The Hell they don't. What was Russia collusion?They don’t make unsupported claims.You believe what NYT and WP say and they are known liars.Lol, so I’m supposed to believe this just because they wrote it?Source for this claim?GOP plaintiff prevailed on 14 of the 21 cases decided on the merits.
okay. Sure.
I’d love to see these cases they supposedly won.
This silly website does. There’s nothing to support this claim.
My error.You do know you are on the wrong thread, right? HR-1 is about voting, not covid. That last paragraph refers to some dumb ass Representative thinking the bill on securing and codifying voting federal elections should also have statehood for DC. Support it if you like. It is just not an issue I care about and is not associated with voting, voting rights or voting laws. Always dishonest when some jerk tacks on a unrelated matter, standard legislation or spending. Often it is either a tag along to something they will pass or a poison pill to kill good legislation, but always a bad idea in my opinion, as I prefer clean legislation.Is it the fault of the partisanship of a writer to question why a bill for COVID relief for the American people includes millions of dollars to Ivy League Universities with endowments of billions?Don't know. Just as soon it got stripped in the Senate, as it is not the primary focus of the bill. I prefer clean legislation that stays on topic, just as I prefer clean spending bills that stay on topic, as we all do, but do not get very often anymore. Not sure we ever have, but I didn't start reading entire pieces of legislation until a few years ago, as I too was to lazy to do more than just bitch about what some partisan writer picked out as the most important to make a case for or against based on their political preferences.So how do you think it will pass when the resolution has DC as a state in it?Nope. If you had read my long post where some air head, wanted me to respond to the right wing talking points post, slanted their way those to ignorant of lazy to read a piece of legislation, you would have seen my comment, saying I do not care about that section and would just as soon DC stay as it is. I am not much of a throw the baby with the bathwater. Never, ever saw a piece of legislation (especially one as complicated as that, thought most are nowadays) that I agreed with every single line. Overall, I still support the bill. It will be tweaked and edited before this is over in the Senate. It goes a long way to requiring securities and accountabilities, and conformance performance across the country in regards to Federal elections, that were complained about by both sides during the 2020, including paper backup that can be viewed by the voter and cross referenced to the electronic count to insure the worst fear (voting machine programming shenanigans) to not take place. It codifies early voting times that is being curtailed in state legislatures, in the effort to keep the opposition party from voting. It makes registering to vote simpler and quicker for all that have trouble standing in line at some location (often DMV) to register or make changes to registration and make the voting database more accessible to states cross referencing voters that might try to register in more than one place. the bill does a host of thing and contribute to greater participation of the populous in voting, which is the basis of our democratically elected representative form of constitutional governance.They want to make DC a state along with other odd laws. Will never pass in the senate.Was wondering how long before the anti-democracy crowd would be bitching about HR-1. It will probably pass. Have you picked your next country yet? Bye.If the Democrats are allowed to pass and implement this bill, you will have two choices, accept the loss of everything this country has ever stood for, or prepare for the second American Revolution.
This is the most comprehensive explanation of what's in HR-1 that I've seen. Please read the complete report before commenting. Thanks in advance.
The Facts About H.R. 1: The “For the People Act of 2021”
www.heritage.org
.
Are you concerned that other reporters and writers dont see an issue with that?
Or is it the "Faux News" organization who is the problem.
It’s an excuse. You decided Trump was going to win. You excluded all other possibilities. Then when he lost, you searched for a reason to believe what you wanted to believe.Trump did win. He was defrauded. They are not excuses they are the truth.I get it. You wanted Trump to win. You really believed he would. But he didn’t. You don’t have to invest excuses for him.If they were secure Trump would be president. Next.
If the Democrats are allowed to pass and implement this bill, you will have two choices, accept the loss of everything this country has ever stood for, or prepare for the second American Revolution.
This is the most comprehensive explanation of what's in HR-1 that I've seen. Please read the complete report before commenting. Thanks in advance.
The Facts About H.R. 1: The “For the People Act of 2021”
.
The Heritage Foundation is giving us the "facts", what, no Breitbart or Gateway Pundit?
I'm prepared for this "revolution" you speak of, and I believe that the FBI and the Federal government is preparing as well, as this was identified as the key threat facing our democracy when Pres. Obama was in office. As January 6th has proven, rightwing domestic terrorism is our greatest threat to democracy.
Invincible ignorance is called that because the ignorance is invincible.Biden won by massive fraud. Nothing you can ever say will change that fact.
The courts misinterpreted Texas law.The governors order was upheld by State and Federal courts, so how is that violating Texas law?
Well, then you obviously didn't even look at or try to understand the Constitutional basis for H. R. 1 - 117th, only looking to spew criticism from a foundation of ignorance. The Heritage Foundation (HF) is a Rightwing propaganda mill, but you already knew that when you opted that as a "source" rather than H. R. 1 itself which doesn't include the distortions supplied and asserted by HF.This is the most comprehensive explanation of what's in HR-1 that I've seen. Please read the complete report before commenting. Thanks in advance.
The Facts About H.R. 1: The “For the People Act of 2021”
I did not search the evidence of fraud was all over until it was censored. Why would they censor what supposedly is a lie? Guilt has been admitted in countless ways. Censorship is just one of them.It’s an excuse. You decided Trump was going to win. You excluded all other possibilities. Then when he lost, you searched for a reason to believe what you wanted to believe.Trump did win. He was defrauded. They are not excuses they are the truth.I get it. You wanted Trump to win. You really believed he would. But he didn’t. You don’t have to invest excuses for him.If they were secure Trump would be president. Next.
