The Left protests the arrests of prostitution rings in Queens.

I have no intentions of changing the mind of a brainwashed old fart. The Cold War has pretty much set your brain on stupid when it comes to capitalism vs socialism. The government under capitalist control, doesn't develop the infrastructure to effectively eliminate poverty. If you're going to do something half-ass., don't do it. Do what's required, or don't do it at all.

Capitalism constantly gets bailed out. Without government assistance, we wouldn't be eating now. There would be a food shortage in peace-time here in the US if American farmers weren't subsidized by Uncle Sam. Capitalism as a "free market", has never existed, it's a unicorn. It always needs the government or socialism to function. Now thanks to advanced automation and artificial intelligence, we're going to be forced by necessity to adopt a marketless system of production. Another word for that is, socialism. It's coming, whether you like it or not. I have no illusions or intentions of convincing people like yourself. I don't write this for you, but for others.
Why then do socialists countries have the most poverty?
 
Im under 40, im just not a complete dumbass, as I can read history and statistics.
You have no idea what capitalism is. Grow up.

:rofl:
You're ignorant, and in the next few years, you're going to be woken up to reality, as advanced automation and artificial intelligence start to replace most jobs.
 
You're confusing the 1980s, with 2020. In 2020 we had a pandemic, and when there's a crisis of that nature, capitalists are going to cash in on distressed properties and many other business opportunities that arise as a result of a crisis. You're the one licking capitalist boots.
Dude, STFU. You are a complete moron.

Your corporate masters thank you for being a complete retard so this will continue. All thanks to the government.
 
"The corporations control our country! The government needs to fix this!"

"Hey bro, the govt you love so much caused the biggest transfer of wealth in history"


1730207494460.webp



Thank gawd we have people that think like this, writing to inform others. Lolz
 
Why then do socialists countries have the most poverty?
They don't they're the most prosperous. For conservative Republicans, progressive Dems are socialists, because they're for labor unions, utility companies being publicly owned, universal healthcare, tuition-free education, and many other policies that in Western Europe today are taken for granted. So following the conservative, Republican metric of what constitutes "socialism", practically all of Europe is socialist. Many industrialized countries are socialist. They have mixed economies, with universal healthcare, tuition-free college..etc. The major centers of economic power are publicly owned, completely nationalized or the government has about a 50% stake in those industries.

If we were to do that here in America, the Republicans and some Dems would die of heart attacks. They would be shouting "Commies! Commies!".."How dare you suggest we nationalize the big oil companies, that's COMMUNISM!"..."Universal Healthcare Is COMMUNISM!". Hey I'm simply following the Republican definition of communism, man, what's the problem?

You also disingenuously, conveniently forget to mention that the American capitalist empire, imposes economic sanctions upon practically all countries that outwardly identify themselves as socialist or Marxist. You don't have the ideological luxury of asserting that "socialism doesn't work", when you're imposing economic sanctions, and embargoes, on it and constantly threatening it with war. If socialism doesn't work, then the American ruling elites should just let it fail on its own. They don't do that because they know that socialism does work and it's the future. So, you might as well become a socialist now in 2024 because in 2034, or 2040, it's socialism that's going to save the day again, for capitalism.

Capitalists today are talking about the government giving everyone a UBI, not out of the goodness of their hearts, but because they know that advanced automation and artificial intelligence, are going to require a major government intervention and bailout. Capitalism can't survive without one government bailout after another, especially in the 21st century, with all of the intelligent automation and artificial intelligence that we have available today.
 
They don't they're the most prosperous. For conservative Republicans, progressive Dems are socialists, because they're for labor unions, utility companies being publicly owned, universal healthcare, tuition-free education, and many other policies that in Western Europe today are taken for granted. So following the conservative, Republican metric of what constitutes "socialism", practically all of Europe is socialist. Many industrialized countries are socialist. They have mixed economies, with universal healthcare, tuition-free college..etc. The major centers of economic power are publicly owned, completely nationalized or the government has about a 50% stake in those industries.

If we were to do that here in America, the Republicans and some Dems would die of heart attacks. They would be shouting "Commies! Commies!".."How dare you suggest we nationalize the big oil companies, that's COMMUNISM!"..."Universal Healthcare Is COMMUNISM!". Hey I'm simply following the Republican definition of communism, man, what's the problem?

