The Meaning Behind The Tsunami Of AntiSemitism

Why try to tell me what my community believes?


You are spinning that. The point is that a majority of American Jews during W-homO-Biden wanted that border open. You may well be an American Jew who did not want it open. But a majority did, the polls showed it. For desalination in California 25 years ago, it was a wall of left wing lesbian Jewish Democrats (and one "Republican") who spiked the idea of desalinating more Pacific Ocean water. Their motive was all about the money the state of CA pays attorneys to argue about finite amounts of water, billions $$ every year just to attorneys to argue about water.
 
you quote Charlie Kirk without attribution

liar...

No matter what dogshit is tossed on the floor by Fox "News", you get on your knees and lick it up...


https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2023/10/17/charlie_kirk_did_someone_in_israel_tell_army_to_stand_down_during_attack_thats_a_legitimate_non-conspiracy_question.html

I've been to Israel many times, the whole country is a fortress.

I've been to that Gaza border. You cannot go ten feet without running into a 19-year-old with an AR-15 or an automatic machine gun that is an IDF soldier. The whole country is surveilled.




regarding 107 "I find this very hard to believe"

IQ over 5 required...
 
I've debated people on this board about this very topic and very little of them actually give substance and it appears you are no exception. Welcome to my ignore list. I've been very tolerant here, giving you multiple chances to actually explain yourself and you've failed every time. Thank you for enlightening me that you are another waste of time.

When you cannot provide a substantial argument to back up your claims, you resort to insults because you've already lost the argument. A classic fallacy most of the people who debate this topic fall for. While being grown adults. Sad.
We're not debating......you are bloviating, muttering all sorts of nonsense based on your antiSemitism.

You've made that evident.


I wrote about your sort in the OP, and it clearly set you off.
 
Why did an elected Israeli official confiscate New Testaments using kids to pick them up, gather them, publicly burn them, and then get on Israeli radio and say he was "purging evil?"



This is nonsense.

Have you been to Israel.....I have, several times.

None of what you write is true.
 
Because I understand history. My OP explains it.
Its not about history, its about why you didn't address my prior post #84. Here it is again:

"Something proportional. Israel shares some responsibility for not having the "most protected border in the world" more secure, and to have a warning system that works. I saw video of Hamas sneaking up on villages when the villages' defenses should have been mobilized.
I'm not defending the savage attack by Hamas on 10/7, but after Gaza, no Jew anywhere will ever be able to not keep looking over their shoulder for a response."

If 10/7 was stopped, Gaza would not be such a mess. Mossad should have caught it.
 
You are spinning that. The point is that a majority of American Jews during W-homO-Biden wanted that border open. You may well be an American Jew who did not want it open. But a majority did, the polls showed it. For desalination in California 25 years ago, it was a wall of left wing lesbian Jewish Democrats (and one "Republican") who spiked the idea of desalinating more Pacific Ocean water. Their motive was all about the money the state of CA pays attorneys to argue about finite amounts of water, billions $$ every year just to attorneys to argue about water.
So what you have is a statistic and are arguing the cause of that statistic and working backwards. That doesn't work.

If x percent of lefthanders voted for something that doesn't mean that there is any connection between the vote and left handedness. And then making a generalized about the left handed community as a whole is fallacious.

What you are left with is a claim that fails about as often as it doesn't and that's not a very useful statistic.
 
This is nonsense.

Have you been to Israel.....I have, several times.

None of what you write is true.


I did not write that. But it isn't from one source, and one of us is a big liar....









 
A Christian Nation replacing Israel would mean that at least someone in the ME would share our values.

Full disclosure: I am neither a Christian nor a Jew, but I do believe that Israel does share most of our values. That you think they are barbaric is wrong, what would you have them do when Palestinian terrorists commit mass murders on Oct 7? There have been several peace treaties signed by Israel and the Palestinians, and every time they were broken by the Palestinians.


We must assert ourselves as the dominant power

And just how would you do that? Put boots on the ground? You want Americans coming home in boxes? Are we to become the world's peacekeepers?

Let me guess: you would cutoff all military aid to Israel, right? And you would be okay with millions of dead Jews, right? From the river to the sea, that's your mantra?
 
Its not about history, its about why you didn't address my prior post #84. Here it is again:

"Something proportional. Israel shares some responsibility for not having the "most protected border in the world" more secure, and to have a warning system that works. I saw video of Hamas sneaking up on villages when the villages' defenses should have been mobilized.
I'm not defending the savage attack by Hamas on 10/7, but after Gaza, no Jew anywhere will ever be able to not keep looking over their shoulder for a response."

If 10/7 was stopped, Gaza would not be such a mess. Mossad should have caught it.
What is your point?

What do you want to know?
 
aipac legislated anti-semitism as hate speech PC, so any of these college campus pro-pally speakers could be silenced

~S~
AI Overview



The statement that "AIPAC legislated anti-semitism as hate speech" is inaccurate.
AIPAC is a lobbying organization, not a legislative body. It has lobbied heavily in support of legislation, such as the Antisemitism Awareness Act, which seeks to provide a statutory definition of antisemitism to address discrimination under existing civil rights law.
 
AI Overview



The statement that "AIPAC legislated anti-semitism as hate speech" is inaccurate.
AIPAC is a lobbying organization, not a legislative body. It has lobbied heavily in support of legislation, such as the Antisemitism Awareness Act, which seeks to provide a statutory definition of antisemitism to address discrimination under existing civil rights law.
try telling us something we don't know PC
;)
~S~
 
I did not write that. But it isn't from one source, and one of us is a big liar....









Let's get to the point.

I have traveled in the Middle East, and been to Israel several times.

I have visited Christian holy sites and walked the stations of the cross in Jerusalem.

Israel protects the rights and views of all three religions, even turned the control of the upper wailing wall over to the Muslims.


Telling as well, is the fact that Israel has turned over authority of the over to the temple mount to the Waqf.....the Muslims.

Christians and Jews cannot pray or even bring a Bible....or wear a cross.

Israel represents the best of Western values, the only nation in the area that does.
 
15th post
then maybe they could show some respect for 'western values' PC
~S~
I have visited Christian holy sites and walked the stations of the cross in Jerusalem.

Israel protects the rights and views of all three religions, even turned the control of the upper wailing wall over to the Muslims.


Telling as well, is the fact that Israel has turned over authority of the over to the temple mount to the Waqf.....the Muslims.

Christians and Jews cannot pray or even bring a Bible....or wear a cross.

Israel represents the best of Western values, the only nation in the area that does.
 
you've proved zip PC

delving into semantics is just plain disingenuous

~S~
  • "Hate Speech" vs. Discrimination: The legislation does not create a new category of "hate speech" as a criminal offense, which would raise First Amendment issues. Instead, it aims to provide a clearer framework for identifying and addressing existing forms of unlawful discriminatory conduct and harassment based on shared ancestry or rethnic characteristics under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.
Ready to admit you are wrong?
 
I have visited Christian holy sites and walked the stations of the cross in Jerusalem.

Israel protects the rights and views of all three religions, even turned the control of the upper wailing wall over to the Muslims.


Telling as well, is the fact that Israel has turned over authority of the over to the temple mount to the Waqf.....the Muslims.

Christians and Jews cannot pray or even bring a Bible....or wear a cross.

Israel represents the best of Western values, the only nation in the area that does.
really? do you support freedom of speech as a 'western value' PC?

~S~
 
Back
Top Bottom