The Most Corrupt Organization In American History Gets Caught Again

[elektra]

whats wrong with you?

it's Democrats, not small d democrats, which is something else entirely.

You have no problem capitalizing Republicans ...

Oh, from now on, it is Democrats
so sorry

 

[yidnar]

Fyi

The EPA was a Republican creation....Not democrat!

the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was created by President Richard Nixon
through an executive order, specifically Reorganization Plan No. 3, which was signed on December 2, 1970.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

• President Nixon's Proposal: President Nixon proposed the establishment of the EPA on July 9, 1970.
• Reorganization Plan No. 3: The EPA was formally established through Reorganization Plan No. 3, which was signed by Nixon and became effective on December 2, 1970.
• Purpose of the EPA: The EPA was created to address growing environmental concerns and to coordinate federal environmental efforts.
• First Administrator William Ruckelshaus was confirmed as the EPA's first Administrator by the U.S. Senate.
• EPA Order 1110.2 Administrator Ruckelshaus signed EPA Order 1110.2 creating the initial organization of EPA.

the EPA of today is a leftist weapon ..

 

[elektra]

No problem:

Strom Thurmond - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

A staunch opponent of civil rights legislation in the 1950s and 1960s, Thurmond conducted the longest speaking filibuster ever by a lone senator, at 24 hours and 18 minutes in length, in opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1957.

In the 1960s, he voted against both the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Despite his support for racial segregation, Thurmond denied the accusation that he was a racist by insisting he was a supporter of states' rights and an opponent of excessive federal authority.

Thurmond switched parties ahead of the 1964 United States presidential election, saying that the Democratic Party no longer represented people like him, and endorsed Republican nominee Barry Goldwater, who also opposed the Civil Rights Act.

That is it? Strom Thurmond? One person switched parties. You stated Democrats.

 one person, hahaha,

that leaves the leader of the KKK a Democrat. senator who opposed the civil rights movement along with so many democrats it was the republicans that passed all three, or is it four civil rights acts.

 

[Dragonlady]

Hahaha, the losers argument that democrats were Republicans and Republicans were democrat.

Your rules, name them. Name them all, you demand names so show us you are not an ignorant hypocrite and name them.

You can't. At best you will come up with a link that is bullshit, showing you never new what the fuck you are talking about, again.

You used a lot of words in an effort to say NOTHING, while denying that political parties have changed direction over time. The old "bullshit baffles brains" technique. Republicans opposed slavery in 1776, but in 1966, 90 years later, they opposed civil rights and voting rights for black people.

If you can't understand that the definitions of "liberal" and "conservative" haven't changed, but that the parties have changed their belief structure, you're even dumber than we thought.

 

[Dragonlady]

the EPA of today is a leftist weapon ..

The environment isn't political. Environmental issues affect both the left and right equally. Hurricanes destroy EVERYONE'S homes. So do floods.

Republicans keep denying that man-made climate change is driving the extreme weather because they don't want to make the capital investments to mitigate the damage. As a result, you're now spending over $100 billion per year to repair the damage being caused.

It would have been cheaper to commit to green energy than to continue to spend money repairing the damage.

But Republicans are always dealing with short term ideas and ignoring the big picture. Selfish and greedy will do that for you.

 

[AntonToo]

That is it? Strom Thurmond? One person switched parties. You stated Democrats.

 one person, hahaha,

that leaves the leader of the KKK a Democrat. senator who opposed the civil rights movement along with so many democrats it was the republicans that passed all three, or is it four civil rights acts.

He was a prominent Democrat who declared that Republican party was the right place for people like him who oppose de-segragation and civil rights acts.

Along with that in my post I was a citing of an APPOLOGY from Republican Chair in 2005 for the party's strategy to solicit southern racists.

Not enough for you?

Ok you tell me how many names will suffice for you to stop posting bullshit.

5? 10? 20? What do we have to do here for you to stop posting like a fucking clown?

 

[Dragonlady]

That is it? Strom Thurmond? One person switched parties. You stated Democrats.

 one person, hahaha,

that leaves the leader of the KKK a Democrat. senator who opposed the civil rights movement along with so many democrats it was the republicans that passed all three, or is it four civil rights acts.

No it was not the Republicans who passed this legislation. It was Northern and Southern DEMOCRATS, fool. Both in the House and the Senate. Not one Republican from south of the Mason-Dixon line voted in favour of EITHER Bill. DEMOCRATS from both the North and South passed the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act.

As a result of these votes, the Democrats in the Southern States left the Democrat Party and joined with the Southern Republicans who still oppose integration and rights for black Southern citizens.

 

[elektra]

No it was not the Republicans who passed this legislation. It was Northern and Southern DEMOCRATS, fool. Both in the House and the Senate. Not one Republican from south of the Mason-Dixon line voted in favour of EITHER Bill. DEMOCRATS from both the North and South passed the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act.

As a result of these votes, the Democrats in the Southern States left the Democrat Party and joined with the Southern Republicans who still oppose integration and rights for black Southern citizens.

Name the year and the democrats that changed parties. You can't.

