The left celebrate the Trump shooting with tasteless social media posts: ‘Close to being the best day ever’

Can you read ? If so, read what I wrote again. This time slower.

There is no such thing as "unarmed" once a suspect's hand(s) disappears from the officer's sight. In those cases, the officer has no way to ascertain if the suspect (of whatever race) is reaching for a gun.

With zero time to react and defend himself, the officer cannot (and should not) gamble with his life. Standard police protocol, taught in every police academy in America, is to shoot when a hand disappears from view.

This is why when encountering suspects, officers always yell (loudly) "Show me your hands" Those who don't do that, get shot, as they should.

Got it ?
Since when did there become no such thing as an unarmed suspect? Did you just pull that out your butt?

Why wasn't this white boy shot?

 
Since when did there become no such thing as an unarmed suspect? Did you just pull that out your butt?

Why wasn't this white boy shot?


I just told you where it comes from. Can you read ?

As for white boys being shot >>>

At 3:50 of the video, Daniel Shaver (a white guy) puts his hands behind his back (out of view of the cop) - the cop screams at him, but doesn't shoot him (as he is supposed to have done). Shaver was lucky. Most cops would have shot him.

Ar 4:27 of the video, Shaver again reaches behind him (hand out of sight). Cop shoots him, killing him instantly. Shaver's luck ran out.

If you (white, black, brown, or whatever) allow your hand to go out of view of the cop, you die. Didn't teach you this in school, huh ?
I know - that's because the schools are run by lefty liberals, who are clueless about guns & law enforcement/

 
LOL, that bullshit video doesn't dispute anything I said. Of all the police shootings that occur why is it we never see a black cop shoot an unarmed white man?
You just saw a white cop (I think shoot a white man)

No such thing as "unarmed". The cop has no way of knowing if the suspect is armed or not.

Armed or unarmed is irrelevant.
 
You just saw a white cop (I think shoot a white man)

No such thing as "unarmed". The cop has no way of knowing if the suspect is armed or not.

Armed or unarmed is irrelevant.
Show me a black cop that shot an unarmed white man. UNARMED means that they don't have a weapon.
 
Show me a black cop that shot an unarmed white man. UNARMED means that they don't have a weapon.
That does NOT establish "UNARMED" to a cop who is holding a suspect at gunpoint, who has not yet been frisked by that cop (or any other cop).

Until a full frisk is accomplished, the suspect is deemed armed and dangerous, and is to be shot if his hand or hands disappear from view.

In the past, in cases where cops did not shoot suspects whose hands went out of the cop's view, cops were killed by those suspects. That's why the police academies adopted their golden rule of
1. announce "Show me your hands"
2. Shoot, the instant hand(s) disappear.

If Daniel Shaver had been reaching for a gun hidden behind his back, instead of just pulling up on his pants, that cop could have been shot dead.

Same thing applies to Betty Shelby in the Terrence Crutcher shooting.
Jeronimo Yanez & Philando Castille. All the cops were cleared based on self-defense.

If anybody is guilty, it is all the leftwing "educators" who fail miserably in their jobs to educate us about how to act in police confrontations.
 
That does NOT establish "UNARMED" to a cop who is holding a suspect at gunpoint, who has not yet been frisked by that cop (or any other cop).

Until a full frisk is accomplished, the suspect is deemed armed and dangerous, and is to be shot if his hand or hands disappear from view.

In the past, in cases where cops did not shoot suspects whose hands went out of the cop's view, cops were killed by those suspects. That's why the police academies adopted their golden rule of
1. announce "Show me your hands"
2. Shoot, the instant hand(s) disappear.

If Daniel Shaver had been reaching for a gun hidden behind his back, instead of just pulling up on his pants, that cop could have been shot dead.

Same thing applies to Betty Shelby in the Terrence Crutcher shooting.
Jeronimo Yanez & Philando Castille. All the cops were cleared based on self-defense.

If anybody is guilty, it is all the leftwing "educators" who fail miserably in their jobs to educate us about how to act in police confrontations.
All the cops were cleared because they were white and murdered someone black.

Again, you are avoiding the question, why is it we never see black police officers murdering unarmed whites.
 
All the cops were cleared because they were white and murdered someone black.

Again, you are avoiding the question, why is it we never see black police officers murdering unarmed whites.
Well, you probably dont recognize this, since you are soaked in anti-white racism, but as long as that is the case, you will never think clearly, or present a meaningful, cogent thought.

The cops who shot suspects whose hands disappeared, shot them for that perfectly good reason, having nothing to do with race, and Daniel Shaver was white, not black. None of these shootings were murders.
You are a racist idiot.
 
Well, you probably dont recognize this, since you are soaked in anti-white racism, but as long as that is the case, you will never think clearly, or present a meaningful, cogent thought.

The cops who shot suspects whose hands disappeared, shot them for that perfectly good reason, having nothing to do with race, and Daniel Shaver was white, not black. None of these shootings were murders.
You are a racist idiot.
So, tell me why you can't post a black cop shooting an unarmed white man whose hands disappeared.
 
So, tell me why you can't post a black cop shooting an unarmed white man whose hands disappeared.
You actually think I couldnt do tht ? You are even more race-nuts than i thought. Pheeeew! (high-pitched whistle)

Despite a leftwing media blackout of such things, of course I can post that >>>


 
You actually think I couldnt do tht ? You are even more race-nuts than i thought. Pheeeew! (high-pitched whistle)

Despite a leftwing media blackout of such things, of course I can post that >>>


She didn't kill him.
 
15th post
You said I "can't post a black cop shooting an unarmed white man whose hands disappeared.";

I just gave you 3 examples. You stand corrected.
Pacific pundit? What is that? I can't find that story no where.

Gateway pundit? Another right-wing rag. The so-called cop wasn't even on duty when that false story took place.
 
Back
Top Bottom