Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There was no such thing as a "qualified scientist" in those days. In fact, there still isn't.Galileo.
Galileo was a qualified scientist that did work relevant to the claims he was making. Show me the Galileo of climate science. What is his/her name and what work have they done to demonstrate that AGW is a hoax?
Those scientists are called skeptics
They are all partisan when it comes to where their paychecks come from.They are a fucking cult of left wing lunatics who happen to make money being scientists.
You wouldn't believe how nonpartisan a lot of scientists are. What you just said is nonsense. And again, there'd be way too much fame to gain by being the one exposing the hoax.
AGW "scientists" are not playing the role of Galileo in this controversy.
They are all partisan when it comes to where their paychecks come from.
You are extremely naive.They are a fucking cult of left wing lunatics who happen to make money being scientists.
You wouldn't believe how nonpartisan a lot of scientists are. What you just said is nonsense. And again, there'd be way too much fame to gain by being the one exposing the hoax.
It's not a conspiracy. It's justAs for trusting scientists to make impartial decisions solely because of the need for knowledge
Even if there was somehow a conspiracy floating on bullshit science there would be lots of scientists that have too much integrity to go along with it. They'd be exposing bullshit at every turn, and there would not be a consensus. It would not be possible to keep something like that afloat in science.
List of scientists who disagree with the scientific consensus on global warming - WikipediaThose scientists are called skeptics
Show me a skeptic that is doing relevant work to demonstrate that AGW isn't happening.
It's not a conspiracy. It's just a bunch of people who all have a vested interest in the hoax being true.They are all partisan when it comes to where their paychecks come from.
A conspiracy that vast is not possible. Too many people do have integrity.
This bullshit right here is why it is so easy for scientists to say whatever they want.AGW "scientists" are not playing the role of Galileo in this controversy.
They are. It's the same old battle with you religious types and your distrust of scientists.
There is a lot more to gain by continuing to push this nonsense.
I'm an atheist, so that pretty much trashes that argument.AGW "scientists" are not playing the role of Galileo in this controversy.
They are. It's the same old battle with you religious types and your distrust of scientists. The church wasn't scientists. Galileo was a scientist dealing largely with ignorant people that didn't believe his work. Again, show me modern Galileo that is using science to demonstrate that AGW isn't happening.
It is possible to buy them off, which is exactly what the politicians have done.There is a lot more to gain by continuing to push this nonsense.
It wouldn't work though. It's not possible to control all of the scientists of the world and push a conspiracy like that
ROFL! You are so fucking naive it must hurt.
None of those people have done work that proves AGW wrong. If they'd done work that makes that clear and obvious there would not be a consensus.
I'm an atheist
We only call Galileo a "scientist" today because his claims turned out to be true. There was no such profession as "scientist" in those days.
Many scientists have debunked the AGW theory.
See Stephen McIntyre and Ross McKitrick on the Hockey Stick controversy.
NPR has a factual rating of very high.More leftwing horseshit.As Carbon Dioxide Levels Rise, Major Crops Are Losing NutrientsNo shit, Sherlock. I already established that. Way to repeat what I’ve already posted.All things remaining the same, increased CO2 does promote plant growth.
Bwahahaha! Those “studies” are so good, you didn’t even post a link to them.Studies show that food plants may grow better, their nutrition levels can fall.
Corn is corn, you fuck’n buffoon. It’s “nutrition level” doesn’t change.
But he's a credible peer reviewed scientist, isn't he? You claim we're supposed to blindly trust these people.See Stephen McIntyre and Ross McKitrick on the Hockey Stick controversy.
Mann is not responsible for scientists all over the world believing that AGW is happening. You people overestimate the significance of his work alone. Any miscalculation he made has not proven that AGW is a hoax.
It has a "factual rating?" You have to be the most gullible moron ever born. NPR is a propaganda organ that pumps out lies on a daily basis. You guys think we're supposed to accept your claims because some self-appointed expert says so. And he's supposed to be credible because some other self appointed expert says he is.NPR has a factual rating of very high.More leftwing horseshit.As Carbon Dioxide Levels Rise, Major Crops Are Losing NutrientsNo shit, Sherlock. I already established that. Way to repeat what I’ve already posted.All things remaining the same, increased CO2 does promote plant growth.
Bwahahaha! Those “studies” are so good, you didn’t even post a link to them.Studies show that food plants may grow better, their nutrition levels can fall.
Corn is corn, you fuck’n buffoon. It’s “nutrition level” doesn’t change.
Forbes reports the same thing, and forbes has a slight right-wing bias.
CO2 food nutrient connect is just just basic science though.
dude.. ok..It has a "factual rating?" You have to be the most gullible moron ever born. NPR is a propaganda organ that pumps out lies on a daily basis. You guys think we're supposed to accept your claims because some self-appointed expert says so. And he's supposed to be credible because some other self appointed expert says he is.NPR has a factual rating of very high.More leftwing horseshit.As Carbon Dioxide Levels Rise, Major Crops Are Losing NutrientsNo shit, Sherlock. I already established that. Way to repeat what I’ve already posted.All things remaining the same, increased CO2 does promote plant growth.
Bwahahaha! Those “studies” are so good, you didn’t even post a link to them.Studies show that food plants may grow better, their nutrition levels can fall.
Corn is corn, you fuck’n buffoon. It’s “nutrition level” doesn’t change.
Forbes reports the same thing, and forbes has a slight right-wing bias.
CO2 food nutrient connect is just just basic science though.
Try and learn how you determine whether claims have any support.
