Black Spokane residents are 5 times more likely to be arrested, new data show
Over the course of a year, a Black person in Spokane is over five times more likely to be arrested by Spokane police than a white person, according to a Spokesman-Review analysis of recently released data.
www.spokesman.com
I have linked a long, well-researched article carrying the inflammatory headline, "Black Spokane residents are 5 times more likely to be arrested..."
But as you read through it, it is logical nonsense. It is based on a gigantic fallacy, namely, that police arrests, if they are not based on RACISM, will be proportionate to the demographic split of the population.
Clearly, in Spokane, Washington and in other jurisdictions mentioned in the article, Blacks are arrested at higher rates than "white" people. But there is no attempt whatsoever to identify WRONGFUL arrests. Is this not the crux of the issue? The implication is that because Blacks are arrested at higher rates, then that is because the police are harassing Blacks - treating them unfairly. But if the arrests are APPROPRIATE, then what is the problem? And there is not even a claim that the arrests are largely wrongful.
Year after year, the best statistical breakdown in the country, the FBI's Uniform Crime Report, reports that a group comprising roughly 6% of the U.S. population - Black males - commits about 45% of the violent crimes, a proportion that is more than seven times higher than one would expect if violent crime were proportionately committed by all demographic groups.
I am humble enough to acknowledge the possibility that some forms of harmful racism are not amenable to objective measurement, but this article is logical nonsense. It doesn't even pretend to support its most important assertions and implications. Yes, Blacks are arrested much more often than whites. As they should be.