The Left protests the arrests of prostitution rings in Queens.

[TruthNotBS]

You are talking out your arse.

Socialism, at least the definition of it, is government controlling industry.

Hitler was at least smart enough to realize that bureaucrats running industry was not such a good idea since they had no expertise in it. However, he made sure those in industry knew that he was in charge and would do as he said or else.

It was a superior model to the Soviet plan which was to have a drunk idiot like Stalin owning and running industry when he had no expertise in it.

That is why China embraced capitalism because without it, they would not be the world's second biggest economy.

BTW, blaming the US regarding how they disperse their money on the woes on places like Venezuela and Cuba is counterproductive, because what you are really saying is that they are dependent on the capitalism of the US ANd their good nature in order to survive.

You are talking out your arse.

That's exactly what you're doing.

Socialism, at least the definition of it, is government controlling industry.

Yes? There are different levels of control over production. Lenin introduced, at the end of his life, markets. Duh? Marx was an internationalist Jewish philosopher and he also towards the end of his life, admitted that material conditions might justify markets. You're debating someone who has been studying socialism for over thirty years. I've read all of the Marxist literature, practically, because I began my socialist activism as a Marxist. In my 30s, when I was around your age, 20 years ago, I became a National Socialist and Fascist. A true fascist. not a fake one like Donald Trump.

Hitler was at least smart enough to realize that bureaucrats running industry was not such a good idea since they had no expertise in it. However, he made sure those in industry knew that he was in charge and would do as he said or else.

Yeah? The bureaucrats, not trained or uneducated in production, don't know much about it. National Socialism requires business to serve the people, the Volk. If you have a business, it's to serve the community, not necessarily to make a profit. Sure, making a profit is fine, being wealthy, no problem. But you're in business to serve the country, not your palette or stomach, your lust for power and private capital. No. National socialism provides the working class with a robust social safety net, it eliminates homelessness, open drug use, and prostitution. It eliminates not just poverty, but also criminality, and substance abuse. Socialism is superior to capitalism and replaces it completely when material conditions allow. We're in line with natural, cosmic law. The laws of the universe, of nature, whatever you want to call it.

It was a superior model to the Soviet plan which was to have a drunk idiot like Stalin owning and running industry when he had no expertise in it.

I can't argue with you on that. The Soviets, despite their flaws and weaknesses (Blind egalitarianism, lack of social cohesion and order, pro-Jewish control over much of its institutions, even the gulag system was led mostly by Jews..etc), were extremely powerful. The German Reich would've beaten the Soviets, but it made several fatal strategic blunders that led to its demise. The Germans over-extended themselves and had way too much confidence. They underestimated the Soviets. Then, of course, having to deal with the US and UK on the Western Front. My Fuhrer's greatest mistake was Operation Barbarossa. He should've allied himself with Stalin and secured Germany vs the Judeo-Anglo empire.

That is why China embraced capitalism because without it, they would not be the world's second biggest economy.

China didn't adopt laissez-faire capitalism, or Ayan Rand, "Atlas Shrugged", Milton Friedman Jew-capitalism. There's a hell of a lot of central economic planning in China and companies are under the heel of the communist party. China is less socialist than the Third Reich, which had a well-established social safety net, for the working-class. That doesn't exist in China, to the extent it did in Germany or the USSR.

China is now preparing to eventually nationalize much of its economy, due to advanced automation and artificial intelligence. So your claim that socialism needs capitalism is actually true to a certain extent, but that is only in the beginning of the transition to a marketless economy (capitalism and socialism need each other before technology completely eliminates the need for wages and markets).

Technology, or material conditions, eventually necessitates non-profit, mass production, that is publicly managed. This isn't even the last stage of socialism, which ends with the individual consumer having complete control over the means of production, due to atomic precision manufacturing, nanotechnology, and a few other tools, allowing people to produce everything they consume without government infrastructure. At that point, maybe 100 or 200 years from now, all adult human relationships become fully voluntary.

BTW, blaming the US regarding how they disperse their money on the woes on places like Venezuela and Cuba is counterproductive, because what you are really saying is that they are dependent on the capitalism of the US ANd their good nature in order to survive.

They indeed rely on whether the US is on their side or not. The American capitalist Jewish-empire, controls everything. They have the exclusive power to "print" the world's reserve currency. The US controls the world's banking system, and much of its trading involves USD. When the American ruling elites decide to commit economic terrorism upon your country, you're up the creek without a paddle.

The US unlike Western Europe, Russia, or East Asia, came out of WW2 unscathed. The American empire is surrounded by two vast oceans, and the only way to successfully invade a nation of such scale is through a land bridge or through a few miles of water, like what we have between Alaska and Russia or Florida and Cuba. A few miles, not thousands of miles of ocean. The US wouldn't have won the war against the Third Reich, without the Soviet Union. Hitler's greatest mistake was going to war with the USSR.

The Soviet Jewnion lost 28 million of its citizens and Germany lost millions as well. When the US was faced with invading Japan, they nuked it. That was the only way to successfully invade the Japanese. American casualties would've rivaled those of Germany and the USSR if they had invaded Japan. The notion that the Japanese were on the brink of surrendering, is to a certain extent true, but not completely because they refused to accept certain terms. The Japanese would've fought the American invaders till the last man. That's how they were back then. They used to fly planes into our ships. Japanese are batshit crazy, you don't want to invade their country. You need nukes.

Imagine if it wasn't for Hitler's error of going to war with socialists, he would've had all of those forces fighting the US and UK. Germany wasn't that far from developing the bomb themselves and if they hadn't had the task of fighting the USSR, they would've developed the bomb before the US. They were significantly more advanced than we were, technologically.