The Left is hailing the election of Macron as a vote against Trump?

So was the USSR, N Korea, Russia now, China now and every other authoritarian shithole that ever sent local representatives to some central location to go through the motions of governance. The difference is in free elections and the peaceful transfer of power. Constitutions and parliaments do not guarantee freedom. A devotion in leaders to accede to the will of the people does.
And yet you leftist shitbags want the same kind of totalitarian rule the USSR and other Communist regimes were for the US. Shut down any opposition to your diseased agenda!
 
And yet you leftist shitbags want the same kind of totalitarian rule the USSR and other Communist regimes were for the US. Shut down any opposition to your diseased agenda!
Don't slither away. Why don't you tell me how just a constitution and a bunch of politicians is a guarantee of freedom? You seem to think so.
 
Last edited:
You miss the whole point, which is that populism like Le Pen and Trump are increasing, because there is no more left wing any more.
I must have missed the memo. :laugh:

The whole point is... you run Trump again in 2024 and you guarantee another GOP loss.

And that would be a tragedy because I'm not sure that America can survive another four years under the idiot Dems.
 

The Left is desperate as they celebrate the election of Macron as a good sign that Trump will be defeated in the US.

Meanwhile, riots break out around Paris in protest as the article states that this may be a sign of more to come as most don't seem to want him. It is suggested that the votes were not rigged, rather, it was just that people voted against the "far right" candidate who opposed Macron.

So that is where world elections are at I reckon. Vote for corrupt Leftist elites that no one wants for fear that someone from "the far right" might win.

Apparently, democracy only involves voting for the Left, also known as the centrist, or allow the fascist right winger in as all voting and life in general will cease. For democracy to exist, only one party will due.

That is, if you believe the media.
This picture was released by Le Pen...

1650935944213.png
 
Listen to yourself

The danger of globalism is globalism?

absolutely

of course its multinational companies that operate in the global economy

it sure isnt mom and pop stores

globalism means that companies can operate in many places at once

and that harms American workers and at times the US economy

No globalism is when you have a global government in order to balance and prevent abuses by global corporations.
For example, when we have the Paris Global Warming Accord, that is an attempt to put in place global regulations to counter global abuses by corporations.
Global corporations are not globalism because they act only for their own desires and satisfaction, not everyone's.
Globalism is when you have global cooperation to protect the whole world from abuses that are beyond what any one country can do.
 
You have a point. It would take somebody only halfway intelligent to have that position.

Those of full intelligence are for NATO.

No, NATO is totally corrupt.
It is a coalition of the old and new colonial imperialists.
It is not based on rights, law, or defense, but on profits and aggression.
NATO is essentially the monarchies that invaded and colonized the world in the 17 hundreds, and deliberately started WWI and WWII.
 
For the umpteenth time. Now Liberals let daddy General educate you. The United States is not, I repeat NOT a frigging democracy but a Constitutional Republic!!!

Yes, but it also is a representative democracy.
When people say "democracy", that is short hand for a the whole "democratic, representative, constitutional, republic".
They do not mean everyone votes on all legislation like Athens did for awhile.
 
It's a democratic republic. F for you, sorry.

To be technical, it is a democratically elected, representative, constitutional, republic.
If any of the 4 aspects are not implemented, then it is authoritarian.
But we all know what we mean by calling it a democracy.
No one actually expects to be able to vote on each piece of legislation.
 
Because everyone used the word "republic" to the point is means nothing.
Like the Republic of Botswana when it was part of the British Commonwealth.
Well that's not the context here. And democratic is also used in the same way. But we are a REPUBLIC, not a direct democracy (the connotation of saying democracy)
 
Well that's not the context here. And democratic is also used in the same way. But we are a REPUBLIC, not a direct democracy (the connotation of saying democracy)

True we are not a "direct democracy" but we have elections for representatives, so we are a "representative democracy".
 
No globalism is when you have a global government in order to balance and prevent abuses by global corporations.
That may be the final result of globalism

one-world government has been an unfulfilled dream of liberals for generations

but its a nightmare for everyone else who values individual freedom
 

Forum List

Back
Top