Then they shouldn't be Commander in Chief either
Thank God we didn't elect her then.
You think God's behind this practical joke? LOL! If so, stop being a dick, God.
Then they shouldn't be Commander in Chief either
BlackFlag both Trump and Obama should have been required to distinguish Constitutional policies from "political beliefs" pushed on people who can't be forced by govt to comply unless they are violating laws.
If Obama couldn't tell he was overstepping beliefs to push the ACA mandates and later the LGBT policies, where people both sides have equal right to defend and exercise their private beliefs without conflict, then Obama's narcissistic or projection of bias was also interfering with his ability to uphold his Constitutional oath of office.
I think this is an EGO and male psychology/dominance issue.
If you are going to say Trump has a disorder, then most males and anyone pushing party politics before Constitutional equal protections ALSO has a mental or ego problem!!!
The problem with your argument: ACA mandate and gay marriage were put before the Supreme Court and found to be constitutional.
Yes and No,
BlackFlag
The process by which it was passed and found to be constitutional is only constitutional
for those like you who agree that it's okay to enforce that in violation of other people's beliefs.
I do not believe that. I am a different denomination of Constitutionalist
who along with Josh Blackman and Mark Levin DO NOT believe it was constitutional to pass it that way.
My argument about POLITICAL BELIEFS being equally protected from violation and discrimination
(by the First and Fourteenth Amendments and the Civil Rights laws against discrimination by creed)
HAVE NOT BEEN MADE YET.
(Not to mention the fact I believe these rights are INALIENABLE
and should not require arguing before a court to be able to defend them from infringement.)
So you have the right to your beliefs, and to pay for them and the policy you deem lawful.
For those like me whose beliefs have been violated on several levels,
we have equal right to exercise and defend those beliefs from
discrimination and penalty by govt.
Thank you
BlackFlag
If you agree to pay the costs to taxpayers from passing and enforcing ACA as was done,
then I have no problem with you exercising the rights and responsibilities for your beliefs.
I intend to lay out the terms of a class action lawsuit and petition,
and see which citizens, leaders and taxpayers agree to pay the costs of their own beliefs.
I know as many progressive Single Payer advocates who don't agree to pay for corporate mandates on for-profit insurance,
but only believe in paying for the actual health care services and management.
These people ought to be able to defend their beliefs in single payer health care as right
and also join in a lobbying campaign to set that up where supporters can choose that program to fund with their taxes.