Without the Republican votes, democrats would not pass any civil rights bill, which were started by Eisenhower. The majority of Republicans voted for and passed the civil rights bills

 

[elektra]

He was a prominent Democrat who declared that Republican party was the right place for people like him who oppose de-segragation and civil rights acts.

Along with that in my post I was a citing of an APPOLOGY from Republican Chair in 2005 for the party's strategy to solicit southern racists.

Not enough for you?

Ok you tell me how many names will suffice for you to stop posting bullshit.

5? 10? 20? What do we have to do here for you to stop posting like a fucking clown?

Like I said, one person left, over states vs federal rights

How come the KKK leader stayed in the democrat party with total democrat support

 

[Crepitus]

The Most Corrupt Organization In American History Gets Caught Again

What was the GOP doing this time?

 

[elektra]

Republicans opposed slavery in 1776, but in 1966, 90 years later, they opposed civil rights and voting rights for black people.

You are an ignorant liar.

Eisenhower began the civil rights bills. The democrats saw the popularity and people changed and tried to jump on board, but too many democrats voted against civil rights.

History shows it was Republicans despite democrats voting against.

 

[AntonToo]

Like I said, one person left, over states vs federal rights

How come the KKK leader stayed in the democrat party with total democrat support

How many? Can you answer?

If I give you two more, will that be enough?

5 more?

10?

What are we talking about? Give me a definitive criteria so I can give you a definitive answer without you being able to continiously weasel out from simply admiting the obvious.

 

[yidnar]

The environment isn't political. Environmental issues affect both the left and right equally. Hurricanes destroy EVERYONE'S homes. So do floods.

Republicans keep denying that man-made climate change is driving the extreme weather because they don't want to make the capital investments to mitigate the damage. As a result, you're now spending over $100 billion per year to repair the damage being caused.

It would have been cheaper to commit to green energy than to continue to spend money repairing the damage.

But Republicans are always dealing with short term ideas and ignoring the big picture. Selfish and greedy will do that for you.

 

[elektra]

How many? Can you answer?

If I give you two more, will that be enough?

5 more?

10?

What are we talking about? Give me a definitive criteria so I can give you a definitive answer without you being able to continiously weasel out from simply admiting the obvious.

You are the one doing the "Weasley out" claiming there was some sort of mass movement of democrats who left the democrat party.

You made a claim that racist democrats left the racist democrat party to make the republican party racist.

You have not shown how this is even a little bit true

 

[AntonToo]

You are the one doing the "Weasley out" claiming there was some sort of mass movement of democrats who left the democrat party.

You made a claim that racist democrats left the racist democrat party to make the republican party racist.

You have not shown how this is even a little bit true

HOW MANY dumbass?

How many names do you need to stop denying well established facts?

You are never going to answer, because you know you are full of shit.

 

[elektra]

HOW MANY dumbass?

How many names do you need to stop denying well established facts?

You are never going to answer, because you know you are full of shit.

You won't define, explain who left because you got no facts.

How many names do I need is your question, instead of you explaining what you think?

You are the one without the answers to your opinion. It is not up to me to ask the "right" question.

Just tell us about this southern strategy and which democrats changed parties.

One person, leaving because of state rights vs federal, does not mean a damn thing. It is one straw that you grasp.

 

[AntonToo]

You won't define, explain who left because you got no facts.

How many names do I need is your question, instead of you explaining what you think?

I explained what I think and linked to you historical sources. I've cited Republican Chair appologising for his party's catering to southern racists.

You refuse to accept sources, you refuse to say how many names need to be listed for you to belive that Republicans had a succesful strategy to convert Dixiecrats into votes for Republicans who opposed civil rights.

So what else am I supposed to give you? You obviously can't be reasoned with.

 

[elektra]

I explained what I think and linked to you historical sources. I've cited Republican Chair appologising for his party's catering to southern racists.

You refuse to accept sources, you refuse to say how many names need to be listed for you to belive that Republicans had a succesful strategy to convert Dixiecrats into votes for Republicans who opposed civil rights.

So what else am I supposed to give you? You obviously can't be reasoned with.

Sources? Wikipedia is your source! Your source is one man, who switched parties!

You are asking how many do you need to name?

Name them all. But you already did, one person is your movement, your southern strategy? One is all you got.

You cited a republican apologizing? So fucking what, a republican apologizing hardly indicates there is some sort of dog whistle strategy only democrats see and hear.

You can't explain the Southern strategy because you don't know what the fuck you are talking about

You link to Wikipedia cause you don't know what you are talking about

There was no southern strategy. There were no democrats switching parties because of the fake southern strategy.

One person left the democrat party prior to the Civil Rights movements in the 1960's, one. That leaves all the racists still in the Democrat party

 

[AntonToo]

Sources? Wikipedia is your source!

Wikipedia CITES ORIGINAL SOURCES.

Be honest, you don't give a shit because you don't like these facts and will resort to any dumbass excuse to not accept them.

 

[AntonToo]

You cited a republican apologizing? So fucking what, a republican apologizing hardly indicates there is some sort of dog whistle strategy only democrats see and hear.

Republican CHAIRMAN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY appologising for his party's Southern Strategy and opposition to desegregation and civil rights legislation in the 60's and into 70s.

...all of which you refuse to belive happened