You also disingenuously, conveniently forget to mention that the American capitalist empire, imposes economic sanctions upon practically all countries that outwardly identify themselves as socialist or Marxist. You don't have the ideological luxury of asserting that "socialism doesn't work", when you're imposing economic sanctions, and embargoes, on it and constantly threatening it with war. If socialism doesn't work, then the American ruling elites should just let it fail on its own. They don't do that because they know that socialism does work and it's the future. So, you might as well become a socialist now in 2024 because in 2034, or 2040, it's socialism that's going to save the day again, for capitalism.

Capitalists today are talking about the government giving everyone a UBI, not out of the goodness of their hearts, but because they know that advanced automation and artificial intelligence, are going to require a major government intervention and bailout. Capitalism can't survive without one government bailout after another, especially in the 21st century, with all of the intelligent automation and artificial intelligence that we have available today.
True socialist countries are like Venezuela and North Korea and Cuba where the state runs everything where poverty and misery reign supreme.

I think you are erroneously referring to places like Europe who are arguably less socialized on many levels than the US.

It is a common mistake.
 
"The corporations control our country! The government needs to fix this!"

"Hey bro, the govt you love so much caused the biggest transfer of wealth in history"


View attachment 1033190


Thank gawd we have people that think like this, writing to inform others. Lolz
The transfer of wealth and power was done by capitalists, in control of a plutocratic oligarchy. If our government was socialist, none of this would happen. Since you're supposedly in your 30s, you're going to see how advanced automation is going to force us by necessity to adopt socialism. You're going to see this in your 40s and 50s. I'm currently 51, I may not be alive to see it, but you will. You're going to be around my age when it happens.
 
The transfer of wealth and power was done by capitalists, in control of a plutocratic oligarchy. If our government was socialist, none of this would happen. Since you're supposedly in your 30s, you're going to see how advanced automation is going to force us by necessity to adopt socialism. You're going to see this in your 40s and 50s. I'm currently 51, I may not be alive to see it, but you will. You're going to be around my age when it happens.
Corporations are a government creation idiot.
 
True socialist countries are like Venezuela and North Korea and Cuba where the state runs everything where poverty and misery reign supreme.

I think you are erroneously referring to places like Europe who are arguably less socialized on many levels than the US.

It is a common mistake.
You're the one making the mistake, of thinking that socialism can't have markets. You haven't read Marx or Lenin, much less studied my socialist tradition, national socialism. National Socialists in Germany turned Germany into the most prosperous country in Europe in the 1930s. The USSR was also quite impressive in its development in the 1930s after it was no longer fighting a revolution.

You conveniently forget that the US, UK, France and 10 other countries invaded Soviet Russia in 1918, right after WW1. Over 200 thousand foreign troops were fighting against the Red Army, alongside the White Tsarist armies. The Marxist socialists won that war and sent all of the invaders retreating back, out of Russia. WW2 in Europe was essentially a war between socialists. National Socialists vs Marxist Socialists. Seven out of ten German soldiers were fighting in the Eastern Front, not vs the US and UK, in Western Europe. The Western Front was smaller, less important to the Third Reich, than the Russian Soviet front.

The countries that you mentioned on your short list of "real socialist countries", are being brutally sanctioned by the American capitalist empire. So you have no argument there at all. Socialism is in your future, so you might as well join us today in 2024.
 
Corporations are a government creation idiot.
Privately owned corporations aren't owned or created by the government. So you obviously are the shithead. You need to take your head out of your ass. The fact that the government provides courts of law to enforce contracts, doesn't imply that private companies filed with a state, are publicly owned. You're just dumb.
 
Privately owned corporations aren't owned or created by the government. So you obviously are the shithead. You need to take your head out of your ass. The fact that the government provides courts of law to enforce contracts, doesn't imply that private companies filed with a state, are publicly owned. You're just dumb.
Government sets up the construct for corporations, that is why they exist. They have special rights and privileges associated with them

For example, the East Indies company was an English corporation that basically had their own private army as they helped conquer India for the British crown.

