I can't. You are just too stupid. This statement proves it . . .
"Since nobody was shot they could have used cap guns."
Then what is the difference between shooting and missing every time and a cap gun? Both are making a loud noise and hitting nothing.
Look, you are obviously too stupid to have a conversation with. Good Lord. I can't even believe it.
He asked me to provide an example (JUST one example he said) of a situation where a person/persons used more than 10 rounds to defend themselves and when I posted the evidence, he claimed that it doesn't count because no one was shot. Can you believe that BS, TD?
Of course it doesn't count. You have done nothing to show they needed hi cap magazines. Since nobody was shot they could have used cap guns.
Are you really this stupid. I don't believe it. No one could possibly be this stupid.
More childish name calling. Can you put together an intelligent thought? You better find one soon you are losing bad.
I can't. You are just too stupid. This statement proves it . . .
"Since nobody was shot they could have used cap guns."
According to you they were shooting at hundreds of unarmed looters. Well they didn't have magazines that held hundreds of rounds, so obviously they did reload. So if they could reload then it shouldn't matter if they had 10 round magazines or 30 round magazines. Sorry there are a lot of holes in your very weak claim. And so far you have given no reason to believe they NEEDED hi cap magazines.
Go back to school! I can't even believe that you made such a statement. Your parents must be proud, and you've got some nerve using the name "brain" for yourself too. Holy smokes!
I can't. You are just too stupid. This statement proves it . . .
"Since nobody was shot they could have used cap guns."
According to you they were shooting at hundreds of unarmed looters. Well they didn't have magazines that held hundreds of rounds, so obviously they did reload. So if they could reload then it shouldn't matter if they had 10 round magazines or 30 round magazines. Sorry there are a lot of holes in your very weak claim. And so far you have given no reason to believe they NEEDED hi cap magazines.
You must be what 12?
I can't. You are just too stupid. This statement proves it . . .
"Since nobody was shot they could have used cap guns."
Then what is the difference between shooting and missing every time and a cap gun? Both are making a loud noise and hitting nothing.
Look, you are obviously too stupid to have a conversation with. Good Lord. I can't even believe it.
Ah you can't defend your claims again. So shocking.
turtledude saintmichaeldefendthem
Here is "brain's" latest brainstorm below.
"Since nobody was shot they could have used cap guns."
turtledude saintmichaeldefendthem
Here is "brain's" latest brainstorm below.
"Since nobody was shot they could have used cap guns."
I can't. You are just too stupid. This statement proves it . . .
"Since nobody was shot they could have used cap guns."
Then what is the difference between shooting and missing every time and a cap gun? Both are making a loud noise and hitting nothing.
Look, you are obviously too stupid to have a conversation with. Good Lord. I can't even believe it.
Ah you can't defend your claims again. So shocking.
Couldn't take the test huh? Maybe your embarrassed about your reading comprehension problem. I would have thought you eager to prove you don't have one.
I can't. You are just too stupid. This statement proves it . . .
"Since nobody was shot they could have used cap guns."
According to you they were shooting at hundreds of unarmed looters. Well they didn't have magazines that held hundreds of rounds, so obviously they did reload. So if they could reload then it shouldn't matter if they had 10 round magazines or 30 round magazines. Sorry there are a lot of holes in your very weak claim. And so far you have given no reason to believe they NEEDED hi cap magazines.
Is this what you do every time you lose? This was too easy.
turtledude saintmichaeldefendthem
Here is "brain's" latest brainstorm below.
"Since nobody was shot they could have used cap guns."
Stupid fortissimo.
I can't. You are just too stupid. This statement proves it . . .
"Since nobody was shot they could have used cap guns."
Then what is the difference between shooting and missing every time and a cap gun? Both are making a loud noise and hitting nothing.
Look, you are obviously too stupid to have a conversation with. Good Lord. I can't even believe it.
Ah you can't defend your claims again. So shocking.
Couldn't take the test huh? Maybe your embarrassed about your reading comprehension problem. I would have thought you eager to prove you don't have one.
This is what you do when I'm talking about saving lives? Pathetic.
turtledude saintmichaeldefendthem
Here is "brain's" latest brainstorm below.
"Since nobody was shot they could have used cap guns."
Stupid fortissimo.
I can't. You are just too stupid. This statement proves it . . .
"Since nobody was shot they could have used cap guns."
According to you they were shooting at hundreds of unarmed looters. Well they didn't have magazines that held hundreds of rounds, so obviously they did reload. So if they could reload then it shouldn't matter if they had 10 round magazines or 30 round magazines. Sorry there are a lot of holes in your very weak claim. And so far you have given no reason to believe they NEEDED hi cap magazines.
Is this what you do every time you lose? This was too easy.
I'm sorry but your statement makes no sense at all and is hilarious because it shows how stupid you really are. Lol! Really, do yourself a favor and go back to school. You are not ready for the real world, that's for sure.
turtledude saintmichaeldefendthem
Here is "brain's" latest brainstorm below.
"Since nobody was shot they could have used cap guns."
Stupid fortissimo.
Maybe you can explain why cap guns wouldn't have done the job just as well? Nobody was shot afterall.
You can't be serious. You MUST be a troll.
Look, you are obviously too stupid to have a conversation with. Good Lord. I can't even believe it.
Ah you can't defend your claims again. So shocking.
Couldn't take the test huh? Maybe your embarrassed about your reading comprehension problem. I would have thought you eager to prove you don't have one.
This is what you do when I'm talking about saving lives? Pathetic.
What's pathetic is your illiteracy. Take the test and prove me wrong.
I can't. You are just too stupid. This statement proves it . . .
"Since nobody was shot they could have used cap guns."
Then what is the difference between shooting and missing every time and a cap gun? Both are making a loud noise and hitting nothing.
Look, you are obviously too stupid to have a conversation with. Good Lord. I can't even believe it.
Ah you can't defend your claims again. So shocking.
turtledude saintmichaeldefendthem
Here is "brain's" latest brainstorm below.
"Since nobody was shot they could have used cap guns."
Stupid fortissimo.
Maybe you can explain why cap guns wouldn't have done the job just as well? Nobody was shot afterall.
turtledude saintmichaeldefendthem
Here is "brain's" latest brainstorm below.
"Since nobody was shot they could have used cap guns."
Stupid fortissimo.
Maybe you can explain why cap guns wouldn't have done the job just as well? Nobody was shot afterall.
You cannot defend yourself against armed people with a cap gun, you moron!!!
turtledude saintmichaeldefendthem
Here is "brain's" latest brainstorm below.
"Since nobody was shot they could have used cap guns."
Stupid fortissimo.
Maybe you can explain why cap guns wouldn't have done the job just as well? Nobody was shot afterall.
It's easier to show you. I'll shoot a bullet right by your head and you'll understand the difference between a gun and a cap gun. You're a whelp that's never seen combat, never been in a deadly situation, never risked your life and never sacrificed for anything greater than your stupid self. If you had any sense of shame whatsoever, you'd kill yourself. You're kept alive by blissful ignorance of your rueful life.
I can't. You are just too stupid. This statement proves it . . .
"Since nobody was shot they could have used cap guns."
Then what is the difference between shooting and missing every time and a cap gun? Both are making a loud noise and hitting nothing.
Look, you are obviously too stupid to have a conversation with. Good Lord. I can't even believe it.
Ah you can't defend your claims again. So shocking.
I don't have anything to defend. You obviously have NO idea what you are talking about. Do really expect someone to take your cap gun comment seriously? OMG.
