, Biden, Hillary and a many more will spend the rest of their days at GITMO.

Trump is definitely the biggest leaker in the White House.

A Trump worshiper on this forum told me this, so it has to be true!!

I get my information straight from the source: Schiff, Vindman and Ciaramella

 

[HappyJoy]

And your evidence?

Adam Schiff himself.

When questions of Vindman were being asked about who he spoke to, no names were mentioned. Yet, when pressed, Schiff suddenly stopped the questioning because it threatened to out the whistleblower.

How would he know if the whistleblower was going to be outed if he didn't know who the whistleblower is?

Simple. He knows exactly who this person is.

.

No the Republicans were trying to find out who Vindman talked to when he relayed information which could lead to the identity of the whistle blower. The question was irrelevant other than to attempt to identify the whistle blower.

Can you please show me in The Constitution and US Code where an accusing Witness is allowed to remain Anonymous especially in something as big as an Impeachment Inquiry?

Thanks....I'll be waiting.

When you show me that jaywalking is in the Constitution.

Jay walking statutes can be found all over the country, so I will ask you again.

Can you please show me in The Constitution and US Code where an accusing Witness is allowed to remain Anonymous especially in something as big as an Impeachment Inquiry?

Thanks....I'll be waiting.

Then why bring the Constitution into this?

Anyway, I've never said it's illegal to show the identity of the whistle blower, doesn't mean Congress is legally obliged to do it. It's irresponsible to name the person since the right has fetishezed the person's identity.

Now, name the statute that says Congress or Schiff has to devolve the identity.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Adam Schiff...........

Prove me wrong

You are wrong, it is Trump himself... this whole thing is a sting operation designed by Trump himself to trap the Dems. When all is done, Obama, Biden, Hillary and a many more will spend the rest of their days at GITMO.

Trump is definitely the biggest leaker in the White House.

A Trump worshiper on this forum told me this, so it has to be true!!

You’re a never trumper. Would you vote for Trump, Warren or abstain?

 

[Frannie]

Adam Schiff...........

Prove me wrong

Argument from ignorance

Impeach then, if any dem has the balls that is

 

[The Original Tree]

Adam Schiff himself.

When questions of Vindman were being asked about who he spoke to, no names were mentioned. Yet, when pressed, Schiff suddenly stopped the questioning because it threatened to out the whistleblower.

How would he know if the whistleblower was going to be outed if he didn't know who the whistleblower is?

Simple. He knows exactly who this person is.

.

No the Republicans were trying to find out who Vindman talked to when he relayed information which could lead to the identity of the whistle blower. The question was irrelevant other than to attempt to identify the whistle blower.

Can you please show me in The Constitution and US Code where an accusing Witness is allowed to remain Anonymous especially in something as big as an Impeachment Inquiry?

Thanks....I'll be waiting.

When you show me that jaywalking is in the Constitution.

Jay walking statutes can be found all over the country, so I will ask you again.

Can you please show me in The Constitution and US Code where an accusing Witness is allowed to remain Anonymous especially in something as big as an Impeachment Inquiry?

Thanks....I'll be waiting.

Then why bring the Constitution into this?

Anyway, I've never said it's illegal to show the identity of the whistle blower, doesn't mean Congress is legally obliged to do it. It's irresponsible to name the person since the right has fetishezed the person's identity.

Now, name the statute that says Congress or Schiff has to devolve the identity.

Because all LAWS, FEDERAL, STATE and LOCAL have to be CONGRUENT with the Principles laid down in THE CONSTITUTION.

One of them is DUE PROCESS, which declares that All Accused persons have the right to see evidence that is against them, and have the right to face their accusers.

This right cannot be abridged, circumscribed, or denied.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution each contain a due process clause. Due process deals with the administration of justice and thus the due process clause acts as a safeguard from arbitrary denial of life, liberty, or property by the government outside the sanction of law. Due Process Clause - Wikipedia

 

[Frannie]

No the Republicans were trying to find out who Vindman talked to when he relayed information which could lead to the identity of the whistle blower. The question was irrelevant other than to attempt to identify the whistle blower.

Can you please show me in The Constitution and US Code where an accusing Witness is allowed to remain Anonymous especially in something as big as an Impeachment Inquiry?

Thanks....I'll be waiting.

When you show me that jaywalking is in the Constitution.

Jay walking statutes can be found all over the country, so I will ask you again.

Can you please show me in The Constitution and US Code where an accusing Witness is allowed to remain Anonymous especially in something as big as an Impeachment Inquiry?

Thanks....I'll be waiting.

Then why bring the Constitution into this?

Anyway, I've never said it's illegal to show the identity of the whistle blower, doesn't mean Congress is legally obliged to do it. It's irresponsible to name the person since the right has fetishezed the person's identity.

Now, name the statute that says Congress or Schiff has to devolve the identity.

Because all LAWS, FEDERAL, STATE and LOCAL have to be CONGRUENT with the Principles laid down in THE CONSTITUTION.

One of them is DUE PROCESS, which declares that All Accused persons have the right to see evidence that is against them, and have the right to face their accusers.

This right cannot be abridged, circumscribed, or denied.

Unless you are Trump and schiff will admit this

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Adam Schiff...........

Prove me wrong

You are wrong, it is Trump himself... this whole thing is a sting operation designed by Trump himself to trap the Dems. When all is done, Obama, Biden, Hillary and a many more will spend the rest of their days at GITMO.

Trump is definitely the biggest leaker in the White House.

A Trump worshiper on this forum told me this, so it has to be true!!

You’re a never trumper. Would you vote for Trump, Warren or abstain?

I will probably vote for the Libertarian candidate again, but too early to say for sure

 

[Frannie]

Adam Schiff...........

Prove me wrong

You are wrong, it is Trump himself... this whole thing is a sting operation designed by Trump himself to trap the Dems. When all is done, Obama, Biden, Hillary and a many more will spend the rest of their days at GITMO.

Trump is definitely the biggest leaker in the White House.

A Trump worshiper on this forum told me this, so it has to be true!!

You’re a never trumper. Would you vote for Trump, Warren or abstain?

I will vote for the Libertarian candidate, but too early to say for sure

According to hillary you would be voting for a russian