The Math Proves Which Side To Support

Those are all Hezbollah homes? How can you tell?
Phuck off, southern Lebanon is known to be occupied by Hezbollah terrorist animals, Why don’t you ask Hezbollah why they’ve been shooting thousands of rockets at civilians in Israeli cities? Because you are a scumbag Islamo-terrorist ass kisser.
 
Those are all Hezbollah homes? How can you tell?
They hide beneath and inside them, just like how Hamas operates in Gaza.

If Hezbollah wore uniforms and didn't hide behind civilians, what would be the most likely outcome?
 
never mind it is documented in the CIA dossier...
No one is denying Israel struck first in 1967, but what you are denying is the mobilization of Arab armies on Israel's border coupled with the violent, genocidal rhetoric of the Arab leaders.

That's why there was a preemptive attack.

Israel then traded land for peace with Egypt in 1978-9, and Egypt then disowned Gaza, which they had annexed in 1948.
 
and no response to the deliberate attack and murder by ISRAEL of the ship and crew USS Liberty...
The USS liberty waded into waters they weren't supposed to be in. They didn't identify themselves, and Israel was not expecting them to be there. (edit: also, Arab armies and ships would deliberately misidentify themselves as a tactic in the war, and other nations have done the same thing before and after) So naturally, Israel thought it was an enemy ship because only enemy ships had been in the warzone.

Was that assumption a mistake? Yes.

Doesn't this incident prove that the US wasn't supporting Israel in the 1967 war? So all the rhetoric you people have been saying about US support for Israel isn't actually entirely true, is it? The US didn't aid or assist Israel in 1967, but the USSR did aid and assist the Arab countries.
 
Last edited:
When Israel commits an act of war and murders Americans, the self proclaimed sub humans do not care at all...
First of all, "subhuman" is pretty advanced Nazi rhetoric, even for you.

Secondly, Israel apologized for the incident and have made amends with that. You only keep bringing it up because you're desperate to find something to delegitimize Israel's existence.

So this isn't even about the USS Liberty for you, you're exploiting that incident to get what you want, which is to divide Israel and the US so that you can achieve your goal of destroying Israel and killing the 7 million Jews who live there.

I've been around a while, so I've seen this tactic used time and time again. Nothing you are doing is unique. It's just hackneyed. You're a hack.
 
No one is denying Israel struck first in 1967, but what you are denying is the mobilization of Arab armies on Israel's border coupled with the violent, genocidal rhetoric of the Arab leaders.

That's why there was a preemptive attack.

Israel then traded land for peace with Egypt in 1978-9, and Egypt then disowned Gaza, which they had annexed in 1948.
The USS liberty waded into waters they weren't supposed to be in. They didn't identify themselves, and Israel was not expecting them to be there. So naturally, Israel thought it was an enemy ship because only enemy ships had been in the warzone.

Was that assumption a mistake? Yes.

Doesn't this incident prove that the US wasn't supporting Israel in the 1967 war? So all the rhetoric you people have been saying about US support for Israel isn't actually entirely true, is it? The US didn't aid or assist Israel in 1967, but the USSR did aid and assist the Arab countries.
Can’t cure stupid, which seems to be a prerequisite for being a die hard Leftist lunatic.
 
Unfortunately, this is the only proposal that makes sense.

There are 2 billions Muslims who control 57 ethnostates spanning 10,000,000 square miles of land across three continents. Surely they can find a place for these people in their lands.

Israel, India, and Pakistan all took in their displaced peoples when each was partitioned. Only Arabs didn't. So now, they should. All Palestinians living in "camps" in those countries should become citizens of that country (Jordan in particular).
Hey, Europe! You're Up.

The Paleonasties shouldn't be sent to any place near Israel. Algeria and Tunisia will have to take them in. The rabid Arab rabble can jihad Europe from there. America can then take in the European refugees, going against the Deep State's long-term policy of White Replacement.
 
Can’t cure stupid, which seems to be a prerequisite for being a die hard Leftist lunatic.
xn4rcpqpsv4h1.png
 
The Paleonasties shouldn't be sent to any place near Israel. Algeria and Tunisia will have to take them in. The rabid Arab rabble can jihad Europe from there. America can then take in the European refugees, going against the Deep State's long-term policy of White Replacement.

I think they should all be sent to Qatar, since they've been the drivers of all this lately.
 
Mass and involuntary deportations are not only legally and morally wrong, they will not solve the problem. Those Arabs willing to live peacefully and alongside Jews and become Israeli Arabs should remain. This has worked successfully in Israel, where a healthy percentage of Arab citizens has created a positive outcome for both them and Israel.
Temporary Unnatural Compatibility
 
As a matter of fact, I also didn't see as any interest of mine to support either side in the clash between the Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland 40 years ago. I rooted for the Protestants just as I am now for the Jews. But in terms of support, I do not believe our country should be the world's leading arms dealer.
Pacifist Pushovers Invented the Term "Merchants of Death"

Once again, a touchy-feely ideology costs us jobs, also confirming that liberal came from a Latin word meaning "freed from having to work for a living."
 
15th post
Just the fact you are using percentages shows they aren't all violent, or even if they believe in the extermination of others, don't bother to enforce it, or possibly think it's obsolete.

I'm not saying they are pacifists or rollovers..........I'm saying not all religious people believe the same thing, even under the same religious umbrella.
"Not All" Is a Strawman Evasion and Pretense of Being Rational
 
Just the fact you are using percentages shows they aren't all violent, or even if they believe in the extermination of others, don't bother to enforce it, or possibly think it's obsolete.

I'm not saying they are pacifists or rollovers..........I'm saying not all religious people believe the same thing, even under the same religious umbrella.
"Just the fact you are using percentages shows they aren't all violent, ...''

So you wish to prove you can be even more stupid?????

Well done, you buffoon.
 
A lot of people describe Catholicism as a death cult and/or organized criminal organization.
Same with American religions.

Difference is................Middle Eastern religions are "in your face", whereas American religions are sneaky, stealthy, and make it look like an "accident" or set up a stooge to take the fall for what they do.
"A lot of people describe Catholicism as a death cult ....."


Can you support that stupidity?
 
Back
Top Bottom