Later, they tried to corner the market on tea in America which led to the Boston Tea Party.

Even though they were not owned by the government, they essentially were an extension of them, much like the Fed is in the US today.

These games of not being owned in name by the government, thus they are not an extension of the government, is just child like idiocy.
 
Last edited:
Government sets up the construct for corporations, that is why they exist. They have special rights and privileges associated with them

For example, the East Indies company was an English corporation that basically had their own private army as they helped conquer India for the British crown.

Later, the tried to corner the market on tea in America which led to the Boston Tea Party.

Even though they were not owned by the government, they essentially were an extension of them, much like the Fed is in the US today.

These games of not being owned in name by the government, thus they are not an extension of the government, is just child like idiocy.
mes of not being owned in name by the government, thus they are not an extension of the government, is just child like idiocy.

It's the mercantile class of that time or the capitalists today, who privately own those companies and rule over our government, so your silly objection is moot. The profits of those companies are in private hands, not the public treasury. So again, you're just spewing nonsense. Your idiotic theory that private American companies are really an extension of our elected politicians and not the capitalists who own them isn't even worth responding to. I'm doing this not for your sake but for others, who still have brain cells.
 
The transfer of wealth and power was done by capitalists, in control of a plutocratic oligarchy. If our government was socialist, none of this would happen. Since you're supposedly in your 30s, you're going to see how advanced automation is going to force us by necessity to adopt socialism. You're going to see this in your 40s and 50s. I'm currently 51, I may not be alive to see it, but you will. You're going to be around my age when it happens.
The govt shutdown small businesses in favor of walmart, costco, sams, amazon etc. But yeah, blame everyone but the people that made it happen. LOL
You dumb and starting to bore me with your biased BS. Good day.
 
It's the mercantile class of that time or the capitalists today, who privately own those companies and rule over our government, so your silly objection is moot. The profits of those companies are in private hands, not the public treasury. So again, you're just spewing nonsense. Your idiotic theory that private American companies are really an extension of our elected politicians and not the capitalists who own them isn't even worth responding to. I'm doing this not for your sake but for others, who still have brain cells.
We saw just how "independent" and "Private" these corporations really are when the government bailed them all out recently using taxpayer money.

LOL

Your only objection is not that these corporations are giving money to the DNC and provide the only revenue they have and are completely dependent upon them because of that fact, your objection is that they may also be able to give it to opponents of the DNC, but you will never admit to that

It's not good enough for you that corporate donations gave Kamala more money than Trump, the issue is that Trump got any to begin with.
 
True socialist countries are like Venezuela and North Korea and Cuba where the state runs everything where poverty and misery reign supreme.

I think you are erroneously referring to places like Europe who are arguably less socialized on many levels than the US.

It is a common mistake.
if we are measuring the relative prosperity of socialist countries, we can't use any of the prosperous ones?????????

that would be like saying all capitalist countries are as poverty stricken as haiti or honduras.
 
The govt shutdown small businesses in favor of walmart, costco, sams, amazon etc. But yeah, blame everyone but the people that made it happen. LOL
You dumb and starting to bore me with your biased BS. Good day.
The US government, if it was socialist, wouldn't have allowed such monopolies or the collapse of local small businesses, despite the pandemic. A national socialist government, wouldn't have allowed Covid to spread the way it did, because we would've had infrastructure in place, plenty of manufacturing, and emergency stocks of medical equipment and other resources.

We would've provided all Americans with an income (unemployment), quarantined the country, through a government mandate for a couple of months, and made not wearing a mask in public, crowded venues a criminal offense, worthy of jail time. Trump defunded the department that was supposed to detect possible pandemics and protect us. He was walking around without a mask, claiming that Covid was just the regular flu. He claimed that Americans would be in church within a few weeks, and on Easter Day 2020, encouraged America to attend church.

You're just being ignorant and stupid.
 
if we are measuring the relative prosperity of socialist countries, we can't use any of the prosperous ones?????????

that would be like saying all capitalist countries are as poverty stricken as haiti or honduras.
After Venezuela went full socialist and the government took over the oil fields, and then economy and country went South soon afterwards.