It’s like if I declared that KC was going to win the super bowl a week before it occurred. Then when they lost, I said it was only because of cheating. You’d question whether I was fairly accusing them because I had decided the outcome even before it occurred.
Not working. Try it on someone else you dishonest piece of shit. Thanks.Invincible ignorance is called that because the ignorance is invincible.Biden won by massive fraud. Nothing you can ever say will change that fact.
I'll FIFYRegistering people to vote is encouraging people who don't know or care about candidates or issue to vote; a huge problem in this country.
In fact it would destroy all vote integrity laws and regulations. And criminalize and objections as to a voters qualifications to vote. From the link in the OP:
.
- Violate the First Amendment with respect to a vast range of legal activity. Voter intimidation or coercion that prevents someone from registering or voting is already a federal crime under the Voting Rights Act and the National Voter Registration Act. But H.R. 1 would add a provision criminalizing “hindering, interfering, or preventing” anyone from registering or voting, which is so vague and so broad that it could prevent providing any information to election officials about the ineligibility of an individual, such as an applicant not being a U.S. citizen.
Republicans have one chance to win elections moving forward, and that is thru fraud. Your very post reinforces this, if people cannot be disqualified from voting, Republicans will lose. They have to be able to "hinder, interfere, and prevent", and they do this through Jim Crow laws, many now being reinvented and/or rebranded under Republican legislatures in Republican states, in order to win electoral votes at the Federal level.
The evidence came from people similarly conditioned to believe it existed. Trump was saying this the whole time.I did not search the evidence of fraud was all over until it was censored. Why would they censor what supposedly is a lie? Guilt has been admitted in countless ways. Censorship is just one of them.It’s an excuse. You decided Trump was going to win. You excluded all other possibilities. Then when he lost, you searched for a reason to believe what you wanted to believe.Trump did win. He was defrauded. They are not excuses they are the truth.I get it. You wanted Trump to win. You really believed he would. But he didn’t. You don’t have to invest excuses for him.If they were secure Trump would be president. Next.
It’s like if I declared that KC was going to win the super bowl a week before it occurred. Then when they lost, I said it was only because of cheating. You’d question whether I was fairly accusing them because I had decided the outcome even before it occurred.
Well going off your post you'd fail that literacy test first thing. Perhaps the tests did have a point after all...anyone to stupid to answer those has no business voting,,,
If the Democrats are allowed to pass and implement this bill, you will have two choices, accept the loss of everything this country has ever stood for, or prepare for the second American Revolution.
This is the most comprehensive explanation of what's in HR-1 that I've seen. Please read the complete report before commenting. Thanks in advance.
The Facts About H.R. 1: The “For the People Act of 2021”
.
Meh...my state already does most of this stuff. It’s mostly no brainer changes.If the Democrats are allowed to pass and implement this bill, you will have two choices, accept the loss of everything this country has ever stood for, or prepare for the second American Revolution.
This is the most comprehensive explanation of what's in HR-1 that I've seen. Please read the complete report before commenting. Thanks in advance.
The Facts About H.R. 1: The “For the People Act of 2021”
.
For instance?If you tried to actually read the bill you would find several reforms you'd like but as far as I can tell you do what the crowd does and you don't try to stand alone and be an individual.I'm an anti America CCP shill and I see nothing wrong with the actual bill itself something the article and the thread avoid.I see nothing wrong with the actual bill itself something the article and the thread avoid.
There, fixed it for you
In the US? Absolutely. And many people received it. That they received due process is shown as it was not able to be contested in law.One specific law, the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, forced individuals and local governments in non-slave states to participate in capturing escaped slaves and returning them to their owners, and specifically denied those captured people the right to any sort of trial or hearing prior to be shipped back South. It was a duly-enacted law, "defining the process in legislation", as you smugly put it. Would you consider that due process?
The evidence came from the states own data. The evidence came from concerned citizens. The evidence came from cardboard being put over windows. The evidence came from stopping the count in states at about the same time only to resume without observers.The evidence came from people similarly conditioned to believe it existed. Trump was saying this the whole time.I did not search the evidence of fraud was all over until it was censored. Why would they censor what supposedly is a lie? Guilt has been admitted in countless ways. Censorship is just one of them.It’s an excuse. You decided Trump was going to win. You excluded all other possibilities. Then when he lost, you searched for a reason to believe what you wanted to believe.Trump did win. He was defrauded. They are not excuses they are the truth.I get it. You wanted Trump to win. You really believed he would. But he didn’t. You don’t have to invest excuses for him.If they were secure Trump would be president. Next.
It’s like if I declared that KC was going to win the super bowl a week before it occurred. Then when they lost, I said it was only because of cheating. You’d question whether I was fairly accusing them because I had decided the outcome even before it occurred.
Paraphrasing, he said he’d only lose if there was fraud. Now how could he know that before the election? No votes were counted but he was telling people he had already won.
You call censorship, other people call stopping misinformation. I wouldn’t want to be part of perpetuating your lies either.
How is that not due process?Poor little stupid commie, this bill limits any case challenging it to one court. Do try to keep up.
Invincible.Not working. Try it on someone else you dishonest piece of shit. Thanks.Invincible ignorance is called that because the ignorance is invincible.Biden won by massive fraud. Nothing you can ever say will change that fact.
