The Legality of forcing COVID injections

[Brick Layer]

The Unconstitutional Federal Vaccine Mandate | The Gateway Pundit | by Katie O'Malley

Many people are objecting to the mandate to get vaccinated and there are a number of lawsuits working through the courts.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905)

Jacobson v. Massachusetts: A state may enact a compulsory vaccination law, since the legislature has the discretion to decide whether vaccination is the best way to prevent smallpox and protect public health. The legislature may exempt children from the law without violating the equal protection...

supreme.justia.com

Taken together, the Tenth Amendment and Jacobson leave no doubt that the ability to create vaccine mandates belongs to the states.
For a federal law (or regulation or executive order) to be “supreme”, it must first be Constitutionally permissible. A federal vaccine mandate is void ab initio!


This mandate-disguised-as-a-work-rule is such a cynical attempt to “work around” the federal government’s lack of authority to issue a mandate any federal judge should see through it.

Jacobson is old, bit it is still the law

Jacobson age implies very strong stare decisis (think a snowball rolling down a hill). Any change would re-write the relationship between the states and the federal government, and essentially repeal the 10th Amendment. Truly, if the federal government can use the Interstate Commerce clause to decide what medicine you have to take if you want to be able to work, there is nothing to stop it from preventing you from being employable if you eat French fries, or drink alcohol, or have unprotected sex, or have too many kids, etc.

It’s Not About the Vaccine, It’s about the Unconstitutional Order

 

[Blues Man]

For such a hot topic and "either/or" issue in this country.......I have yet to see any legal information about any of this, concerning the personal rights and freedoms of citizens in this country.

Issues - for example:

*The government forcing/harassing people to take this drug.
*What if a person is naturally immune to COVID, or it only affects them as a head cold would and nothing more serious?
*Allergic reactions to this "vaccine"........migraines, heart conditions, Bells Palsy, miscarriages, death.....
*The FACTUAL reality of this drug being "approved" years before all proper testing has been accomplished.
*Companies FORCING people to get this "vaccine" or get fired/never hired.
*Businesses FORCING people to show their PRIVATE health information in order to custom that establishment?
*The happenings in Australia, New Zealand, and Britain.

Just a few aspects of legal positions I would like to see brought up by the legal professions that are on the side of the citizens rights.

I would really like to know the stances and legality of all this crap going on with COVID. What do lawyers who protect citizens rights have to say about all of this??

I see no one being forced to get a shot.

 

[Brick Layer]

You're "Fully Vaccinated" Until The Definition Is Changed!



"...your not part of this, it's not about you, your not free to do anything."

 

[Ivan88]

NOTICE AND DEMAND

Upon ……………name of organization

Notice is hereby given that forcing your employees to ingest in anyway, dangerous, unproven drugs as a condition for employment is an actual physical danger and risk to any such employee or employees;

And, hence the employer at all levels of administration is assuming full liability for any harm caused to
Any employee so coerced & forced to take/ingest or be injected with dangerous, unproven drugs who is injured thereby has full LAWFUL RIGHT TO PURSUE FULL AND PUNITIVE COMPENSATION FROM ALL LEVELS OF SUCH ADMINISTRATIVE COERCION, FORCE, DECEIT.

THEREFORE, it is hereby DEMANDED in the interest of all parties involved in this matter to CEASE AND DESIST from all forms of ultimatums, force and coercion against ……….Name, heirs and assigns, immediately regarding this Notice and Demand.

 

[Grumblenuts]

NOTICE AND DEMAND

Upon ……………name of organization

Notice is hereby given that forcing your employees to ingest in anyway, dangerous, unproven drugs as a condition for employment is an actual physical danger and risk to any such employee or employees;

And, hence the employer at all levels of administration is assuming full liability for any harm caused to
Any employee so coerced & forced to take/ingest or be injected with dangerous, unproven drugs who is injured thereby has full LAWFUL RIGHT TO PURSUE FULL AND PUNITIVE COMPENSATION FROM ALL LEVELS OF SUCH ADMINISTRATIVE COERCION, FORCE, DECEIT.

THEREFORE, it is hereby DEMANDED in the interest of all parties involved in this matter to CEASE AND DESIST from all forms of ultimatums, force and coercion against ……….Name, heirs and assigns, immediately regarding this Notice and Demand.

^Winner: Drama Queen 2021!

 

[Brick Layer]

WE ARE LIVING THROUGH A GLOBAL BIO WEAPON ATTACK, PEOPLE HAVE THE CURE TO FIGHT IT
​

 

[rupol2000]

Traditionally the courts recognize this enhanced authority when it's clear that the risk to the public outweighs the exercise of individual rights.

This is the purpose of the communist left bastard, to graze people like sheep. It doesn't matter if it's medicine or something else
Anything can be justified by the public interest, including the removal of your children to be sacrificed to the priests. It sounds wild to you, but the legalization of fagots seemed the same wild 50 years ago.

 

[Brick Layer]

Pfizer Board Member: Pandemic Could Be Over in US by January

www.theepochtimes.com

minute marker 10:06
EP. 2620B - THOSE WHO ARE BLIND WILL SOON SEE THE LIGHT, ONE STEP AT A TIME

 

[Pellinore]

The Unconstitutional Federal Vaccine Mandate | The Gateway Pundit | by Katie O'Malley

Many people are objecting to the mandate to get vaccinated and there are a number of lawsuits working through the courts.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905)

Jacobson v. Massachusetts: A state may enact a compulsory vaccination law, since the legislature has the discretion to decide whether vaccination is the best way to prevent smallpox and protect public health. The legislature may exempt children from the law without violating the equal protection...

supreme.justia.com

Taken together, the Tenth Amendment and Jacobson leave no doubt that the ability to create vaccine mandates belongs to the states.
For a federal law (or regulation or executive order) to be “supreme”, it must first be Constitutionally permissible. A federal vaccine mandate is void ab initio!


This mandate-disguised-as-a-work-rule is such a cynical attempt to “work around” the federal government’s lack of authority to issue a mandate any federal judge should see through it.

Jacobson is old, bit it is still the law

Jacobson age implies very strong stare decisis (think a snowball rolling down a hill). Any change would re-write the relationship between the states and the federal government, and essentially repeal the 10th Amendment. Truly, if the federal government can use the Interstate Commerce clause to decide what medicine you have to take if you want to be able to work, there is nothing to stop it from preventing you from being employable if you eat French fries, or drink alcohol, or have unprotected sex, or have too many kids, etc.

It’s Not About the Vaccine, It’s about the Unconstitutional Order

Yake (the author) does make good references that others in this thread could stand to pay attention to. He is correct about the fundamentals of Jacobson v Mass, the Tenth Amendment, the Supremacy Clause, and the Interstate Commerce Clause. However, he does not apply these correctly to this new OSHA standard.

For one, it isn't a mandate; there is a choice. For two, his branding of the new standard as a "work-around" ignores the granted power that OSHA has to create it, and the many limitations it carries. It affects only a sliver of the population (on-site, indoor workers in large companies with no exemptions) and requires an emergency to invoke, so no need to worry about the upcoming french fry limit. He's trying to make his point by name-calling (mostly hidden in the footnotes), repetition, cherry-picking, slippery-sloping, and a few other logical fallacies.

He's also a sloppy writer, and any five-year-old can tell that this is a highly slanted site, not a news site. Best to treat this as an opinion piece, and not a very cogent one at that.

 

[Brick Layer]

The Fifth Circuit of the Federal Court of Appeals has temporarily suspended the federal vaccine mandate!

BREAKING: Federal Court issues temporary halt to Biden’s vaccine mandate over ‘grave statutory and constitutional’ issues

On Saturday, and citing “grave statutory and constitutional issues,” the Fifth Circuit of the Federal Court of Appeals has temporarily suspended the federal vaccine mandate.

thepostmillennial.com

 

[Brick Layer]

“Two weeks to flatten the curve.”

 

[rupol2000]

In fact, even in Russia it is not legal. This is done at the expense of complex tricks.
For example, the constitution states that vaccination is voluntary, but the law obliges certain occupational groups to be vaccinated. Government by-laws cannot contradict the law, but orders are issued that oblige to vaccinate not only these categories, but also those who work in production, under the pretext of the special economic importance of these enterprises.
There are quite a few such tricks, and all this is buried in the demagoguery of the authorities. But opportunities to resist this are now very limited.

 

[Brick Layer]

🚨BREAKING: SENATE VOTES TO KILL BIDEN VACCINE MANDATE, MULTIPLE DEMOCRATS VOTE WITH REPUBLICANS AGAINST UNCONSTITUTIONAL FORCED INJECTIONS - HUGE WIN 🇺🇸🙌🏻 | By Benny JohnsonFacebook

🚨BREAKING: SENATE VOTES TO KILL BIDEN VACCINE MANDATE, MULTIPLE DEMOCRATS VOTE WITH REPUBLICANS AGAINST UNCONSTITUTIONAL FORCED INJECTIONS - HUGE WIN 🇺🇸🙌🏻

www.facebook.com

 

[Brick Layer]

HUGE. CDC Withdraws Use of PCR Test for COVID and Finally Admits the Test Can Not Differentiate Between the Flu and COVID Virus
This is BIG NEWS.

After December 31, 2021, the CDC will withdraw the use of the PCR test for COVID-19 testing. The CDC finally admitted the test does not differentiate between the flu and COVID virus.

In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. Such assays can facilitate continued testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can save both time and resources as we head into influenza season.

This explains the disappearance of Flu cases in the US in 2020. It also inflated the COVID cases as Dr. Fauci and the DC elites knew would
happen.

HUGE. CDC Withdraws Use of PCR Test for COVID and Finally Admits the Test Can Not Differentiate Between the Flu and COVID Virus

I other words, all that data - the data relied on by ALL OF these Tests is FAKE, FONY, and FALSE has been from the start - heavily skewed and clearly a fraud on the people!!!

CLEARLY ALL THE TESTING THUS FAR HAS BEEN A FRAUD -- TO THIS POINT.

 

[Brick Layer]

US Warship Stuck Overseas as Navy Tries to Halt COVID Outbreak Among Fully Vaccinated Crew​

US Warship Stuck Overseas After COVID Spreads Through Fully Vaccinated Crew

The Milwaukee is the first Navy ship this year to pause its deployment because of a coronavirus outbreak on board.

www.westernjournal.com

 

[Brick Layer]

Instead of Facing Charges of Crimes Against Humanity - Fauci Eligible to Receive the Largest Retirement Pay in US Government History | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

Dr.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Liberty Report!
Thanks to a FOIA request we now know that Biden's covid czar Anthony Fauci will, when he retires, enjoy the highest pension in US history! He will be pulling in more than $350K for his 50+ years of "public service." But according to Fauci he has no plans of leaving: in a recent interview he said that him retiring now, before covid is defeated, would be like the US leaving in the middle of World War II. How's that for megalomania? Also today: lockdowns were the worst policy failure in history and even a government-funded study proves it.

 

[Brick Layer]

 

[Brick Layer]

Rand Paul: Thousands Dying Every Month Because Of Fauci’s Obsession With Pushing Health-Mandates [Video]​

Rand Paul: Thousands Dying Every Month Because Of Fauci’s Obsession With Pushing Health-Mandates [Video] | The Liberty Beacon

www.thelibertybeacon.com

 

[boedicca]

There is a supreme court precedent for it. It's perfectly legal.

When the Supreme Court Ruled a Vaccine Could Be Mandatory | HISTORY

A 1905 Supreme Court ruling backing a city-issued fine for refusing the smallpox vaccination provided a powerful and controversial precedent for the flexing of government authority.

www.history.com

That is a load of Craticular.

Jacobson was fined $5 for not getting the vaccine. This is a far cry from losing his job or forced to get the vaccination.

 

[Captain Caveman]

For such a hot topic and "either/or" issue in this country.......I have yet to see any legal information about any of this, concerning the personal rights and freedoms of citizens in this country.

Issues - for example:

*The government forcing/harassing people to take this drug.
*What if a person is naturally immune to COVID, or it only affects them as a head cold would and nothing more serious?
*Allergic reactions to this "vaccine"........migraines, heart conditions, Bells Palsy, miscarriages, death.....
*The FACTUAL reality of this drug being "approved" years before all proper testing has been accomplished.
*Companies FORCING people to get this "vaccine" or get fired/never hired.
*Businesses FORCING people to show their PRIVATE health information in order to custom that establishment?
*The happenings in Australia, New Zealand, and Britain.

What "happenings" in Britain?