Countries that don't have those type of natural resources will more than likely never have wealth like that.

Perhaps the closest I have seen socialism work was in Libya where Kaddafi seemed to be invested in using his government owned oil fields to help the people achieve the highest standard of living in all of Africa, but then Obama and his cronies in Europe decided to kill him off.

They then gave Obama a Nobel Peace Prize.

Funny how that works.
 
After Venezuela went full socialist and the government took over the oil fields, and then economy and country went South soon afterwards.

Countries that don't have those type of natural resources will more than likely never have wealth like that.

Perhaps the closest I have seen socialism work was in Libya where Kaddafi seemed to be invested in using his government owned oil fields to help the people achieve the highest standard of living in all of Africa, but then Obama and his cronies in Europe decided to kill him off.

They then gave Obama a Nobel Peace Prize.

Funny how that works.
Again, you keep ignoring the fact that the US being the exclusive issuer of the world's reserve currency, has an extreme amount of control and power over world trade and banking. When the American empire decides you're not its friend, you're fucked. When the US imposes economic terrorism upon your country, you're up the creek without a paddle. Venezuela had all of its businesses, gas stations..etc, closed in the US and throughout Latin America and the Caribbean. Billions of dollars in assets are till this day, seized, frozen. You have no conception of the devastation, that Venezuela experienced as a result of telling American oil companies to fuck-off.

You also conveniently ignore the many accomplishments of socialism in the Soviet Union and National Socialist Germany, which here in America is known as "Nazi" Germany. The German Weimar Republic was a disaster, and it was socialism in the 1930s, that turned Hitler's Germany into the most prosperous, powerful nation on Earth. Its mistake was in going to war with the Soviet Union (other socialists), It was socialism that won the war, not America or the UK. If it wasn't for the USSR, and Germany's stupid mistake, of going to war with other socialists, we would all be speaking German now, Our flag would have a Swastika on it.

You working-class morons, who defend your capitalist masters and Jewish Zionists are just stupid. The US government is ZOG = Zionist Occupied Government. It's a capitalist plutocratic oligarchy, led by Jews. You need to wake up and smell the coffee or the tea if you're in the UK or Australia. Wake up.
 
Last edited:
Again, you keep ignoring the fact that the US being the exclusive issuer of the world's reserve currency, has an extreme amount of control and power over world trade and banking. When the American empire decides you're not its friend, you're fucked. When the US imposes economic terrorism upon your country, you're up the creek without a paddle. Venezuela had all of its businesses, gas stations..etc, closed in the US and throughout Latin America and the Caribbean. Billions of dollars in assets are till this day, seized, frozen. You have no conception of the devastation, that Venezuela experienced as a result of telling American oil companies to fuck-off.

You also conveniently ignore the many accomplishments of socialism in the Soviet Union and National Socialist Germany, which here in America is known as "Nazi" Germany. The German Weimar Republic was a disaster, and it was socialism in the 1930s, that turned Hitler's Germany into the most prosperous, powerful nation on Earth. Its mistake was in going to war with the Soviet Union (other socialists), It was socialism that won the war, not America or the UK. If it wasn't for the USSR, and Germany's stupid mistake, of going to war with other socialists, we would all be speaking German now, Our flag would have a Swastika on it.

You working-class morons, who defend your capitalist masters and Jewish Zionists are just stupid. The US government is ZOG = Zionist Occupied Government. It's a capitalist plutocratic oligarchy, led by Jews. You need to wake up and smell the coffee or the tea if you're in the UK or Australia.
You are talking out your arse.

Socialism, at least the definition of it, is government controlling industry.

Hitler was at least smart enough to realize that bureaucrats running industry was not such a good idea since they had no expertise in it. However, he made sure those in industry knew that he was in charge and would do as he said or else.

It was a superior model to the Soviet plan which was to have a drunk idiot like Stalin owning and running industry when he had no expertise in it.

That is why China embraced capitalism because without it, they would not be the world's second biggest economy.

BTW, blaming the US regarding how they disperse their money on the woes on places like Venezuela and Cuba is counterproductive, because what you are really saying is that they are dependent on the capitalism of the US ANd their good nature in order to survive.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom